Northumbria police destroy Battle of Orgreave and other miners' strike files
Northumbria police disposed of the papers less than a month before Rishi Sunak called last summer's election, which brought the Labour party into government with a longstanding manifesto pledge to hold an inquiry into the scenes of violent policing at Orgreave.
In response to a freedom of information request from Joe Diviney, a PhD researcher at the University of Sheffield, the force said last week: 'We can confirm that two boxes containing documents/records in relation to the miners' strike and Orgreave were destroyed on 29 April 2024 and 30 April 2024.
'These were not moved elsewhere. As part of the records management review process they were destroyed as they were outside of the retention period.'
Kate Flannery, the secretary of the Orgreave Truth and Justice Campaign (OTJC), which has led calls for an official inquiry for a decade, said: 'This is extremely disturbing news. We are now understandably worried about how many other police forces may have recently destroyed or intend to destroy important information that would be very relevant in an Orgreave inquiry or investigation.'
The violence at the Orgreave coking plant in South Yorkshire on 18 June 1984, when striking miners were charged by police on horseback and hit over the head by officers carrying truncheons and short shields, is remembered as the landmark confrontation of the bitter, 1984-85 strike. Approximately 8,000 miners assembled for a mass picket of the plant called by the National Union of Mineworkers, and were met by 4,500 police officers from forces nationwide, led by South Yorkshire police.
A year later, a criminal prosecution of 95 miners for the offence of riot collapsed after police officers were repeatedly accused of lying by the miners' barristers, and of malpractice including that an officer's signature on a police statement was forged.
The OTJC has always pointed to the connection with the 1989 Hillsborough disaster, in which subsequent inquests found 97 people were unlawfully killed at the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest, due to gross negligence manslaughter by the South Yorkshire police officer in command, Ch Supt David Duckenfield. After the disaster, the force mounted a false narrative to blame Liverpool supporters, that bereaved families fought for decades to overturn.
In 2016, when Yvette Cooper, now home secretary, was chair of the home affairs select committee, Northumbria police's then chief constable, Steve Ashman, confirmed to her that the force held documents relating to the Orgreave operation. They included a superintendent's report on an incident in which a police constable was shown on television news hitting a miner with his truncheon.
Northumbria police sent four units, 92 officers in total, to South Yorkshire, Ashman said, and the superintendent had outlined 'the management and logistics' associated with their work, including a timetable of the day at Orgreave starting at 4.50am.
One of the OTJC's key aims has long been to see police planning documents, to see if the violent policing was predetermined, or was a response to initial stone-throwing by miners, as the police alleged at the time.
Diviney said: 'As a historian, I'm mortified that Northumbria police would destroy evidence that is of vital importance to an inquiry. I'm saddened for the miners and their families who have waited too long for truth and justice.
'It illustrates inherent problems with the police being custodians of their own evidence. And it's another reason to hurry up with an inquiry.'
A Northumbria police spokesperson said: 'We can confirm two boxes containing data in relation to the miners' strike were disposed of in April 2024 following a formal review, retain or disposal process in line with force policy and the Data Protection Act 2018.'
Labour has promised an Orgreave inquiry since the 2017 general election, and pledged in its 2024 manifesto to 'ensure, through an investigation or inquiry, that the truth about the events at Orgreave comes to light'.
Cooper wrote to the OTJC this month before the 41st anniversary of the Orgreave events, saying she was continuing to consider 'the scope and format of an investigation or inquiry', and that 'my officials are working at pace'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ten-foot drone came so close to Heathrow passenger jet that pilot and first officer SAW it pass windshield
A ten-foot drone came so close to colliding with a passenger jet that it covered the plane's windscreen. The Airbus A320 had just taken off from London 's Heathrow Airport back in May and was at 9,000 ft when the near-miss occurred, The Sun reports. A report into the incident by investigation bod UK Airpox Board said: 'Both the Captain and First Officer saw a bright white object pass overhead from the opposite direction. 'It appeared to be approximately 2-3 metres in size at the very least.' The report added: 'It may have been larger as it filled a good proportion of the windshield.' The report added that the aircraft was spotted on radar by air traffic controllers. The in-flight incident investigation body was told a suspected drone had been spotted near London's City Airport prior to the incident. 'The Captain only saw the object for a second or two in peripheral vision so could not reliably comment on the shape. No markings were identified.' The pilot stated that the object 'went over us, probably within about 10m'. It is not clear which airline was operating the aircraft. It comes after a drone came within 10 to 20 metres of colliding with a Boeing 737 airliner as it approached Gatwick Airport in April. In a separate incident, a suspected drone came within 10ft of crashing into a British Airways passenger jet flying over London. The plane, operated by the airline's regional carrier BA Cityflyer, was travelling at 3,000ft four nautical miles north west of London City Airport, when pilots noticed an object with lights. The crew of the Embraer 190, which can carry up to 98 passengers, reported spotting the object at 6.10pm on October 31 after climbing out of the east London airport on a route used for domestic services to Edinburgh and Glasgow. While the incident was reported to police, the nature of the object was never formally identified. According to a report filed by the UK Airprox Board, which monitors and analyses near misses, said that both pilots 'instinctively flinched' as the object came 'extremely close' to the aircraft. The report concluded the incident meant there was a 'definite risk of collision' and or required 'providence', an instinctive pilot judgement in response to an emergency situation. In recent years, pilots have warned of the risk of drones causing potentially catastrophic damage if sucked into a jet engine or smashing into a windscreen.
Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Secret tactics high street stores use to stop shoplifters - as police admit there's 'no point' arresting them
As shoplifting rates double and leading police chiefs admit there's 'no point' arresting thieves, members of the public and shop staff are having to take matters into their own hands. While innocent bystanders have started accosting suspected thieves, this week Lancashire Constabulary issued advice to business owners to say hello to shoplifters when they enter the premises, to deter them from setaling. Meanwhile, staff have also turned to their own secret tactics to catch them in the act, including handing a basket to customers they feel suspicious about. Popular shops including Iceland, Superdrug and Boots are sharing the methods they use to deter shoplifters in the hope that their stores can escape unscathed from the shoplifting epidemic. Staff in Iceland have resorted to locking suspected thieves inside stores to stop them escaping with bags full of produce. A clip shared on TikTok showed a security guard locking up the sliding doors as another member of staff tackled the shoplifter and attempted to wrestle the goods off them. Much to the shock of the thief's companion, the staff refused to let the detained shoplifter go so the accomplice began banging on the entrance, demanding she be released. Dressed in a fleece dressing gown with the hood up, the irate shopper shouted: 'Get off her man, come on, don't do that to her man. Why are you locking the door on her?'. She also yelled at the guards through the door asking them not to 'hold her like that' because 'she's a woman'. Inside, the security guard could be seen collecting several items from the floor and handing them back to shop staff. People in the comments asked whether the guard was allowed to detain the shoplifter but many more jumped to Iceland's defence and said the staff were within their rights to make a citizen's arrest. A citizen's arrest or an arrest without a warrant can be made if a person is in the act of committing an indictable offence or there are reasonable grounds for suspecting they are or might be about to. Offence include theft, burglary and criminal damage. Government advice warns that such arrests should only be made if a police officer cannot do it and if the person might cause harm to themselves or others, cause loss or damage to a property or escape before police arrive. While some supermarkets and shops are using citizens arrests to deter thieves, others are opting for a softer approach. Beauty chain Superdrug have taken to social media with a tongue in cheek campaign warning shoplifters that they are constantly being watched. In one clip, filmed by two staff members at a store in Stourport, outside Worcester, two sales assistants point to their headsets and body worn cameras to show potential thieves that they are being monitored and staff can communicate with each other. The video ends with them holding up a basket to the camera and pointing at it and then at the screen to indicate shoppers should use a basket. A video featuring staff from a shop in Halifax, west Yorkshire, showed the measures taken by the store to deter shoplifters. It followed one staff member as they followed and watched a potential thief who browsed products including a luffa and nail varnish. They appeared in various poses, hiding behind stands and crouching down as the Mission Impossible theme tune played over the clips. As well as watching closely, staff member Caitlin revealed Superdrug stores deter shoplifters by asking if they need any help. High Street pharmacy Boots has also taken to TikTok to promote its Stop, Think, Don't Shoplift campaign. In the minute-long video, a staff member at the Boots in the Arnison Centre, Durham, poses as a shoplifter and goes around the shop pretending to steal items while staff show how they tackle possible thefts. The clip starts by staff greeting the potential thief at the door, smiling, waving and saying hello. They then approach them as they shop, asking if they need any help as they pick up and put down various items. The Durham-based shop also showed off their rotating hooks which they say stops 'pesky thieves' and the security tags and plastic packaging on their beauty products which are difficult to remove. The high street chain has also instituted a rule of only three of each item, making it harder for shoplifters to grab a shelfful of expensive products and make a dash. The clip then shows the member of staff approaching the pretend thief and offering them a basket so it's easier to keep an eye on what they have taken. In another snippet, the fake shoplifter tried to open up luxury products but is fooled by an empty box, with the store advising other locations to use 'dummy boxes' provided by the beauty companies and to security tag the actual items. The video ended by a member of staff telling the would-be thief to 'stop' and 'think', resulting in the customer going through their pockets and bag and handing over an item they had attempted to steal. A store in Nottingham has also taken matters into their hands and installed CCTV to catch out shoplifters. A guard, watching live footage, issues announcements over the tannoy system telling thiefs they've been spotted and to return any stolen items meaning that stock is kept safe and instances of confrontation are avoided. The efforts of shopkeepers up and down the UK come after the total thefts reached 530,643 in the year to March, at an estimated cost of £1.8bn to retailers. Last year, Lancashire Police launched Operation Vulture, which encouraged businesses to use 'customer greeters' to cut down on crime. An online guide called How to Deter a Shoplifter, the force advised: 'By greeting genuine shoppers, not only does this provide a positive impression of your store, it also deters potential shoplifters. 'An offender is less likely to shoplift if they sense that they are to be seen and noticed by staff.' But the advice was criticised by another policing chief has seemingly admitted that there is little deterrent for shoplifters because they are so often freed by courts to steal again. Katy Bourne, the national lead for shoplifting at the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, said: 'People have got to know that they're going to get caught and that there's a meaningful deterrent when they do it. There is no point arresting shoplifters if there is no effective deterrent.' Insisting that it is 'madness' that the thieves blighting Britain's retailers are often not being put behind bars, Ms Bourne told The Telegraph: 'People have got to know that they're going to get caught, and that there's a meaningful deterrent when they do. 'There is no point arresting shoplifters if there is no effective deterrent.'
Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Samuel Pepys the sex addict and RAPIST: Great Fire of London diarist's shocking deeds revealed... by the man himself
We have always known Samuel Pepys liked the occasional bit of nooky with a prostitute in an alley off Fleet Street, on his way home to his wife Elizabeth in Seething Lane. But if like me you have always brushed off that behaviour as 'that was just how things were in the 1660s, and I don't think he did it too often', it is time to think again. Unfortunately, as a new edition of his famous diaries illustrates all too vividly, we now have to add Pepys to the list of formerly respected famous figures who turn out to have fallen catastrophically short of acceptable sexual behaviour, to the point where their names are now mud. Most of us treasure Pepys as an essentially sound family-minded man, who buried his Parmesan during the Great Fire of London, made merry music round his table in the evenings, picked 'sparagus' from his garden, and sat up in bed late into the night talking and bickering with his dear wife. His diaries are close to our hearts because they give us a uniquely detailed glimpse into how one man's daily life was lived in those days: boats up and down the Thames, busy days in the Naval Office, fretting about over-expenditure on his wife's clothes, a hearty supper, and so to bed. All that will all change once you read historian Guy de la Bédoyère's newly transcribed selected extracts from the diaries. 'Selected' is the key word. De la Bédoyère has sifted the 1.25 million words of the diaries (written in shorthand between January 1660 and May 1669) down to 40,000 or 50,000 words of wall-to-wall filth and sleaze. He has left out all the charming, cosy stuff, and left in all the vile, predatory behaviour. When you read the diaries in this light, you'll see that Pepys was, in fact, a serial adulterer, a sex addict, a coercive predator, and a rapist. Pepys was so adept at hiding his behaviour that it wasn't till October 25, 1668, that Elizabeth caught him at it. She came downstairs one evening and saw him with one hand under the coats of their pretty 16-year-old servant girl Deb Willet, his other hand touching her genitals, or her 'cony' as he called them in the slang of the day. Elizabeth was distraught, and furious. In bed that evening, she ranted and raved, 'calling me a dog and a rogue', and threatened to publish his shame. Pepys minded desperately about his reputation. He was appalled that his bourgeois wife should think of going public with his dalliance. He wished she were more like the Queen, who was stoical about Charles II's flaunting of his mistresses. Elizabeth didn't go public, but she would not let the matter rest. Poor Deb, in tears, was sacked. Pepys, though sorry for her, still wanted 'to have the maidenhead of this girl which I should not doubt to have if I could get time to be with her'. In deepest secrecy he stalked Deb to the lane lined with brothels near Lincoln's Inn where she'd moved to. He tracked her down, forced her to pleasure him. With outrageous hypocrisy, 'gave her the best counsel I could to have a care of her honour', in other words advised her how to steer clear of predatory men. That sexual encounter with Deb is about the hundredth such encounter with women you'll have read about once you get to October 1668 in this shocking, sometimes exhausting chronicle of non-stop adulterous sex. Elizabeth didn't know the half of it. Her husband craved and achieved an illicit sexual encounter once every few days. De la Bédoyère writes, 'it's too glib to dismiss him as a 'sex pest' or a 'sex offender'. His behaviour is consistent with the neuropsychological disorder of addiction'. As well as the constant clandestine feeling-up of the maids who dressed him, he had a string of reliable women dotted about London, from Westminster to Deptford, who gave him sex on demand. Betty Martin (nee Lane) and her sister Doll were regulars. 'I f****d her under the chair two times,' he proudly writes of Betty, only afterwards worrying that he might have hurt her. Some of the women Pepys was seeing, such as Mrs Bagwell, were wives whose husbands wanted a promotion in the Navy. Mrs Bagwell's husband and in-laws may even have encouraged her to offer her body to Pepys, who as Clerk of the Acts to the Navy Board had a lot of influence when it came to promotions. There was a destitute naval widow, Mrs Burrows, who relied on Pepys for a widow's pension. He groomed her to accept that the way to get it was to let him have his wicked way with her. You know he's about to describe the details of the sex when he goes into 'polyglot': his own weird mixture of foreign languages interspersed with English. 'Did also tocar [touch] la thigh de su landlady'. 'I did what I would con ella' is a frequent one. 'Tocanda sa cosa con mi cosa' (touching her thing with my thing), 'hazer me hazer' (made me have an orgasm) . . . On and on it goes. Why did the secretive Pepys write it all down? You get the sense that he had an urge to 'chalk up' his sexual 'successes', and by doing so in shorthand, which itself was half in a foreign language, he doubly disguised them. When he was at his most predatory, he added extra consonants to English words, making them even harder (he hoped) for any future transcriber to decode. De la Bédoyère surmises that he recorded his encounters partly to expiate the guilt. Quite often, the women protested. Pepys clearly got a kick out of his sexual conquers under duress – which were essentially rapes. 'Many hard looks and sighs the poor wretch did give me,' he writes of Mrs Bagwell, 'and I think verily was troubled at what I did, but at last after many protestings I did arrive at what I would, with great pleasure.' This happened a few more times; once, he was so violent towards her that he injured his own hand while holding her down. 'Nevertheless in the end I had my will.' Add to this the way he domestically abused his wife, once giving her a black eye, and how he beat his servants with broomsticks and shut them in the cellar all night, and you get a new, deeply unattractive picture of the controlling Pepys beneath the surface of his cheerful bustle. I'm sure lots of men were at it, in those far less enlightened days, but that does not excuse him. He suffered from aching remorse – but that doesn't let him off the hook either. The scales have fallen from my eyes.
