North Korea threatens response over US-South Korea military drills
Defence chief No Kwang Chol stated Pyongyang would respond at 'the level of the right to self-defence' to the Ulchi Freedom Shield exercises scheduled from 18 to 21 August.
The annual drills, designed to counter North Korea's nuclear capabilities, have long angered Pyongyang, which views them as invasion rehearsals.
The Korean Central News Agency carried No's declaration that North Korean forces would adopt a 'thoroughgoing and resolute counteraction posture' against the US-South Korea war games.
Approximately 28,500 US troops remain stationed in South Korea, with both nations maintaining the defensive nature of their regular joint exercises.
Recent months showed tentative signs of easing tensions after both Koreas removed border propaganda loudspeakers following President Lee Jae Myung's election.
Seoul confirmed North Korean troops began dismantling their border loudspeakers shortly after South Korea's new administration took similar steps in June.
The removal followed President Lee's policy shift from his predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol's hardline stance, which saw relations plunge to historic lows.
Lee's government has requested civic groups stop sending anti-Pyongyang leaflets by balloon as part of efforts to reduce cross-border tensions.
North Korea's growing military ties with Russia since Moscow's Ukraine invasion have further complicated regional dynamics. – AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Nvidia, AMD to pay US 15% of China AI chip sales
(FILES) People attend a Nvidia production preview exhibition in Taipei on May 21, 2025. Chinese authorities summoned US technology giant Nvidia on July 31, 2025 to discuss "serious security issues" discovered involving its chips, the country's top internet regulator said. (Photo by I-HWA CHENG / AFP) New York: Nvidia Corp and Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) have agreed to pay 15% of their revenues from Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) chip sales to the US government in a deal to secure export licences, an unusual arrangement that may unnerve both US companies and Beijing. Nvidia plans to share 15% of the revenue from sales of its H20 AI accelerator in China, according to a person familiar with the matter. AMD will deliver the same share from MI308 revenues, the person added, asking for anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. The arrangement reflects US President Donald Trump's consistent effort to engineer a financial payout for America in return for concessions on trade. His administration has shown a willingness to relax trade conditions like tariffs in return for giant investments in the United States – as with Apple Inc's pledge to spend US$600bil on domestic manufacturing. But such a narrow, select export tax has little precedent in modern corporate history. Beijing, which has grown increasingly hostile to the idea of Chinese firms deploying the H20, is unlikely to warm to the idea of a chip tax. Yuyuantantian, a social media account affiliated with state-run China Central Television that regularly signals Beijing's thinking about trade, on Sunday slammed the chip's supposed security vulnerabilities and inefficiency. 'This seeming quid pro quo is unprecedented from an export control perspective. The arrangement risks invalidating the national security rationale for US export controls,' said Jacob Feldgoise, a researcher at the Washington-based Centre for Security and Emerging Technology. It 'will likely undermine the US' position when negotiating with allies to implement complementary controls,' he added. 'Allies may not believe US policymakers if they are willing to trade away those same national security concerns for economic concessions – either from US companies or foreign governments.' A Nvidia spokesperson said the company follows US export rules, adding that while it hasn't shipped H20 chips to China for months, it hopes the rules will allow US companies to compete in China. AMD didn't respond to a request for comment. The Financial Times earlier reported the development. It followed a separate report from the same outlet that the Commerce Department had begun issuing H20 licences last week, days after Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang met with Trump. Huang has lobbied long and hard for the lifting of restrictions, arguing that walling China off will only slow the spread of American technology and encourage local rivals such as Huawei Technologies Co. 'It's a strategic bargaining chip' that tightens Washington's grip on a critical tech sphere during trade negotiations with China, said Hebe Chen, an analyst with Vantage Markets in Melbourne. 'Over time, this hurdle for chips entering China will likely deter Nvidia and AMD from deeper expansion in the world's largest chip-importing market, while giving local Chinese producers a clear edge to capture market share and accelerate domestic semiconductor innovation,' Chen said If Washington goes ahead with the tax, it should funnel some capital to the United States – but not an enormous amount in relative terms. Both Nvidia and AMD have said it'll take time to ramp back up production of their China-specific products – even if orders return to previous levels, which is uncertain. Nvidia raked in US$4.6bil of revenue from the H20 in its quarter ended April 27 – days after new restrictions on shipping the AI accelerator to China were imposed. It said it had been unable to ship US$2.5bil of H20 China revenue in that period because of the new rules. That implies it would have gotten more than US$7bil in H20 sales to China during the period. If it can return to that level, the US government will stand to get about US$1bil a quarter from its deal. AMD could generate US$3bil to US$5bil of revenue this year if restrictions were lifted, Morgan Stanley estimates. Chinese alternatives such as Huawei's Ascend chips now account for 20% to 30% of domestic demand, it reckoned. 'The US government clearly needs the money given its deficits and eagerness to collect tariffs,' said Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at Union Bancaire Privee in Singapore. 'But the complication is China's accusations about H20 chips containing backdoors, which could be a negotiation tactic to highlight that the country is not that 'hard up' for US chips,' Ling added. — Bloomberg
Malaysiakini
4 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Malaysia in a shifting world order
COMMENT | The global geopolitical landscape is undergoing a seismic shift. For decades, American dominance economically, militarily, and diplomatically has defined the post–Cold War international order. Today, that dominance is increasingly challenged by emerging powers and shifting global alignments. The rise of competing powers, growing distrust of US intentions, and the resurgence of nationalist economic policies, particularly under Donald Trump's second term, are accelerating the fragmentation of global power. In place of a US-led unipolar order, a multipolar world is emerging, one increasingly defined by the rivalry between the United States, an emerging axis of Russia-China-India (RCI), and a recalibrated European Union. Trump's recent moves to impose tariffs on a wide swath of countries, including traditional allies like the European Union, Canada, South Korea, and India, mark a decisive...
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Could Trump tariffs become BRICS building blocks?
United States President Donald Trump has the BRICS group of nations directly in his trade war crosshairs, slapping super-high tariffs on imports from Brazil and India, and accusing them of pursuing "anti-American" policies. Washington's relations with Brasilia and New Delhi have sunk to new lows. But this belligerence could backfire. The White House said last Wednesday it would impose an additional 25 per cent tariff on goods from India, citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil. That brings the levy on most goods to 50 per cent, among the highest rate faced by any US trading partner. Brazil also faces 50 per cent tariffs on many of its US-bound exports, not because of trade imbalances, but because of Trump's anger at what he calls a "witch hunt" against his ally, Brazil's former president Jair Bolsonaro, who has been charged with plotting a coup following his election loss in 2022. This breakdown in relations could be Trump's intention: push these countries to the brink so that they'll agree to trade deals that are heavily lopsided in Washington's favour. That strategy seemed to work with Japan and the European Union. But hitting these BRICS economies with eye-watering tariffs could push them closer together, strengthening the resolve of a group that appeared to be losing whatever momentum, purpose and unity it had. The original BRIC nations — Brazil, Russia, India and China — held their first summit in 2009, eight years after former Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill coined the acronym for this group of emerging economies he said would challenge the G7 group of rich countries in the future. South Africa became the "S" in BRICS two years later, and the club now comprises 11 countries including Indonesia, Iran and Saudi Arabia, as well as a further nine "partner" countries, including Malaysia, Nigeria and Thailand. It was always a disparate group — geographically, economically, culturally and politically — meaning its cohesiveness has always been questionable. Its relations have sometimes been rocky, particularly among its largest members. That's why it was so notable when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi last Wednesday announced that he would visit China for the first time in over seven years. This could be a sign that rising tensions with Washington are helping to thaw frosty ties between New Delhi and Beijing. Also on Wednesday, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said he planned to call the leaders of India and China to discuss a joint BRICS response to Trump's tariffs. "I'm going to try to discuss with them about how each one is doing in this situation ... so we can make a decision," said Lula. "It's important to remember that the BRICS have 10 countries at the G20," he added, referring to the group that gathers 20 of the world's biggest economies. While nothing unites like a common enemy, the differences between the BRICS countries could limit how solid that front can actually be. Only 14 per cent of their trade is with each other. Russia and Brazil may have higher levels of intra-BRICS trade, but only nine per cent of China's exports are BRICS-bound, significantly less than the 19 per cent that goes to emerging Asia and 15 per cent destined for the US. And in economic, political and military terms, China matters far more than the others on the global stage. But there are signs that intra-BRICS trade is strengthening. China-Russia trade was a record US$244.8 billion last year, and China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. China is Brazil's largest trading partner, accounting for 28 per cent of Brazil's exports and 24 per cent of its imports. Roughly 70 per cent of China's soyabean imports are from Brazil. Trump's tariffs could push BRICS countries closer together in the near term, in areas such as trade, investment and currency usage. They may feel it's in their economic interests and, for some, in their political interests, to present a united front. How long that front can hold is anyone's guess. In the meantime, however, Trump's tariff salvos are BRICS-bound. How these emerging economies respond could be an indication of whether we may truly be seeing a reshuffling of global alliances. The writer is from Reuters
