"Unreasonable" tax audit of some Hong Kong media
Hong Kong's press freedom ranking has plummeted since Beijing cracked down on dissent after huge, sometimes violent pro-democracy protests in 2019.
The Hong Kong tax authorities alleged that a group of online outlets, reporters and some of their family members had failed to report their income from 2017 to 2019 in full.
Backdated demands have been issued as a result, according to the Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA).
The association told reporters it believed the audits "were not based on sufficient evidence or reasonable grounds."
The impacted media outlets listed by the HKJA include Hong Kong Free Press, Inmedia and The Witness, a news site focused on covering court cases, as well as two others.
HKJA said the tax department had claimed back money for "bizarre" reasons, including calculating non-existent income from before one of the outlets was founded.
Selina Cheng, the HKJA's chair and a former Wall Street Journal reporter, said the association, herself and her parents were also impacted.
Hong Kong's Inland Revenue Department (IRD) said it followed the legal process and that its actions were not aimed at specific industries, according to local media.
IRD added that it would not comment on "individual cases."
Hong Kong journalists rated the city's press freedom lower than ever in an annual survey last year, citing fears around sweeping national security laws.
More than 90 percent of journalists surveyed said the city's press freedom was "significantly" impacted by a domestic security law enacted in March 2024 that punishes crimes like espionage and foreign interference.
Colloquially known as Article 23, it was the second such law enacted for the financial hub, following one imposed by Beijing in 2020 after the pro-democracy protests.
China's foreign ministry said that Hong Kong's security laws "target a very small number of individuals who severely endanger national security, not law-abiding media reporters."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
4 days ago
- Daily Express
Need to justify termination
Published on: Monday, August 11, 2025 Published on: Mon, Aug 11, 2025 By: John Mark Text Size: JUST LAST week the Industrial Court (IC) ordered Football club Perak FC Sdn Bhd to pay RM1.04 million in compensation to former head coach Lim Teong Kim for unfair an earlier case, two former director-employees were awarded more than RM2 million. Advertisement These outcomes underscore the significant financial risks businesses face when termination of employment are mishandled. An ex- employee who believes they have been unfairly dismissed can file a complaint under Section 20(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 with the Industrial Relations Department (IRD) within a strict 60-day window from the date of termination. The IRD's initial step is to organise a conciliation session to help both the former employee and employer find an amicable resolution. If a settlement is reached, the IRD will facilitate the creation of a Memorandum of Agreement. If the dispute cannot be settled, the Director-General of the IRD will refer the case to the Industrial Court (IC). Advertisement Our employment laws are very different from the at-will employment such as in the US where there's no requirement to establish 'just cause' for termination. The Federal Court in Maritime Intelligence Sdn Bhd v Tan Ah Gek [2021] 10 CLJ 663, stated that the right to livelihood in the context of employment is a fundamental right guaranteed under Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution. Section 20(1) exemplifies this very right. The Federal Court also emphasised the importance of giving clear reasons when terminating an employee as these will be closely scrutinised by the IC. Employment law in essence is a social legislation which is intended to protect employees but it allows employers to terminate employees if they have valid reasons. It puts in place, checks and balances on the employer to justify the reasons for termination. Some examples of direct termination of employment Misconduct Covers a wide spectrum of situations from absenteeism to sexual harassment and criminal breach of trust (CBT). Rules of natural justice require the employee to be given an opportunity to be heard and defend himself. The employee should be given a show cause letter with clear descriptions of his misconduct. Material facts such as description of the alleged misconduct, time and date, location and the parties (such as immediate superior, colleague or even a victim). This would enable the employee to understand the alleged misconduct and give a proper reply. The employee would either admit/plead guilty or deny. The employer may accept the employee's explanation or disagree if the reply is found unsatisfactory. The employer may proceed to conduct a formal domestic inquiry (or due inquiry), an internal process to investigate whether the employee has committed the alleged misconduct. Based on the domestic inquiry findings, the management would be able to decide an appropriate punishment such as a written warning or dismissal being the heaviest punishment. Failure to conduct a domestic inquiry is not fatal or a must. Hence some employers may choose not to conduct a domestic inquiry and base their decision on their investigation and on the show cause letter. However, the importance of having a domestic inquiry cannot be soft-peddled. The IC in Syarikat Telekom Malaysia Berhad v Saidon bin Puteh [1996] 1 ILR 619, observed that: 'A due inquiry properly conducted and well documented …provides a reliable record for the employer to turn to when, due to the effluxion of time witnesses have become unavailable or memories have faded, the employer is fixed with difficulties in having to prove his case before an industrial tribunal…' There's a possibility that witnesses and records may be unavailable to the employer when the case reaches the IC. Hence, conducting a domestic inquiry may still be relevant and practical. It is pertinent to note, that establishing misconduct doesn't always justify dismissing an employee. The Doctrine of Proportionality of Punishment requires that the punishment must fit the offence or must be appropriate. The employer should consider the severity of the alleged conduct, the employee's employment record and other relevant factors. Non-confirmation and poor performance These concern employees who don't meet minimum standards or achieve targets. New hires would normally be on a probationary period (usually for three to six months) to test them on their suitability and ability to perform the job. If they fall below the standards or do not perform, employers may choose not to confirm the employee. They must be appraised, warned of their shortcomings and given sufficient opportunity to improve and given guidance/coaching. If confirmed employees later become non-performers, it would be prudent to place them on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) to give them the opportunity to improve. Having a structured and documented process is a must. Redundancy and rightsizing Restructuring of a business may result in a position being redundant or irrelevant. Businesses might do so to cut losses or to be sustainable in the long term. But they have to adduce evidence to justify such reasons or reasonable steps they have taken before taking such drastic measures. Advancement of technology or automation can also make a job redundant. For example, Elevator Operators, a position which existed since the invention of elevators became almost extinct with automation by the 70s. More recently, with artificial intelligence, there is a possibility that some jobs will be redundant. Incapacity or frustration of contract The employment contract becomes frustrated when it has become impossible for both parties to perform their obligations under the contract. Some examples include: Long-term illness or disability where the employee is unable to perform the job Impossible for a driver of a bus to drive a bus legally if he has been banned from driving busses by the authorities A new law or regulation which makes it impossible to conduct a business. If one day the government decides to ban vape/e-cigarettes, the manufacturer would be forced to cease operations. Expiry of a fixed-term contract Fixed-term employment contracts are employment contracts for a specified duration. Businesses commonly use such contracts for temporary work assignments or for a specific project. Such contracts merely end at the expiry of its term. The IC will scrutinise whether such contracts are genuine, based on business needs or not genuine, an attempt to circumvent protections afforded to employees. Finale caution The law mandates that employers must have a valid justification for terminating an employee. To successfully defend their actions in the Industrial Court, employers must ensure their termination process is meticulously structured and thoroughly documented.
Malaysian Reserve
23-07-2025
- Malaysian Reserve
HK arrests 18-year-old for writing ‘seditious words' in bathroom
HONG KONG police arrested an 18-year-old on suspicion he left what they called 'seditious' messages in a bathroom, adding to a recent series of national security actions that signal authorities' continued efforts to curb dissent. The man is accused of being 'involved in writing seditious words in a commercial building toilet on three separate occasions,' the government said Wednesday. The content allegedly provoked hatred and disaffection against the government and incited others to defy the law. The move is the latest in a flurry of enforcement actions against perceived threats to the Chinese state in the former British colony. Hong Kong is seeking to burnish its status as a finance hub after its image took a hit from strict pandemic controls and clampdown on political freedoms. Earlier this month police arrested four men for allegedly advocating independence for the semi-autonomous Chinese territory. In June, local authorities took their first known joint operation with Beijing's security officers to investigate a case of alleged foreign collusion. Police also banned a Taiwanese video game that month for allegedly calling for armed revolution. In its Wednesday statement, the National Security Department of the police charged the man for carrying out 'with a seditious intention an act or acts that had a seditious intention,' a crime that's punishable by up to seven years of imprisonment on first conviction. The offense is defined in the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, commonly known as Article 23, which was fast-tracked into domestic law last year. It's been invoked in addition to the Beijing-imposed National Security Law of 2020, which authorities used to detain and imprison dozens of leading democracy activists. The Hong Kong government didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. –BLOOMBERG
New Straits Times
30-06-2025
- New Straits Times
Hong Kong's last active pro-democracy group to disband amid security crackdown
HONG KONG: Hong Kong's League of Social Democrats said on Sunday that it would disband amid "immense political pressure" from a five year-long national security crackdown, leaving the China-ruled city with no formal pro-democracy opposition presence. The LSD becomes the third major opposition party to shutter in Hong Kong in the past two years. Co-founded in 2006 by former lawmaker Leung Kwok-hung as a radical wing of the pro-democracy camp, the LSD is the last group in Hong Kong to stage small protests this year. Mass public gatherings and marches spearheaded by political and civil society groups had been common in Hong Kong until 2020, but the threat of prosecution has largely shut down organised protests since. China imposed a national security law on the former British colony in 2020, punishing offences like subversion with possible life imprisonment following mass pro-democracy protests in 2019. A second set of laws, known as Article 23, was passed in 2024 by the city's pro-Beijing legislature covering crimes such as sedition and treason. Current chair Chan Po-ying said the group had been "left with no choice" and after considering the safety of party members had decided to shutdown. Chan declined to specify what pressures they had faced. "We have endured hardships of internal disputes and the near total imprisonment of our leadership while witnessing the erosion of civil society, the fading of grassroots voices, the omnipresence of red lines and the draconian suppression of dissent," Chan told reporters, while flanked by six other core members including Tsang Kin-shing, Dickson Chau, Raphael Wong, Figo Chan and Jimmy Sham. In February, the Democratic Party, the city's largest and most popular opposition party, announced it would disband. Several senior members told Reuters they had been warned by Beijing that a failure to do so would mean serious consequences including possible arrests. Earlier this month, China's top official on Hong Kong affairs, Xia Baolong, stressed national security work must continue as hostile forces were still interfering in the city. "We must clearly see that the anti-China and Hong Kong chaos elements are still ruthless and are renewing various forms of soft resistance," Xia said in a speech in Hong Kong. The League of Social Democrats is one of Hong Kong's smaller pro-democracy groups known for its more aggressive tactics and street protests in its advocacy of universal suffrage and grassroots causes including a universal pension scheme. In a 2016 incident, Leung threw a round object at former Hong Kong leader Leung Chun-ying inside the legislature. Three LSD members were fined on June 12 by a magistrate for setting up a street booth where a blank black cloth was displayed and money was collected in public without official permission. Chan told reporters that the party had no assets to divest and no funds left after several of its bank accounts were shut down in 2023. While never as popular as the more moderate Democratic Party and Civic Party, it gained three seats in a 2008 legislative election - its best showing. The LSD's founder Leung, 69, was arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit subversion in 2021 in the landmark '47 Democrats' case. He is currently serving a sentence of six years and nine months in prison. Another member, Jimmy Sham, was also jailed in the same case and released in May. The security laws have been criticised as a tool of repression by the U.S. and Britain, but China says they have restored stability with 332 people so far arrested under these laws.
