logo
MIKEY SMITH: 7 wild Donald Trump moments as he warns of 'great depression' unless he gets his way

MIKEY SMITH: 7 wild Donald Trump moments as he warns of 'great depression' unless he gets his way

Daily Mirror08-08-2025
Donald Trump yesterday invited a weird guy into the Oval to wax on about how great his economy is - unless one thing gets in his way
As the old saying goes: While Vance is away, the Donald will heave out a weird guy to point at made-up charts to make him look good.

JD Vance is currently somewhere in Kent, enjoying the hospitality of David Lammy - with whom he spent some of the morning fishing.

Meanwhile, Trump is flitting between holding up big bits of cardboard that say largely meaningless or unproven things about how great the US economy is, and telling the world the US economy faces total collapse if it turns out his tariffs were illegal.

Here's everything that happened in Trump World that you need to know about. Strap in.
1. Steve Bannon isn't running
Turns out Steve Bannon is not running for President. He says.
Yesterday the Mail claimed Trump's former advisor was secretly planning a run for 2028, claiming sources close to him and Trump had said Bannon had begun "soliciting political advice"

Which...doesn't sound much like Bannon to me.
Asked if he was running by the National Pulse, Bannon said: "Trump 2028".
2. JD's gone fishin'
JD Vance took a shot at David Lammy's prowess as a fisherman today, as both enjoyed a morning of angling in a lake.

Vance is visiting the UK for a few days of "holiday" - but also seeking movement on Gaza and Ukraine, and we reckon probably meeting a few people who might be interested in his presumptive 2028 run.
During a gaggle ahead of their sit-down meeting, Lammy said: "The one strain on the special relationship is that all of my kids caught a fish, but the Foreign Secretary did not."
Asked if he too had caught a fish, Vance said: "I caught a few, actually. I don't want to brag, but I did OK."

Vance also claimed his boss Donald Trump had "reduced tensions" around the world since becoming President.
"David once said to me, and this is probably a couple of years ago, that there's this feeling that the world is in a state of incredible tension," Vance said at the start of a day of meetings at the Foreign Secretary's official country residence, Chevening.
"I certainly felt that a couple of years ago. I think the President of the United States has done a lot over the last six or seven months to lower that tension."

That is certainly a take.
3. Trump held a deeply weird Oval Office presentation from a right-wing economist, who said everything's fine and the bits that aren't are Biden's fault
Trump summoned the media to the Oval last night for a "major economic announcement."
When they arrived, they found Stephen Moore - a conservative writer, TV commentator and, I guess, economist, who has worked for the Heritage Foundation (the hard right think tank which came up with Project 2025) for an exceptionally long time.

Trump tried to put him on the board of the Federal Reserve in his first term, but couldn't get him approved by the Senate, who found him to be unqualified.
He's also an "informal" advisor to the President. What I'm saying is that he's not by any stretch what you would consider an independent or unbiased economic analyst.
But he did bring some charts with him.

In a deeply weird "presentation", he claimed to have "new data" which nobody had seen before.
He claimed the Bureau of Labour Statistics had "overestimated job creation by 1.5 million jobs" during the last two years of Biden's term, according to his "data" that "nobody has ever seen before" but which he has access to.
Thing is, even if that number is true - and we have no way of knowing because he won't share the data - it's totally normal for BLS figures to be adjusted.

The monthly figures are always, to an extent a projection. See, they're gathered from a massive survey of American companies. And companies don't always reply to surveys on time. And sometimes they don't reply at all...because they go out of business.
The average monthly revision is +/- about 51,000 jobs. And considering most of the revisions during Biden's term - and Trump's for that matter - were downward, that figure of 1.5 million isn't far off what the public BLS numbers showed anyway.

In the last year of Biden, the average monthly revision was -60,000. In the first five months of Trump it's -65,000. This is totally normal, and the only real way of counting job numbers with any accuracy on a rolling basis.
The reason, by the way, that they only looked at the last two years of Biden's term is that in the first two years, there was a period of revising them massively up, when the Covid bounceback happened.
Anyway, he then claimed that new data from the Census Bureau, which again nobody else has access to but him, but will be released within "the next six months", showed average household incomes adjusted for inflation was up £1,174. Which sounds like a lot. But where's he getting these magic, secret numbers from?

Turns out he and his team at (and I'm not kidding, they're really called this) the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, a right wing advocacy group, had come up with a new model to use monthly survey data from the Census Bureau to predict future releases of national income data, according to The Washington Post. But none of this was explained at the time.
And while the charts have now gone up on his group's website, the data behind them has not.
Hilariously, at the bottom of most of the charts is a tiny bit of text citing the source as "Author's Calculations".

Anyway. If you didn't see any of this deeply weird event, have a look. It's so odd.
4. Trump honoured some Purple Hearts, and also accepted some...
Trump held a ceremony at the White House for about 100 Purple Heart recipients last night, which is quite a common thing for a President to do.
What was less common was that he revealed three of those present had mailed their Purple Hearts to him after the assassination attempt in Butler Pennsylvania.

"What a great honor to get those Purple Hearts," Trump said.
"I guess, in a certain way, it wasn't that easy for me either, when you think of it. But you went through a lot more than I did, and I appreciate it very much."
5. Trump warns of a "Great Depression" if his tariffs are ruled illegal
The president says there would be another "GREAT DEPRESSION!" if a U.S. Appeals Court rules he exceeded his authority by declaring an emergency to impose the taxes and mandates repayment of the billions of dollars collected so far.

"If a Radical Left Court ruled against us at this late date, in an attempt to bring down or disturb the largest amount of money, wealth creation and influence the USA has ever seen, it would be impossible to ever recover, or pay back, these massive sums of money and honor," Trump said. "It would be 1929 all over again."
The government has collected about $130 billion in tariff revenues so far this year, about $74 billion more than it did last year, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center.
6. Pete Hegseth has reinstalled a statues honouring some of America's most racist traitors
Pete Hegseth has been on the airwaves again, this time crowing that under his leadership, America's national cemetery would once again give space to a memorial honouring some of America's most racist traitors.

Yes, the Confederate Memorial, commemorating those who fought for the confederacy in the Civil War, which was removed in 2023 for reasons that to most people are plainly obvious, will soon be put back in Arlington Cemetery and Hegseth is delighted.
The monument has long been criticised for including depictions of slaves as "faithful black servants."
They were included in the sculpture by the artists, Moses Ezekiel, because he wanted to undermine the "lies" told about slavery and the South, and "correctly" rewrite history to depict black slaves as being supportive of the Confederate cause.

Of course, this is all over the head of Hegseth.
"We recognise our history, we don't erase it," he told (who else?) Fox News.
"We don't follow the woke lemmings off the cliff that want to tear down statues."

He went on to say the monument was to "recognise the service of Americans of all chapters."
Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp!
As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond.
We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in.
All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group.
We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
7. GB News viewers rejoice!
It's a great day for viewers of GB News, who will soon be able to watch their favourite "news channel" in the same place they get their Trump tweets.
You'll recall we reported on the launch of Truth+ - a streaming service built into Truth Social, Trump's own social network.
Well, as of today, GB News is in the channel listings, right alongside Lindell TV, the "news channel" run by the MyPillow guy and Trump's favourite channel, and the highly popular documentary Lizard People: Rulers of Time And Space.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House Democrats launch investigation into Paramount merger and ‘bribe' to Trump
House Democrats launch investigation into Paramount merger and ‘bribe' to Trump

The Independent

timea few seconds ago

  • The Independent

House Democrats launch investigation into Paramount merger and ‘bribe' to Trump

The ranking members of the House Judiciary and Energy and Commerce committees are launching an investigation into Skydance's $8 billion merger with Paramount and whether the $16 million settlemen t to Donald Trump constituted a 'bribe,' the committees announced on Thursday. The Hill first reported on the launch of the congressional probe and a letter sent to Paramount leadership, which The Independent has also reviewed. In the letter sent to new Paramount CEO David Ellison on Wednesday night, E&C ranking member Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. and Rep. Jamie Raskin, Judiciary's top Democrat, called on Paramount leadership to provide documents and correspondence related to the deal and its approval process with the Trump administration. The merger, which was approved late last month by the FCC and officially closed on August 7, came after a politically strained and fraught process that included the previous Paramount leadership paying Trump to settle a lawsuit over a 60 Minutes interview that CBS News' own lawyers said was 'without merit.' Additionally, after the settlement was announced, the president claimed that he had reached a 'side deal' with Ellison to air up to $20 million worth of pro-Trump advertisements and programming on CBS once Skydance took over the company. While the previous Paramount leadership denied any knowledge of any secret agreement, Ellison has remained mum about the matter. Days before the merger was approved by Trump's handpicked FCC chief Brendan Carr, Skydance agreed to install an ombudsman for two years to conduct a 'comprehensive review' of CBS News and review 'complaints of bias.' The company also agreed to eliminate all diversity hiring practices. On top of that, Paramount announced just before the administration approved the merger that it was canceling the long-running late show hosted by outspoken Trump critic Stephen Colbert, even though it was the top-rated program in late-night. Trump and Carr immediately celebrated the news of Colbert's cancellation. Paramount, meanwhile, has insisted the move was purely for financial reasons, while company sources claimed the show lost $40 million a year. 'In the days and weeks leading up to government approval of the deal, Paramount also agreed to pay $16 million to settle President Trump's meritless lawsuit related to benign edits of an episode of '60 Minutes'—a standard editorial practice—which the FCC also investigated without any legitimate regulatory basis,' the letter to Ellison read. 'The settlement raises significant concerns that Donald Trump demanded and Paramount paid an illegal bribe—a $16 million payment to the President in exchange for merger approval from the FCC.' Carr spent months during the approval process slamming CBS News' coverage of Trump, accusing it of anti-conservative bias while also reviewing complaints over alleged 'news distortion' at the network, specifically over the 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. Raskin and Pallone aren't the only ones who have accused Paramount of bribing the president to push through the merger process. While the company – then led by chief shareholder Shari Redstone – was in mediation over the lawsuit, several Democratic senators warned the company that any settlement with Trump could be seen as a violation of anti-bribery statutes. 'Paramount also canceled the highly popular 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,' which President Trump openly dislikes, shortly after Mr. Colbert's on-air criticism of Paramount's settlement as a 'big fat bribe,'' Raskin and Pallone stated. 'As a condition of the merger, Skydance also agreed to make changes to CBS and its editorial practices that align with the Trump Administration's political agenda, including a commitment to eliminate 'perceived bias' in its reporting, the hiring of an ombudsman to police the news organization's editorial choices, and the dismantling of any initiatives aimed at promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion.' The congressmen also raised questions about the influence the new Paramount chief's father had on the process. Larry Ellison, the founder of Oracle, is a close ally of the president's and has invested heavily in his son's venture. 'And within days of your June 7 meeting, President Trump endorsed your bid to purchase Paramount,' the lawmakers wrote Ellison. 'Moreover, your father, Larry Ellison, who contributed up to $6 billion toward your purchase of Paramount, reportedly met privately with President Trump multiple times in recent months. Notably, none of these meetings were memorialized with filings in the FCC's docket on this transaction, prompting objections from other parties in the record.' Referencing the supposed 'side deal' with the president, the congressmen brought up Trump's public boast that he anticipated that the 'new Owners' would give him $20 million of PSAs and similar programming. 'This offer was necessarily contingent on the FCC approving the deal and does not appear to present any legitimate value to the public, only to President Trump,' Pallone and Raskin stated. 'Therefore, this appears to be an offer of payment and benefits to a government official designed to achieve a specific outcome from the government — in other words, a bribe.' Also noting that several CBS newsroom leaders parted ways with the network over Paramount's settlement negotiations with Trump, the two Democrats said that the combination of all of these actions could 'run afoul of federal and state anti-bribery statutes' while demanding detailed answers surrounding the merger approval process. 'Two wrongs do not make a right—illegitimate demands from the FCC or the Administration do not absolve your company from wrongdoing,' the lawmakers wrote to David Ellison. 'If Skydance offered a side deal of up to $20 million worth of advertisement or programming to President Trump in order to receive regulatory approval for the merger with Paramount, these actions would run afoul of federal and state anti-bribery statutes.' They continued: 'Similarly, if Paramount forced out CBS's longtime leaders, spent $16 million to settle a sham lawsuit with President Trump, or cancelled a highly popular comedy show that President Trump dislikes in order to curry favor with the Administration and to receive regulatory approval for the merger with Skydance, these actions would likely further embolden President Trump to use lawsuits and regulatory authority to attack media organizations that he finds objectionable in order to silence them.'

Trump's kitchen meltdown: President wags finger at Putin in Nixon copycat stunt
Trump's kitchen meltdown: President wags finger at Putin in Nixon copycat stunt

Daily Mirror

timea minute ago

  • Daily Mirror

Trump's kitchen meltdown: President wags finger at Putin in Nixon copycat stunt

Donald Trump posted the image after Moscow unleashed one of its heaviest bombardments of Ukraine, in what critics say was a bid to show himself standing firm against Russia's strongman Donald Trump has sparked controversy after posting a provocative photo of himself pointing his finger at Vladimir Putin - echoing the infamous 1959 'Kitchen Debate' between Richard Nixon and Nikita Khrushchev. ‌ The US President dropped the image online today just hours after Moscow unleashed one of its heaviest bombardments of Ukraine since the war began, in what critics say was a calculated bid to show himself standing firm against Russia 's strongman. ‌ Trump's copycat pose, mirroring Nixon's clash with Khrushchev in a mock-up American kitchen during the Cold War, is being billed by allies as a symbol of defiance. But insiders claim it is also the latest sign of his growing fury at Putin's refusal to end the carnage. ‌ One well-placed source told the Mirror: 'There is no secret that Trump has become increasingly angered by Putin's lack of action. He says one thing, but then immediately carries out further attacks on Ukraine, showing he has no interest in stopping the killing. Putin is beginning to make Trump look weak, and it's wearing on the President. He's already threatened much greater sanctions against Russia if peace is not forthcoming and it's clear Trump feels time is running out.' The original 'Kitchen Debate' took place during the American National Exhibition in Moscow, when then–Vice President Nixon and Soviet Premier Khrushchev went toe-to-toe in front of cameras. What began as a row over washing machines and televisions quickly descended into a fiery exchange about capitalism versus communism and became one of the defining images of the Cold War. ‌ Now Trump is trying to cast himself in the same mould, pointing the finger at Putin as Nixon once did at Khrushchev, inviting comparisons between his standoff with Moscow and America's ideological battle with the Soviet Union. The timing of the stunt, however, raised eyebrows. Russia's overnight blitz of Ukrainian cities left dozens dead and injured, further escalating a war already grinding into its third year. Against that backdrop, Trump's photo-op was seized upon by supporters as proof of American resolve and derided by critics as a cheap gimmick. ‌ 'Trump thinks he's Nixon squaring up to Khrushchev,' one social media user wrote online. 'In reality, he's cosplaying statesmanship while bombs fall on civilians.' The Internet was split. MAGA supporters hailed the image as a show of leadership, with one supporter posting: 'This is America standing tall. Trump is showing Putin he won't be pushed around.' Others were scathing, branding it ' Instagram diplomacy' and 'a stunt that trivialises a brutal war.' Historians and foreign policy experts were equally divided. Some said the symbolism was clever, drawing on an iconic Cold War moment to remind the world of America's strength. Others warned it was simplistic, dangerous even, reducing a complex modern conflict to a recycled photo-op. 'It's a flashy gesture,' said one analyst. 'But Ukraine isn't 1959 Moscow, and Putin isn't Khrushchev. The stakes today are far higher and a finger-pointing picture won't bring the bombs to a halt.' Still, Trump's move has ensured he is once again at the centre of the Ukraine debate, positioning himself as the man prepared to stare down Putin.

Trump's Chief of Staff pushes to protect Bondi amid Epstein fallout
Trump's Chief of Staff pushes to protect Bondi amid Epstein fallout

Daily Mail​

timea minute ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump's Chief of Staff pushes to protect Bondi amid Epstein fallout

Attorney General Pam Bondi was able to hold on to her job despite a sandstorm of public outcry from Donald Trump's base for her to be sacked over the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles was Bondi's biggest cheerleader amid the torrent of calls for Bondi's scalp - and she went to bat for the 'blonde Barbie' with 'nerves of steel' in a rare on the record interview. 'You know, she looks like Barbie. She's blonde and beautiful, and I think people will underestimate her because of how she looks,' Wiles told The New Yorker magazine . The White House Chief of Staff added: 'But she's got nerves of steel, and she has stood up to some withering situations with a fair amount of grace.' Known as Trump's 'Ice Maiden' working behind the scenes to instill cold hard discipline and fierce loyalty, Wiles admitted to magazine that Bondi's ties to the president run even deeper than hers. Asked about Bondi's relationship with Trump, Wiles said: 'I have a long one. Hers is longer.' Trump's own personal loyalty can be mercurial, but for now Wiles has been the bulwark against Bondi's dismissal, beating back public campaigns from right-wing personalities like Laura Loomer. As Florida girls, Wiles and Bondi's ties also span years. Both worked as lobbyists at Ballard Partners, a Florida-based firm founded by Republican fundraiser Brian Ballard, who also personally contributed to Trump's campaigns. Wiles worked for Ballard from 2011 to 2019. Bondi joined the firm in 2019 following her tenure as Florida's Attorney General. It appears that several Trump allies – including his own daughter Ivanka – were pushing for Bondi to get a role in his first administration. Even Ballard said at the time: 'I would imagine her opportunities are unlimited. There's nobody closer to Trump in Florida than Pam Bondi.' But a Trump ally told the New Yorker that back then, when Bondi's name would come up, the president would 'roll his eyes and shake his head.' 'I always took it as he didn't take her seriously—he didn't think she was a person of substance,' they claimed. The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment on the sprawling New Yorker piece on Bondi, and whether it took Trump some time to warm up to her joining his team the first time around. Fast forward to 2024 after former Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz withdrew his nomination to head-up Trump's Justice Department in his second term, Bondi emerged as the clear replacement. Those involved in the selection claim that Trump did not consider anyone else. Bondi became one of the most controversial Cabinet officials, however, once the DOJ and FBI released a memo concluding it found nothing new in its review of the Epstein files. This sent MAGA world ablaze with claims a cover-up was afoot and that Bondi was not being as 'transparent' as Trump promised she would be. Loomer led the calls for her to be fired and multiple reports emerged claiming Bondi lost her secure footing with Trump.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store