Groups clash as hotel near Cardiff takes in Afghans
Among its members were leaders of 'Voice of Wales', an online platform that challenges official immigration policy.
In response, people describing themselves as anti-racism campaigners, mostly from Stand Up to Racism (SUTR) and allied groups, staged a counter-demonstration.
The hotel is currently housing Afghan nationals who supported British forces during the war in Afghanistan and have been granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK, known as Entitled Persons (EPs).
The Ministry of Defence selected the site as part of a relocation programme, with the first intake including 19 families, three couples, and one single person.
The arrangement is expected to last up to nine months while permanent housing is secured.
The protest began at 6pm on the access road leading to the hotel.
Protesters on one side (Image: NQ) People gathering outside the hotel (Image: NQ) From the perspective facing the hotel, the 'Concerned Families group' stood to the left, while SUTR and their supporters gathered to the right.
Initially, the two groups remained largely self-contained, but tensions escalated, prompting police to establish a cordon and instruct attendees not to cross sides.
In the middle of the road stood aid worker Nizar Dahan, known as 'Neezo,' who was told by police to choose a side. At first he declined, and then reluctantly complied, saying: 'I don't believe in sides, I am a human being, and I don't believe in all these divisions. There is no left and right, just humans and we all need to think that way.'
Neezo also said he was perfectly happy to chat to all at the protest and would respect all views.
The SUTR side, led by human rights lawyer Hussein Said, appeared more organized and unified in its protest behaviour. Protesters carried printed signs and banners, including those from the National Education Union.
Chanting was coordinated and persistent, with slogans denouncing fascism and racism. Hussein said: 'These people fought for this country and are in danger. We have a duty to take them in.'
When asked about the nature of fascism, he did not define it but said: 'The threat of fascism anywhere is a threat that must be taken very seriously.
"Of course, we weren't sure if fascist people would turn up today, but there was enough to concern the police and the council so we felt we must be loud and clearly visible here today to say we won't stand for this.'
On the opposite side, Stan Robinson of 'Voice of Wales' challenged the official narrative surrounding the Afghan families.
He said: 'You shouldn't believe these figures. Only one in sixteen (of the people moving into the hotel) is genuine, and all their families are entitled to come.'
Mr Robinson expressed concern about the long-term impact on local services and questioned the transparency of the relocation process.
He added that the only exception to his hard-nosed approach would be care and resettlement of Gurkhas and their families.
While the protest remained relatively peaceful, both sides exchanged heated accusations.
Despite this, attendees from both sides described the police operation as effective and well-managed.
However, Mr Robinson voiced dissatisfaction with the policing approach, accusing officers of bias.
He claimed that police cameras were focused only on his side and that officers failed to act on provocative chants from the counter-protesters.
Stan Robinson (Image: NQ) By 7.40pm, the SUTR group was led off the site under police supervision, with the visible police presence swelling from around 20 officers at 6pm to about 40.
Officers blocked traffic to allow for an orderly evacuation of the site, and by 8pm the site was almost entirely cleared.
The protest highlighted deep divisions over migration, national identity, and public accountability, with each side insisting it spoke for the true interests of local residents and the wider community.
At the end of July, Vale Council provided clarity on the situation, saying: "As Entitled Persons (EPs), this group have the right to live in the UK following their efforts supporting the British military in Afghanistan.
"These households are not illegal immigrants, asylum seekers or refugees. The UK Government has granted them indefinite leave to remain in this country, which is now regarded as their home.
"The first of two intakes, which is expected shortly, will consist of 19 families with children, three couples and a single person.
"This temporary arrangement, lasting up to nine months, is in place while they are helped to find more permanent accommodation across the UK."
As of writing there were no reports of arrests.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on attacking the ECHR: the real target is judicial independence and the rule of law
Most British citizens have little contact with human rights law, which is as it should be in a mature democracy. Widespread anxiety about basic freedoms is a feature of more repressive regimes. Many people will only have heard of the European convention on human rights (ECHR) in the context of the last Conservative government's failed attempts to dispatch asylum seekers to Rwanda, or in a handful of incidents where convicted criminals or terrorist suspects have avoided deportation to jurisdictions where they might face inhumane treatment. Such cases are amplified by politicians who are hostile to the whole apparatus of human rights law. The Strasbourg court that adjudicates on breaches of the ECHR is denounced as an enemy of British sovereignty. Those attacks will continue for as long as asylum, and small-boats traffic on the Channel in particular, are salient political issues – for the foreseeable future, in other words. Labour's new 'one-in, one-out' scheme for returning seaborne refugees is more robust in legal and humanitarian terms than the failed Tory method. France is a safe country. That won't stop critics accusing the government of failing to control the border and citing international human rights conventions as the main impediment to the restoration of law and order. Nigel Farage has said he would 'get rid of the ECHR' as a day-one priority should Reform UK ever form a government. Kemi Badenoch is drifting to the same position, albeit with circumspection. The Conservative leader acknowledges that peremptory rupture is not straightforward, especially for Northern Ireland since European convention rights are woven into the Good Friday agreement. Mrs Badenoch has commissioned a report to consider how an ECHR exit might be achieved but expressed her personal view that Britain 'will likely need to leave' because human rights are wielded as a 'sword … to attack democratic decisions and common sense.' The core argument, for both Mrs Badenoch and Mr Farage, is that voters want politicians to expel undesirable elements from society but the popular will is being thwarted by unelected judges. Human rights, in this conception, are a loophole through which criminals and foreign interlopers evade justice. Ideas codified after the second world war as foundational principles of a new democratic settlement for Europe are recast as attacks on the law-abiding majority. This rhetorical subterfuge gets a purchase on public discourse through channels previously opened by Brexit. The ECHR is not an EU institution, but the fact of it being European in name stirs suspicion that it is an alien imposition. Dispensing with human rights obligations would be a necessary step for any government seeking to emulate Donald Trump's programme of detaining and deporting migrants without regard for due process. It is not far-fetched to envisage a Reform government recreating that model, given Mr Farage's record of admiration for Mr Trump. ECHR rulings are not infallible. A 71-year-old institution can reasonably be scrutinised with a view to reform. But that is not what its noisiest UK antagonists have in mind. They target the convention not because it is a big part of public life, but because it is a minor one and poorly understood. It is a soft target in a longer campaign to undermine judicial independence, discredit liberal principle and, ultimately, degrade the rule of law to the benefit of unaccountable executive power.
South Wales Argus
5 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Taliban investigating death threats against UN Afghan female staff
In its latest update on the human rights situation in Afghanistan, the UN mission to the country said dozens of female national staff were subjected to explicit death threats in May. The threats came from unidentified individuals related to their work with the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, or UNAMA, other agencies, funds, and programmes, 'requiring the UN to implement interim measures to protect their safety', according to the report. It said the Taliban told the UN mission that their personnel were not responsible for the threats. An Interior Ministry investigation is under way, the report said. Afghan girls attend a religious studies class at the Tasnim-e-Nusrat religious education centre in Kabul (Ebrahim Noroozi/AP) The Interior Ministry spokesman, Abdul Mateen Qani, said no such threats had been made. 'This is completely incorrect,' Mr Qani said. 'The ministry has an independent department for this, and we have a strategic plan for protection and security so there is no threat to them in any area, nor can anyone threaten them, nor is there any threat to them.' Mr Qani did not answer questions about an investigation. The Taliban barred Afghan women from working at domestic and foreign nongovernmental organisations in December 2022, extending this ban to the UN six months later, and then threatening to shut down agencies and groups still employing women. Humanitarian agencies say the Taliban have hampered or interfered with their operations, allegations denied by authorities. The UN report is the first official confirmation of death threats against Afghan women working in the sector. The report also highlighted other areas affecting women's personal freedoms and safety. In Herat, inspectors from the Vice and Virtue Ministry began requiring women to wear a chador, a full-body cloak covering the head. Dozens of women deemed 'not in compliance' were barred from entering markets or using public transportation. Several women were detained until relatives brought them a chador, the report said. In Uruzgan, women were arrested for wearing a headscarf, a hijab, rather than a burqa. Women have also been denied access to public areas, in line with laws banning them from such spaces. In Ghor province, police forced several families to leave a recreational area. They warned the families against visiting outdoor picnic sites with women. In Herat, vice and virtue inspectors stopped family groups with women and girls from accessing an open recreational area, only allowing all-male groups. Nobody from the Vice and Virtue Ministry was immediately available to comment on the Ghor, Herat and Uruzgan incidents, which the UN said happened in May. In Kandahar, the Public Health Department instructed female health care workers to be accompanied to work by male guardians with an identification card proving that they were related to the woman by blood or marriage. It was not immediately clear if the card is specific to Kandahar or will be rolled out across Afghanistan. 'The process to apply for a mahram (male guardian) identification card is reportedly cumbersome and can take up to several weeks as it requires the de facto Department for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice and a member of the local community (eg malik, imam or village elder) to verify the relationship,' the UN report said.
North Wales Chronicle
6 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Taliban investigating death threats against UN Afghan female staff
In its latest update on the human rights situation in Afghanistan, the UN mission to the country said dozens of female national staff were subjected to explicit death threats in May. The threats came from unidentified individuals related to their work with the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, or UNAMA, other agencies, funds, and programmes, 'requiring the UN to implement interim measures to protect their safety', according to the report. It said the Taliban told the UN mission that their personnel were not responsible for the threats. An Interior Ministry investigation is under way, the report said. Afghan authorities, including the Interior Ministry, did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the report or the investigation. The Taliban barred Afghan women from working at domestic and foreign nongovernmental organisations in December 2022, extending this ban to the UN six months later, and then threatening to shut down agencies and groups still employing women. Humanitarian agencies say the Taliban have hampered or interfered with their operations, allegations denied by authorities. The UN report is the first official confirmation of death threats against Afghan women working in the sector. The report also highlighted other areas affecting women's personal freedoms and safety. In Herat, inspectors from the Vice and Virtue Ministry began requiring women to wear a chador, a full-body cloak covering the head. Dozens of women deemed 'not in compliance' were barred from entering markets or using public transportation. Several women were detained until relatives brought them a chador, the report said. In Uruzgan, women were arrested for wearing a headscarf, a hijab, rather than a burqa. Women have also been denied access to public areas, in line with laws banning them from such spaces. In Ghor province, police forced several families to leave a recreational area. They warned the families against visiting outdoor picnic sites with women. In Herat, vice and virtue inspectors stopped family groups with women and girls from accessing an open recreational area, only allowing all-male groups. Nobody from the Vice and Virtue Ministry was immediately available to comment on the Ghor, Herat and Uruzgan incidents, which the UN said happened in May. In Kandahar, the Public Health Department instructed female health care workers to be accompanied to work by male guardians with an identification card proving that they were related to the woman by blood or marriage. It was not immediately clear if the card is specific to Kandahar or will be rolled out across Afghanistan. 'The process to apply for a mahram (male guardian) identification card is reportedly cumbersome and can take up to several weeks as it requires the de facto Department for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice and a member of the local community (eg malik, imam or village elder) to verify the relationship,' the UN report said.
