Germans claw their way back to thwart Kookaburras
It was the home nation's first FIH Pro League meeting of the European campaign.
The match on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST) fell on a special occasion for Queensland defender Tim Howard, who made his 150th international appearance in green and gold, as the Kookaburras sought to atone for their 1-2 loss to England.
Australia came out with the intensity that had seen them win five from six matches on their European tour.
But a second-half resurgence from Germany flipped the script, with the hosts delivering a blistering third quarter to snatch the lead and hold on in the final minutes.
"It was a tough game out there today,'' Howard said after the match.
"I've played with and against a lot of the guys over here in Germany in their domestic competition and they're a really tough team.
"They made the most of their opportunities and they really pushed after what was probably a poor start.''
Despite the loss, Howard said his milestone reflected how much he loved the sport and the team.
"The past 150 games have been amazing,'' he said.
"I'm loving it a lot, I'm loving it more than I probably ever have, and I'm very grateful to still be playing.
"I love this team, I love playing international hockey, so I'll try and do it for as long as I can."
Kookaburras coach Mark Hager made four changes to the side that went down to England on Sunday night, including the return of prolific striker Blake Govers.
Within three minutes, Govers rocketed home the opener off his right foot, his 161st international goal and his seventh in four games of the European tour.
Drag-flick specialist Joel Rintala then scored with a thunderous strike to double Australia's lead midway through the first quarter.
Germany responded in the second quarter, striking back through Gonzalo Peillat.
Australia's Ash Thomas was suddenly the busier of the two keepers, while Howard marked his milestone with a crucial tackle on the halftime buzzer to preserve the Kookaburras' 2-1 lead.
However, the third quarter belonged to Germany.
They levelled early with a well-worked field goal, then struck again moments later off a penalty corner to take the lead for the first time.
Both sides fought hard in the fourth quarter as Australia pushed desperately for an equaliser. Despite a late surge and mounting pressure, the Kookaburras couldn't find a way to send the match to a shootout.
The Netherlands lead the standings on 35 points, with the Kookaburras second on 27 points, with Belgium third and Germany fourth.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
22 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The trophy in Trump's Oval Office is everything that's wrong with world soccer
On the latter, Infantino has been the subject of intense hostility from domestic leagues and players' unions, to the point FIFA has been fighting legal fires over the world governing body's alleged 'abuse of dominance' and lack of consultation when adding to an insanely congested international calendar. This is understandable. A Europe-based player who participates in Euro 2024, the 2025 Club World Cup and the 2026 World Cup will effectively have zero rest for three straight off-seasons. There is no room to move, and how the Club World Cup affects the domestic season of Chelsea and PSG et al may yet be revealing. Then back into the oppressive North American summer heat they will go for a World Cup across three countries in the US, Canada, and Mexico. There's nothing like watching an injured player doing his best work. 'FIFA was put on earth really to regulate the global game and to run international football, and the Club World Cup is a move into club football,' Premier League chief executive Richard Masters said earlier this month. FIFPro president Sergio Marchi, meanwhile, labelled it 'nothing more than a fiction created by FIFA' and its 'grandiloquent staging inevitably reminiscent of the 'bread and circuses' of Nero's Rome'. There are so many more voices in this debate, but for the sake of brevity, let's stick with former Liverpool manager Jürgen Klopp, who called it 'the worst idea ever implemented in football in this regard'. Arsene Wenger, a vocal critic of fixture congestion throughout his previous role overseeing Arsenal, has now taken a 'fantastic competition' view in his current capacity as FIFA's chief of global football development. 'A real Club World Cup was needed,' said Wenger, who recently campaigned for a World Cup every two years. He added that every club involved would favour this format moving forward – and of course they would when the prize fund is $US1 billion. Chelsea received an estimated $US114.6 million; it is little surprise other big European clubs would like a piece of the pie. Real Madrid's reported push for a biennial cycle is apparently supported by other clubs who failed to qualify for this year's tournament, including Barcelona, Manchester United, Liverpool and Napoli. The proposal for 48 teams fits that agenda given that, unless FIFA lifts its cap of 12 European entrants and two from each country, expansion is the only way to ensure more European clubs (notwithstanding other cross-continental quirks in the qualifying criteria). But this tells us what the Club World Cup is not. It is not a bucket-list trophy like the World Cup or continental championships. The value is not in the prestige of the title. Had Inter Miami (demolished by PSG in the round of 16) won, Lionel Messi would not have retired any more contented for the privilege (he already has three of the old Club World Cups with Barcelona). There is no way he would have picked this space-age trophy over the World Cup he finally added to his otherwise complete CV in 2022. That is not to say the football was bad. Despite the naff, corporate anti-culture, the actual football was quite good, headlined by novelty rivalries and upsets galore. Al Hilal knocked out Manchester City and Auckland City drew held Boca Juniors to a draw. Then there was the standout quality and colour of Brazilian sides Flamengo (beat Chelsea), Botafogo (beat PSG), Fluminense (beat Inter Milan and made the semi-finals) and Palmeiras (topped their group and made the quarters). In this sense, the organisers were savvy, offering an extended hand to the peripheral or uninitiated football fan, and to America's diaspora who comprised a portion of these numbers (not that this was intended given the Trump administration's stance on diversity and immigration). It offered hope for the future of such an event, if treated more modestly. But FIFA is nothing if not bloated, and the money speaks for itself: the revenue averaged out at $US33 million per match. At that rate, why not add even more games? The problem here is that the world governing body is failing to recognise the law of diminishing returns that are less tangible than cold, hard cash. All that money has cheapened the global football ecosystem, in a surreal sort of inflation that disrupts its delicate balance without actually distributing wealth in a more equitable way. Diluting the game's meaning without addressing the yawning gap between rich and poor. Infantino, presumably the Nero in Marchi's metaphor, nevertheless hailed his pet project as 'a huge, huge, huge success' on the eve of the final. He did so from New York's Trump Tower, where FIFA has set up a base and where he refused to answer any questions regarding anything unrelated to the Club World Cup (like Saudi Arabia being awarded hosting rights to the 2034 World Cup) and even some things related to the Club World Cup (like Saudi's Surj Sports Investments largely bankrolling the tournament). And so, once again, propaganda wins the day. Soft power and influence and sportswashing remain the modus operandi, and Trump's trophy will keep playing its geopolitical part from the Oval Office. Loading Infantino is somewhere up in space, mapping the approximate positions of planets at the time of FIFA's foundation in 1904 and the Club World Cup's opening match in 2025. Orbiting the earth in pursuit of celestial symbols to engrave on his trophy, just to give others the chance to 'hold the world of club football in their hands'.
The Age
22 minutes ago
- The Age
The trophy in Trump's Oval Office is everything that's wrong with world soccer
On the latter, Infantino has been the subject of intense hostility from domestic leagues and players' unions, to the point FIFA has been fighting legal fires over the world governing body's alleged 'abuse of dominance' and lack of consultation when adding to an insanely congested international calendar. This is understandable. A Europe-based player who participates in Euro 2024, the 2025 Club World Cup and the 2026 World Cup will effectively have zero rest for three straight off-seasons. There is no room to move, and how the Club World Cup affects the domestic season of Chelsea and PSG et al may yet be revealing. Then back into the oppressive North American summer heat they will go for a World Cup across three countries in the US, Canada, and Mexico. There's nothing like watching an injured player doing his best work. 'FIFA was put on earth really to regulate the global game and to run international football, and the Club World Cup is a move into club football,' Premier League chief executive Richard Masters said earlier this month. FIFPro president Sergio Marchi, meanwhile, labelled it 'nothing more than a fiction created by FIFA' and its 'grandiloquent staging inevitably reminiscent of the 'bread and circuses' of Nero's Rome'. There are so many more voices in this debate, but for the sake of brevity, let's stick with former Liverpool manager Jürgen Klopp, who called it 'the worst idea ever implemented in football in this regard'. Arsene Wenger, a vocal critic of fixture congestion throughout his previous role overseeing Arsenal, has now taken a 'fantastic competition' view in his current capacity as FIFA's chief of global football development. 'A real Club World Cup was needed,' said Wenger, who recently campaigned for a World Cup every two years. He added that every club involved would favour this format moving forward – and of course they would when the prize fund is $US1 billion. Chelsea received an estimated $US114.6 million; it is little surprise other big European clubs would like a piece of the pie. Real Madrid's reported push for a biennial cycle is apparently supported by other clubs who failed to qualify for this year's tournament, including Barcelona, Manchester United, Liverpool and Napoli. The proposal for 48 teams fits that agenda given that, unless FIFA lifts its cap of 12 European entrants and two from each country, expansion is the only way to ensure more European clubs (notwithstanding other cross-continental quirks in the qualifying criteria). But this tells us what the Club World Cup is not. It is not a bucket-list trophy like the World Cup or continental championships. The value is not in the prestige of the title. Had Inter Miami (demolished by PSG in the round of 16) won, Lionel Messi would not have retired any more contented for the privilege (he already has three of the old Club World Cups with Barcelona). There is no way he would have picked this space-age trophy over the World Cup he finally added to his otherwise complete CV in 2022. That is not to say the football was bad. Despite the naff, corporate anti-culture, the actual football was quite good, headlined by novelty rivalries and upsets galore. Al Hilal knocked out Manchester City and Auckland City drew held Boca Juniors to a draw. Then there was the standout quality and colour of Brazilian sides Flamengo (beat Chelsea), Botafogo (beat PSG), Fluminense (beat Inter Milan and made the semi-finals) and Palmeiras (topped their group and made the quarters). In this sense, the organisers were savvy, offering an extended hand to the peripheral or uninitiated football fan, and to America's diaspora who comprised a portion of these numbers (not that this was intended given the Trump administration's stance on diversity and immigration). It offered hope for the future of such an event, if treated more modestly. But FIFA is nothing if not bloated, and the money speaks for itself: the revenue averaged out at $US33 million per match. At that rate, why not add even more games? The problem here is that the world governing body is failing to recognise the law of diminishing returns that are less tangible than cold, hard cash. All that money has cheapened the global football ecosystem, in a surreal sort of inflation that disrupts its delicate balance without actually distributing wealth in a more equitable way. Diluting the game's meaning without addressing the yawning gap between rich and poor. Infantino, presumably the Nero in Marchi's metaphor, nevertheless hailed his pet project as 'a huge, huge, huge success' on the eve of the final. He did so from New York's Trump Tower, where FIFA has set up a base and where he refused to answer any questions regarding anything unrelated to the Club World Cup (like Saudi Arabia being awarded hosting rights to the 2034 World Cup) and even some things related to the Club World Cup (like Saudi's Surj Sports Investments largely bankrolling the tournament). And so, once again, propaganda wins the day. Soft power and influence and sportswashing remain the modus operandi, and Trump's trophy will keep playing its geopolitical part from the Oval Office. Loading Infantino is somewhere up in space, mapping the approximate positions of planets at the time of FIFA's foundation in 1904 and the Club World Cup's opening match in 2025. Orbiting the earth in pursuit of celestial symbols to engrave on his trophy, just to give others the chance to 'hold the world of club football in their hands'.
News.com.au
43 minutes ago
- News.com.au
National survey reveals AFL is Australia's national sport, NRL third
A national survey has delivered NRL officials a reality in check in their rivalry with the AFL and posed questions about the Perth venture. More than 1000 people across all states and territories were asked which code they regarded as the “national sport� and the AFL was the overwhelming winner. Nearly 46 per cent of respondents picked the AFL, which has teams in five states compared with the NRL’s three, despite rugby league boasting an international presence and amid claims from ARL Commission boss Peter V’landys that his code had eclipsed their rivals as talks ramp up for a new TV deal Nationally, cricket came in as the second pick (20.5 per cent) with rugby league (14 per cent) third. Only in one state, NSW, was rugby league chosen ahead of other sports. Even in NSW, only 27 per cent picked rugby league as the national sport, marginally ahead of cricket (24 per cent) and AFL (21 per cent). The most respondents in the survey came from NSW. In Queensland, a state long thought to be a rugby league stronghold, AFL came out on top, with just less than 35 per cent of the vote, on the back of the growth of the Brisbane Lions, last year’s premiers, and the emerging Gold Coast Suns. In the Sunshine State, which boasts four NRL teams and only two AFL teams, rugby league came in third, behind the AFL and cricket, with only 20 per cent of those surveyed choosing it as the national sport. Worryingly, ahead of the NRL’s push into Perth in 2028, less than 5 per cent of West Australian respondents chose rugby league as the national sport compared with 69 per cent choosing AFL. The results of the “sports perception� survey, conducted by Net World Sports, come after V’Landys said the NRL had “overtaken� their AFL rivals. “They always looked down at us as the poor cousin, but we’ve overtaken them in audience. They thought we were inferior, but we’re not,� he said. That’s despite the AFL smashing the seven million mark for match attendance in 2025, with crowd averages of 37,000 spectators per game compared with the NRL’s 20,000.
