Texas High-Speed Rail Project Future Uncertain After Latest Setback
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The proposed Texas Central high-speed rail project suffered a fresh blow this week when Spanish rail operator Renfe decided to liquidate its U.S. subsidiary—Renfe of America—and write off its entire investment, as reported by Trenvista and El Economista.
The announcement followed recent setbacks, including the Trump administration's withdrawal of a $63.9 million federal grant and the quiet exit of Japanese investors from the $40 billion venture linking Dallas and Houston.
Renfe's withdrawal not only removed a leading international operator from the project but also highlighted the financial instability facing what is one of the nation's most ambitious transportation undertakings.
Newsweek reached out to Renfe and Texas Central for comment on Friday via email outside of regular office hours.
Why It Matters
The Texas Central high-speed rail line, envisioned as a transformative connection between Houston and Dallas, had promised to revolutionize mobility in the region and establish the United States as a player in high-speed rail. Its struggles bear implications for federal infrastructure policy, private-public investment risks, and the credibility of large-scale rail projects nationwide.
A range of high-speed rail projects has been proposed across the U.S. In May, former Obama-era Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood told Newsweek that he believed one successful high-speed line could unlock other projects across the country.
What To Know
Map of the proposed Dallas to Houston high-speed rail line produced by Texas Central.
Map of the proposed Dallas to Houston high-speed rail line produced by Texas Central.
Texas Central
Renfe Liquidates Its U.S. Subsidiary After Heavy Losses
Renfe, Spain's state railway operator, dissolved Renfe of America after recognizing accumulated losses of €4.5 million (approximately $5 million) and writing down all investment in the Texas Central project, as documented in its 2024 accounts.
This move followed more than five years of unsuccessful efforts to establish U.S. high-speed rail operations as a strategic partner for Texas Central. Renfe originally anticipated up to €5.3 billion in revenues through 2042, having won a contract to operate the proposed 386-kilometer Dallas–Houston line. However, the company declared the value of its U.S. investment at zero and publicly abandoned any hope of recovering debts dating back to 2019.
Federal Funding Pulled After Cost Overruns and Delays
The U.S. Department of Transportation withdrew a $63.9 million grant in April previously allocated to Amtrak for Texas Central, labeling the project "a risky venture for the taxpayer." Texas Central, which initially had a $10 billion budget estimate, saw its spending expectations balloon to over $40 billion, according to reports from the Reason Foundation and multiple financial outlets.
Key Investors and Stakeholders Exit
Renfe's departure followed the prior exit of major Japanese investors, who reportedly lost over $272 million in the venture. Fort Worth-based Kleinheinz Capital Partners took over as lead investor, acquiring significant stakes from Japanese shareholders.
Texas Central has acquired only about 25 percent of the land needed for the line, with outstanding construction permits and further land acquisition unresolved. The current combination of lost foreign expertise and evaporating funds has increased scrutiny from the Texas legislature, which is now demanding enhanced transparency and annual financial disclosures from project leaders.
Possible Silver Lining in Private Equity Approaches
Some industry observers suggested that private equity-led models, similar to those seen in Florida and Nevada, might offer a path forward. Robert Pearsall, Partnership Director at the US High Speed Rail Association (USHSR), told Railway-News the withdrawal of Amtrak and federal funds could help clear the path for private capital, pending state-level approvals. Yet, the pace of future development depends on clearing Texas's legislative barriers, securing financing, and restoring confidence among lenders and landowners.
What People Are Saying
Jennifer Stevens, from campaign group ReRoute the Route, which opposes the proposed Texas Central line, told The Texan: "This is a company that has been nearly broke for at least half a decade. Now because of this government filing we know Texas Central left a Spanish investor holding the bag on their $5 million investment. They are either unwilling or unable to pay for services rendered more than five years ago."
Former Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood told Newsweek in May: "If you build it they will come, if you build it, it will be successful and I think that will be the case with Brightline West, Las Vegas to L.A., and I think it will be true San Francisco to L.A. I think they will be wildly popular. I really believe at this point if you build it they will come and the proof of that is Europe and Asia—their trains are wildly popular."
What Happens Next
Texas Central leaders intend to continue seeking funding and regulatory approvals while preparing to rebid for lost operating contracts. However, the project's future will depend on whether additional private investors step forward and whether state and federal regulators support a new business model for high-speed rail between Dallas and Houston.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Mutua de Riesgo Maritimo, Sociedad de Seguros a Prima Fija
AMSTERDAM, August 20, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--AM Best has affirmed the Financial Strength Rating of B++ (Good) and the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating of "bbb" (Good) of Mutua de Riesgo Maritimo, Sociedad de Seguros a Prima Fija (Murimar) (Spain). The outlook of these Credit Ratings (ratings) is stable. The ratings reflect Murimar's balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as strong, as well as its adequate operating performance, limited business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management (ERM). Murimar's balance sheet strength assessment of strong is supported by its strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalization at year-end 2024, as measured by Best's Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR), underpinned by solid retained earnings. Murimar's balance sheet strength also factors in its small capital base, which can give rise to volatility in its risk-adjusted capitalisation. AM Best considers Murimar's operating performance to be adequate. In 2024, the mutual achieved record profits after-tax of EUR 3.3 million, and a combined ratio of 84.8%, below Murimar's five-year average of 92.4% (2020-2024) (as calculated by AM Best). Murimar is a niche insurer focused on marine hull and cargo insurance for small- to medium-sized vessels in Spain. Murimar ranks third overall in Spain's marine market and is a leader in the fishing vessel segment. In 2024, Murimar reported gross written premium (GWP) of EUR 42.1 million, of which EUR 39.4 million referred to non-life business. Distribution through Murimar's strong agency network and effective client retention aided by its mutual status supports its market position. Although concentrated in its domestic market, Murimar has started to expand internationally over the past five years. In 2024, international business represented 18% of its GWP. This press release relates to Credit Ratings that have been published on AM Best's website. For all rating information relating to the release and pertinent disclosures, including details of the office responsible for issuing each of the individual ratings referenced in this release, please see AM Best's Recent Rating Activity web page. For additional information regarding the use and limitations of Credit Rating opinions, please view Guide to Best's Credit Ratings. For information on the proper use of Best's Credit Ratings, Best's Performance Assessments, Best's Preliminary Credit Assessments and AM Best press releases, please view Guide to Proper Use of Best's Ratings & Assessments. AM Best is a global credit rating agency, news publisher and data analytics provider specialising in the insurance industry. Headquartered in the United States, the company does business in over 100 countries with regional offices in London, Amsterdam, Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore and Mexico City. For more information, visit Copyright © 2025 by A.M. Best Rating Services, Inc. and/or its affiliates. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. View source version on Contacts Juan A. Villaescusa Prades Financial Analyst +31 20 808 1162 Eli Sanchez Director, Analytics +31 20 808 3190 Christopher Sharkey Associate Director, Public Relations +1 908 882 2310 Al Slavin Senior Public Relations Specialist +1 908 882 2318
Los Angeles Times
6 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Nebraska announces plan for immigration detention center dubbed the ‘Cornhusker Clink'
LINCOLN, Neb. — Nebraska announced plans for an immigration detention center in the remote southwest corner of the state as President Trump's administration races to expand the infrastructure necessary for increasing deportations. The facility will be dubbed the 'Cornhusker Clink,' a play on Nebraska's nickname of the Cornhusker State and an old slang term for jail. The alliterative name follows in the vein of the previously announced 'Alligator Alcatraz' and 'Deportation Depot' detention centers in Florida and the 'Speedway Slammer' in Indiana. Republican Gov. Jim Pillen said Tuesday he and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had agreed to use an existing minimum security prison work camp in McCook — a remote city of about 7,000 people in the middle of the wide-open prairies between Denver and Omaha — to house people awaiting deportation and being held for other immigration proceedings. It's expected to be a Midwest hub for detainees from several states. 'This is about keeping Nebraskans – and Americans across our country – safe,' Pillen said in a statement. The facility can accommodate 200 people with plans to expand to 300. McCook is about 210 miles west of Lincoln, the state capital. 'If you are in America illegally, you could find yourself in Nebraska's Cornhusker Clink. Avoid arrest and self deport now using the CBP Home App,' Noem said in a separate statement. Noem's agency posted a picture on social media showing ears of corn wearing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement hats, standing in front of a prison fence. The governor said later at a news conference in McCook that the center will have the advantage of being located at an existing facility and near a regional airport. He told reporters he didn't know if the center would house women as well as men or if children could be held there. He said he first learned the federal government was interested in the facility on Friday. Pillen also announced he would order the Nebraska National Guard to provide administrative and logistical support to Nebraska-based immigration agents. About 20 soldiers will be involved. And he said the Nebraska State Patrol would allow six troopers to help federal immigration agents make arrests. The Trump administration is adding new detention facilities across the country to hold the growing number of immigrants it has arrested and accused of being in the country illegally. ICE centers were holding more than 56,000 immigrants in June, the most since 2019. The new and planned facilities include the remote detention center in the Florida Everglades known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' which opened last month. It's designed to hold up to 3,000 detainees in temporary tent structures. When Trump toured it, he suggested it could be a model for future lockups nationwide. The Florida facility also been the subject of legal challenges by attorneys who allege violations of due process there, including the rights of detainees to meet with their attorneys, limited access to immigration courts and poor living conditions. Critics have been trying to stop further construction and operations until it comes into compliance with federal environmental laws. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis announced last week that his administration is preparing to open a second facility, dubbed 'Deportation Depot,' at a state prison in north Florida. It's expected to have 1,300 immigration beds, though that capacity could be expanded to 2,000, state officials said. Also last week, officials in the rural Tennessee town of Mason voted to approve agreements to turn a former prison into an immigration detention facility operated by a private company, despite loud objections from residents and activists during a contentious public meeting. And the Trump administration announced plans earlier this month for a 1,000-bed detention center in Indiana that would be dubbed 'Speedway Slammer,' prompting a backlash in the Midwestern state that hosts the Indianapolis 500 auto race. Corrections director Rob Jeffreys said the 186 inmates currently at the McCook work camp will be transferred to other state facilities over the next 45 to 60 days. The repurposed facility will be run by the state but will be paid for by the federal government. He said it's already set up and accredited to hold prisoners, so detainees won't be housed in tents or other temporary quarters. In a video posted to social media, state Sen. Megan Hunt, an independent, blasted a lack of transparency about plans for a detention center, citing her unfulfilled request to the governor and executive branch for emails and other records. She urged people to support local immigrant rights groups. 'The No. 1 thing we need to do is protect our neighbors, protect the people in our communities who are being targeted by these horrible people, these horrible organizations that are making choices to lock up, detain, disappear our neighbors and families and friends,' Hunt said. Around a half-dozen protesters sat in the hallway outside the governor's office Tuesday afternoon making signs that said, 'No Nazi Nebraska' and 'ICE = Gestapo.' Maghie Miller-Jenkins of Lincoln said she doesn't think an ICE detention center is a good idea, adding the state should tackle problems like child hunger and homelessness. 'This state has numerous things they could focus on that would benefit the constituents,' she said. Funk writes for the Associated Press. AP reporters Steve Karnowski in St. Paul, Minn., Jack Dura in Fargo, N.D., and Scott McFetridge in Des Moines, Iowa, contributed to this story.
USA Today
6 minutes ago
- USA Today
Jack White, White House trade jabs over Trump's Oval Office decor
Less than a year into Donald Trump's presidency, he's overhauling not just some of the nation's laws, but the house from which he signs them − and musician Jack White has some thoughts. Amid Trump's White House makeover, which thus far has included a paving over of the famous Rose Garden and bedecking some of its historic rooms in gold, White blasted the changes as "vulgar" and "gaudy." In an Aug. 19 Instagram post, the lead singer of the White Stripes critiqued an image of Trump, 79, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy sitting in the newly gold-drenched Oval Office. "Look at how disgusting Trump has transformed the historic White House. It's now a vulgar, gold leafed and gaudy, professional wrestler's dressing room," White, 50, wrote. "Can't wait for the UFC match on the front lawn too, he's almost fully achieved the movie 'Idiocracy.'" Jack White threatens to sue over Trump campaign staffer's use of White Stripes song "Look at his disgusting taste, would you even buy a used car from this conman, let alone give him the nuclear codes?" he continued. "A gold plated trump bible would look perfect up on that mantle with a pair of trump shoes on either side wouldn't it?" White is seemingly referring to several money-making ventures from the president, who has long demonstrated a propensity for selling merchandise with his name on it. "What an embarrassment to American history," White concluded, before lauding Zelenskyy as "a REAL leader" in "a black suit." Notably, when Zelenskyy visited the White House earlier in Trump's presidency, he was critiqued by Trump-friendly reporters and the president himself for wearing army fatigues rather than a suit. White, now a solo artist, once owned a furniture business, while Trump, a real estate magnate, has long been known to favor a flashy, Rococo aesthetic. The pair's divergence on matters of style may come as no surprise, as the singer's sartorial choices have traditionally leaned into a more cool-toned emo look. When reached for comment, White House communications director Steven Cheung called White "washed up" and defended the Oval Office's new ornate look. "Jack White is a washed up, has-been loser posting drivel on social media because he clearly has ample time on his hands due to his stalled career," Cheung wrote. "It's apparent he's been masquerading as a real artist, because he fails to appreciate, and quite frankly disrespects, the splendor and significance of the Oval Office inside of 'The People's House.'" The Oval Office, and the White House itself, shapeshift with each incoming administration, as staff work to transform the historical home to match the preferred aesthetic of the new first family. That Trump's choices tilt toward a brash, Waldorf-Astoria style baroqueness slots neatly into a lifetime of building designs that reflect Gilded Age sensibilities.
