Wife Earns Rs 75 Lakh, Husband Has Rs 14-Lakh Govt Job: Who Pays Alimony To Whom?
In a rare reversal of roles, a divorce case in India has sparked heated debate online after a 34-year-old IT professional expressed fears of having to pay alimony to her government employee husband. The case, which surfaced on Reddit, challenges the traditional norm where husbands are usually ordered to support their wives financially after separation.
The woman, earning around Rs 75 lakh annually, shared her predicament, asking, 'Will I have to pay alimony to my husband?" Her 35-year-old husband, by contrast, earns Rs 1.2 lakh per month, totalling approximately Rs 14 lakh annually.
In her post, she detailed that her husband had financially and emotionally mistreated her throughout their five-year marriage and is now demanding money from her.
The woman shared that hers was a love marriage, but the relationship has now deteriorated badly. She fears her husband will not agree to a mutual consent divorce without demanding money, forcing her to consider filing for divorce on grounds of mental cruelty. According to her, she has call recordings and bank records as evidence of his abuse. Earlier, the couple lived together in a government quarter, but she has since moved out, citing safety concerns. Expressing fear for her life, she also asked whether she could file for divorce in another state to ensure her security.
Her post elicited various reactions on Reddit. Some users provided legal and economic perspectives. One user wrote, 'Yes, if your earnings were supporting his lifestyle, then he can ask for alimony. But since he has a permanent government job and accommodation, the alimony may be reduced or possibly even waived off if you did not directly fund his lifestyle."
Another user wrote, 'It is very rare to see a wife earning five times more than her husband. In such cases, alimony may have to be paid. The court usually fixes 20–33 percent of your income as alimony. Things like property, car, shares, and even gold can also be included in the calculation. So secure your assets in advance."
Support also came from users who pointed out the husband's potential additional income from bribes, given his government position, arguing the case was more about control than money.
One user wrote, 'He is a government employee, so he must be earning a lot of money from bribes. This seems to be more about control than money. It's sad that some people are supporting him just because he is a husband. Stay strong—this can happen to anyone, maybe even to their sisters tomorrow."
This case has ignited a broader debate on social media about gender roles and economic inequality. It raises questions about whether a higher-earning wife should pay alimony to her husband, especially when the husband has a secure government job.
The woman's story of enduring her husband's behaviour and striving for a better life resonated with many, providing inspiration to those in similar situations.
This case not only highlights the legal intricacies of divorce and alimony but also challenges traditional gender roles and economic expectations in society. It also highlights that women today are not only financially independent but also increasingly aware of their rights.
view comments
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Loading comments...
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Surat diamond factory heist was staged for insurance, owner, son and driver held: Police
In a twist in DK Sons diamond factory heist, the Surat police on Tuesday arrested the firm's owner Devendra Chaudhary, his elder son Piyush Chaudhary and his driver Vikash Bishnoi for hatching a conspiracy and staging a theft in his firm for allegedly getting an insurance claim amount of Rs 20 crore. Police said that no diamonds were stolen from the Surat factory and that Chaudhary had taken the insurance just eight days ago. Police also arrested Chaudhary's driver Vikash Bishnoi from Rajasthan in connection with the case. On Monday, Chaudhary had lodged a complaint with Kapodara police station alleging that polished and rough diamonds and cash, all worth Rs 32.53 crore – were stolen from the metal safe of his firm, DK Sons, at Kapoorwadi area of Kapodara, Surat. The theft has since become a topic of discussion in Surat, famous for its diamond industry. According to police, Devendra Chaudhary, a resident of Punagam in Surat and native of Barmer district of Rajasthan, has been running two diamond firms – one Diamond King and another D K Sons – in the same building at Kapodara. In his complaint, Chaudhary had alleged that some miscreants (around 4 to 5 men) broke open the main gate of his diamond firm between August 15 and 17, and decamped with the diamonds kept in a metal safe on the fourth floor of his manufacturing and polishing factory. While leaving the factory, they vandalised the CCTV cameras installed inside and outside the factory and took away the video recorder, the complaint said. Acting on the complaint, the top police officials reached the spot and found the broken safe and CCTV cameras. Police also checked the CCTV footage of nearby properties and found that miscreants came in two auto rickshaws and escaped in the same autos. Police sources said that the 'theft' took place on Sunday night. During the probe, the police on Monday identified both the auto drivers. During questioning, they revealed that they were hired by passengers from different locations, one near Surat Railway Station and another from Varachha. Speaking to The Indian Express, Surat Deputy Commissioner of Police (Zone 1) Alok Kumar said, 'We have found Devendra Chaudhary's statements contradictory. A month ago, he kicked out a security guard, who had been working in the firm for the last 15 years, intentionally. During the probe, he also pointed fingers at the security guard to mislead the police.' 'During the probe it was revealed that he had taken insurance of Rs. 20 crores around eight days ago. We have checked his properties and found they were mortgaged. He has incurred huge debts,' Kumar said. 'He failed to produce the bills for the alleged stolen diamonds and gave contradictory statements. During a thorough interrogation, he confessed to hatching a conspiracy and staging the theft,' the DCP said. Kumar said the owner hatched the plan and got his elder son, Piyush Chaudhary and driver, Vikash Bishnoi, also a native of Rajasthan, involved in the fabricated diamond theft story. He said that a Crime Branch team has caught Vikash Bishnoi from Rajasthan, and they are on their way to Surat. Vikash had made arrangements for other men to commit 'theft' in the DK Sons, the DCP said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
24 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Govt approves ₹62,000 crore deal to buy 97 LCA Mark 1A fighter jets
In a major boost for Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Make in India in defence project, India on Tuesday cleared the project for buying 97 LCA Mark 1A fighter jets for the Indian Air Force. The final approval for the acquisition of 97 LCA Mark 1A fighters was given by a high-level meeting today and will pave the way for Hindustan Aeronautics Limited to produce the aircraft, defence sources told ANI. This will be the second order for the LCA Mark 1A fighters, as the government has already placed orders for 83 aircraft a few years ago for around Rs 48,000 crore. The programme will help the IAF to replace its fleet of MiG- 21s, which are finally being phased out by the government in next few weeks, they said. The indigenous fighter aircraft programme, fully backed by Defence Ministry and Air Headquarters is set to be a big boost for promoting indigenisation as well as give major business to the small and medium enterprises engaged in defence business across the country, they said. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been pushing for the revival of the HAL, which has bagged orders for building all types of indigenous fighter aircraft, helicopters, along with the engines for them under his government. The Prime Minister had also undertaken a sortie in the trainer variant of the indigenous fighter, which was first-ever sortie by the Prime Minister of India in any combat aircraft. The plan to acquire 97 more LCA Mark 1A fighter jets was also announced first by the then Air Force chief Air Chief Marshal VR Chaudhari on foreign soil in Spain when he told ANI about the mega plans to boost the indigenous fighter aircraft orders. The LCA Mark 1A plane has more advanced avionics and radars than the initial 40 LCAs being supplied to the Air Force. The indigenous content in the new LCA Mark1As is going to be more than 65 per cent. The programme has been the harbinger of the Atmanirbhar Bharat and Make in India initiatives of the nation. More importantly, it is a flag bearer of India's self-reliance in the aerospace sector. The HAL is also set to bag deals for buying over 200 LCA Mark 2s and a similar number of fifth-generation Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Proposed online gaming bill could wipe out India's real money gaming sector, push users offshore, warn industry leaders
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills The Union Cabinet has approved the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 for introduction in Parliament, a move industry experts say could effectively wipe out India's real money gaming (RMG) draft bill seeks to encourage e-sports and social online games but proposes a blanket ban on real-money gaming. It makes offering, aiding, abetting, or promoting such games an offence, with heavy fines and harsher penalties for repeat institutions would be barred from processing related payments, while authorities would be empowered to block content, investigate violations, and seize warned that outright prohibition could backfire, pushing users to illegal offshore gambling and unregulated platforms.'A restriction will push millions of Indian users toward offshore betting websites, matka operators, and unregulated platforms, exposing them to fraud, addiction risks, and zero consumer protection,' said Rameesh Kailasam, president and CEO of an industry group representing internet startups. 'The bill seems aimed at offshore gambling and betting apps but ends up targeting law-abiding, tax-paying Indian startups.'The online gaming sector employs more than 200,000 professionals across 400+ startups and has drawn Rs 25,000 crore in FDI. Industry leaders warned that the ban could erode investor confidence, choke FDI inflows, and cost the exchequer an estimated Rs 20,000 crore in lost taxes. An allied ecosystem that spends nearly Rs 6,000 crore annually on advertising, technology, and infrastructure could also take a representatives are urging the government to pursue 'smart regulation' that distinguishes games of skill from games of chance, ensures user safety and responsible gaming, enforces grievance redressal, and clarifies taxation experts have flagged constitutional concerns, noting that courts have previously ruled skill-based games are not gambling.'The Bill is extremely problematic, prima facie unconstitutional and not sustainable in law. 'Betting and gambling' as well as 'amusements and entertainments' are squarely state subjects,' said gaming lawyer Jay Sayta, who represents several gaming firms. 'Parliament lacks legislative competence here, except under Article 252 if states pass resolutions. The Centre should wait until the Supreme Court delivers its verdict in the Gameskraft case before proceeding.'
