
China's Political Calendar as a Guide to Leadership Succession
Ultimately, it is impossible for outside observers to confirm these rumors. Many rely on media outlets and YouTube pundits to come up with what is, after all, mere speculation. There are other sources, however. For instance, we can gain some insight into what is currently happening by consulting China's political calendar.
The most important years ahead for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) are 2027, when the 21st Party Congress convenes, 2032, when the 22nd Party Congress convenes, and 2035, the year Xi himself has set to achieve 'socialist modernization.' The white paper on 'National Security in a New Era,' released in May 2025, outlines construction plans for Chinese national security over the next decade and has made 2035 the target for completion for the national security system, further underscoring the importance of that year. Another, somewhat less important year is 2029, which will mark the 80th anniversary of the founding of the communist nation. Born in 1953, Xi will be 74 in 2027, 79 in 2032, and 82 in 2035.
At present, Xi's administration is in the third year of its third term and will enter its fourth year this autumn. With speculation swirling about his health, Xi has yet to name a successor, and so most expect him to embark on a fourth term in 2027. That term would end in 2032, but given that his administration has emphasized 2035 as a key milestone, there is reason to believe that he plans to remain in power through that year. In 2035, Xi will be 82, the age at which Mao Zedong died, making it entirely possible that he will remain in office into the mid-2030s. However, by his fifth term beginning in 2032, he will surely need to have a clear successor in place. That means that even if the individual is not one of the top seven (members of the Politburo Standing Committee) during Xi's fourth term, a successor is likely to at least be selected from the current 24 members of the Politburo Standing Committee and brought in beginning in 2027. Of course, there is always the possibility that this won't happen until sometime after 2027, but that has not stopped predictions in China that Xi will in fact soon begin the task of choosing who will follow him. In fact, Xi's succession is one of the biggest concerns in Chinese politics, and the recent speculation about his health and his grip on power will surely intensify as 2027 approaches. The Chinese public naturally has a strong interest in the transition of power.
In considering this transition of power, it's worth noting that apart from Ding Xuexiang (born 1962), all of the seven Standing Committee members were born in the 1950s, and will thus be in their mid-70s by the time Xi's fourth term ends in 2032. Even Ding Xuexiang will be 70 by then. The fact that he is the youngest of the top seven is one of the main reasons why he is often mentioned as a possible successor to Xi Jinping.
Nor are any of the current 24-member Politburo particularly young, with the youngest four born in 1964. It is worth noting here that Chinese born in the late 1960s would have been university students during the Tiananmen Square protests and massacre in 1989. Looking elsewhere, Zhou Zuyi, Secretary of the Fujian Provincial Communist Party Committee, was born in 1965, with all other provincial and municipal secretaries having been born before 1964.
Thus, since Xi Jinping came to power, the CCP leadership has aged rapidly. This can be seen as reflecting the aging of Chinese society itself, but one might also conclude that Xi's administration has an aversion to people born in the late 1960s, who would have come of age at a time when Western culture was having a strong influence on Chinese society. There is even speculation that this generation may be bypassed entirely in the succession process. To counter that, we might note that some deputy provincial and municipal secretaries were born in the late 1960s, with Xiong Maoping a prime example, having been appointed deputy secretary of the Liaoning Provincial Communist Party Committee in July 2025. Yet many officials born in the late 1960s have not moved up the party ranks, and increasingly the focus is now on the growing number of appointments of deputy secretaries who were born in the 1970s. The list includes Zhuge Yujie (Hubei Province), Shi Guanghui (Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region), Zhu Zhongming (Shanghai), Yang Jinbai (Hainan Province), Liu Xiaotao (Jiangsu Province), Guo Ningning (Fujian Province), and Lu Dongliang (Shanxi Province). Some of these figures are expected to be made members of the Politburo or even Standing Committee by 2027.
In the meantime, the PLA's leadership is even older, with Xi's childhood friend and ally, Zhang Youxia, Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission of CCP, born in 1950. Zhang is three years older than Xi, and will turn 77 in 2027. Having made the unusual decision to stay on at the age of 72 in 2022, many expect him to retire in 2027. Who will be his successor? This is an immediate concern for the PLA, where a number of high-ranking officials have been appointed, only to then be purged. That turnover has left it unclear if a successor will be determined by 2027. Its personnel issues notwithstanding, the PLA has been able to maintain its expansionist path under its top two leaders, Xi and Zhang, despite rumors about their health. Still, the instability within the military leadership shows how difficult it will be for the Central Committee of CCP to identify a successor for Xi.
Time is the great equalizer. Moving forward, the most significant challenge for Chinese politics will be in the realm of personnel. For outside observers, insight may well come from monitoring developments in the context of the political calendar discussed here.
KAWASHIMA Shin is a professor at the University of Tokyo.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Yomiuri Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan to Export Frigates to Australia: Use Joint Development to Strengthen Foundations of Defense Industry
The high-tech capabilities of a Japanese frigate, equipped with a variety of functions such as anti-ship and antiaircraft capabilities and operable by a small number of personnel, seem to have been appreciated. It is hoped that the first joint defense development project between Japan and Australia will be utilized to strengthen systems for safeguarding maritime security and foster the defense industry. The Australian government has announced that it will accept Japan's proposal regarding a new model of frigates that the Australian navy plans to introduce. The two countries will jointly develop a vessel with enhanced capabilities based on the Mogami-class frigate manufactured by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. for the Maritime Self-Defense Force. Australia plans to introduce 11 vessels with a 2030 start of operations in mind. The first three vessels will be built in Japan before construction is transferred to Australia for the remaining eight vessels. Australia narrowed down its candidates to Japanese and German manufacturers in autumn last year and since then has held discussions on which to choose. Australia ultimately chose Japan's proposal because it attached importance to such points as Japan's model being operable with a crew of 90, about half the number required for comparable conventional vessels, mainly thanks to the digitalization of instruments. The Australian military is reportedly facing a serious shortage of personnel. Australia is rushing to enhance its naval capabilities due to a sense of caution about China. In February, the Chinese military conducted live-fire training exercises in waters near Australia. China is also deepening security cooperation with Pacific island nations. The waters connecting Japan and Australia are important maritime transport routes for both countries. The waters around the small island nations can be said to be a strategically important area for Australia. China's behavior, as if it is trying to bring these waters under its influence, is unacceptable. The MSDF also plans to eventually have a total of 24 Mogami-class frigates. Use of the same vessels by Japan and Australia and improvement of mutual operational capabilities will effectively help deter China's activities. There remain issues to be resolved in the joint development plan. Australia is said to want to equip its new frigates with U.S.-made cruise missiles. This will require construction in which the hulls are modified. The Japanese side also will need to smoothly transfer technology to Australian engineers. Japan must make steady preparations for a formal contract to be concluded early next year. This is the first time Japan will export large-scale military equipment. For this reason, some may view this as a shift in the nation's postwar arms export policy, but that view is mistaken. In 1976, the Cabinet of then Prime Minister Takeo Miki decided on a de facto total ban on arms exports. Before then, Japan allowed exports in a limited manner under the Three Principles on Arms Exports established in 1967, which prohibited exports to countries such as those involved in conflicts. In 2014, the government established the Three Principles on Transfer of Defense Equipment and Technology, marking a shift toward exports with certain conditions. With an increasingly severe security environment, this is an era when it has become necessary to jointly develop equipment and deepen defense cooperation with friendly countries. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, Aug. 7, 2025)


Asahi Shimbun
5 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
VOX POPULI: Abrupt swerve in the government's rice policy is unnerving
Most passengers must have felt something was wrong when their bus started slowing down, running behind schedule. But the bus driver maintained that he was 'going fast enough' and didn't want to exceed the speed limit. He even braked repeatedly. And now, the driver says he is going to step on the gas. Huh? On Aug. 5, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced a major change in the nation's rice policy—from 'don't produce (rice)' to 'produce (rice).' His call for increased rice production signified a de facto switch from the government's long-established policy of curtailing rice production. Since last summer, the farm ministry has repeatedly insisted that there was 'enough rice.' However, an inspection reportedly revealed that rice was in short supply. Until the price of white rice doubled, the government remained unable to assess the volume of rice in circulation and estimate the demand. What a surprise. To return to the bus analogy, I suppose that the speed displayed on the driver's speedometer differed from the actual speed of the bus. In the first place, the government's traditional rice production curtailment policy always benefited rice farmers who minimized their output. And this served, without a doubt, to 'distort' their relationship with the free market. And now, the government is suddenly telling them to produce more rice. Things could certainly get a bit difficult in the days ahead. An old Chinese saying goes to the effect, 'For the emperor, the people are everything; for the people, food is everything.' It is probably a timeless and universal truism that the people will turn their backs on the rulers who fail to solve food-related issues. Where is our bus going? A fight has already begun over who is going to sit in the driver's seat, making the journey quite precarious. Is the bus going straight ahead, or will it swerve to the right or the left? We, the passengers, are growing really anxious. —The Asahi Shimbun, Aug. 7 * * * Vox Populi, Vox Dei is a popular daily column that takes up a wide range of topics, including culture, arts and social trends and developments. Written by veteran Asahi Shimbun writers, the column provides useful perspectives on and insights into contemporary Japan and its culture.


The Diplomat
8 hours ago
- The Diplomat
How Trump's Tariffs Upended BYD's Mexico EV Gambit
Intensifying China-U.S. trade tensions are reshaping EV supply chains across the Americas, redirecting Chinese investments toward more politically receptive markets like Brazil. In 2023, Chinese automaker BYD announced an ambitious project to build a 150,000-unit electric vehicle (EV) plant in Mexico, epitomizing the promise of nearshoring. Mexico's low labor costs, robust supply chains, and duty-free access to North America under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) made it a strategic gateway for Chinese manufacturers aiming at the booming U.S. EV market. Two years on, this vision has collapsed. In July 2025, BYD indefinitely shelved the project. Executive Vice President Stella Li cited 'geopolitical issues significantly impacting the automotive industry,' signaling the project's suspension amid rising China-U.S. tensions. The immediate catalyst was the tariffs put in place by U.S. President Donald Trump. In September 2024, Trump – then a former president and the Republican nominee for the 2024 presidential election – proposed a prohibitive 200 percent tariff on Chinese-brand vehicles assembled in Mexico. He explicitly said such a tariff would be designed to make Chinese cars built in Mexico uncompetitive in the U.S. market. Otherwise, the U.S. 'will not have any [automobile] manufacturing plants,' Trump warned. 'China is going to take over all of them because of the electric car.' Trump's proposed tariff dwarfed the existing 100 percent levy the Biden administration had just added to Chinese EVs at the time. While he hasn't implemented the change since re-entering the White House, Trump did implement an additional 25 percent tariff on all automotive imports, although close allies like Japan and South Korea won lower rates in trade negotiations. The tariff burden has effectively frozen BYD's $3 billion investment, disrupting negotiations with Mexican states such as Puebla and Jalisco, and creating uncertainty across the automotive sector. Before the latest iteration of Trump's trade war, Mexico offered clear advantages for Asian automakers, including BYD and other Chinese firms. Auto industry wages average about $4 per hour, significantly lower than comparable U.S. wages. Yet USMCA allowed tariff-free exports to the U.S. if 75 percent of vehicle content is sourced in North America. Mexico also benefits from extensive transport infrastructure, including dual-ocean ports and rail connections to major U.S. markets, significantly reducing transit times compared to direct shipments from Asia. For Chinese companies, Mexico also represented a hedge against increasing U.S. and European antidumping investigations. Companies such as BYD, SAIC MG, and Chery expanded dealership networks, while JAC Motors began local assembly operations as early as 2017. However, the growing bipartisan consensus in Washington now views Chinese EVs as strategic threats. Trump's tariffs effectively weaponized border access, forcing automakers to reconsider their production strategies. Even before Trump's escalation, Beijing had expressed reservations. China considers its companies' strength in the EV sector to be a key plank of its economic security plan. In March 2025, China's Ministry of Commerce reportedly delayed approval for BYD's Mexican venture due to security concerns about proximity to the U.S., potentially exposing sensitive battery and software technologies to IP theft. Instead, Chinese authorities are now encouraging investment in Belt and Road partner countries such as Brazil, Hungary, and Thailand. This aligns with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum's statement from November 2024, indicating that her administration had not received an official investment proposal from BYD. In other words, the factory never got past the theoretical stage – even before Trump was re-elected. Privately, Mexican officials recognize their dilemma: they can either attract billions in Chinese investment or maintain harmonious relations with their primary trading partner, especially with USMCA scheduled for review in 2026. The most immediate impact will be to diminish Mexico's prospect of becoming Latin America's primary EV hub. Tesla has also postponed its Nuevo León gigafactory, as Trump's administration moved to revoke consumer credits for EV purchases. Mazda, Nissan, and Stellantis have similarly placed investments on hold. Suppliers who ramped up for EV production, like Querétaro-based wiring harness maker Nexxus and lithium-ion cathode startup Trina in Sonora, now face uncertain futures. Conversely, Brazil stands to gain significantly. BYD has already begun constructing a $1 billion plant in Bahia for assembling passenger cars and electric trucks targeting South America. SAIC MG expanded its São Paulo factory, while GAC Motor is exploring Rio de Janeiro as an assembly location. Brazil's modest 4 percent tariff on electric-powertrain imports makes it increasingly attractive compared to the steep potential duties facing Mexico. Alberto de la Fuente, president of Mexico's National Auto Parts Industry, emphasized the economic impacts, noting that each additional tariff percentage erases roughly $150 in profit per compact EV, severely impacting competitiveness. This trend risks creating a divided Latin America, with Mexico retaining traditional combustion-engine manufacturing for North America, and Brazil emerging as the region's leading EV production base for Mercosur and African markets. 'It makes little sense for BYD to enter Mexico without tariff-free access to U.S. markets,' explained Gregor Sebastian, a senior analyst at Rhodium Group. 'Until trade uncertainties resolve, Chinese investments will likely favor Brazil and Southeast Asia.' The effects extend to the entire supply chain for electric vehicles and EV batteries. Sonora's lithium industry, which expected investments from major Chinese battery makers, may now default to raw exports to China, limiting regional value-added jobs. Initiatives such as Nuevo León's T-MEC rail line and Jalisco's dry port at Ocotlán, designed as EV export hubs, now face uncertain prospects. Mexican technical colleges that introduced EV-specific training programs risk oversupplying graduates in a shrinking local market. 'Once tariffs reach prohibitive levels, they transform corporate calculus,' noted Maaike Okano Heijmans from the Clingendael Institute, 'forcing companies to reconfigure global manufacturing footprints.' BYD's halted Mexican venture underscores the global trend of clean-tech supply chains fracturing along geopolitical fault lines. Asia-Pacific companies now navigate competing blocs. The United States and its allies are enforcing stringent industrial policies against Chinese components, while China-driven networks are being fostered by Belt and Road funding. The European Union and select middle powers are attempting neutrality while concerned about subsidized Chinese competition. Going forward, Mexico has a few options. It can choose to prioritize manufacturing batteries over EVS. Collaborations with battery manufacturers like CALB and LG Energy Solutions, supplying multiple automakers, are politically safer investments. Mexico can also seek to tap into U.S. International Development Finance Corporation grants designed to 'friend-shore' critical mineral projects, such as Mexico's lithium developments. The government could also seek to negotiate a solution that will allow it to build an EV manufacturing industry with an eye toward the future, when tariff policies might moderate. This might involve agreements to limit Chinese EV production exclusively for local markets, employing digital tracking to prevent re-export to the United States. It's not clear how attractive this would be to Chinese firms, however. For now, as long as Trump's tariffs persist, Chinese automakers will avoid Mexico, even while U.S. companies look to expand domestic production amid higher consumer costs. More broadly, the EV market will continue to fracture, with Chinese manufacturers dominating emerging markets while U.S., Japanese, and Korean brands solidify their positions in North America, and Europe remains contested. BYD's withdrawal underscores that geopolitical strategies now define industrial development as significantly as traditional factors like cost and logistics. Until tariff uncertainties subside, Mexico's role in global EV production remains vulnerable to political shifts, reaffirming that global business decisions increasingly hinge upon geopolitical landscapes rather than economics alone.