Teen, 15, nearly died after falling ill with a bacterial infection while menstruating
A woman reveals how she slipped in a coma and almost died after suffering toxic shock syndrome . rom a tampon as a teenager
Now, Shannon Turner has laid bare the horrifying ordeal exclusively with DailyMail.com, saying: 'It put me in a coma and nearly took my life - I hadn't even had my period for a full year yet.'
Shannon, who just 15-years-old and on a family vacation at the time, revealed she began to feel sick in the evening after she landed, but she assumed it was just jet lag, but woke up the next day with extreme symptoms, including: vomiting, diarrhea, a fever, and fatigue.
She continued: 'I was brought to the doctor that afternoon, given a shot for nausea, and sent home.'
'I continued to deteriorate and was brought back to the doctor later that same day.'
She recalled: 'My last memory is collapsing in the office and laying on the ground because it hurt too much to sit up.'
'My heart rate was extremely high, my blood pressure was dangerously low, and I was rushed to the ICU. I didn't wake up until a few days later.'
While Shannon was unconscious, doctors worked furiously to diagnose her - initially misdiagnosing her with meningitis and nearly performed an unnecessary spinal tap.
She said: 'Thankfully, my mom mentioned to a family member that I was on my period - and that's when menstrual toxic shock syndrome (mTSS) was suggested.'
'The doctors were informed and my treatment plan shifted. I was incredibly lucky the infectious disease doctor on call had studied toxic shock and knew exactly what to do, but because mTSS progresses so quickly, I was still given a 50/50 chance of survival.'
She explained that after the doctors saved her life, she was sent home with 'little guidance' on what to expect during recovery, or how long her symptoms would last - and the aftermath was brutal.
'My hospital stay was only a few days, but the recovery afterward took much longer,' Shannon said.
'I dealt with memory loss, anxiety, attention issues, and depression. My periods also became extremely painful.
'From the age of 15, I was put on prescription painkillers to manage my menstrual pain.'
Her experience led to her starting her nonprofit, Protect Her Inc., which is dedicated to 'revolutionizing menstrual health education.'
'We believe knowledge is power - and yet, so many people are navigating their cycles with almost none,' she pointed out.
'I began to see why [there were no recourses], because periods have been taboo for far too long. It's the same reason I never talked about my experience with mTSS, and that silence was incredibly isolating.'
Now, over 15 years later, Shannon regularly shares tips on how to avoid the life-threatening situation happening to other people - as well as the symptoms she ignored.
'My message to anyone using tampons is: use the lowest absorbency possible. Your tampon should be saturated when you remove it - if your flow is light, opt for a liner instead,' she listed.
She also advises against using tampons overnight, noting if you begin to get sick you won't notice the symptoms if you're asleep.
'We need to stay aware of what our bodies are telling us - especially when there's a foreign object inside us,' she pointed out.
Shannon added it's important to learn about the brands of sanitary products you're using, and make sure you're comfortable with their ingredients and manufacturing standards.
She urged: 'Most importantly, be in tune with your body. It's always communicating with us, if we take the time to listen.'
Shannon also advises people to immediately take a tampon out if they start feeling sick - describing the symptoms as flu-like.
She insisted: 'So [if you experience] headaches, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever - take the tampon out. If you feel even worse go seek medical attention.'
Shannon now hopes to educate young women through her non-profit, Protect Her Inc, which provides comprehensive menstrual education to adolescents aged seven to 18, with 'a focus on practical knowledge that fosters confidence, health literacy, and open dialogue.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
32 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
What you need to know about sarcoma – the cancer you've never heard of
When most people think of cancer, names like breast, lung, or prostate cancer instantly come to mind. However, there's another, lesser-known form called sarcoma that affects thousands of people in the UK every year, yet rarely makes headlines. Despite its relative obscurity, it's one of the most aggressive and challenging cancers to diagnose and treat. Advertisement Ahead of Sarcoma Awareness Month (July), we got in touch with Helen Stradling, head of support and healthcare professional engagement services at Sarcoma UK, to find out exactly what sarcoma is, why awareness is so low, and what some of the early symptoms are… What is sarcoma? Sarcoma refers to a broad group of cancers that start in the bones and soft tissues. Photo: Alamy/PA. Sarcoma is a type of cancer that can appear anywhere in the body and everyday 15 people in the UK are diagnosed with it, according to Sarcoma UK's website. 'In terms of breast cancer, lung cancer and bowel cancer, it's very obvious where they come from, whereas the word sarcomas doesn't really tell you anything,' acknowledges Stradling. 'Sarcomas are cancers of the bits and pieces that put us together, like nerves, bones, blood vessels and fat cells.' There are many different subtypes of sarcomas, but they are generally grouped into two main categories. Advertisement 'The main types are sarcomas of bone and sarcomas of soft tissue,' explains Stradling. 'The most common soft tissue sarcomas are the GISTs (gastrointestinal stromal tumours), liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas, and in the bone sarcomas, the ones we tend to hear the most about are the osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcomas.' Why have many people never heard of sarcomas? 'I think it all comes down to the rarity of it,' says Stradling. 'We diagnose about 5,300 sarcomas in the UK every year, so it's very unlikely when somebody gets a sarcoma diagnosis that they've known somebody else that's had one. 'It's also not the type of cancer that you see spoken about very often in the media. A lot of people that get a sarcoma diagnosis have never heard of sarcomas before.' What are the symptoms? View this post on Instagram A post shared by Sarcoma UK (@sarcoma_uk) 'The main sign of a soft tissue sarcoma is a lump that you can see that is changing or growing,' highlights Stradling. 'Benign lumps are really common, but anyone who has a soft tissue lump anywhere on the body that is growing and changing needs to get that checked out.' Whereas, the main symptom of bone sarcomas is bone pain or swelling that tends to be worse at night. Advertisement 'There's a lot of reasons for joint and bone pain, but if you've got bone pain that you can't put down to any kind of injury, that is not relieving itself with painkillers or anything like that, and the pain wakes you at night, that's a red flag sign,' emphasises Stradling. However, GISTs sarcomas tend to be harder to identify. 'GISTs are a little bit more tricky, because you can hardly ever see anything from them,' says Stradling. 'It's more likely to show up with more subtle signs like bloating or blood in your vomit or stools. 'If you have got any these symptoms and you are being pushed back from healthcare professionals that you're seeing, we would urge you to keep going. If you are really concerned that it could be a sarcoma, mention the word to the professional so that it is something they can consider or start investigating.' Advertisement How is it diagnosed? Diagnosis of sarcomas usually start with an ultrasound or an X-ray. Photo: Alamy/PA. 'It usually starts with somebody either seeing their GP, a physio or a nurse and a lot of time it will be a soft tissue lump that's growing or bone pain,' says Stradling. 'With soft tissue sarcomas we tend to start with an ultrasound and with bone sarcomas we start with X-ray. 'If there's any concern that it might be something more sinister, the patient then has an MRI scan. But most importantly, once that MRI scan is done, we must get a biopsy, because with there being so many different subtypes, we need to know exactly which one we're dealing with to know which is the best treatment for you to have.' Like most forms of cancer, sarcomas can be found at different grades and are much easier to treat if you catch them early before they spread. 'The sooner we can get these diagnosed the better,' says Stradling. 'We know that getting patients into seeing the specialist teams and getting them started on treatment as soon as we can makes a huge positive difference for outcomes.' The primary focus of Sarcoma Awareness Month is to encourage earlier diagnosis and to improve treatment options for those affected by this disease. Photo: Alamy/PA. How is it treated? The primary treatment for sarcomas, both soft tissue and bone sarcomas, is surgery. The goal is to remove the tumour, along with a margin of healthy tissue to minimise the risk of recurrence, according to Sarcoma UK's website. Advertisement 'We really need to get the them at a size where we can do a surgery that isn't going to leave somebody with life-limiting mobility or not being able to do everything that they want to do,' says Stradling. 'We want to avoid the stage where the tumours have already spread, because then the treatments that we've got are limited.' Sarcomas can also be treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, often alongside surgery. 'We do use chemotherapy and radiotherapy for a number of sarcomas, but in a lot of the cases, we don't use them until they've already spread because we know that they're not as effective as we would like them to be,' explains Stradling. 'However, this is slightly different with the younger people that get the bone sarcomas, as they do tend to start with chemotherapy as a kickoff treatment. But in most cases, surgery is the first thing that needs to happen.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
NHS struggles to turn cash into care
The NHS is one of the worst health systems in the western world at converting money into better care, a report by the TaxPayers' Alliance suggests. Researchers examined data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development to compare 13 health systems, including in the UK, Canada, Australia, France and Germany, and found the UK had the lowest life expectancy and highest rates of avoidable deaths. It showed that the NHS struggled to convert funding into more resources such as doctors, nurses, hospital beds or scanners, with two thirds of its budget swallowed up by staffing costs, including pensions. The TaxPayers' Alliance report said: 'Without a serious improvement in productivity, the extra cash released by Rachel Reeves is unlikely to be noticed by patients.' The NHS was handed an extra £29 billion in Labour's spending review this month and is on track to take up 50 per cent of all public spending by the end of the decade. However, experts have warned that the money will be wasted unless the NHS can improve efficiency and productivity. The TaxPayers' Alliance report said the UK ranked third highest out of the 13 countries in terms of how much is spent on health as a percentage of GDP. However, it only ranked 12th by the metric of converting money into resources that can help treat patients. • The Times View: Wes Streeting must transform Britain's crippled health services The NHS also ranked 11th when it came to capital spending on new technology and hospitals. The researchers said priority 'must be given to capital investment over further expansions on staff' in order to boost productivity. The figures showed that the NHS spends 64 per cent of its budget on staffing, far more than comparable countries such as New Zealand or Ireland, which spend 42 per cent and 33 per cent respectively. This was largely due to generous public-sector pensions for doctors and other NHS staff. There have been calls for reforms to rebalance NHS remuneration away from pensions towards take-home pay. Last year a report by Lord Darzi highlighted a collapse in NHS productivity in the past decade. It found that the hospital workforce had risen by 17 per cent between 2019 and 2023, yet output had not risen at nearly the same rate, which was largely due to a failure to invest in upgrading equipment and buildings. • Darzi report: money alone can't cure what ails NHS Darwin Friend, head of research of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'Our comprehensive analysis of healthcare productivity is by no means all doom and gloom, with the NHS clearly performing well in some areas, particularly when looking at its use of existing resources. 'But it does paint a bleak picture for taxpayers, given the overwhelming evidence to suggest that the vast extra funding announced at the spending review will simply be throwing good money after bad without more fundamental and far-reaching reform. 'If the government wants to deliver on its promises, it will need to be far braver than politicians have been and consider changes previously considered unpalatable, including regional pay bargaining, the prioritisation of capital spending and a role for more insurance-based financing. 'It will also have to face down demands for increased pay, given the disproportionate amount of the NHS budget that is swallowed up by staffing.' Kristian Niemietz, head of political economy at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said: 'In state-run health systems like the British NHS, there is often a temptation to prioritise day-to-day spending over long-term investment. Politicians know that by the time the detrimental effects become apparent, somebody else will be in charge and it will be somebody else's problem. 'The paper also shows that while the NHS cannot be described as 'underfunded', it is in a very real sense under-resourced. These are not the same thing — a pile of cash does not magically transform itself into a doctor, a nurse or an MRI scanner. The NHS is remarkably bad at converting its financial resources into medical inputs.' The report analysed data from 13 countries: Portugal, South Korea, Norway, Germany, Spain, Australia, Ireland, Italy, Denmark, New Zealand, France, the UK and Canada.
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
10% of those attending sexual assault treatment units reported multiple assailants
One in 10 of all people attending sexual assault treatment units in Ireland last year reported that they had been attacked by multiple assailants. The latest annual report of the country's six sexual assault treatment units (SATUs) shows the proportion of cases where someone has been sexually assaulted by two or more individuals increased to 10 per cent in 2024 from nine per cent in 2023 and seven per cent in 2022. Advertisement It also revealed that the rate of use of weapons in incidents of sexual violence more than doubled to seven per cent last year with physical restraints being used in 36 per cent of all reported cases. The report said the latest figures could suggest an escalation in the severity of injuries sustained in incidents of sexual assault as the number of people requiring referrals for injury follow-up care increased by a third to 21 – two per cent of all cases. Five individuals needed to be hospitalised due to their injuries last year. The latest figures show 21 per cent of people who reported sexual violence expressed concern that they their drink may have been spiked while a further 17 per cent were unsure whether a drug-facilitated sexual assault had occurred. Advertisement They also reveal that the share of incidents where the perpetrator was described as a stranger also increased to 31 per ceny last year from 28 per cent in 2023 and 26 per ceny in 2022. However, there was a fall in the rate of 'recent acquaintance' assaults by someone who the victim has met in the previous 24 hours which decreased by 4 percentage points to 11 per cent in 2024. Overall, the report shows the number of people attending the HSE-funded SATUs fell by four per cent last year with a total of 1,021 people who had experienced sexual violence attending the six centres – down 41 on the previous year. The largest SATU in Dublin recorded a 13 per cent decrease in attendances – down 57 compared with the previous year to 394 in 2024 while there was an 18 per cent decrease in numbers at the Galway centre – down 24 to 113. Advertisement The other four centres – Cork, Mullingar, Letterkenny and Waterford – all reported modest increases in the number of people using their services. Approximately half of all people attending SATUs last year were aged under 25, while the average age of attendees was 28 years. The report revealed two per cent of individuals attending SATUs were aged under 14 years. According to official figures, 91% of people using SATU services in 2024 were female, while eight per cent were male and one per cent identified as another gender or none – a similar trend to recent years. Advertisement Approximately 7 out of 10 people attending SATUs last year identified themselves as Irish. Individuals from 57 other nationalities also availed for SATU services with four per cent of all cases needing the assistance of a translator. The report shows a third of all incidents of sexual violence reported at SATUs occurred in Dublin, while 83 per cent occurred within Ireland. A further 7.5 per cent took place in the rest of Europe. Advertisement While weekend days of Friday, Saturday and Sunday continued to account for the largest proportion of incidents, their share decreased from 79 per cent in 2023 to 56 per cent last year. The report reveals that 35 per cent of people attending a SATU last year did so less than 24 hours after their experience of sexual violence with another 25 per cent seeking assistance between 24 and 72 hours. The overwhelming majority of incidents (82 per cent) occurred between 8pm and 8am. More than two-thirds occurred indoors with 22 per cent in the victim's home and 21 per cent in the assailant's home. Despite some lack of facilities, the report showed that 95 per cent of people were seen within three hours of a request for a forensic clinical examination – the highest rate ever and ahead of the target of 90 per cent. However, it also highlighted how a third of cases where there was a delay beyond three hours was due to a SATU being 'unavailable for use.' SATU national clinical lead, Maeve Eogan, said in most cases this generally meant a unit was unavailable because another case was in progress. Another 24 per cent of delays were due to the unavailability of a forensic clinical examiner and 21 per cent due to the absence of SATU support staff. 'These findings highlight the need for additional forensic suites and sufficient staffing, particularly in high-demand units,' said Prof Eogan. She added: 'It remains imperative that people can access responsive care in a timely fashion and that all aspects of society are aware of the prevalence and potential impacts of sexual violence, and the location and type of services available.' Just over half of all individuals (52 per cent) attending a SATU last year opted for a forensic clinical examination which is available to anyone aged 14 years or over who wants to make a complaint to An Garda Síochána about experiencing sexual violence which has occurred within the previous seven days. A quarter of people, who did not want to report the matter to gardai, opted for a sexual health screen with no forensic samples taken while 13 per cent, who were undecided about notifying gardaí about what happened to them, chose a forensic clinical examination where forensic samples are securely stored for a period of up to 12 months. The report also highlighted how SATU staff continued outreach activity last year including attendance at a number of concerts and festivals. Prof Eogan said engagement and collaboration with communities was increasingly recognised as an important factor in creating awareness, reducing incidents, facilitating disclosure and provide a swift care response for those who have experienced sexual violence. 'Nobody ever 'wants' to attend a SATU and we never cease to be amazed by the strength that our service users display, despite the significance of the events they have experienced,' Prof Eogan remarked.
