logo
SC Senate votes to remove state treasurer over $1.8B accounting error

SC Senate votes to remove state treasurer over $1.8B accounting error

Yahoo22-04-2025
South Carolina Treasurer Curtis Loftis defends himself during an eight-hour hearing in the state Senate Monday, April 21, 2025, amid efforts to remove the Republican from office. (Screenshot of SCETV legislative livestream.)
COLUMBIA — The South Carolina Senate voted late Monday to remove state Treasurer Curtis Loftis from office for his role in a $1.8 billion accounting error that went unreported for nearly a decade.
By a vote of 33 to 8, with five senators absent, the Republican-controlled Senate used an obscure constitutional measure to do something never done before in South Carolina history — remove an elected official from office — in this case one who is a member of the majority's own party. All eight votes against removal were cast by Republicans.
But senators don't have the authority to remove Loftis on their own.
The House would also need to approve his removal by a two-thirds majority, which would then require Gov. Henry McMaster to take the official action.
And Republican leaders in the House have not said whether they will take up the case.
South Carolina's accounting problems, which involved almost no actual money, stem from the changeover from the state's legacy accounting system to a new one.
During that process, a series of electronic ledger entries made it appear the state had $1.8 billion sitting untouched in a fund with no record of where it was supposed to go. A forensic accounting firm hired by the state ultimately found the entries were made in error and all but $200 million of the money was never real.
But what seemed to frustrate senators the most is that the state's financial officials never alerted the General Assembly to the issue.
Two Republican members of the panel that has spent the last year investigating the matter argued the treasurer was incompetent, untrustworthy and 'willfully neglected his duties' when he failed to report the mistakes to legislators.
'When he was faced with a $1.8 billion anomaly that remained in state records for years and years and years, he failed to detect it, he failed to report it, and when questioned, he failed to tell the truth about it,' said Sen. Stephen Goldfinch, R-Murrells Inlet.
'This was not momentary oversight or a technical misunderstanding by any means,' he said. 'It was a sustained failure of judgment, of duty and of candor.'
Questions from senators, Republicans and Democrats both, were largely focused on what the treasurer knew when and why he had not taken responsibility for his role.
'It makes it so difficult for me to tell my neighbor … It is so hard to defend,' Sen. Luke Rankin, R-Myrtle Beach, said to Loftis. 'Help me. Help us. Accept the responsibility.'
In response, Loftis said, 'Tell me what you want me to accept responsibility for, because it's complicated.'
Throughout the process, Loftis has maintained he did nothing wrong and instead laid the blame for the error outside his office. No money went missing, he has argued, and the whole investigation amounted to nothing more than political theater.
Lawyers representing the treasurer opened their arguments with a photo of Loftis and Republican President Donald Trump. They pointed to his winning track record — four terms in office — and he is now making his case to voters again, 14 months ahead of the Republican primary.
'Our democracy was built by letting issues like this be decided at the ballot box.' said attorney Deborah Barbier.
The legal team went on to remind many of the 34 Republicans in the 46-member Senate that they represent GOP-dominated districts.
The voters who elected them also likely cast their ballot for Loftis, said attorney Johnny Gasser, and choosing to remove Loftis amounted to telling residents their vote didn't matter.
'Do you really want to go down this path today?' Gasser asked.
But Sen. Larry Grooms, who has led the investigation, contended Loftis had not behaved like the treasurer voters believed they had elected in 2022 or any of the previous election years. Loftis, he said, decided 'protecting his public image was much more important than faithfully executing the duties of Office of State Treasurer.'
'Now that he's been outed, now that his secret is exposed, now that sunlight is shining upon him and his failures, he is a different person,' added the Bonneau Beach Republican. 'This Curtis Loftis is a liability to the finances of our state.'
And while the accounting error itself involved almost no real money, that hasn't stopped the state from racking up bills trying to get to the bottom of the problem.
'The self-proclaimed 'best friend of the taxpayer' is costing the taxpayers tens of millions in legal, auditing and oversight fees,' Grooms said. 'And these costs to the taxpayer are just beginning. With friends like this, who needs tax-and-spend liberals.'
Lofits did acknowledge his actions may have fallen short of expectations at times and promised to do a better job in the future.
'My passion for fighting what I perceive to be injustice may have been inappropriate, but my intent was always to do the honorable thing,' he told the Senate. 'I hope all of us in this room agree that we should rise above the moment and return our focus to what matters — serving the people of South Carolina with honor, respect and purpose.'
For many, it was too little, too late.
'If your banker has a $1.8 billion error in your account, what do you do?' Goldfinch said. 'At the end of the day, you go get a different banker.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Man Fleeing Home Depot ICE Raid Fatally Hit By Car
California Man Fleeing Home Depot ICE Raid Fatally Hit By Car

Newsweek

time23 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

California Man Fleeing Home Depot ICE Raid Fatally Hit By Car

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A man was struck and killed on a Southern California freeway Thursday while fleeing a federal immigration raid at a Home Depot, authorities have said. The fatal incident occurred in Monrovia, the Los Angeles County city nestled in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains, about 10 a.m. on Thursday, according to a press release issued by Monrovia City Manager Dylan Feik. The Department of Homeland Security said its agents did not pursue the man. Federal agents stage show of force at MacArthur Park, July 7, 2025, in Los Angeles. Federal agents stage show of force at MacArthur Park, July 7, 2025, in Los Angeles. Damian Dovarganes/AP The Context President Donald Trump has directed his administration to remove millions of migrants without legal status as he looks to fulfill his campaign pledge of widespread mass deportations. The Republican leader ordered immigration enforcers to ramp up operations in Democratic-led sanctuary states. The raid was one of several immigration enforcement operations carried out at Home Depot stores across Southern California in the past two months. Immigration authorities have been under growing scrutiny, with the agency at the center of the national debate over immigration policy. Concerns have been raised over ICE's enforcement practices. What To Know A Monrovia Police Department officer observed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at the Mountain Avenue store, after receiving a call at 9:43 a.m, Feik said. After the collission, the man was taken to a nearby hospital, where he died from his injuries, Feik said. The California Highway Patrol said it is investigation the death. Authorities have not yet released the man's name. State Rep. John Harabedian, who represents the San Gabriel Valley, said federal officers detained 10 people during the operation. "Today in Monrovia, federal immigration agents conducted a raid at Home Depot," Harabedian said in a statement on his Instagram story. "One individual, fearing for their safety, fled and was tragically struck by a vehicle. Ten people were detained during the operation." What People Are Saying Monrovia City Manager Dylan Feik said in a press release on Thursday: We extend our condolences for the individual and his family. We also express our appreciation to the Monrovia Police Department and its volunteers, Monrovia Fire & Rescue as well as the California Highway Patrol. A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told NBC News: "This individual was not being pursued by any DHS law enforcement." "We were not aware of this incident or notified by California Highway Patrol until hours after operations in the area had concluded."

On India's Independence Day, Modi vows to punish Pakistan for future attacks

time26 minutes ago

On India's Independence Day, Modi vows to punish Pakistan for future attacks

NEW DELHI -- Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi warned Pakistan that India will punish its neighbor if there are future attacks on India as he marked 78 years of independence from British colonial rule. Modi's remarks Friday come three months after nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan engaged in four days of intense fighting, their worst clash in decades. Modi addressed the country from New Delhi's 17th-century, Mughal-era Red Fort, saying India has established a 'new normal' that does not differentiate between 'terrorists' and those who support terrorism. He said he would not tolerate what he called Islamabad's 'nuclear blackmail." 'India has decided that it will not tolerate nuclear threats. For a long time, nuclear blackmail had been going on but this blackmail will not be tolerated now,' Modi said. Pakistan previously has rejected India's statements about nuclear blackmail as provocative and inflammatory. India celebrates its Independence Day one day after Pakistan. The two states came into existence as a result of the bloody partition of British India in 1947. The process sparked some of the worst communal violence the world has seen and left hundreds of thousands dead. It triggered one of the largest human migrations in history and some 12 million people fled their homes. India and Pakistan exchanged tit-for-tat military strikes in May that brought them to the brink of a war. The fighting between the two countries was sparked by an April massacre by gunmen in Indian-controlled Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists. India blamed the attack on Pakistan-backed militants. Islamabad denied responsibility while calling for a neutral investigation. Days after the massacre, India launched strikes on Pakistan and said it had hit nine 'terrorist infrastructure' sites. 'Terror infrastructure was turned to rubble,' Modi said in his speech Friday. Pakistan responded by sending waves of drones into India, as well as missile and artillery bombardments. Dozens of people were killed on both sides until a ceasefire was reached May 10 after U.S. mediation. Pakistan immediately claimed it shot down six Indian aircraft during the clashes, including a French-made Rafale fighter. India acknowledged some losses but did not provide details. Last week, India's air force chief said India shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one other military aircraft during clashes in the first such public claim by India. Pakistan rejected it, saying both sides should open their aircraft inventories to independent verification. During his Friday speech, Modi also hinted India would continue its unilateral suspension of the Indus Water Treaty. The treaty, which India suspended after the April massacre, allows sharing of the Indus River that runs about 2,897 kilometers (1,800 miles) through South Asia and is a lifeline for both countries. 'Rivers from India were irrigating the lands of enemies while my country's farmers and land faced a deficiency of water," Modi said. 'India has now decided that blood and water will not flow together." Pakistan has said any effort by India to stop or divert the water from flowing into Pakistan would be considered an 'act of war.' Modi did not directly mention U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on India in his Independence Day speech but said he would not compromise on the agriculture sector, one of the main sticking points in trade negotiations with the U.S. Earlier this month, Trump imposed a 25% penalty on India in addition to 25% tariffs for buying oil and weapons from Russia. India has resisted U.S. pressure to open its markets to some farm products as Modi's government is unwilling to risk angering farmers, who are a powerful voting bloc. 'India will not compromise on interest of farmers," he said. Modi claimed India's demography was being changed as part of a 'conspiracy' through illegal migration and announced what he called a 'high-powered demographic mission' to tackle the problem. He did not provide further details. 'No nation in the world can hand over itself to infiltrators,' he said. Modi's ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party has repeatedly described influx of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh as a 'national security crisis' and claimed that unchecked Muslim infiltration from the country is leading to a demographic shift in India. In recent months, Indian officials have conducted what they call a verification drive, which they say is intended to identify immigrants lacking legal status. Many people, most of them Muslim, have been detained or expelled to neighboring Bangladesh.

Is House size the solution to the gerrymandering problem?
Is House size the solution to the gerrymandering problem?

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Is House size the solution to the gerrymandering problem?

Plymouth Advertisement To be truly representative, why not expand House to 10,000 members? Jeff Jacoby's suggestion to enlarge the House of Representatives as a way to end the gerrymandering wars was a good idea but did not go far enough. Today's data and data processing capabilities would still make gerrymandering possible, even if the United States tripled the number of members of the House, and districts would still be too large. Large districts enable the wealthy and special interests to make our representatives beholden to them, and enable outside money to influence what our country's Founders meant to be local elections. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Technology is distorting our electoral processes. Why not use technology to support the democracy the Founders envisioned? Why not expand the House to 10,000 members, with each member representing approximately 34,000 constituents? That's close to the same number when the country was founded, 30,000. We should also end the requirement that all members be physically present and use more video conferencing and other technology to support the actions needed for the House to govern. This would make the 'people's chamber' once again the people's chamber, reduce the cost of elections, make representatives more accessible, and truly eliminate gerrymandering. Advertisement Richard Amster Cambridge Gerrymandering isn't the only problem with the House I stand in complete agreement with both Jeff Jacoby's analysis of the gerrymandering problem and his fitting solution. Our Framers intended Article 1 of the US Constitution, which establishes Congress, to be the most significant. They wanted House members to be close to the average citizen. They anticipated this body increasing in size with our nation's increasing population, to accurately reflect the views and needs of the people. Capping the number of representatives at 435 in 1929 was wrong — and so is the historic practice of gerrymandering, famously done in Massachusetts in 1812 and repeated often since then in virtually every state. But our nation's lawmaking body is also undermined by two related factors — the use of seniority in committee assignments and the lack of term limits. Partly as a result, representatives spend too much time on political pandering, fund-raising, and trying to manage age-related infirmities. Instead of giving committee assignments to the longest serving members, who have been waiting in the wings and feel entitled to the role, grant them to members with practical experience in the work of that committee. And while we're in the mood for change, let's allow representatives only four terms. This should be sufficient time for each to make substantive contributions, especially in smaller districts more 'in touch' with their constituents. Advertisement Peter Vangsness Medway Small districts aren't enough: We need good government initiatives Jeff Jacoby proposes enlarging the House of Representatives as a solution to political gerrymandering. But it's important to note that the term 'gerrymander' goes back to Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry, who signed a state redistricting plan into law in 1812. Wags referred to one tortuous, lizard-shaped, North Shore district as a 'Gerry-mander.' The congressional districts at the time had about 35,000 constituents each, and digital computers were still more than a century from their birth. So you do not need large congressional districts, or computers, to engage in gerrymandering. To point out something that should be obvious, running an honest government requires bipartisan support for fair districting practices, honest ethics oversight, and effective protection against foreign government interference. Donald Segretti, Lee Atwater, Roger Ailes, and others have for decades used dirty tricks to win elections — and many of these dirty tricksters have been Republicans. At the same time, the purging of voter rolls has often disproportionately affected Democratic voters. This contrasts with a decades-long effort by Democrats to improve voting access and integrity, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the post-Watergate campaign-finance reforms. The disparity is stark between the Republicans, who are backing away from bipartisanship and good government initiatives, and the Democrats, who remain committed to them. Stuart Gallant Belmont

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store