Coalition urges Nashville vote on fairgrounds future over NASCAR plan
Why it matters: There's growing chatter that a deal is close between O'Connell and Speedway Motorsports Inc. to revitalize the racetrack and bring back NASCAR to the fairgrounds.
The groups plan on releasing a joint statement Wednesday morning calling on city leaders to support a referendum.
The prospect of revitalizing the track has been stuck in political gridlock for 14 years.
Driving the news: The coalition of opponents includes neighborhood groups (South Nashville Action People and Belmont Hillsboro Neighbors), environmental groups (the Cumberland River Compact and the Southern Environmental Law Center) and community activist organizations (the progressive group NOAH's economic equity, jobs and transportation task force).
Those groups prefer the property be converted into a park and affordable housing, and for investments to be made in cleaning up Brown's Creek, which runs through the fairgrounds.
Flashback: Opponents pitched a plan two years ago to amend the Metro charter by replacing racing with affordable housing on the list of programming required at fairgrounds.
That effort stalled after a lawsuit challenged its legality.
Between the lines: The soonest a measure could be on the ballot is 2026.
There are two routes for Metro charter amendments: A petition drive, which requires thousands of voters to sign on in support, can trigger a ballot measure. Or Metro Council can also pass legislation to send a proposed amendment to voters for approval.
The intrigue: Metro council member Terry Vo, who represents the area, called the fairgrounds a "gem."
"Nashvillians have been clear: they want more affordable housing, more green space, and more walkable neighborhoods," Vo said in a statement. "That's why I support exploring alternative uses of the speedway site, including the idea of restoring part of it to scenic green space — a place where families can picnic, children can play, and neighbors can come together."
What they're saying: "While our neighborhood's proximity means we may experience the impacts of fairgrounds activities more frequently than others, we also recognize that this land is a public asset for the entire city," SNAP board president Shay Sapp said in a statement. "It should therefore be used in ways that reflect the shared priorities of all Nashvillians."
State of play: Previous Mayor John Cooper struck a deal with Speedway Motorsports in 2023 to essentially build a new racetrack. State law allows the city to use tax revenue generated at the property to help finance a racetrack plan.
The O'Connell administration and Speedway have been in talks over the last year about the possibility of a new deal.
Friction point: There is a disagreement about where the public stands on the issue. Opponents of the racetrack plan point to polling showing affordable housing and a park are popular alternatives to auto racing. Racing supporters point to their own polling showing public backing for preserving the 121-year-old track.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
a day ago
- Axios
Coalition urges Nashville vote on fairgrounds future over NASCAR plan
A coalition of neighborhood, environmental and community groups opposing a possible fairgrounds racetrack deal are calling on Mayor Freddie O'Connell and the Metro Council to let voters decide the fate of the embattled property. Why it matters: There's growing chatter that a deal is close between O'Connell and Speedway Motorsports Inc. to revitalize the racetrack and bring back NASCAR to the fairgrounds. The groups plan on releasing a joint statement Wednesday morning calling on city leaders to support a referendum. The prospect of revitalizing the track has been stuck in political gridlock for 14 years. Driving the news: The coalition of opponents includes neighborhood groups (South Nashville Action People and Belmont Hillsboro Neighbors), environmental groups (the Cumberland River Compact and the Southern Environmental Law Center) and community activist organizations (the progressive group NOAH's economic equity, jobs and transportation task force). Those groups prefer the property be converted into a park and affordable housing, and for investments to be made in cleaning up Brown's Creek, which runs through the fairgrounds. Flashback: Opponents pitched a plan two years ago to amend the Metro charter by replacing racing with affordable housing on the list of programming required at fairgrounds. That effort stalled after a lawsuit challenged its legality. Between the lines: The soonest a measure could be on the ballot is 2026. There are two routes for Metro charter amendments: A petition drive, which requires thousands of voters to sign on in support, can trigger a ballot measure. Or Metro Council can also pass legislation to send a proposed amendment to voters for approval. The intrigue: Metro council member Terry Vo, who represents the area, called the fairgrounds a "gem." "Nashvillians have been clear: they want more affordable housing, more green space, and more walkable neighborhoods," Vo said in a statement. "That's why I support exploring alternative uses of the speedway site, including the idea of restoring part of it to scenic green space — a place where families can picnic, children can play, and neighbors can come together." What they're saying: "While our neighborhood's proximity means we may experience the impacts of fairgrounds activities more frequently than others, we also recognize that this land is a public asset for the entire city," SNAP board president Shay Sapp said in a statement. "It should therefore be used in ways that reflect the shared priorities of all Nashvillians." State of play: Previous Mayor John Cooper struck a deal with Speedway Motorsports in 2023 to essentially build a new racetrack. State law allows the city to use tax revenue generated at the property to help finance a racetrack plan. The O'Connell administration and Speedway have been in talks over the last year about the possibility of a new deal. Friction point: There is a disagreement about where the public stands on the issue. Opponents of the racetrack plan point to polling showing affordable housing and a park are popular alternatives to auto racing. Racing supporters point to their own polling showing public backing for preserving the 121-year-old track.
Los Angeles Times
2 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
Metro bus ridership continues to dip. Are fears over ICE raids partly to blame?
Ridership across Metro's transit system plunged in June after federal immigration authorities conducted dramatic raids across Los Angeles County, sowing fear among many rail and bus riders. Last month, the transit agency's passenger numbers on buses continued to dip, although the reasons are not fully clear. Ridership on rail crept up roughly 6.5% in July after a decrease of more than 3.7 million boardings across the rail and bus system the month before. Bus ridership accounted for the bulk of the June hit, with a ridership drop of more than 3.1 million from May. In July, bus boardings continued to decrease slightly by nearly 2%. While it's possible that concerns over safety have persisted as immigration raids continued to play out in the Los Angeles region, a drop in bus ridership from June to July in years past has not been uncommon, according to Metro data. A review of the number of boardings from 2018 shows routine dips in bus ridership during the summer months. The agency said 'there is a seasonal pattern to ridership and historically bus ridership is lower in July than June when schools and colleges are not in regular session and people are more likely to take time off from work.' June saw a roughly 13.5% decline from the month before — the lowest June on record since 2022, when boardings had begun to climb again after the pandemic. The reduction in passengers was not felt along every rail line and bus route. Metro chief executive Stephanie Wiggins noted during a board of directors meeting last month that the K Line saw a 140% surge in weekday ridership in June and a roughly 200% increase in weekend ridership after the opening of the LAX/Metro Transit Center. Metro has struggled with ridership in recent years, first when the pandemic shuttered transit and then when a spate of violence on rail and buses shook trust in the system. Those numbers started to rebound this year and before June's drop, had reached 90% of pre-pandemic counts. But financial challenges have continued. Metro, which recently approved a $9.4 billion budget, faces a deficit of more than $2.3 billion through 2030. And federal funding for its major Olympics and Paralympics transportation plan to lease thousands of buses remains in flux. Maintaining ridership growth is critical for the the agency. More than 60% of Metro bus riders and roughly 50% of its rail riders are Latino, according to a 2023 Metro survey. The decline in June's ridership was due in part to growing concerns that transit riders would be swept up in immigration raids. Those fears were magnified when a widely shared video showed several residents apprehended at a bus stop in Pasadena. Three of the men who were arrested at the stop by federal agents are plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the Trump administration. They spoke earlier this month at a news conference in favor of the 9th U.S. Court of Appeals decision to uphold a temporary restraining order against the immigration stops and arrests. Pedro Vasquez Perdomo, a day laborer, said he was taken by unidentified men while waiting at the bus stop to go to work like he did every day. He said that he was placed in a small space without access to a bathroom or adequate food, water and medicine. Vasquez Perdomo said the experience 'changed my life forever' and called for 'justice.' Closures at stations during the raids and D Line construction beneath Wilshire Boulevard also affected June's numbers, according to Metro officials.
Washington Post
2 days ago
- Washington Post
Save this American eyesore
Regarding the Aug. 13 Metro article 'Congressman calls decades-old peace vigil a '24/7 eyesore'': People like Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-New Jersey) who concern themselves with the appearance of our nation's capital presumably do so out of respect for what it represents. However, isn't it also in the interest of our common national heritage that we preserve and protect freedom of speech and important historic sites?
