Princess Kate 'icing on the cake' in King Charles plan as hidden royals step up
While King Charles and Emmanuel Macron were the stars of the recent French state visit, the work of three major royals also played an important role in representing the Firm.
Princess Kate, Princess Anne, and Birgitte, Duchess of Gloucester all stepped up during the three-day affair, with the hard-working royal women all playing a key part of two major events.
While Princess Kate made headlines for her stunning red ensemble, Princess Anne and the Duchess of Gloucester also received their own recognition for their glamorous looks at both Tuesday night's state banquet, and Wednesday night's banquet on the second day of the President's visit.
Many were quick to comment on Princess Anne's new hairstyle, as royal commentators pointed out that she had been sporting the same up-do for decades, while the Duchess of Gloucester was named the best dressed during a banquet at Guildhall on Wednesday evening, which was hosted by the Lord Mayor and City of London Corporation.
With another major state visit just around the corner, with plans for US president Donald Trump to visit the UK in September, royal expert Jennie Bond has outlined how all three women, particularly Kate, will be instrumental for the upcoming visit.
The former BBC royal correspondent told the Mirror that the Princess of Wales will have an important role when Trump arrives on UK shores, explaining: "Catherine will be the icing on the cake for a man as vain as Donald Trump. To be seen with her will be gold dust in his eyes. And I'm sure she will be there to massage his ego in the most diplomatic, subtle and regal way."
Jennie also said that Birgitte, Duchess of Gloucester, and Princess Anne will play key roles during the US state visit, saying: "I'm sure that Birgitte will be on hand again when President Trump comes to the UK. After so many years in the Royal Family, she is well versed in the niceties of a State Visit."
"And the Princess Royal will also have a key role, as always. She really is the King's right hand woman; his confidante, his wingwoman."
When asked how Princess Anne and the Duchess of Gloucester would feel about the numerous headlines about their looks during the French state visit, Jennie Bond shared that both are "hard working, no-glory seeking women of the Royal Family", who would be more dedicated to their royal work than fixating on their appearances.
Bond said: "Neither, I think, would care one fig about what anyone said about their looks. They dress appropriately for the business of the occasion. Neither seeks to be the centre of the attention, even though they often are. They want the focus to be on the business or cause or campaign in hand. And both have one aim: to support the institution of monarchy."
"Anne and Birgitte are stalwarts on the royal treadmill. They work hard, ask for no recognition, almost shun publicity…and just get on with the job. The Royal Family has slimmed down drastically through a combination of circumstances— and so these two more than pull their weight each week. Quietly and in a business-like way. And that is a huge help for the King."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
23 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
MasterChef's Gregg Wallace 'deeply sorry' for behaviour
It comes as a report found 45 out of 83 allegations made against Wallace during his time on the show were substantiated. The report, led by law firm Lewis Silkin, found that the 'majority of the allegations against Mr Wallace (94%) related to behaviour which is said to have occurred between 2005 and 2018', with only one allegation substantiated after 2018. The report also concluded that the 'majority of the substantiated allegations against Mr Wallace related to inappropriate sexual language and humour'. Following the report's publication this morning (July 14), Wallace has released a statement. Gregg Wallace 'deeply sorry' for behaviour In a statement to the PA news agency, he said: 'For eight months, my family and I have lived under a cloud. "Trial by media, fuelled by rumour and clickbait. "None of the serious allegations against me were upheld. "I challenged the remaining issue of unwanted touching but have had to accept a difference in perception, and I am deeply sorry for any distress caused. "It was never intended. "I'm relieved that the Banijay report fully recognises that my behaviour changed profoundly in 2018. "Some of my humour and language missed the mark. "I never set out to harm or humiliate. "I always tried to bring warmth and support to MasterChef, on screen and off. 'After nearly 20 years on the show, I now see that certain patterns, shaped by traits I've only recently begun to understand, may have been misread. "I also accept that more could have been done, by others and by myself, to address concerns earlier. 'A late autism diagnosis has helped me understand how I communicate and how I'm perceived. "I'm still learning. "Banijay have given me great support, and I thank them. "But in the end, the BBC left me exposed to trial by media and the damage it leaves in its wake. 'To those who've shown kindness, thank you. Recommended reading: "It mattered. "This has been brutal. "For a working-class man with a direct manner, modern broadcasting has become a dangerous place. "I was the headline this time. But I won't be the last. 'There will be more casualties if the BBC continues down this path, where protecting its legacy matters more than protecting people. "For my part, with full legal support, I will consider my next move."
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Tim Davie turns on BBC staff over Bob Vylan failings
The director general of the BBC has said staff at Glastonbury had the authority to cut Bob Vylan's performance from the air, as he appeared to blame them for broadcasting chants against the Israel Defense Forces. Tim Davie told Parliament's culture, media and sport committee on Monday that ending the broadcast was an 'option open to those on the ground on the day,' but that they had not taken action. During a performance at the festival, the punk rap duo encouraged the crowd to join in chants of 'death, death to the IDF', in reference to the Israeli military killing thousands of Palestinians in Gaza. The performance was carried live and remained available on BBC iPlayer for several hours, leading to severe criticism of the corporation from ministers, MPs and anti-Semitism campaigners. In a letter to MPs, Mr Davie appeared to blame those working at Glastonbury, which he also attended, for the mistake. 'There were individuals present at Glastonbury who had the authority to cut the livestream after appropriate consideration,' he wrote. 'Those individuals had access to advice and support offsite should they have considered it necessary.' But the director general refused to answer a question from Dame Caroline Dineage, the committee's chairman, over whether cutting the live feed was discussed during the performance. He wrote: 'You will appreciate that the answer to this question is currently being considered through the appropriate internal processes. 'What we can say is that cutting the livestream was an option open to those on the ground on the day.' He added that the corporation was taking immediate action on the 'failings', including 'ensuring proper accountability for those found to be responsible for those failings in the live broadcast'. The BBC has since changed its rules so that high-risk artists are not broadcast live. Mr Davie said in his letter that Bob Vylan were assessed as a 'Category A' risk for broadcast, while Kneecap, another band performing at the festival, were considered even more risky. Kneecap was not streamed live, but the corporation decided that Bob Vylan could broadcast. Mr Davie said that 'other mitigations were considered and were put in place' for Bob Vylan's performance, but conceded that 'there were failures in our coverage which led to offensive content being broadcast live'. He added: 'I deeply regret that such deplorable behaviour appeared on the BBC and want to apologise to our viewers and listeners and in particular the Jewish community.' The incident led to an intervention on Sunday from Dame Melanie Dawes, the chief executive of Ofcom, who said that public trust in the BBC had been weakened by the broadcast. She called on executives to 'get a grip quicker' on similar situations in future. 'A problem of leadership' Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, said that the fiasco had exposed 'a problem of leadership' at the BBC, and sources close to her suggested she expected to see members of staff fired for the mistake. Mr Davie's letter came on a day of turmoil for the BBC, as it published two other investigations into the Gregg Wallace debacle and the decision to air a documentary about the conflict in Gaza that featured the son of a Hamas official. The boy was interviewed without reference to his father's role. Campaigners have called for Mr Davie's resignation over the documentary, which the BBC has since acknowledged did not meet its editorial guidelines. Gideon Falter, chief executive of Campaign Against Antisemitism, said: 'If the BBC were an accountable organisation, senior executives would be scrambling to save their jobs. 'Instead, it's the usual weasel pledge to 'update some guidelines'. This is appalling. 'Under director general Tim Davie, the BBC has gone from national treasure to national embarrassment. He needs to go.' Danny Cohen, former director of BBC Television, added: 'This looks like a classic case of 'deputy heads must roll' and that is nowhere near good enough.'
South Wales Argus
37 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Ofcom to investigate after Gaza documentary breached BBC editorial guidelines
The regulator said it had examined the BBC report and would be investigating under its broadcasting code, which states that factual programmes 'must not materially mislead the audience'. An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'Having examined the BBC's findings, we are launching an investigation under our rule which states that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience.' The programme was removed from BBC iPlayer in February after it emerged that the child narrator, Abdullah, is the son of Ayman Alyazouri, who has worked as Hamas's deputy minister of agriculture. The review, conducted by Peter Johnston, the director of editorial complaints and reviews, which is independent of BBC News, said the programme was in breach of accuracy for 'failing to disclose information about the child narrator's father's position within the Hamas-run government'. But the review found no other breaches of editorial guidelines, including breaches of impartiality, and also found no evidence that outside interests 'inappropriately impacted on the programme'. The report said that 'careful consideration of the requirements of due impartiality was undertaken in this project given the highly contested nature of the subject matter'. Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone, which also aired on BBC Two, was made for the BBC by independent production company Hoyo Films. The detail of the background information regarding the narrator's father is deemed as 'critical information', which the report said was not shared with the BBC before broadcast. The report found that Hoyo Films did not 'intentionally' mislead the BBC about the position of the narrator's father, but said the independent production company 'bears most responsibility for this failure'. However, it further added that the BBC also 'bears some responsibility'. The report detailed that at the time the programme first aired the information regarding the position of the narrator's father was known only by three members of the production company, 'but not anyone within the BBC'. It said: 'In light of this inequality of information and the opportunities that the production company had to bring this information to the BBC's attention, which it did not take, the production company is the party with most responsibility for this failure. 'However, I do not consider that the production company intentionally misled the BBC about the narrator's father's position. 'The production company has been consistently transparent that, notwithstanding their belief that the father's position was a civilian or technocratic one, as opposed to a political or military position in Hamas, they made a mistake and should have informed the BBC about it.' The narrator's scripted contribution to the programme also did not breach BBC standards on due impartiality, the report said, adding: 'I have also not seen or heard any evidence to support a suggestion that the narrator's father or family influenced the content of the programme in any way.' But the use of a child narrator for this programme was 'wrong', the report added. It explained that in this instance, the narrator 'was put in a position where his narration had to be highly scripted (meaning there was a limited portrayal of his background, story and life) and where he had to carry the rights-of-reply of others, in particular the IDF. 'In light of what the production company knew about the narrator's family and background, putting him forward as the voice of the programme as it was scripted was wrong in my view.' The BBC's director-general Tim Davie said: 'Peter Johnston's report identifies a significant failing in relation to accuracy in this documentary. I thank him for his thorough work and I am sorry for this failing. 'We will now take action on two fronts – fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability and the immediate implementation of steps to prevent such errors being repeated.' The BBC Board said: 'We thank Peter Johnston for his work. His report is a comprehensive examination of a complex programme, the production of which spanned many months from concept through to broadcast – and is critical in laying bare the facts of what happened. 'Nothing is more important than trust and transparency in our journalism. We welcome the actions the executive are taking to avoid this failing being repeated in the future.' Hoyo Films said in a statement that they take the report findings 'extremely seriously' and 'apologise for the mistake that resulted in a breach of the (BBC) editorial guidelines'. They added: 'We are pleased that the report found that there was no evidence of inappropriate influence on the content of the documentary from any third party. 'We appreciate the rigorous nature of this investigation, and its findings that Hoyo Films did not intentionally mislead the BBC, that there were no other breaches of the editorial guidelines in the programme, and that there was no evidence to suggest that the programme funds were spent other than for reasonable, production-related purposes. 'Hoyo Films welcomes the report's recommendations and hope they will improve processes and prevent similar problems in the future. 'We are working closely with the BBC to see if we can find an appropriate way to bring back to iPlayer the stories of those featured in the programme. 'Our team in Gaza risked their lives to document the devastating impact of war on children. 'Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone remains a vital account, and our contributors – who have no say in the conflict – deserve to have their voices heard.' It comes as it was announced that Mr Davie and BBC chairman Samir Shah will face questions from MPs over the documentary, the investigation into allegations of misconduct made against Gregg Wallace, and its Glastonbury Festival coverage of Bob Vylan and Kneecap. The pair will appear before the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on September 9.
