
Reeves and Starmer to roll the pitch for tax rises in a difficult autumn budget
Although Treasury sources have insisted Rachel Reeves will stick to her pledge not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT, senior Whitehall sources said that she and Keir Starmer had begun a series of meetings to thrash out the shape of the budget.
A rise in gambling levies – advocated by the former prime minister Gordon Brown – is thought to be near-guaranteed as part of the package of tax rises.
The pressure facing the government was underlined on Thursday when the Bank of England warned that it could be forced to keep interest rates at higher levels for longer than previously thought as soaring food prices linked to Labour's tax increases threaten to drive inflation to 4% this year.
The central bank cut interest rates to their lowest level in two years but warned Britain was facing a toxic cocktail of sluggish growth, rising unemployment and stubbornly high inflation.
Reeves and Starmer have held talks over the past weeks to begin to set the parameters of the budget and the economic narrative ahead of Labour's conference. The government's limited options were further emphasised this week when the National Institute of Economic and Social Research said 'moderate but sustained' tax rises would be needed in the budget for Reeves to overcome a deficit of £41.2bn and restore a near-£10bn buffer.
No date has been set for the budget, which was held last year on 30 October, but government sources expect that it will be in November, giving the chancellor a little longer to roll the pitch for controversial tax rises or cuts – as well as hoped-for improvements in growth.
Advisers believe that a 'no surprises' approach will be crucial to prevent negative market reaction. 'Last year was a model of how to do it,' one said. 'Had we done it otherwise, it would have been a mess.' one said.
Sources pointed towards the early signs Reeves gave to the markets more than a month ahead of her budget last year that she planned to change her fiscal rules around borrowing to invest – and said there would be a similar approach this time.
However, Labour was roundly attacked by business leaders after for failing to warn about a £25bn increase in employer national insurance contributions (NICs), with companies including Tesco and Boots warning that it would raise their costs by £7bn and lead to higher prices and job cuts.
Starmer has spent the week in Chequers meeting key aides and ministers as he begins work on his conference speech. The prime minister is understood to be keen to spend much of the summer thinking about the longer-term major structural problems in the UK economy that the party failed to identify before the election; the sources of low economic growth and productivity.
Strategists also believe that the budget should be a moment to make the argument that Britain must now make serious choices on growth and productivity. They say Starmer must forcefully rebut the charges that the poor state of the economy is down to individual tax and spend choices, but is a sign of the weakness of the economy's fundamentals.
The budget, they believe, should be a moment to set out the hard road of reforms to tackle those issues.
Reeves and Starmer are understood to have agreed some broad principles for the budget and the Treasury will begin to submit ideas to Downing Street towards the end of the month.
But sources close to Reeves said she is unmoved on her two main pledges – there will be no rise in income tax, national insurance or VAT and no change to the fiscal rules.
One tax rise which is near certain is changes to gambling levies, despite a massive lobbying offensive by the industry. Brown has urged Reeves to spend funds from raising taxes on parts of the gambling industry on lifting the two-child benefit cap, a measure likely to be made even more expensive by higher inflation.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
In one of its closest decisions since its independence more than 25 years ago, the Bank's monetary policy committee (MPC) voted by 5-4 to cut its key base rate by a quarter point to 4%.
Taking borrowing costs to the lowest level since March 2023, a cut was widely expected in financial markets. However, the decision was a close call, with the rate-setting panel for the first time in history holding two votes before reaching its verdict.
Andrew Bailey, the Bank's governor, said: 'We've cut interest rates today, but it was a finely balanced decision. Interest rates are still on a downward path, but any future rate cuts will need to be made gradually and carefully.'
Reeves sought to claim credit for the cut, as she claimed Labour's economic management had helped Threadneedle Street to reduce borrowing costs five times from a peak of 5.25% in August last year.
'The stability we have brought to the public finances through our Plan for Change has helped make this possible,' she said.
However, the MPC warned tax-raising measures in the chancellor's first autumn budget had contributed to the rekindling of inflationary pressures hitting shoppers in the pocket across the country.
Bailey warned that rising inflation could delay further rate cuts in future. 'I do think the path continues to be down …' he said. '[But] the path has become more uncertain because of what we're seeing.'
City investors pared their bets for the timing of future rate cuts, with financial markets expecting a next quarter-point move in February and only one more similar reduction before the end of 2026.
Reeves said reducing child poverty was a priority of the government but did not commit that any money from higher gambling levies would be spent on removing the two-child limit. The child poverty taskforce is expected to be released ahead of the budget this autumn.
'I talk to Gordon [Brown] regularly, and saw him last week when I was in Scotland,' Reeves said on Thursday. 'Like Gordon, I am deeply concerned around the levels of child poverty in Britain. No child should grow up hungry or parents not be able to afford the basics for their family.
'On gambling taxes, we've already launched a review into gambling taxes. We're taking evidence on that at the moment, and again, we'll set out our policies in the normal way, in our budget later this year.'
Inside No 10 and the Treasury there was fury at the predictions of a £51bn hole in Reeves' budget by the NIESR thinktank, which aides say is impossible to calculate at the moment given that the budget could be another four months away.
But there are fears in other parts of government about how boxed in the government has become, when Reeves has also appeared to rule out a wealth tax. 'I am at a loss really how they square the circle,' one Whitehall source said. 'It will have to be salami slicing small pieces here and there, when what we should do is bite the bullet.'
At the Bank of England's press conference on Thursday, the MPC singled out fast-rising food prices as it warned that food price inflation was on track to reach 5.5% before the end of the year. It attributed much of the rise to global factors, including increasingly extreme weather events hitting cocoa and coffee harvests, highlighting the dangers from the climate emergency.
However, it also pointed to 'material' rises in employment costs and new charges for recycling packaging, both driven by the government, that were being passed on to shoppers by UK supermarkets.
'In addition to global agricultural commodity prices, domestic labour costs are currently an important driver of food price inflation,' the Bank said.
Business leaders had warned that Reeves's £25bn increase in employer NICs and a 6.7% rise in the 'national living wage' from April would force them to cut jobs and put up prices.
Official figures show unemployment has crept higher in recent months, while the economy shrank in April and May. Inflation has also risen by more than expected, reaching 3.6% in June.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
25 minutes ago
- Finextra
Fraudster convicted in £1.3m Ponzi scheme following FCA investigation
Daniel Pugh has been found guilty of fraud, following a prosecution by the FCA. 0 This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author. Mr Pugh, aged 35 and of Devon, set up a Ponzi scheme that netted over £1m. Through his fraudulent Imperial Investment Fund (IIF), Mr Pugh took money from 238 investors he targeted largely through Facebook adverts. They were offered impossibly high returns of 1.4% a day, 7% a week or 350% a year. The FCA will commence confiscation proceedings in order to recover the proceeds of crime. Steve Smart, joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said: 'Mr Pugh deliberately defrauded unsuspecting investors. Fighting financial crime is a priority for the FCA and we are committed to holding fraudsters to account.' Mr Pugh was today found guilty of one count of conspiracy to defraud. At the start of the trial he pleaded guilty to carrying out unauthorised regulated activity which breached sections 19 and 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. A further individual remains wanted in relation to the same offences.


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘The fairest way' or a ‘political disaster'? Readers split on whether Reeves should raise income tax
Independent readers are sharply divided over whether Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves should raise income tax to help fill the £50bn shortfall in the public finances this autumn. Some see it as the fairest option, targeting those most able to pay. 'A penny or two on the rates of income tax might just work wonders,' said one, while others argued it is long past time to align capital gains with income tax rates or reform property taxes. Opponents warn that raising income tax could damage growth and hand political advantage to Reform leader Nigel Farage. 'A rise in income tax across the board would be a political disaster for Labour,' cautioned another. Some prefer alternatives such as VAT, targeted wealth taxes, or cutting waste before hiking any taxes. Several also pressed for bold investment in green infrastructure and small businesses, but all agreed the government must find a credible way to fund public services. Here's what you had the say: What choice does she have? Really, what choice does she have? It is hardly surprising the economy is so sluggish and she has gaps to plug from the effects of a disastrous Brexit (it was: really), a pandemic, and a clueless previous administration, who, to be fair to them, also had limited choices. Among the solutions is to slaughter the sacred cow of putting up income tax. A penny or two on the rates of income tax might just work wonders and could be the fairest way of generating revenue from those best able to contribute towards the public good. DIRKCUTLASS Those with the broadest shoulders As always, the disabled are blamed as the culprits upsetting Reeves' books. The welfare climbdown can only be attributed to £5bn when Reeves' calculations are in the region of £50bn. She and Starmer need to come clean and articulate the hangover of Covid furlough, problems caused by Ukraine and Trump, and put up taxes across the board – such as freezing allowances, increasing income tax and national insurance, equalising capital gains tax with income tax and making it liable for NI, reforming council tax on high-value properties. Starmer and Reeves need to be making sure those with the broadest shoulders bear their fair share of the burden. Kernow What do you think – should Rachel Reeves raise income tax, or find the money elsewhere? Share your thoughts in the comments below. VAT is the better option Why income tax? VAT is the much better option as it is a consumption tax. It is easy to adjust for – you raise the tax-free threshold for the poorest in society to compensate. It doesn't affect business significantly. As it taxes consumption, this encourages saving and investment. Kwame Tax unearned income Tax unearned income in line with income tax brackets. This would be worth £16 billion a year. Stop subsidising private companies completely. Apply a void tax to all properties empty for more than six months. Introduce a system whereby renovations etc. are exempt. Some savings ideas – centralise all NHS procurement and HR. Have a locum register for nurses and stop using expensive agencies (same salaries for temp nurses, though). Slightly Tipsy Max Align capital gains tax with income tax Since the wealthy get most of their income from gains, why not align capital gains tax rates to income tax rates, as is done in Australia? That would bring in around £8 billion a year. In addition, replacing council tax and stamp duty with a French-style proportional property tax could generate an additional £3bn–£4bn per year, with even more potential under a land value tax framework. There's plenty of scope for a chancellor and a prime minister who aren't afraid of their own shadows. Pomerol95 Cut waste before raising taxes Still no sign of any reduction in government wasted expenditure – now in the billions each month. No use Starmer looking serious about income tax rises. He refuses to act to curb expenditure or legislate for change! SPCK Political disaster for Labour A rise in income tax across the board would be a political disaster for Labour. Farage would walk into No. 10 on the ticket of 'never believe Labour's promises'. fastyellosaab No changes to basic rate expected The last UK Chancellor to increase the basic rate of income tax was Denis Healey back in 1975. Do not expect any changes to the rate, even though it would actually be the fairest way to raise revenue. Expect tinkering with allowances and other tax measures, which are easier to 'sell' politically. Blackkbeard's host People fear job loss more than a tax rise Really? Does anyone worry like that – that their income tax might go up by 1 per cent or they may have to pay a bit more for petrol? That's not what keeps people awake at night when there are so many worse possibilities, like being made redundant and having no income at all, which could happen to most of us at any time. Chrisw27 Commitment to growth needed Sorry, but what does stabilising the economy mean? Jobs, SMEs, house prices are falling like there's no tomorrow. Extra taxes are not going to make things better. We need a government committed to growth – massive projects to get us a green new economy that will create jobs and prosperity. Support for SMEs to grow faster. Conversations about big hard issues like how do we pay for the NHS in a world of an ageing population, and where the care is going to come from. Instead, we have a continuation of business as usual. I challenge myself to see one policy that is different to what we would have if Rishi were in power. I struggle. Boring75 Taxes rises should have been in the manifesto Good news – there should have been tax rises in the manifesto. You can't have good public services run on fresh air and, after fourteen years of Tory rundown – particularly of the NHS – there is much repairing to do, given that Tory taxes were almost all paid to their mates rather than into public services. Evidence? Just look at the state of the water service and supply 'industry'. Let's see it brought back into public control. rEUjoin High taxes in the 1970s In the 1970s, Labour raised income tax to 83 per cent for top earners; the rest paid 33 per cent or more. Bin men went on strike (like Birmingham today). Doctors wanted more pay. Train drivers struck. Does this start to sound familiar? Karl Hurting the poorest Just like raising employers' NIC was obviously going to impact the poorer working person, so will raising VAT. Wealthier people can afford to pay more; poorer people can't – and it matters not if you take more of their wages or make them pay more for their goods, the result is the same to the poor. Pen2030 Tinkering won't fix deep problems Starmer and Reeves think tweaking things here and there – a few extra billion in taxes, a few billion less in welfare spending – will sort the finances and the UK economy. No. The problems run deep and require more positive actions than Starmer and Reeves are willing to take. So the UK economy will continue to stagnate. More and more voters will lose faith and look elsewhere. ChrisMatthews Why does Starmer not encourage a government efficiency (oxymoron, I know) drive – cutting waste in all departments? Sell off unused government land or buildings. Try to look at other ways of filling holes, PM, before making another U-turn on a promise not to raise taxes. All the other tax increases in place since Labour took over to fill the black hole – where's that increased income gone? Face it, the UK government hasn't got a clue. Chuckiethebrave Want to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day's top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click 'log in' or 'register' in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Yorkshire chief says Hundred cash can give county a ‘once in a lifetime' chance
Yorkshire's chief executive Sanjay Patel believes the club's cash windfall from the Hundred represents a 'once in a lifetime opportunity' to end years of financial turmoil at Headingley. The White Rose have sold their entire 51 per cent share in Northern Superchargers to the Sun Group, owners of Indian Premier League franchise Sunrisers Hyderabad, becoming the only one of the eight host counties not to retain a stake. With around £40million coming in as part of that deal, as well as another payment in region of £18m from the England and Wales Cricket Board's central sales pot, Yorkshire are finally in a position to eradicate the onerous £25m debt that has hamstrung the club for a generation. The Hundred may not be universally popular in Yorkshire, a hotbed of cricket tradition, but Patel is clear that the influx of money has helped avert the prospect of oblivion. 'Without this money coming in we were going into administration,' he told the PA news agency. 'Financially, it wasn't sustainable and there's no way of trading your way out of that. We were borrowing money to stay alive and there's only so long you can do that. 'Thankfully this cheque has come along, allowed us to clear our debts, and make sure this club never gets itself into this financial position again. It's amazing news, a once in a lifetime opportunity. 'We can look forward now to doing things that haven't been achievable in the past because of the finances: it's a platform to think about the stadium, the facilities and how we grow cricket in Yorkshire for the next five to 10 years.' Patel is relaxed about being an outlier in selling lock, stock and barrel to outside investors, insisting it remains more of a relationship than a takeover. 'I'd like to think it will still be a partnership, they have a massive affinity to Headingley and are very respectful to the heritage and traditions,' he said. 'India is fanatical about cricket and the closest you get to that in England is right here in Yorkshire. It's in the DNA. If you can have a partnership on a cricket level and be able to say, 'the club should be safe forever if we look after this money', why wouldn't you do it? It seems like a no-brainer.' One change is already in the works, with the Sun Group preparing to bring the team into line with the 'Sunrisers' teams they already have in India and South Africa. After five seasons attempting to foster new allegiances to the Superchargers name, they will need to start afresh in 2026. 'One of the implications of selling if you're going to have different brands. If you're not comfortable with that, don't sell,' concludes Patel. 'Our brand will change and that decision will be made over the next couple of months. What we've got to do is make sure the audience we have for the Superchargers translates to whatever the new brand is.'