Richard Osman reveals he pined for wife for a year before meeting on BBC show
The Pointless presenter, 54, met Doctor Who actress Ingrid, 48, on Richard Osman's House of Games in 2021.
Of their first meeting, Richard previously said: 'Ingrid came on House of Games. I knew who she was through social media. We'd never met – I had never met her. I had a little twinkle in my eye, I'll admit that.
'She came on, we filmed that day together. Our first date is completely on camera. After filming, I was thinking, 'How can I ask her for a drink, this is difficult.''
After becoming friends, they struck up a romance, and were eventually married in a 2022 wedding ceremony which Richard described as 'the most magical, joyful day.'
In a new interview, the former Taskmaster contestant has shared how he had a crush on his future wife long before they actually met.
Speaking to The Sunday Times, Richard said: 'I was aware of Ingrid from social media and thought she was very funny, but beyond a single tweet we'd never communicated.
'I asked our mutual friend, the comedian Lou Sanders, to check if Ingrid was available. She wasn't. Twelve months later, in 2021, Ingrid was a guest on my quiz show House of Games.
'This time Lou told me Ingrid was available, so I spent a long day in front of the cameras desperately trying not to flirt. I made eye contact less with her than any other guest ever.'
Having become friends during her House of Games appearance, romance then blossomed for Richard and Ingrid during lockdown.
Engagement rumours began when Ingrid was spotted wearing an emerald ring.
Richard then confirmed the news in May 2022, during an interview with The Observer.
Asked by fellow writer Marian Keyes whether rumours of their engagement were true, the Thursday Murder Club author replied: 'Yes,' adding: 'Exciting, isn't it?'
The pair then tied the knot in December that year, surrounded by friends and family.
On the Christmas Day edition of Desert Island Discs, Richard paid tribute to Ingrid, explaining: 'I'm happy with myself, I've got these beautiful kids, I've met the woman who I'm going to be with for the rest of my life.
'That thing of competition and ambition, you soon realise that rocket fuel disappears and it's about happiness and my kids bring me happiness and Ingrid brings me happiness.'
Richard split from his first wife in 2007, with whom he shares two older children, Ruby and Sonny, both of whom are in their twenties.
Both children were present at his wedding to Ingrid, with his son acting as his best man during the ceremony.
In the wake of their wedding, Richard admitted how 'terrified' he had been to get married. More Trending
Appearing on Loose Women, he shared: 'Yeah, it's terrifying to get married. All of our friends were there, there's so much you have to organise, you've got the band, the booze, the ceremony, all that stuff.
'And also, it was so filled with love that day, everyone we knew, everyone we loved, people from school, from my whole life, were there, and you just think, 'Just don't get it wrong.'
'Of course, the second you're there and standing opposite each other, doing the vows, you know it can't go wrong.
View More »
'But beforehand it was absolutely terrifying.'
Got a story?
If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
MORE: All 5 episodes of 'captivating' war drama streaming on BBC after agonising wait
MORE: Major stars and Hollywood icons who've appeared in Casualty from Tom Hiddleston to Kate Winslet
MORE: John Torode returns to TV for first time since MasterChef sacking for 'racist term'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
22 minutes ago
- Daily Record
'Masterpiece' BBC period drama so captivating it makes you 'forget Downton Abbey'
This groundbreaking BBC drama has been hailed by critics as being better than Downton Abbey... This BBC period drama has been widely praised by fans, with many claiming it is better than Downton Abbey. Wolf Hall is a British TV series based on two of Hilary Mantel's acclaimed novels Wolf Hall and Bring Up the Bodies. This fictionalised biography follows the life of Thomas Cromwell - the influential advisor to King Henry VIII. The six-part series first aired on the BBC in 2015, directed by BAFTA-winning filmmaker Peter Kosminsky and was adapted for the screen by acclaimed screenwriter Peter Straughan. The official synopsis reads: "Starring Damian Lewis, Mark Rylance and Claire Foy, this series is a six-part adaptation of Hilary Mantel's novels Wolf Hall and Bring Up the Bodies. The historical drama follows the story of Thomas Cromwell through his rise in social hierarchy." "From his humble beginnings as a blacksmith's son, Cromwell became King Henry VIII's chief minister. The episodes chronicle his life as he deals with the power struggles of the Tudor Court and a king who has difficulty producing a male heir," it concludes. The series stars Mark Rylance, known for Bridge of Spies, as Thomas Cromwell and Damian Lewis, best known for his role in Homeland, who plays the infamous King Henry VIII in the series. The cast has seen widespread critical acclaim for their roles. Wolf Hall has been described as a critical success, earning eight Emmy Award nominations as well as receiving three Golden Globe nominations, ultimately winning the award for Best Miniseries or Television Film. The series earned an impressive 98 per cent rating from critics and fans on Rotten Tomatoes. According to the site's summary, Wolf Hall is praised as "Beautifully filmed and brilliantly acted, Wolf Hall masterfully brings Hilary Mantel's award-winning novels to life." Julia Raeside of The Guardian, said: "Forget Downton Abbey. The adaptation of Hilary Mantel's Tudor novels, broadcast in the US starting Sunday, is among the best British TV shows in years." While one viewer described the series as a "masterpiece" with another calling it "horrifying and also exhilarating." A top critic stated: "Subtle, brutal, elegant - Wolf Hall embodied in one moment. This was simply brilliant television." Another critic added: "Simply put, Wolf Hall is delicious. Smartly put together and exquisitely acted, it's a character study of sorts, much like The Godfather, Part II." "You almost expect Cromwell to whisper to whatever courtier he's just destroyed, 'It's just business," they concluded. A fan of the show praised the drama, penning: "This is one of the best period pieces I've ever seen. It masterfully captured the lives of the characters at the time, and I was glued to the screen for every second of it. I definitely recommend it for drama and history fans!" Wolf Hall is available to stream on BBC iPlayer.
Daily Mirror
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
BBC Breakfast's Rachel Burden's life off-screen from well-known husband to baby admission
BBC Breakfast star Rachel Burden is a familiar face to millions of viewers, but she keeps her personal life very much underwraps BBC Breakfast's Rachel Burden is the go-to hero, frequently stepping in at the eleventh hour to fill in for her colleagues Naga Munchetty, Charlie Stayt, Sally Nugent, and Jon Kay when they're away from the show. Last year, the journalist and mother of four took over for Naga, joining forces with Charlie Stayt on the famous red sofa. Viewers were quick to sing her praises, urging BBC bosses to secure Rachel as a mainstay on the morning programme. At that time, fervent viewers took to social media platform X to voice their support for Rachel, with one user pleading: "Please, can we keep Rachel instead of Naga?" Another fan echoed this sentiment, tweeting: "BBCBreakfast Rachel Burden is one of the better presenters on the BBC." A third viewer complimented the dynamic between Charlie and Rachel, saying: "This pairing of Charlie with Rachel seems to work well as with Nina....", reports the Express. A final person stated: "Rachel demonstrating how to do a good interview #BBCBreakfast." Many will fondly remember Rachel for her Sunday morning stints on BBC Breakfast alongside Roger Johnson, where their shared laughter and rapport shone through. The 50-year-old television presenter also has her own weekday breakfast show on BBC Radio 5 Live, where she has become a familiar voice to her audience since 2011. While Rachel's professional achievements are well known, her personal life away from the spotlight remains much more private. Famous husband Rachel is blissfully wed to BBC luminary Luke Mendham, famed for his roles in acclaimed programmes like BBC's Panorama, Britain's Secret Charity Cheats, BBC Horizon, and Channel 4 Dispatches. The couple has been married for over two decades, even commemorating a significant wedding anniversary just last year. Rachel celebrated the momentous day on Instagram with a nostalgic photo from their nuptials. To honour their 20th anniversary, Rachel captioned: "It was 20 years ago today," and humorously shared: "So I *made* him put on that old suit, because I loved my wedding dress so much." She also recounted: "And we celebrated with beautiful friends who married in the same church the day before us - although we only found out when we moved in opposite them three years later (and were both pregnant and due on the same date)." Concluding with a hopeful note, she expressed: "Anyway, we made it. And I quite fancy having a go at another 20." Family life The mother of four is an avid sharer of her family life on social media, posting pictures of her children and their family adventures. Residing in Cheshire, Rachel, Luke, and their children – Rose, Alice, Sam, and Henry – relish their time spent exploring the great outdoors together. Back in 2017, Rachel opened up about her dream of a large family; while Luke seemed satisfied with their family as it was, Rachel harboured a desire for a fourth child. In a heartfelt interview with Cheshire Live, Rachel revealed: "I spent quite some time persuading my journalist husband, Luke, that our family would be complete with a fourth child; quite something when we had originally planned to have only two." "Selfish" admission Rachel recently sparked a heated discussion during her appearance on the Mid Point Podcast with Gabby Logan, where she reflected on the birth of her fourth child and pondered whether her decision was "selfish" for prioritising her desire over potential birth risks. Despite having three previous children with relatively uncomplicated deliveries, Rachel confessed that she hadn't considered the possibility of complications arising - a reality she unfortunately faced when her son was born prematurely at 31 weeks. In a candid conversation with Gabby, Rachel expressed regret: "I had three very sort of straightforward pregnancies and I made the terribly arrogant assumption I'd have a fourth baby and it would be fine and straightforward." She continued, sharing her introspection: "And I think sometimes when I reflect on it, I think it was a really selfish thing to do. I came from a big family - I really wanted a big family," highlighting her deep-seated desire for a large family unit. Viewers can catch BBC Breakfast every morning on BBC One, starting at 6am.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
The death of banter and the BBC
I may be the last person in the UK to have seen the 1999 film Human Traffic (rereleased last month). Justin Kerrigan's inspired, low-budget comedy – which I watched this week – is about a group of clubbers and ecstasy-heads out for a night's fun in Cardiff. Starring actors like John Simm, Shaun Parkes and Danny Dyer, it not only showed a reckless abandonment to hedonism now consigned to history, but also celebrates the kinds of friendships among the young which you suspect, in an age of social media, don't even exist anymore. This disparate group of people, all with the drabbest of day-jobs, meet in a pub each Friday to prepare themselves for the chemical onslaught of the night ahead, desperate for the walls between them to dissolve: 'We've all got to try and get on the same level together… so we feel like a unit when we hit the club.' Though occasionally they turn on each other in drug-fuelled paranoia, they're still there for one another, forgiving indiscretions, sometimes baring their souls, always ready to congregate at the usual pub table to enjoy each other and lend moral support. Getting decidedly mixed reviews on its release, Human Traffic is now seen as one of those zeitgeisty films about a lost world. Quite how lost that world really is comes home with an article published in a broadsheet this week about the BBC, revealing (hang onto your pearls) that an unnamed 'prominent female presenter… ranked among the corporation's top 50 highest-paid employees' once showed 'a lewd picture to a colleague… [an] unsolicited nude photograph of an unknown man.' The traumatised colleague – who presumably never watches the BBC or any other channel after 9 p.m. – is said to have been 'a junior member of staff.' A source at the BBC acknowledged that the move was meant only to be 'jokey, locker-room type banter' and that an apology had been made to the young woman involved, but that she had been 'completely horrified' and said she 'cried about it.' Perhaps the photo was unusually graphic, or the young woman's religion (if she had one) was a factor. Perhaps there's a wider context to it all. Doubtless there will be apologies, shamings, even sackings, and it will all come out. 'As soon as the name of this woman – and details of her bad behaviour – are unleashed,' the source adds, 'it will derail entire departments and mark the first female to be formally swept up into the BBC's wrongdoing roll call.' Yet, until we're told more, many might consider this a slight overreaction to a naughty photograph. Are scores being settled, by any chance? One feels, despite everything, sorry for the BBC. There it is, the bloated, sermonising, tumour-ridden Leviathan beset by endless scandal and accusations of bias or 'selective reporting'. In a world where it's no longer trusted, heeded nor esteemed, where competing services (YouTube among them) offer more relevant and compelling content, it still makes its annual financial demand on us – like some toothless old gangster trying to run a protection racket long after the triads have moved in. One understands too the corporation's hysteria following genuine scandals like that of Jimmy Savile or Huw Edwards. The ice on which the BBC stands grows thinner and more brittle by the day. Yet seeing stories like the above, coming so closely after the recent sacking of John Torode from MasterChef, the words 'witch hunt' come to mind. This is something that should concern us all. You could break down the complex of people who have helped engineer this joyless, sullen atmosphere over the past decade. There's the trembling, litigious worker dashing to HR when certain pieties are infringed. The HR manager's pharisaic, ovine concern – 'We take your hurt very seriously. This company should be a safe space for all its workers.' The newspaper editors who, should the case come to light, print po-faced articles, inflaming the outrage; the columnists who join in, clicking their tongues for clickbait. And the rest of us, mostly too scared to say what we are thinking: 'For God's sake stop being so silly. Is this what we Brits have become?' It may be that in an ideal world you wouldn't show naked pictures of anyone to a work colleague (one senses the scolds, puritans and careerists about to have a field day) but in an even more ideal world (which many of us recall) your colleague, even one bereft of humour, might at least have had a sense of proportion. You wouldn't have been reported and a simple apology, should anyone require one, would have sufficed. A prim, zero-tolerance, panicky atmosphere at work – and its eager cheerleading by an assenting media class – is good news for no one, nor does it lead to a happier or more efficient company. More likely it means greater isolation, less trust and goodwill, more people having sleepless nights worrying about things they've said at work, and their possible misinterpretation. It means fewer jokes, less laughter, more of us opting for a risk-free blandness of manner that's an insult to the personalities and talents we've been given. More people may opt to work from home, and who can blame them? In their desire to make workplaces 'safe', HR managers have steadily turned them into potentially career-ending danger zones. 'Bring your whole self to work,' went the slogan a few years ago. Was that someone's sick joke? Most of us these days would hesitate to bring our whole selves to a WhatsApp chat with a close family member. A scene from Human Traffic, in fact, comes to mind. It's four a.m. in the morning, the ecstasy's wearing off and a roomful of party guests – so full of empathy and the urge to confide and commiserate a few hours before – are trying to deal with the worst comedown in history. They sit about, these people who once connected, now silent and faintly hostile, trying to dodge each other's eyes in the awful grey light of dawn. Each one has become the other's potential informer, judge and social executioner: 'The only thing you've got in common now is paranoia. It's coming through the walls man.' Who knew then that director Justin Kerrigan would be describing an entire country, 25 years on?
