
German court lifts ban on ‘mouthpiece for right-wing extremists'
Founded in 2010 and edited by Jürgen Elsässer, Compact magazine had considerable reach beyond the hard-right bubble. It claimed a print circulation of 40,000 a month and millions of views online.
The magazine was officially classified as an 'extremist organisation' by Germany's domestic intelligence agency, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz, in 2021. Among the conspiracy theories that it promotes is the concept of 're-migration', a dog whistle for deporting ethnic-minority Germans.
The magazine promotes conspiracy theories
SEAN GALLUP/GETTY IMAGES
Nancy Faeser took the step to ban the magazine last year when she was interior minister . She labelled Compact a 'central mouthpiece of the right-wing extremist scene' — citing its antisemitic, racist and anti-democratic content. A federal administrative court in Leipzig then suspended Faeser's ban, pending a final ruling on Compact's appeal, which was issued on Tuesday, declaring that even inflammatory speech remains protected under the country's laws.
The presiding judge, Ingo Kraft, concluded that Compact's output, while polemic and sharply worded, did not cross the threshold into active hostility against the democratic order. 'The basic law guarantees freedom of opinion and the press even for enemies of freedom,' Kraft said.
Nancy Faeser ordered a ban on the magazine's publisher last year
MAXIMILIAN SCHWARZ/REUTERS
Germany's basic law provides MPs with the means to crack down on parties and speech like Holocaust denial that are deemed unconstitutional — a learning from its fascist past. However, there are no provisions allowing the ban of publications.
The interior ministry had resorted to banning the organisation that publishes Compact. The court said, however, that this violated the proportionality requirements as subversive activities were not central to its mission. Even sharp critiques of migration policy and revisionist takes on history must be tolerated in a pluralistic democracy, the court argued.
The ruling comes as a blow to proponents of a crackdown on extremism, as the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) has surged to become Germany's second-largest party.
In 2021, Germany's government had tightened laws punishing abuse against politicians. In one such case a journalist at a far-right magazine was convicted for sharing a manipulated image of Faeser showing her holding a fake sign with the words 'I hate freedom of opinion'.
• What is AfD? The reasons behind rise of the hard right in Germany
Elsässer celebrated the Compact ruling, and predicted that, if Compact could not be banned, then it would be impossible to ban the AfD.
The Social Democrats, the junior partner in Germany's coalition government, announced on Monday that they would push to start proceedings on banning the AfD, which was also recently labelled 'extremist' by the Verfassungsschutz.
Alexander Dobrindt, the current interior minister, said the government would respect and review the ruling, but added that 'banning organisations remains an applicable and possible tool against extremist endeavours'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Trump-Putin latest: Don hails ‘productive' talks with Vlad… but reveals ‘there is no deal yet' with ‘calls to be made'
'We didn't get there': Key lines from Trump and Putin statements Trump and Putin spoke side by side on stage in Alaska for around 10 minutes, signalling progress in their private talks but ending without a firm agreement. Here are the key takeaways: Putin says he is 'sincerely interested' in ending the conflict, which he called a 'tragedy.' He insists Russia must eliminate the 'primary causes' of the war and warns Ukraine and Europe not to 'sabotage' talks. He describes the meeting as a 'starting point for resolution' and calls his relationship with Trump 'business-like.' Putin agrees with Trump's claim that the war would not have started if he had been in office after 2020. Trump says there is still disagreement, adding: 'There is no deal until there is a deal' and 'we didn't get there' despite progress. He says 'many points were agreed to' but 'a few' remain — with 'one' being the most significant, without specifying. Trump says he will soon call Zelensky and European leaders, stressing it is 'ultimately up to them.' He ends by saying he will 'probably' see Putin again soon, to which the Russian president replies: 'Next time in Moscow.'


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Why Reform UK should be represented in the House of Lords
Much diminished from the glory days when it fielded prime ministers and vetoed legislation, the House of Lords remains an important part of Britain's democracy. Though still in constitutional limbo while politicians argue over whether it should be reformed or abolished, the Lords, with or without hereditary peers, performs an essential task in scrutinising legislation, raising issues of public concern and tidying up poorly drafted laws. Its strength is that it is increasingly non-partisan. Many peers are appointed after a lifetime of public service and sit as crossbenchers. They bring varied experience to the chamber, independent opinions and voting patterns untrammelled by party diktats. True, too many are still appointed as reward for slavish loyalty, as compensation for careers cut short or for filling party coffers. True, some recent appointments have been breathtaking in their frivolity and cynicism. It is true also that there are simply too many peers, with some turning up only for the minimum time to qualify for the daily allowance while their voices remain unheard and their views unknown. However it is finally constituted, the upper chamber, as in other western democracies, should be broadly representative of the nation, its voters and its vital interests. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, is therefore absolutely right in demanding that his party should be represented. It won 4.1 million votes in the general election, gained many seats in local elections, controls ten councils outright and may do well in future elections. The Greens, the Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru and the Ulster Unionists, all winning fewer votes, have 13 peers between them. • Reform peers? We don't need Putin apologists, says John Healey Bizarrely, nomination to the Lords is entirely in the prime minister's gift. There are several serious politicians affiliated to Reform. Sir Keir Starmer should put their names forward straight away.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Watch live: Trump and Putin's Alaska summit
US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin hold a joint news conference - follow live.