To the Astronomer crew -- past and present ...: Astronomer's ex-employees writes a long LinkedIn post on Andy Byron's 'Kiss-Cam' scandal; interim CEO Pete DeJoy reacts
Astronomer, the software company at the centre of the 'kiss cam' scandal, announced that Cofounder and Chief Product Officer Pete DeJoy will be serving as interim CEO, as it sent Andy Byron on leave. And yes, in a new update a few hours later, the company said that Andy Byron has resigned, and the Board of Directors has accepted his resignation. As the video of Astronomer CEO Andy Byron and HR head Kristin Cabot caught together at a Cold Play concert went viral, memes too started flooding the internet.
Commenting on the same, a former Astronomer employee Zachary Hensley wrote a long LinkedIn post on the 'Kiss-Cam' scandal. Hensley was the vice president of technology and operations at Astronomer from 2019 to 2024. He is currently President of Livegistics.
In the post, he admitted that he's laughed at Byron's expense following his scandal. 'Yes, I've laughed at the memes.' At the same time, he went on to add that Astronomer as a company are much more that this: 'But I also know Astronomer is more than one moment or one person. It's a team of smart, kind, driven people doing incredible work. And I'll always be rooting for them.'
He concluded his lengthy post by writing, 'To the Astronomer crew—past and present—I love y'all. Keep going. Keep building. You've got this.' Among others, the post got a response from Astronomer's interim CEO Pete DeJoy. He has 'Liked' Hensley's LinkedIn post.
Zachary Hensley's full LinkedIn post on Astronomer CEO's Kiss Cam scandal
The last couple days have been . . . weird, as a former Astronomer employee. I've seen the memes (and shared more than a few), reconnected with
folks I haven't talked to in a couple of years, and felt a strange mix of pride, nostalgia, and whiplash. I won't weigh in on the recent incident or the individuals involved, but I do want to say something about the company and the people.
I joined Astronomer in late 2019 as employee 19 and left in early 2024. In those 4+ years, I wore nearly every hat, leading: sales ops, customer success, support, IT, HR ops, FP&A, security, compliance, platform engineering and operations, and more. I was also undefeated in Slack GIFs. (Ask anyone). It was one of the hardest things I've ever done; but it was also the most rewarding stretch of my life.
We built something pretty rad during those years. Yes, we built a product (or, products, I suppose. I lost count at which version of cloud we were on when I left), but we also built a team that cared deeply for one another. We raised our Series A on Zoom in the first days of COVID, when no one knew if that was even possible. We raised our B. Then our C. We navigated the SVB collapse and multiple RIFs. And through all of that, the people held strong and genuinely loved and gave a shit about each other.
Startups are weird. They're intense. And if you weren't in one during the pandemic, it's hard to describe just how intense. But I will always remember how many of us leaned in to support each other, even when it had nothing to do with work.
That spirit didn't disappear when I left. I still know many of the folks there, and I know they care. They care about the product. About the customers. But, most importantly, they care about each other.
So, yes, I've laughed at the memes. But I also know Astronomer is more than one moment or one person. It's a team of smart, kind, driven people doing incredible work. And I'll always be rooting for them.
To the Astronomer crew—past and present—I love y'all. Keep going. Keep building. You've got this.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
The data is clear: you should stop trading and invest in mutual funds instead
In a recent LinkedIn post, Zerodha CEO Nithin Kamath cited a study by Elm Wealth in which 118 finance students were given the first page of the Wall Street Journal a day in advance for trading. They got the direction right about half the time but faltered on risk management. Half lost money, and 16% went bankrupt. They earned a paltry 3.2% on average, compared to a 130% average return by five experienced traders. Markets regulator Sebi has similar thoughts about small investors. Its latest research on the performance of individual traders in Indian derivatives showed 90% lost money for the fourth straight year. These 9.6 million individuals collectively blew ₹1.05 trillion in 2024-25. The number of trades has grown 2.2 times since 2021-22, and losses have increased 2.6 times, reflecting the higher risk investors have been taking in search of quick gains since the pandemic. Another type of investing has also grown during this period: the mutual fund systematic investment plan (SIP), which requires more discipline but is also far more rewarding in the long term. More than 90% of open-ended equity funds have delivered a compound annual return of over 20% in the past five years. Cash contraction Despite yawning gaps in performance, small investors continue to flock to short-term trading. Many are into derivatives or the cash segment, where they take positions in stocks that they square off the same day. A Sebi research paper released in July 2024, which studied the behaviour of 6.9 million individual investors in the cash segment, showed about 36% were also conducting intra-day trading. The performance of these individual day traders was poor: 70% made losses in such trades, and the figures were similar over three periods. The share of such traders aged below 30 increased from 18% in 2019-20 to 48% in 2023-24. Over this period, investor participation increased three-fold in tier-I cities, five-fold in tier-II towns, and 10-fold and tier-III towns. IPO flipping A similar penchant for short-term returns is seen in initial public offerings (IPOs)—the first time a company sells shares to the general public. Retail investors—those who applied for less than ₹2 lakh worth of shares in a public issue—sold about 43% of shares (in value terms) allotted to them within a week of listing, a Sebi study in September 2024 showed. By comparison, qualified institutional buyers sold only about 20% of their allotment within a week. The Sebi study covered 144 IPOs and 9.27 million unique shareholders (9 million retail investors) between April 2021 and December 2023. Many were new to the market, with about 48% of the underlying demat accounts opened between 2021 and 2023. They also had a tendency to quickly sell IPO shares that made gains while holding on to those that were losing money. Disciplined investing The number of demat accounts in India shot up from about 40 million in December 2019 to about 192 million in March 2025. The number of operational SIPs has tripled from about 31 million in March 2020 to about 92 million in June 2025, while SIP assets grew about 6.4 times. Investors are also holding on to their mutual funds longer. An Amfi-Crisil study showed the share of SIP assets held for more than three years increased from 13% in March 2020 to 52% in March 2025. During this period, 60% of open-ended equity funds beat their benchmark, and nearly 90% delivered compound annual returns above 20%. Given the risk-reward equation, most small investors ought to be long on equities. is a database and search engine for public data
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pete DeJoy education qualification: How a science grad from Bowdoin College is now steering Astronomer as interim CEO
In the startup world, leadership transitions are often swift and strategic. But few unfold under the kind of spotlight that recently surrounded Astronomer, the data orchestration company best known for commercialising Apache Airflow. When former CEO Andy Byron stepped down amid a wave of media attention and controversy, the company didn't look to external talent or polished executive search firms. Instead, it turned to someone who had been there since the beginning, Pete DeJoy. DeJoy, a co-founder of Astronomer, wasn't just another name on the leadership bench. He had spent years helping shape the company's technical and cultural identity from the ground up. His educational journey, which began in the chemistry and physics departments of Bowdoin College, reflects a grounding not in corporate theory, but in systems thinking, scientific discipline, and analytical rigor. Dejoy's powerful foundation at Bowdoin College Bowdoin College, located in the quiet town of Brunswick, Maine, has long been known for its strong liberal arts tradition. It is not a school typically associated with Silicon Valley-style disruption, but it has a history of producing thinkers with the curiosity and depth needed to lead in complex environments. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo DeJoy's bachelors in chemistry and physics gave him exactly that, a foundation built not just on formulas and lab reports, but on critical thinking, research-based inquiry, and long-term problem-solving. Unlike many startup leaders who lean on business school pedigrees, DeJoy's path has been shaped by his exposure to scientific complexity and intellectual versatility. The cross-disciplinary nature of his education seems to have quietly influenced his leadership style. Whether debugging a data pipeline issue or navigating a boardroom conversation, he brings a methodical approach rooted in the habits of a trained scientist. Building Astronomer from the ground up DeJoy's role at Astronomer predates the company's rapid growth and recent media buzz. In his own words, shared via LinkedIn, he has 'poured his entire professional life' into the company. What began as a focused mission to help businesses adopt and manage Apache Airflow more effectively has, over time, evolved into a central player in the global data and AI infrastructure stack, as he also noted. Much of that growth happened under the radar, with DeJoy at the helm of product and platform development. The pandemic years tested the startup's agility, scaling the company from 30 to 300 employees without ever gathering in the same room. Through these challenges, DeJoy remained a constant, solving hard problems, staying late to fix what was broken, and mentoring new engineers who joined the ride. Rising to lead in an unexpected moment When Astronomer recently found itself under public scrutiny, DeJoy stepped into the interim CEO role with quiet clarity. His LinkedIn post announcing the transition struck a rare balance of realism and resolve. 'The spotlight has been unusual and surreal,' he acknowledged, while quickly redirecting focus to the company's mission, team culture, and customer trust. DeJoy's rise to the interim CEO role is not a conventional tech story. He didn't major in business or computer science, nor did he leap from a top-tier accelerator into a unicorn valuation. His journey has been slower, more embedded, and arguably more hands-on. His education in physics and chemistry shaped a mindset that values experimentation, persistence, and clarity, all qualities that now serve him in the CEO seat. In an ecosystem often obsessed with scale and speed, DeJoy's story reminds us that leadership can come from the lab bench as much as the boardroom. His Bowdoin education didn't just train him in scientific theory, it taught him how to think critically, navigate ambiguity, and stay anchored in complexity. As interim CEO, these are precisely the skills Astronomer seems to need most. As of mid-2025, Astronomer stands at a pivotal juncture. With Pete DeJoy now leading the company through a sensitive transition, attention has turned to how the platform will evolve in the growing world of enterprise AI. While it remains unclear whether he will stay on as permanent CEO, his appointment signals a vote of confidence in technical stewardship, founder commitment, and educational depth. DeJoy's story offers an encouraging message to students and early-career professionals: you don't need to take the obvious path to end up at the top. Sometimes, the scientist really does steer the ship. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
xAI Project Skippy asked workers to record their facial expressions to train Grok, report says
Elon Musk's artificial intelligence venture xAI asked its employees to record themselves expressing emotions and having conversations, as part of an internal project to help train its AI chatbot Grok, Business Insider has reported. The initiative, internally known as 'Project Skippy,' was launched in April and involved over 200 employees. The goal was to teach Grok how to recognise and analyse human facial expressions and emotional cues. Workers, particularly AI tutors, who help train the company's large language model, were asked to film themselves in 15- to 30-minute conversations with colleagues, playing both the role of user and AI to internal documents and Slack messages that were reviewed by Business Insider, several employees were uncomfortable. Apparently, many even raised questions about how their likeness might be used in the future, and some chose to opt out project lead reportedly told employees in a recorded meeting that Skippy would help 'give Grok a face,' and that the video data could be used to eventually develop avatars of people. However, the engineer reassured workers that the recordings were only for internal training and would not be made public. 'Your face will not ever make it to production,' they said. 'It's purely to teach Grok what a face is.' Still, workers had to sign a consent form that granted xAI 'perpetual' access to their likeness. This included not just training purposes but also use in commercial products and services. While the form stated that the data would not be used to create a digital copy of the worker, it wasn't enough to allay xAI staff were guided on how to have natural conversations during the recordings. They were asked to maintain eye contact, avoid one-word replies, and were even given suggested discussion topics, some of which were apparently surprisingly personal or provocative, such as 'How do you secretly manipulate people to get your way?' or 'Would you ever date someone with a kid or kids?'The project came just weeks before xAI launched lifelike avatars named Ani and Rudi, which move their lips and make realistic gestures. Users on social media were quick to show that the avatars could be prompted into disturbing behaviours. Ani engaged in sexually suggestive conversations, while Rudi made threats of violence, including bombing banks. xAI, last week, also launched a chatbot for children called Baby Grok was recently caught in another controversy for making antisemitic remarks, which followed another instance of Grok passing racist comments in replies to users on X.- EndsTune In
