
Ray-Ban Meta or Oakley Meta HSTN? The battle of smart glasses
Fast-forward to 2025, Meta partnered with Oakley to introduce the Oakley Meta HSTN line, which comes with a sporty spin on the company's AI eyewear. With the Oakley HSTN Meta limited edition now entering the market, there seems to be some tough competition for Ray-Ban Meta.
If you are planning to buy a Meta-backed pair of smart glasses, it is likely you may have many questions about how Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta stack up against each other. To make things easy, here is an instant comparison between the two wearables.
For starters, both models feature 12MP ultra-wide cameras, capturing 3024 x 4032 images and 1440 x 1920 video at 30 FPS. However, the Oakley HSTN takes a slight lead with a 100-degree field of view and the ability to record 720p video at a super-smooth 120 FPS. The Wayfarer's field of view remains unlisted, making the HSTN a more versatile choice for action-packed moments.
In terms of performance and AI integration, both smart glasses are somewhat similar. They offer full access to Meta AI for vocal queries, live translation, and seamless interaction through the Meta AI app. Making calls, sending texts, and managing settings are equally intuitive on both.
For audio, both feature open-ear speakers. While the Ray-Ban Wayfarer specifies 'open-ear Bluetooth speakers' with Bluetooth 5.2, the Oakley HSTN simply states 'open-ear' but comes integrated with Bluetooth 5.3 connectivity. This minor upgrade in the HSTN could translate to slightly more stable and efficient wireless audio.
If cutting-edge camera features like a wider field of view and higher frame rate video are your priority, the Oakley HSTN Meta offers a slight edge. However, for core smart glass functionalities and AI integration, both models deliver a similar experience.
In terms of size, the Oakley HSTN is available in a single size and weighs 49 grams, whereas the Ray-Ban Meta offers standard and large options, with the standard weighing the same as the Oakley.
The Oakley HSTN has a more rounded lens and noticeable notched nose pads, while the Ray-Ban Meta has the recognisable square Wayfarer lens.
Users can also opt for many other lens options. The Ray-Ban Meta offers a more extensive selection with transitions between clear, green, brown, and red. More frame colour options, including a special transparent option, are available with Ray-Ban Meta, offering more customisation.
On the other hand, the Oakley HSTN is only available in one colour option, and it only gets the Prizm 24K polarised lens, which is designed for sports and outdoor settings.
Between the Oakley HSTN and the Ray-Ban Meta, a key difference lies in battery life, with Oakley claiming a substantial eight hours on a single charge, double Ray-Ban's stated four hours.
The charging cases also present a notable contrast. Oakley's case promises an impressive 48 additional hours of use, surpassing Ray-Ban's 36 hours. While Ray-Ban offers a sleek leather case, Oakley's more rugged design caters to active lifestyles.
The decision ultimately comes down to cost and design. The limited-edition Oakleys are significantly more expensive, and it depends if the improvements, such as a better camera and better battery, truly make more than a marginal difference.
The Ray-Ban Wayfarers, which start at Rs 29,900 and go up to Rs 35,700, will be slightly less expensive than the Oakley smart glasses, which come at $499 (about Rs 43,000). The Wayfarer provides a more affordable access into the world of smart glasses, while the HSTN appeals to more experienced users due to its better cameras as well as extended battery life.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
WhatsApp cracks down on harmful behaviour, bans over 98 lakh accounts in India this June
WhatsApp removed more than 98 lakh accounts in India during the month of June as part of its ongoing efforts to tackle misuse and harmful behaviour on the platform, according to the company's latest compliance report. The Meta-owned messaging service disclosed that around 19.79 lakh of these accounts were banned proactively, without waiting for user reports, based on internal abuse detection mechanisms. Published in line with the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, the June report outlines actions taken by WhatsApp to curb violations originating from India. The platform received a total of 23,596 user complaints during the period, with action taken against 1,001 accounts. These actions included banning accounts or reversing previous bans following a review. Out of the total complaints, 16,069 were appeals related to account bans. Following assessments, action was taken on 756 of these cases. The remaining complaints spanned categories such as account assistance, safety-related concerns, and product feedback. WhatsApp emphasised that it considers it more effective to prevent harmful behaviour in advance rather than respond after the fact. The platform's abuse detection systems operate at multiple levels, during account registration, while messages are being sent, and in response to user feedback or behavioural patterns flagged internally. Meanwhile, in other news, Italy's antitrust regulator has launched a formal investigation into Meta Platforms over claims that it misused its market dominance by integrating its artificial intelligence tool into WhatsApp without securing user consent. The Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) announced last week that the probe focuses on potential breaches of European Union competition laws. It alleges that Meta's integration of its AI assistant into WhatsApp, introduced in March 2025, may have disadvantaged rival services by directing users toward its own tools. According to the regulator, the Meta AI assistant was embedded into WhatsApp's search bar, effectively introducing a new service within an existing one. The AGCM raised concerns that this move may have compelled users to interact with Meta's AI by default, undermining fair competition and limiting consumer choice.


Economic Times
6 minutes ago
- Economic Times
How much does Apple pay its employees in AI, software and other roles?
Synopsis The AI talent war intensifies as Meta lures AI researchers from Apple, prompting Apple to increase compensation for its engineers. Despite launching Apple Intelligence, Apple is facing delays in Siri's revamp and early-stage AI search ambitions. The company is actively hiring across AI roles, offering competitive salaries and benefits to attract talent in this competitive landscape. AP Apple The AI race is heating up and top companies are striving to retain their top AI talent. In the past one month, four senior AI researchers haves switched to Meta from Apple, forcing the tech giant to increase compensation for engineers in its Apple Foundation Models (AFM) group, according to a Bloomberg is lagging behind in the AI race even after launching Apple Intelligence in 2024. Siri's major revamp remains delayed, and Apple's AI search ambitions are still in early development. However, the company is hiring across machine learning and AI roles and is offering lucrative pay packages and perks like stock grants, product discounts, and flexible working Apple does not publicly disclose salaries, a report by Business Insider shared filings for international hires. The filings reveal that AI and engineering roles are among the best-paid. Here is a look at Apple's salary ranges across various roles (base pay only, excluding stock grants and bonuses): Salary Range (USD) Machine Learning Engineer $143,100 - $312,200 Machine Learning Researcher $114,100 - $312,200 Data Scientist $105,550 - $322,400 Software Development Engineer (Applications) $132,267 - $378,700 Human Interface Designer $135,400 - $468,500 Hardware Systems Engineer $125,495 - $378,700 AR/VR Software Development $129,805 - $312,200 Software Engineering Manager $166,691 - $378,700 RF/Analog/Mixed Signal Engineer $131,352 - $312,200 Design Verification Engineer $103,164 - $312,200 While Apple's salaries are competitive, Meta's poaching spree highlights a broader 'talent war' in AI, where giants are racing not just for products, but for people.


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
How much does Apple pay its employees in AI, software and other roles?
The AI race is heating up and top companies are striving to retain their top AI talent. In the past one month, four senior AI researchers haves switched to Meta from Apple, forcing the tech giant to increase compensation for engineers in its Apple Foundation Models (AFM) group, according to a Bloomberg reports. Apple is lagging behind in the AI race even after launching Apple Intelligence in 2024. Siri's major revamp remains delayed, and Apple's AI search ambitions are still in early development. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Public Policy Others CXO Operations Management MCA Data Science Data Science Product Management Project Management Healthcare Design Thinking Management Leadership Degree Finance MBA Artificial Intelligence Skills you'll gain: Economics for Public Policy Making Quantitative Techniques Public & Project Finance Law, Health & Urban Development Policy Economics for Public Policy Making Quantitative Techniques Public & Project Finance Law, Health & Urban Development Policy Duration: 12 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate Programme in Public Policy Management Starts on Mar 3, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Economics for Public Policy Making Quantitative Techniques Public & Project Finance Law, Health & Urban Development Policy Duration: 12 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate Programme in Public Policy Management Starts on Mar 3, 2024 Get Details However, the company is hiring across machine learning and AI roles and is offering lucrative pay packages and perks like stock grants, product discounts, and flexible working conditions. While Apple does not publicly disclose salaries, a report by Business Insider shared filings for international hires. The filings reveal that AI and engineering roles are among the best-paid. Here is a look at Apple's salary ranges across various roles (base pay only, excluding stock grants and bonuses): Live Events Salary Range (USD) Machine Learning Engineer $143,100 - $312,200 Machine Learning Researcher $114,100 - $312,200 Data Scientist $105,550 - $322,400 Software Development Engineer (Applications) $132,267 - $378,700 Human Interface Designer $135,400 - $468,500 Hardware Systems Engineer $125,495 - $378,700 AR/VR Software Development $129,805 - $312,200 Software Engineering Manager $166,691 - $378,700 RF/Analog/Mixed Signal Engineer $131,352 - $312,200 Design Verification Engineer $103,164 - $312,200 While Apple's salaries are competitive, Meta's poaching spree highlights a broader 'talent war' in AI, where giants are racing not just for products, but for people.