Passengers seem more prone to motion sickness in EVs
According to the Guardian, EV passengers, especially those in the back seat, more often report feeling nauseous.
An explanation lies in the brain's response to motion cues. William Emond, a PhD student studying car sickness in France, suggests that the cause is occupant unfamiliarity.
Most people understand that engine sounds and vibrations in ICE power vehicles are associated with specific motion changes, like acceleration or deceleration. These help the brain prepare for movement, reducing the likelihood of motion sickness.
Electric cars, however, operate almost silently. Therefore, they lack the mechanical feedback of vehicles powered by fossil fuels. Without engine revs or vibrations, passengers receive fewer auditory or tactile warnings of motion changes. There is therefore a disconnect between what the brain expects and what the body experiences, known as sensory mismatch. This mismatch is a well-known cause of motion sickness. For it creates confusion between the signals coming from the eyes, inner ear, and body.
Not all back seat passengers prefer ICE power.
Several reports corroborate this association. A 2020 study highlighted the absence of engine sound as a potential trigger of motion sickness. A study published last year found a strong link between motion sickness and fewer seat vibrations in electric vehicles.
Another key factor is regenerative braking, a common feature in EVs. This system slows the car gradually by prolonged, low-frequency deceleration. Such slowing has been associated with heightened motion sickness, likely because it disrupts the brain's expectations about how and when the vehicle should slow down.
Emond explains that the brain builds a 'motion model' based on experience, allowing it to anticipate how a vehicle will behave. When driving a familiar petrol car, people can rely on engine noise, vibration, and torque to predict movement. By contrast, EVs represent a new motion environment, one in which the brain has no prior model to work from. The lack of anticipatory cues results in a sensory conflict that can trigger nausea if it continues for an extended period.
As EV adoption increases, researchers are exploring ways to address this unique form of motion sickness. Some studies have proposed using visual or vibrational signals in EVs to help passengers anticipate changes in motion. Ambient lighting or seat vibrations could provide the brain with the information it needs to avoid the sensory mismatch that causes illness.
Motion sickness may remain an unintended consequence of the transition to cleaner transport until working solutions are found.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
3 days ago
- Newsroom
Scrapping petrol tax could be transformative. But will it?
Comment: The way we currently get around is unfair, and unhealthy. Some people travel a lot, creating disproportionate harms on people and the planet, such as pollution, injury risk and physical inactivity. Others cannot afford to travel enough, missing out on things that are important, such as catching up with loved ones or healthcare appointments, or end up having to forego expenditure on other important things, such as food. Replacing fuel excise duty (or petrol tax) with electronic road user charges for all vehicles – as announced by Transport Minister Chris Bishop last week, offers an opportunity to transform the way we fund and pay for our transport system in a way that works for people and the planet – by reflecting the true costs imposed when we use the roads. Bishop said 'it isn't fair to have Kiwis who drive less and can't afford a fuel-efficient car paying more than people who can afford one and drive more often'. And on the whole, we agree. We know that those households with the lowest income drive far less (about 100km a week less) but also have to spend a much greater proportion of their income on getting around (16 percent of income compared with 9 percent or higher-income households). Those on lower incomes are also far less likely to be able to afford an electric vehicle with cheaper running costs, instead paying the relatively more expensive petrol tax. However, Bishop's proposal represents a narrow view of the harms, or wider costs, of driving to society. It is largely based on the assumption all vehicles should contribute 'fairly' (based on weight and distance travelled) towards road maintenance, operations and improvements. But a pricing structure that also accounts for the costs to our health system of injuries, pollution and physical inactivity caused by the transport system, might also include differential charging for different types of vehicles. For example, we know that SUVs cause more severe injuries to those outside of the vehicle, and while EVs reduce tailpipe emissions, they still contribute to congestion and injury risk. The proposal does suggest that weight, as well as distance travelled, will be factored into pricing; however, it should also consider the damage that heavier and larger vehicles do to people and the environment. A change in the way we are charged for using the roads offers a real opportunity to design a progressive charge that alleviates costs pressures for those already struggling to pay for the driving they need to do, while reducing levels of driving overall. One way to achieve this would be through increasing the rate per km, above a certain amount of kilometres driven. Given the costs involved in running and operating the scheme, and that this needs to be revenue generating for Government, it seems unlikely there will be a reduction in the cost of travel in real terms for everyone. However, if the Government is committed to fairness, it needs to ensure costs don't escalate for those who can least afford it and who have few alternatives. The proposed changes to road user charges are most likely to be successful and acceptable if they are accompanied by investment in public transport, walking and cycling and alongside strategic urban planning that supports local access to the things we all need such as shops, schools and sports grounds. The most straightforward way to ensure that charging for using the roads doesn't force people into situations where they have to forego other essentials, is to ensure that it's easy and safe to get around in other ways, or that we don't need to travel as much. For both fairness and health and wellbeing we need to continue to improve travel options other than driving. Bishop presented this as a new way to fund our roads, but we should be taking a more holistic view – this is an opportunity to think about how we fund our transport system. Using revenue raised to reduce the need to drive can make charging for driving more acceptable. Bishop said, 'This is a once-in-a-generation change. It's the right thing to do, it's the fair thing to do, and it will future proof how we fund our roads for decades to come'. This policy has the potential to be truly transformative and be part of creating a transport system (not just roads) that is fairer, and healthier for everyone. It can be done. The question is, will it?
The Spinoff
06-08-2025
- The Spinoff
How to charge an EV at home or on the road
Charging an EV is easy, but for many new users it won't be as familiar as pumping petrol. So how does it all work? Like any new technology, EVs come with their own learning curves, and charging is chief among them. Prospective owners may find themselves asking questions like: Will I need a special charging port? Will charging on the road take hours? How much will it cost? Will my power bill go through the roof? Better NZ Trust aims to educate the public on EVs and promote their uptake. Chairperson and longtime EV enthusiast Kathryn Trounson spoke to Naomii Seah to answer some of the most common EV charging questions. Will my power bill skyrocket? Running an EV will result in a higher power bill, but the increase may not be as dramatic as you expect. And this cost will also be offset by savings at the pump. 'You will see an upturn in your power bill, but you're not going out and buying petrol. If it costs you 80 dollars to fill up, well you'd get a lot of mileage out of 80 bucks of electricity,' Trounson says. 'Filling up' an EV at home costs the equivalent of $1.60 per litre during off-peak hours. By comparison, the average price of Unleaded 91 is currently sitting around $2.50 per litre. What are 'off-peak' hours? Off-peak hours are times when electricity demand is low, like overnight when most people are sleeping. Time of use power plans, which adjust the cost of electricity based on the time of day, can be particularly good for EV drivers. Genesis has a plan specifically for EV owners that offers time-of-use benefits. With Genesis's EV plan, you save 50% on variable electricity rates from 9pm to 7am every day.* So how do EV drivers charge at home? 'We've been charging our cars in the garage for 10 years, and we just use the standard three-pin plug,' says Trounson. Three-pin domestic chargers are usually included when you buy an EV and don't require any fancy equipment, just a standard household socket. An electrician can install an outside power point if you don't already have one, as extension cords should never be used to charge an EV. How long does charging take? Most EV owners charge overnight, says Trounson. While you probably won't get to 100 percent (nor would you want to, for battery health reasons) an overnight charge is usually more than enough, as most people drive less than 30km a day. For those who use their car often, a faster at-home option is a wall-mounted charging unit. These charge at around twice the rate of a standard plug, so are a good option if you can only charge for a few hours between uses. Some wall-mounted chargers have smart features. They can be programmed to charge at off-peak times, set to stop at a specific charging level and connect to your phone. It's a good idea to consult an electrician on this though as it may require work on your wiring. Where can I charge on the road? 'We have 1,400 or so charging places up and down the country. Their speed varies… for some of the higher spec cars, you might only sit charging for 10 minutes,' Trounson says. Public chargers are available at malls, gyms and supermarkets and at least every 75km on most of our state highways. In addition to fast-chargers, some public stations offer a slower, cheaper (sometimes free) charge, but you might need to bring your own cable. Fast chargers vary in speed. Slower ones can add 50km to your car's battery in under half an hour. Faster ones can add 400km in under 15 minutes. Trounson generally finds she has enough time for a bathroom break or a coffee run while charging, but that's it. One thing to note is that charging speeds are limited by an EV model's internal capacity. Plugging an older model into an ultra-fast charger won't shorten charging times. How do I charge on-the-go? ChargeNet is the major supplier of our public charging stations with over 400 sites. You just have to set up an account to use them. Sessions can be started through the ChargeNet app, or through a key fob. The fob links to your account, and you just scan it to start and stop sessions. 'I find that the app is fine and dandy if you're travelling in places with good reception… I choose to use my tag because it's almost simpler, but some people prefer everything listed on their phone,' Trounson says. How much does on-road charging cost? ChargeNet estimates the average rapid or hyper-rapid charging session to cost between $5 and $15. With the Genesis EVerywhere plan, customers can charge their EV at ChargeNet stations at their home rates, saving up to 70%^ on fees. They can also pay for their ChargeNet sessions via their Genesis Energy bill. How do I plan for a long trip? Before taking a long trip, Trounson recommends doing a test run at a nearby public charging station first. 'It's like being taken to a petrol station by your parents when you first learn to drive. Someone explains to you how to lift the nozzle, and where the tank is. It's not that hard, you've just got to learn how to use it.' You'll also want to pre-plan your charging stops and ChargeNet has an in-app map of their locations. Once on the road, Trounson says the rule-of-thumb is to charge to 80% and then move on. Anymore, it costs you extra time and money for little benefit as the delivery of electricity tapers off dramatically. 'Imagine you're trying to fill a bucket with a firehose without spilling anything. You can be gung-ho until an inch from the top, and then you have to be very careful. It's the same principle.' Any charging etiquette to be aware of? It's mostly basic courtesy, says Trounson. The biggest faux pas is probably unplugging someone's car before it's done charging, or pressing the emergency stop button in the absence of an emergency. 'All EVs can use public chargers, but you have to observe the parking limits. Don't use a charging area just to park because it's easier. Monitor your charging session and return to your car when it's done – you don't want to be the one holding up a space someone needs. 'We just try and get people to understand that you have to be polite, and there's a queuing system if necessary. But that only usually comes into play during peak times like Christmas.'
RNZ News
29-07-2025
- RNZ News
Buses, not EVs, could be the real solution to health and climate change
Fast, reliable buses and safe lanes for e-bikes could be better than switching one type of car for another, researchers say. Photo: Supplied/ Auckland Transport A mass switch from petrol-powered to electric vehicles will result in more road injuries, a study out of Otago University has found. That's because the fuel savings provided by EVs will prompt people to drive more. Transport and climate researchers say rolling out other measures - like fast, reliable buses and safe lanes for e-bikes - would be a better way to get both health and climate benefits than switching driving one type of car for another. Otago University's Dr Caroline Shaw led the study calculating the health impacts of switching from fossil fuel to electric vehicles, if nothing was done to help people access better alternatives to driving. Otago University Associate Professor Caroline Shaw. Photo: SUPPLIED She found a gradual shift to around three quarters of vehicles being EVs by 2050 would lower carbon emissions, but could also cost the country millions more in health costs. While previous studies focussed on tailpipe emissions, this one also looked at driver behaviour . "When the price decreases of petrol and diesel people drive a bit more, so we basically said ok we know electric vehicles are quite a lot cheaper to drive so let's make the assumption it's a similar kind of change, and what happens is when the price decreases and people drive more, the risk of injury increases," she said. More driving also increased air pollution from vehicles' tyres, she said. EVs lowered health impacts and deaths from tailpipe air pollution, but that was balanced by increased motor vehicle injuries and deaths from more driving. Dr Shaw said there were other ways to get quick wins for living costs, health and the climate, namely by making it easier to e-bike and catch faster, more convenient buses. Rail was also very helpful, but harder to roll out quickly at scale, she said. "Buses are great because we can put buses in and we can do it quite quickly they don't need a whole heap of hard infrastructure like trains or light rail , not that I'm against either of those," she said. University of Auckland senior planning lecturer Dr Tim Welch agreed. He said just switching out one type of car for another without changing anything else only worsened congestion, meaning fossil fuel cars, EVs and buses sat in traffic longer. He said the transport system needed re-balancing to give people real alternatives to driving. "It makes sense that things like electric buses, operated by the government, and owned by the government, are a much more efficient way to reduce emissions than asking people to open their wallets and buy a new car, and buy the charging infrastructure, because otherwise they should feel guilty or whatever." Both researchers said the key to getting people to want to ride buses was providing fast, dedicated bus lanes - which cities such as Auckland already did on some routes, with plans for more. On Auckland's North Shore, the Northern Express bus to the CBD, which has its own dedicated busway, clocked 7 million passenger trips over the year to June. Figures from Auckland Transport or AT show total monthly bus patronage on routes between west Auckland and the CBD grew rapidly after the western express or WX1 and two other new bus routes, replaced previous, less convenient routes in late 2023. The popular double decker WX1 bus clocked almost one million passenger trips over the year to June, while all western express routes combined reached 1.8m. The researchers said even diesel buses were more efficient and climate-friendly than driving because each buses carried so many more people and reduced congestion for cars on the roads. Auckland Transport has 224 zero-emission buses, and plans to have 450 by August next year, about one-third of the total fleet. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
