logo
A Triumph of Ideological Elasticity as Chandrababu Naidu Lauds Narendra Modi in Tribute to Narasimha Rao

A Triumph of Ideological Elasticity as Chandrababu Naidu Lauds Narendra Modi in Tribute to Narasimha Rao

The Wire16-07-2025
Pavan Korada
A lecture on a Congress prime minister, delivered by a regional leader whose party was born in opposition to him, had become a platform to deify a BJP prime minister.
Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu during a programme titled "The Life and Legacy of PV Narasimha Rao", in New Delhi on July 15, 2025. Photo: @JaiTDP on X via PTI
New Delhi: On July 15, a peculiar séance was underway at the Prime Minister's Museum and Library at Teen Murti Bhavan. The official purpose was to reflect on the "Life and Legacy of P.V. Narasimha Rao," the accidental prime minister, the architect of liberalisation, and – according to the whispers in the corridors of Indian politics – the "first Bharatiya Janata Party prime minister."
The medium chosen for this communion was N. Chandrababu Naidu, the chief minister of Andhra Pradesh, himself a politician whose career is a testament to ideological elasticity.
As Naidu spoke, it became clear that the tribute was not exactly Rao's. The lecture was a bait-and-switch, a political ritual not of remembrance, but of fealty. In a performance of strategic sycophancy, Naidu used Rao's memory to offer praise to a usual figure: Narendra Modi.
This performance revealed far more about Naidu's own precarious position in the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) coalition and the ideological shifts reshaping India than it did about the man he was ostensibly there to honour.
The evening's partisan flavour was set from the outset. The host, Nripendra Misra, a veteran bureaucrat who served as principal secretary to Narendra Modi, listed the subjects of previous lectures. For the non-Congress prime ministers, there was a reverential "Shri." For the others, a stark mention: "Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Lal Bahadur Shastri." This was likely no slip but a signal from a Modi-era power broker that a reordering of reverence is fast taking place in the very institution meant to preserve the nation's history.
Naidu took the stage and began with a perfunctory nod to Rao as a "great statesman" before pivoting to his true subject. "I have seen everything over the last five decades in politics," Naidu declared, moving on to framing the last 10 years under Modi as the singular apex of India's journey. With surgical precision, he excised the decade of UPA rule under Manmohan Singh – the very finance minister who was the other and indispensable half of the Rao-Singh reform duo. In Naidu's retelling, Indian history had a 10-year black hole between Vajpayee and Modi.
Naidu peddled the much-debunked claim that the World Bank had ranked India as the "fourth most income-equal country globally." This claim, born of a misread government press release, serves as a crucial myth for a leader whose own "Super Six" welfare promises in Andhra Pradesh remain largely unfulfilled in his first year in power.
The convenient amnesia of history
Naidu choosing Rao as the vessel for his adulation of Modi was ironical.
Naidu's entire political existence is a direct consequence of the Kamma community's historical antagonism towards the Congress government that Rao once led in Andhra Pradesh. Rao's tenure as chief minister in the early 1970s, with his government's land ceilings act and restrictive 'mulki' rules, created considerable alienation among the powerful Kamma caste. This disenchantment directly fuelled the meteoric rise of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), founded by Naidu's father-in-law, N.T. Rama Rao.
Naidu built his political empire on the foundations of Kamma disaffection with the Congress, a disaffection ignited by policies under Rao.
As Naidu stood and recast Rao as an uncomplicated hero, more glaring was his omission of the sordid realities of Rao's own ascent to power. In his searing 1991 essay ' Meham in Nandyal,' the late civil liberties icon K. Balagopal documented the brutal "gangsterism" and "warlord" tactics that secured Rao's unopposed election, writing of abducted opposition candidates and intimidation sanctioned from the highest echelons of Congress. Naidu's hagiography naturally sought to bury this version.
The saffron price tag
Naidu's performance aligned seamlessly with the Hindutva project of the NDA masters. Mentioning that Rao was fluent in 17 languages, he could not resist a pointed jibe: "Now we are all talking, why should we learn Hindi?". Many will consider this a direct betrayal of the Dravidian political consensus Naidu once claimed to champion.
This capitulation became a grotesque family affair this week. First, his deputy, Pawan Kalyan, called Hindi the tongue of " peddamma" (mother's elder sister). Then, Naidu's son and heir-apparent, Nara Lokesh, while speaking to a national news channel, incorrectly insisted "Hindi is our national language," defiantly doubling down even when corrected.
This is, seemingly, the price of admission to the new NDA. After a vitriolic campaign against Modi before 2019 – which led BJP president Amit Shah to declare the doors to the NDA "permanently closed" for him – Naidu has completely surrendered. He now finds himself on a saffron tightrope, making ample space for a soft-Hindutva narrative – praising yoga, for example even in his speech – something that the BJP has masterfully weaponised as a tool of cultural normalisation.
Unable to fight Hindutva, Naidu is now actively helping to build its kingdom.
The neoliberal gospel of a 'good cat'
Throughout his lecture, Naidu invoked the term "public policy" with the fervour of a televangelist. As Balagopal diagnosed decades ago, this is code for a specific ideology. Naidu's "public policy" is the gospel of neoliberalism, which posits a state not as a provider but a "facilitator" for private capital. It's why he speaks of social responsibilities and public-private partnerships, replacing the language of rights and social justice with the language of corporate-friendly "efficiency" and the "charity" of billionaires like Bill Gates.
The most revealing articulation of this philosophy was his proud mention of the "P4 model" – public private people's partnership. This is a masterstroke of hollow sloganeering. The standard P3 model is already criticised for outsourcing state responsibility to corporations. Adding the fourth 'P' for 'people' is a cynical PR flourish, designed to make the state's retreat sound like democratic empowerment. It diffuses responsibility onto an amorphous "people" who possess none of the institutional power of the state or the financial power of the corporation, rendering them participants in name alone. It allows the government to abdicate its duties while claiming to be more inclusive; a slogan ostensibly suited for a leader who has been slow to implement his own government's welfare schemes.
Rao's famous appropriation of Deng Xiaoping's quote, "It should not matter if a cat is black or white, if it catches a mouse... it is a good cat," which Naidu also cited, finds expression in Naidu himself. For him, ideology is merely the colour of the cat; power is the mouse. Any cat that helps him catch the mouse is, for that moment, a good cat.
As the evening concluded, one was left with a profound sense of political vertigo. A lecture on a Congress prime minister, delivered by a regional leader whose party was born in opposition to him, had become a platform to deify a BJP prime minister, while simultaneously erasing the legacy of another Congress PM who was instrumental to the very reforms being discussed.
Balagopal wrote that Naidu was a man who did not just represent his times but actively latched onto them. Today, the times are defined by Modi's hyper-centralised power and the BJP's Hindutva expansionism. Naidu, the ultimate survivor, is once again latching on, hoping to ride the wave.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mercy Found A Messenger: Indian Nurse Nimisha Priya's Death Sentence Overturned In Yemen After Kerala Grand Mufti's Intervention
Mercy Found A Messenger: Indian Nurse Nimisha Priya's Death Sentence Overturned In Yemen After Kerala Grand Mufti's Intervention

India.com

time13 minutes ago

  • India.com

Mercy Found A Messenger: Indian Nurse Nimisha Priya's Death Sentence Overturned In Yemen After Kerala Grand Mufti's Intervention

New Delhi: Her name echoed in protests and petitions across India for months. Now, finally, there is a glimmer of relief. Nimisha Priya, the Indian nurse who had been sentenced to death in Yemen, is no longer on death row. Long suspended in legal limbo, her fate shifted this week after a determined effort came to light. The office of Indian Grand Mufti Kanthapuram AP Abubakker Musliyar confirmed the development in a public statement: 'The death sentence of Nimisha Priya, which was previously suspended, has been overturned. A high-level meeting held in Sanaa decided to completely cancel the death sentence that was temporarily suspended earlier.' The announcement followed weeks of behind-the-scenes negotiations involving Yemeni tribal leaders, religious intermediaries, the team of the Grand Mufti and other Indian representatives working through unofficial channels. A trained nurse from Kerala, Nimisha had been convicted in Yemen in a high-profile case that drew both diplomatic concern and public outrage. She was accused of killing her Yemeni partner, a charge she and her supporters have contested as a desperate act of survival in a situation marked by abuse and confinement. A 'blood money' settlement was long speculated as the only possible way to save her life under Yemeni law. That effort intensified earlier this year when her mother, Vasantha, publicly pleaded for help to raise the compensation needed. While full details of the meeting in Sanaa remain under wraps, what is now confirmed is that Nimisha Priya will not be executed. The news was received with cautious celebration among those who had worked quietly for months to open communication lines in Yemen's deeply tribal and war-scarred judicial system. Authorities and legal observers have said this case may set a rare precedent for intervention in personal law matters in Yemen, especially involving foreign nationals. Further updates are expected in the coming days on whether Nimisha will be released or serve a prison term under local laws. For now, though, the noose has been removed. And for a mother, a daughter and those who believed in second chances, that makes all the difference.

Chidambaram questions Pahalgam terrorists' identity, BJP hits back
Chidambaram questions Pahalgam terrorists' identity, BJP hits back

Indian Express

time41 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Chidambaram questions Pahalgam terrorists' identity, BJP hits back

As Parliament debates Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, former Union Minister P Chidambaram's recent remarks on the terrorists involved in the killings have kicked up a row. In an interview to The Quint, uploaded on Saturday (July 26), Chidambaram said the Pahalgam attackers 'for all we know could be homegrown terrorists' and 'why do you assume that they came from Pakistan'? He also said that 'there is no evidence' that the terrorists came from Pakistan. To a question on 'what they (government) are trying to hide', Chidambaram said: 'They are hiding the fact. I think. And this is speculation. The CDS hinted at that – that we made tactical mistakes, we restrategised. So, what tactical mistakes were made? What was the re-strategising? Those questions either they (government) are incompetent to answer or they are unwilling to answer… They are unwilling to disclose what the NIA has done all these weeks.' 'Have they identified the terrorists, where they came from? For all we know they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do you assume that they came from Pakistan? There is no evidence of that. They are also hiding the losses,' the Congress leader said in the interview. He said he wrote in a column that in a war, losses occur on both sides. 'I understand that India would have suffered losses. Be upfront. Winston Churchill in World War 2 made a statement every other day. Whatever losses Britain suffered, they made it plain… They (government) are reluctant to admit the losses… I think they think they can put a large shroud on Operation Sindoor.' BJP's national information and technology department in-charge Amit Malviya hit out at Chidambaram over his statement. 'P Chidambaram, former UPA-era Home Minister and the original proponent of the infamous 'saffron terror' theory, covers himself with glory yet again.' Quoting his interview, Malviya said: 'Once again, the Congress rushes to give a clean chit to Pakistan — this time after the Pahalgam terror attack.' 'Why is it that every time our forces confront Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, Congress leaders sound more like Islamabad's defence lawyers than India's Opposition,' asked Malviya. 'When it comes to national security, there should be no ambiguity. But with the Congress, there never is — they always bend over backwards to protect the enemy,' Malviya said on X. Asked about BJP's reaction, Chidambaram said: 'I saw a troll and I have responded to the troll.' In a post on X on Monday, the Congress leader said: 'Trolls are of different kinds and use different tools to spread misinformation. The worst kind is a troll who suppresses the full recorded interview, takes two sentences, mutes some words, and paints the speaker in a black colour!'

Shubham's kin question PC's remarks, seek martyr status for him
Shubham's kin question PC's remarks, seek martyr status for him

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Shubham's kin question PC's remarks, seek martyr status for him

Kanpur: As the Lok Sabha debated 'Operation Sindoor' on Monday, Aishanya Dwivedi, the wife of victim Shubham Dwivedi, demanded 'Martyr' status for all 26 victims of the horrific incident. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now She also accused political leaders of undermining the gravity of the April 22 attack this year and reminded them that "terrorists didn't ask for anyone's caste or political party – they attacked Indians". Reacting to the remarks of P. Chidambaram who raised suspicion that this could have been the handiwork of homegrown terrorists, Aishanya said, "I fail to understand why some people -- XYZ or anyone -- are making such insensitive statements. Do they forget that they are Indians first? "You are not thinking like an Indian; you are politicising the issue. It is disrespectful to those who died in Pahalgam, and you are, in a way, siding with Pakistanis. Many families mourned after the Pahalgam attack, and you are undermining their feelings," she said. She called for unified national solidarity, emphasising that this wasn't a political matter. "My husband Shubham was a son of this soil. If this country truly stands by its citizens, this is the time to show it," she said. She stressed the need to address counter-terrorism strategies: "What is the govt doing to eradicate this from the root? What are we doing to fight terrorism? What strategies are in place? What action will we take moving forward? These are the questions that matter most to me today." Pursuing martyr status for Shubham Dwivedi and 25 others remains her priority: "Shubham didn't just die; he gave his life for the country. What more does it take to be called a martyr?" She also questioned the approval of the India-Pakistan cricket matches and announced to boycott them. Suham's father Sanjay Dwivedi expressed anger over Chidambaram's remarks. He said that politics should never be placed above national interest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store