Israel's Netanyahu ramps up attacks on Australian PM Albanese over Palestine stance as Jewish council urges restraint
Diplomatic ties between Australia and Israel have soured since Albanese's centre-left Labor government last week announced it would conditionally recognise Palestinian statehood, following similar moves by France, Britain and Canada.
The decision prompted Netanyahu to launch a personal attack on Albanese and he doubled down on his condemnation in an interview to be broadcast on Sky News Australia.
'I think his record is forever tarnished by the weakness that he showed in the face of this Hamas terrorist monsters,' Netanyahu said, after describing Albanese earlier this week as 'a weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews.'
Sky News Australia released the comments ahead of the broadcast of the full interview on Thursday at 8pm (1000 GMT).
Albanese on Wednesday played down Netanyahu's criticisms, saying he did not 'take these things personally' and that he treated the leaders of other countries with respect.
Last week, Albanese said the Israeli prime minister was 'in denial' about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, where the UN has warned of the risk of widespread starvation and international pressure is growing for Israel to allow unrestricted aid into the territory.
The Executive Council of Australian Jewry in separate letters sent on Wednesday to both leaders urged them to discuss differences through diplomacy rather than public posturing.
'We write to express our deep dismay and concern at the recent 'war of words',' the letters said.
'If things need to be said publicly, they should be said using measured and seemly language befitting national leaders. Australia and Israel are mature democracies and their governments need to act accordingly,' the council said.
Israel this week revoked the visas of Australian diplomats to the Palestinian Authority after Albanese's government cancelled the visa of an Israeli lawmaker over remarks it considered controversial and inflammatory.
Netanyahu has been facing global pressure over Israel's military offensive in the Gaza Strip, which has killed at least 60,000 Palestinians according to the enclave's health ministry, and displaced most of the population.
Israel's military announced the first steps of an operation to take control of Gaza City on Wednesday, calling up tens of thousands of reservists despite many of Israel's closest allies calling for it to reconsider.
The offensive began after Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel in October 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 more hostage. Israel is currently considering a new ceasefire proposal. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
The grotesque Gaza war which Asean has to take serious note — Phar Kim Beng
AUGUST 22 — The war in Gaza is no longer just a Middle Eastern tragedy. It has become a global cautionary tale — one that Asean can ill afford to ignore. The statistics emerging from Israeli military intelligence itself paint a stark picture of a war that has tilted almost entirely against civilians. Nineteen months into the conflict, Israel's own classified assessments reveal that just 17 percent of those killed were identified anti-Israeli resistance fighters, normally defined as Hamas or Islamic Jihad. The remaining 83 percent — five out of six deaths — were civilians. In numerical terms, out of more than 53,000 Palestinians killed, only about 8,900 were combatants. The rest were ordinary men, women, and children who happened to live in Gaza, caught in the path of relentless bombardment. This ratio of civilian casualties stands as one of the most extreme in recent decades of warfare, raising urgent questions about proportionality, accountability, and the erosion of international humanitarian laws. At first glance, the Gaza war might seem distant from Southeast Asia. Yet the principles at stake cut to the very core of Asean's own security and diplomatic architecture. The Association has long championed the sanctity of civilian life and the peaceful resolution of disputes — values enshrined in the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC) and reiterated in countless Asean declarations. If civilian slaughter on such a scale is normalised in one part of the world, it lowers the threshold for violence everywhere, including our own region. Southeast Asia is no stranger to conflicts where combatants blend into the civilian population, from southern Thailand to Mindanao in the Philippines. If Asean states ever adopt the logic that heavy civilian casualties are acceptable collateral in counterinsurgency or counterterrorism operations, the region could quickly descend into cycles of repression and radicalisation. Gaza's tragedy is a warning of what happens when restraint collapses. Asean leaders cannot ignore the humanitarian catastrophe either. Malaysia and Indonesia, with their strong civil society movements and Muslim majorities, are already under domestic pressure to respond. The widespread perception across the region is that the Palestinians are being collectively punished. If Asean remains silent, it risks eroding its credibility as a moral and political actor in global affairs. Moreover, Asean has consistently presented itself as a champion of multilateralism and a bridge between civilisations. The Gaza war has become a civilisational wound, fuelling Islamophobia in the West and anti-Western sentiment in the Global South. This picture taken from a position on Israel's border with the Gaza Strip, shows destroyed buildings in the besieged Palestinian territory, at sunset on August 21, 2025. — AFP pic If Asean aspires to a larger global role — through platforms like the East Asia Summit or the Asean-Gulf Cooperation Council Dialogue — it must show that it has the moral clarity to speak out on issues that transcend borders. The Gaza conflict also carries strategic lessons that Asean cannot afford to overlook. First, the reliance on overwhelming military force without a political strategy is a recipe for perpetual insecurity. Israel's campaign may weaken Gazans and Palestinians temporarily, but it has radicalised an entire generation of them. Asean states facing separatist or insurgent challenges should heed this lesson: security cannot be achieved by firepower alone; it requires inclusive political settlements. Second, the role of external powers in enabling or constraining conflicts is a reminder of Asean's own vulnerability. The United States' continued supply of weapons to Israel, despite global condemnation, underscores how great powers will often prioritise their alliances over international law. Asean, situated at the heart of the US-China rivalry, must prepare for a world where the rules are bent by those powerful enough to do so. Neutrality and balance will not be enough; Asean must strengthen its own institutions and norms to shield the region from being trampled by larger geopolitical struggles. Third, the Gaza war demonstrates the power of information. The revelation that Israel's own intelligence database confirms the overwhelming civilian toll was not meant for public view. Yet once exposed, it reframes global discourse and challenges official narratives. For Asean, where control of information remains sensitive in many member states, the lesson is clear: truth has a way of surfacing, and when it does, governments must be prepared to face the moral and political consequences. The Gaza war demands that Asean find its voice. As the chair rotates annually, each host country must use the Asean platform to advocate for adherence to humanitarian principles in all conflicts, not just those close to home. Malaysia's chairmanship in 2025-2026, with its theme of 'Sustainability and Innovation,' presents an opportunity to anchor Asean's moral compass in a turbulent world. Asean's silence risks being interpreted as acquiescence to the erosion of humanitarian norms. Its strength has always been in offering a middle path — quiet diplomacy, consensus, and bridge-building. These qualities are urgently needed not just in Southeast Asia, but also in reminding the world that indiscriminate slaughter must never be normalised, even in wars waged against terrorism. The war in Gaza is more than a conflict between Israel and Hamas. It is a brutal demonstration of how quickly the laws of war can be abandoned, how readily civilian life can be discounted, and how fragile international norms truly are. For Asean, it is not enough to watch from the sidelines. To remain relevant in global affairs, the region must take note of Gaza — not as a distant tragedy, but as a living warning of what happens when restraint gives way to retribution. Asean must remember: silence in the face of such devastation is not neutrality — it is abdication. * Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies and Director of the Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies at the International Islamic University of Malaysia. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
US says all 55 million visas fair game for review
WASHINGTON: All 55 million foreigners who hold visas for the United States are subject to continuous review, the State Department warned Thursday as President Donald Trump ramps up his crackdown on visas and immigration. 'The Department's continuous vetting includes all of the more than 55 million foreigners who currently hold valid US visas,' a State Department official said. 'The State Department revokes visas any time there are indications of a potential ineligibility, which includes things like any indicators of overstays, criminal activity, threats to public safety, engaging in any form of terrorist activity or providing support to a terrorist organization.' The official did not say that all 55 million visas were under active review, but made clear that the Trump administration considered all of them fair game. The official, speaking on customary condition of anonymity, said that the Trump administration was stepping up scrutiny in particular for students. 'We're reviewing all student visas,' the official said, saying the State Department was 'constantly monitoring what people have said' on social media, which visa applicants are now required to show. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has proudly targeted anti-Israel protesters, using an obscure law that allows him to rescind visas for people deemed to counter US foreign policy interests. The State Department earlier said it has revoked 6,000 visas since Rubio took office in January with Trump. It marks four times as many student visas as president Joe Biden's administration revoked in the same period the previous year, according to the State Department. Rubio has argued that the administration has the right to issue and revoke visas without judicial review and that non-US citizens do not enjoy the US constitutional right to free speech. But the administration has faced setbacks in two of the highest-profile cases. Mahmoud Khalil, a legal permanent resident in the United States who led pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, was freed in June by a judge. Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish graduate student at Tufts University who wrote a piece in a campus newspaper critical of Israel, was freed by a judge in May pending arguments - AFP
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Khaled: Military's integrity unfazed by arrests
Shared commitment: (From left) Marles and Khaled posing for a photo after signing a joint statement at the 5th Malaysia-Australia HLC meeting on defence cooperation. — Bernama KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin says the recent arrest of several armed forces officers does not affect the overall integrity of the country's defence institution. The Defence Minister said these were isolated incidents which should not undermine the people's respect and trust for the armed forces. However, he advised military personnel to steer clear of any unlawful actions to avoid tarnishing the image of the armed forces. 'I hope no one abuses the rank or position entrusted to them. 'This case does not represent the armed forces which remains strong, respected and trusted by the people to defend the nation's sovereignty,' he said when launching the ministry's Fly the Jalur Gemilang Campaign in conjunction with National Month 2025 here yesterday. It was reported that three serving and two former armed forces officers were among 10 people arrested by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission to assist in investigations into a smuggling syndicate in southern Peninsular Malaysia. Khaled said the spirit of nationhood must be instilled in every citizen, especially among armed forces personnel and the defence community, , Bernama reported. He said the armed forces was not only a symbol of physical defence but also of sovereignty, integrity and the nation's independence. 'When we talk about independence, we immediately picture the warriors who defended the country. Every parade at Dataran Merdeka and Warriors' Day is a manifestation of the armed forces' image, and we must uphold this dignity,' he said. Khaled also urged society to revive the patriotic spirit and reject elements that could threaten national unity. 'This year's theme, 'Malaysia Madani, Rakyat Disantuni', is not an empty slogan but a call for each of us to serve the nation with sincerity and integrity. 'Flying the Jalur Gemilang is not just a mere symbol but represents patriotism, freedom and the nation's well-being,' he said. Meanwhile, Malaysia and Australia have reiterated their concern over developments in the South China Sea and the need for all states to resolve disputes peacefully in accordance with international law, particularly the 1982 UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea). In a joint statement released after the 5th Malaysia-Australia High Level Committee Meeting (HLC) here yesterday, Khaled and Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles raised their 'serious concern about developments in the South China Sea that undermine peace, security and stability in the region, including dangerous and unprofessional actions at sea and in the air, and excessive maritime claims inconsistent with international law.' They emphasised the importance of freedom of navigation and overflight consistent with UNCLOS, which provides the comprehensive legal framework for all activities in the oceans and seas, said the statement. Both ministers noted that maritime claims must be consistent with UNCLOS, emphasising the need for all states to resolve disputes peacefully in accordance with international law. Khaled and Marles also reaffirmed their commitment to Asean centrality, and Asean-led regional architecture that is open, transparent, rules-based and inclusive. On the HLC meeting, both ministers reaffirmed their deep defence cooperation and shared commitment to safeguarding regional stability. The meeting also marked several milestones, including the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, when the Malaysia-Australia defence partnership was first forged; the 75th anniversary of Australia's assistance during the Emergency; and the 70th anniversary of Australia's diplomatic presence in Malaysia. Both ministers reaffirmed the importance of Operation Gateway, which for more than 45 years has contributed to regional security and emphasised the commitment to further strengthen the initiative to enhance interoperability and safeguard the security of both nations in an increasingly complex regional environment. The joint statement also said that the ministers reiterated their commitment to the Five Power Defence Arrangements as a key pillar of regional security. The statement also mentioned Khaled's appreciation to Australia for supporting the infrastructure upgrade and runway refurbishment at the Royal Malaysian Air Force Butterworth Air Base.
