
Epstein 'client list' doesn't exist, Justice Department says, walking back theory Bondi had promoted
The acknowledgment that the well-connected Epstein did not have a list of clients to whom underage girls were trafficked represents a public walk-back of a theory that the Trump administration had helped promote, with Bondi suggesting in a Fox News interview earlier this year that such a document was 'sitting on my desk' for review.
Even as it released video from inside a New York jail meant to definitively prove that Epstein killed himself , the department also said in a memo that it was refusing to release other evidence investigators had collected. Bondi for weeks had suggested more material was going to be revealed — 'It's a new administration and everything is going to come out to the public,' she said at one point — after a first document dump she had hyped angered President Donald Trump's base by failing to deliver revelations.
That episode, in which conservative internet personalities were invited to the White House in February and provided with binders marked 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1' and 'Declassified' that contained documents that had largely already been in the public domain, has spurred far-right influencers to lambast and deride Bondi.
After the first release fell flat, Bondi said officials were poring over a 'truckload' of previously withheld evidence she said had been handed over by the FBI. In a March TV interview, she claimed the Biden administration 'sat on these documents, no one did anything with them,' adding: 'Sadly these people don't believe in transparency, but I think more unfortunately, I think a lot of them don't believe in honesty.'
But after a months-long review of evidence in the government's possession, the Justice Department determined that no 'further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted,' the memo says. The department noted that much of the material was placed under seal by a court to protect victims and 'only a fraction' of it 'would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial.'
The two-page memo bore the logos of the Justice Department and the FBI but was not signed by any individual official.
'One of our highest priorities is combatting child exploitation and bringing justice to victims,' the memo says. Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends.'
Conservatives who have sought proof of a government coverup of Epstein's activities and death expressed outrage Monday over the department's position. Far-right influencer Jack Posobiec posted: 'We were all told more was coming. That answers were out there and would be provided. Incredible how utterly mismanaged this Epstein mess has been. And it didn't have to be.'
Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones wrote that 'next the DOJ will say 'Actually, Jeffrey Epstein never even existed,' calling it 'over the top sickening.' Elon Musk shared a series of photos of a clown applying makeup appearing to mock Bondi for saying the client list doesn't exist after suggesting months ago that it was on her desk.
The client list hubbub began when Bondi was asked in a Fox News interview whether the department would release such a document.
She replied: 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review.'
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Justice Department spokesperson Chad Gilmartin said Monday that Bondi was referring to the Epstein files in general, not a client list specifically.
Among the evidence that the Justice Department says it has in its possession are more than 10,000 videos and images that officials said depicted child sex abuse material or 'other pornography.' Bondi had earlier suggested that part of the reason for the delay in releasing additional Epstein materials was because the FBI needed to review 'tens of thousands' of recordings that she said showed Epstein 'with children or child porn.'
The Associated Press published a story last week about the unanswered questions surrounding those videos.
Multiple people who participated in the criminal cases of Epstein and socialite former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell told AP that they had not seen and did not know of a trove of recordings along the lines of what Bondi had referenced. Indictments and detention memos also don't allege the existence of video recordings and neither Epstein nor Maxwell were charged with possession of child sex abuse material even though that would have been easier for prosecutors to prove than the sex trafficking counts they faced.
The AP did find reference in a filing in a civil lawsuit to the discovery by the Epstein estate of videos and pictures that could constitute child sex abuse material, but lawyers involved in that case said a protective order prevents them from discovering the specifics of that evidence.
The Justice Department did not respond to a detailed list of questions from AP about the videos Bondi was referencing.
Monday's memo does not explain when or where they were located, what they depict and whether they were newly found as investigators scoured their collection of evidence or were known for some time to have been in the government's possession.
Epstein was found dead in his jail cell in August 2019, weeks after his arrest on sex trafficking charges, in a suicide that foreclosed the possibility of a trial.
The department's disclosure that Epstein took his own life is hardly a revelation even though conspiracy theorists have continued to challenge that conclusion.
In November 2019, for instance, then-Attorney General William Barr told the AP in an interview that he had personally reviewed security footage that revealed that no one entered the area where Epstein was housed on the night he died and Barr had concluded that Epstein's suicide was the result of 'a perfect storm of screw-ups.'
More recently, FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino have insisted in television and podcast interviews that the evidence was clear that Epstein had killed himself.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
15 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump's 30% tariff letter leaves EU scrambling to bring U.S. on side
The European Union has been left scrambling after U.S. President Donald Trump said he would slap a 30% tariff on goods imported from the bloc beginning Aug. 1. European leaders were quick to respond, saying they would still work to strike an agreement with the U.S. before the start of August. The EU also further delayed countermeasures which were set to come into effect this week and warned that preparations for additional retaliatory moves were underway. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic on Monday told reporters that the letter had been received with "regret and disappointment ... especially considering the advanced stage of our ongoing negotiations." Sefcovic stressed that the EU was still focused on finding a negotiated solution, but was preparing for all possible outcomes — which could include countermeasures. He also said that he would speak to his U.S. counterparts later in the day. "I cannot imagine walking away without genuine effort," the trade commissioner said. With less than a month before Trump's new deadline, the European Union will have to act fast to prevent the tariffs from coming into effect or risk further escalation. While EU leaders remain determined to strike a deal, economists and analysts warned that the threat of a 30% tariff rate has nevertheless added fresh pressure to the 27-member block. "It's very bad news for Europe," Alicia Garcia-Herrero, senior fellow at Bruegel and chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis, told CNBC's "Europe Early Edition" on Monday. "Trump is pushing the commission to really come up with a better deal," she added. Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING, and Inga Fechner, a senior economist at ING who focuses on global trade, struck a similar tone. "Trump's letter to the EU is not a love letter but also not a hate letter. It's a letter to increase pressure in the ongoing negotiations," they said in a note on Sunday. The EU however still has options, the economists said, suggesting that one approach could be for the EU to offer to boost its purchasing of U.S. products ranging from soybeans to military equipment. Brussels could also reduce existing tariffs and other trade hurdles on items such as U.S. cars, or introduce export bans on products that are important to the U.S. such as European-made pharmaceuticals, Brzeski and Fechner said. "The fourth and final option would be to go into outright retaliation with either increasing tariffs on US goods or the nuclear option in trade: tariffs on digital services but also tighter regulations on US tech firms," the economists suggested, noting, however that this would likely trigger a full blown trade war. Despite the additional pressure for the EU, the expectation remains that the bloc and Washington D.C. will strike a agreement in the coming weeks. "I think both sides will strike a compromise. This is in the best interest of both the U.S. and the European Union," said Joerg Kraemer, chief economist at Commerzbank. "I expect in the end, a kind of average tariff rate for the European Union for exports to the U.S. in the area of 15%," he told CNBC'S "Europe Early Edition" on Monday. Notably, this rate would be higher than the 10% that had previously been anticipated by many and is in line with the deal that has been agreed upon by the U.K. and U.S. Berenberg Economist Salomon Fiedler meanwhile appeared more optimistic, saying in a note that the bank was still expecting 10% duties even as "the risks are now strongly skewed towards higher rates." One reason for optimism is that Trump has repeatedly taken extreme positions initially, and then later compromised, Fiedler argued. "The fact that Trump only threatened the new 30% rate for 1 August, instead of implementing it more quickly, suggests he is still looking to negotiate," he said. Trump may also shy away from further tariffs as businesses start passing on higher import costs to consumers, Fiedler suggested. The domestic political backdrop may also change, which could make it less important for the U.S. president to try and keep public attention on trade, he added. On the flipside, risk factors for higher levies include the unlikelihood that the U.S.' trade deficits — which Trump has often used as an argument for tariffs — will disappear, and the U.S. administration's reliance on tariff incomes to supplement its budget, according to Fiedler. "The always remote hope of a good negotiation outcome — the bilateral removal of all tariffs and some other trade barriers between the EU and the US — has all but disappeared from view by now," he noted.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stablecoin Bill Poised to Pass as House Kicks Off ‘Crypto Week'
(Bloomberg) -- Republican House leaders anticipate passing an industry-friendly stablecoin regulatory bill this week, sending Congress's first major digital assets legislation to the president and kicking off a series of votes on related measures that supporters have dubbed 'Crypto Week.' Why Did Cars Get So Hard to See Out Of? How German Cities Are Rethinking Women's Safety — With Taxis Philadelphia Reaches Pact With Workers to End Garbage Strike Advocates Fear US Agents Are Using 'Wellness Checks' on Children as a Prelude to Arrests Industry backers hope the legislation will promote wider use of dollar-denominated stablecoins, marking the first big victory for crypto advocates since they poured hundreds of millions of dollars last year into efforts to elect friendly lawmakers, according to Federal Election Commission filings. 'The golden age of digital assets is here,' said Republican Representative Bryan Steil of Wisconsin, an industry ally who chairs a House subcommittee on crypto. President Donald Trump, whose family has launched its own crypto ventures, has made digital assets regulation a priority of his second term, declaring that the US will be the 'crypto capital' of the world. Many Democrats have unsuccessfully demanded crypto legislation prohibit Trump and his family's digital assets ventures, which has earned them hundreds of millions of dollars. The House is also scheduled to vote on two other industry-backed measures this week, one that would set broader market structure rules for crypto and another prohibiting the Federal Reserve from issuing digital currency. The Senate passed the stablecoin legislation last month with broad bipartisan support. It sets regulatory rules for dollar-backed stablecoins, including a requirement for firms to hold dollar-for-dollar reserves in short-term government debt or similar products overseen by state or federal regulators. Republicans in the House and Senate have been negotiating a path forward on the other crypto legislation. House GOP members have previously expressed concern over the Senate ever adopting a market structure measure, and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott has set a September 30 deadline for his panel to finish its work on that legislation. The market structure legislation, which would give most of the responsibility for digital assets to a regulatory agency the industry views as more friendly, won bipartisan support in House committee votes and is expected to win some Democratic votes on the floor. The bill classifies most cryptocurrencies as commodities to be overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission rather than the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Senate Banking Committee held a hearing on market structure last week, and the Agriculture Committee, which has jurisdiction over the CFTC, scheduled a hearing for Tuesday. Senators plan to release draft legislation in July and unveiled guiding principles in June, which were largely in line with the House's version of market structure. The top-ranking Democrats on related committees, Representative Maxine Waters on the House Financial Services Committee and Elizabeth Warren on the Senate Banking Committee, have opposed the measures. They argue that none of the crypto legislation does enough to protect consumers and the bills lack conflict of interest measures to combat the Trump family's ties to the crypto industry. Waters is planning to counter-program Republicans with an 'anti-crypto corruption week.' --With assistance from Lydia Beyoud and Steven T. Dennis. 'Our Goal Is to Get Their Money': Inside a Firm Charged With Scamming Writers for Millions Trump's Cuts Are Making Federal Data Disappear Trade War? No Problem—If You Run a Trade School Thailand's Changing Cannabis Rules Leave Farmers in a Tough Spot Will Trade War Make South India the Next Manufacturing Hub? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
European markets open in the red after Trump threatens 30% EU tariff
Investors in Europe reeled from US President Donald Trump's tariff threats on Monday morning, sending the major indexes into negative territory. As of around 9.30am CEST, France's CAC 40 was down 0.52% at 7,788.23, the UK's FTSE 100 slipped 0.38% to 8,941.12, and Germany's DAX dropped 0.85% to 24,049.73. Spain's IBEX 35 fell 0.80% to 13,897.80, while Italy's FTSE MIB dropped 0.86% to 39,726.27. The STOXX 600 slid 0.48% to 544.73 and the STOXX 50 fell 0.83% to 5,338.57. The movements come as EU trade ministers are meeting on Monday morning to discuss President Trump's surprise announcement of 30% tariffs on the European Union. Trump shared the plans on Saturday and said that the same rate, set to kick in on 1 August, would be applied to goods from Mexico. European officials have been working to secure a deal with the US after the president threatened a 50% tariff on EU exports in May, up from an initially proposed 20% rate. President Trump then retracted the threat of a 50% duty, although retained separate tariffs on exports like steel, aluminium, and cars. In response to Trump's announcement over the weekend, the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen said the EU would not impose retaliatory tariffs on US imports before 1 August, allowing time for negotiation. Denmark's foreign minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, also told reporters ahead of the meeting on Monday: 'We shouldn't impose countermeasures at this stage, but we should prepare to be ready to use all the tools in the toolbox.' He added: 'So we want a deal, but there's an old saying: 'If you want peace, you have to prepare for war.'" Related Which European economy stands to suffer the most from US tariffs? EU trade ministers to mull US tariffs as Germany's Merz cautions calm Maroš Šefčovič, the EU's trade representative in its talks with the US, also said on Monday that negotiations would continue. 'I'm absolutely 100% sure that a negotiated solution is much better than the tension which we might have after 1 August." He told reporters in Brussels: 'I cannot imagine walking away without genuine effort. Having said that, the current uncertainty caused by unjustified tariffs cannot persist indefinitely and therefore we must prepare for all outcomes, including, if necessary, well-considered proportionate countermeasures.' In light of US isolationism, the EU is also looking to expand trade with alternative partners. Leaders from the bloc will travel to China for a summit later this month, seeking to promote stronger relations despite disagreements over the alleged 'dumping' of cheap Chinese goods in Europe. This accusation prompted the EU to impose its own tariffs on Chinese goods last year. While in China for the summit, EU leaders will also be courting other Pacific nations like South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Singapore, the Philippines, and Indonesia, whose prime minister visited Brussels over the weekend to sign a new economic partnership with the EU. The downbeat investor sentiment in Europe also comes despite pledges to increase defence spending. France's president Emmanuel Macron on Sunday pledged to raise France's military spending by €6.5 billion over the next two years. Macron said the 2026 defence budget would be raised by €3.5bn, and another €3bn in 2027. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data