logo
Hamilton by-election: Farage to visit before vote

Hamilton by-election: Farage to visit before vote

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage is expected to visit the constituency ahead of the vote on June 5.
The vote is taking place following the death aged 57 of the local MSP and Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie in March this year.
The First Minister said official figures show the government's decision to scrap peak rail fares - made under the government's Cost of Living Guarantee - could save rail commuters in the constituency hundreds of pounds every year.
READ MORE:
'The SNP are terrified': 'Reform can win by-election - and take power in Holyrood'
Analysis: Reform support in Hamilton should worry other parties
Hundreds of care staff to go on strike over £38 million government U turn
Update on winter fuel payments to more pensioners expected in coming weeks
The main destination station for passengers travelling to or from Hamilton Central is Glasgow Central. Currently, an anytime day return between Glasgow Central and Hamilton Central is £9.20 and an off-peak day return is £6.00.
Glasgow Central is also the main destination station for passengers travelling to or from Larkhall. An anytime day return from there is £11.20 and an off peak return is £7.70.
Following the Scottish Government's decision to scrap peak rail fares for good from September, someone commuting five days every week from Hamilton Central to Glasgow Central will save more than £760 a year from September, the SNP said.
The party added that someone with the same commute from Larkhall station will save £910.
'The SNP is taking action to cut costs and ease financial pressures amid the cost of living crisis," said Mr Swinney.
'Scrapping peak rail fares is a critical part of my Cost of Living Guarantee that will save commuters hundreds of pounds.
"Alongside SNP policies like free tuition, free prescriptions and the most generous childcare offer in the UK we are supporting people when they need it most and putting more money in people's pockets.
'Labour meanwhile took away the winter fuel Payment from over 36,000 pensioners in South Lanarkshire, have allowed energy bills to rise by over £200 and cut £5 billion of support for disabled people.
'Unlike the Labour Party, the SNP is always on your side; taking action on what matters to people in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse and across Scotland.'
SNP by-election candidate Katy Loudon said: 'Too many households in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have borne the brunt of the cost of living crisis, with the UK Labour government presiding over rampant inflation and soaring energy bills.
'In Scotland, the SNP is bringing costs down for people, with policies like free bus travel for 2.3 million people, bringing back the winter fuel payment and scrapping peak rail fares.
'The Labour Party has lost its way, but this SNP government is delivering on what matters to you.
'Vote SNP on 5 June for a cheaper commute and to put your priorities first.'
Labour came second in the seat in the 2021 election but have had a challenging campaign following a number of policy decisions by the government taken to improve public finances.
They include the decision to end universal winter fuel payments and cuts to welfare benefits.
Last week the Prime Minister said he would restore winter fuel payments to some pensioners. Details on who will receive the benefit are expected next month.
Reform UK have been campaigning in the constituency with the deputy leader Richard Tice telling The Herald on Sunday last week he believed his party could beat the SNP following momentum behind the party in the wake of the local elections in England.
Mr Farage campaign trip will be his first visit to Scotland since 2019 when he attended a campaign event for the Brexit Party.
During a visit to Edinburgh in 2013 he had to be locked in a pub on the Royal Mile by police for his own protection and rescued by a riot van after a protest by independence supporters.
Reform UK took 7% of the Scottish vote in last year's general election, while recent polling suggests increasing support among the electorate - most notably at the potential expense of the Conservatives and Labour.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour's war on Middle England: Rural areas could foot the bill to pay for Rayner's reforms of council tax
Labour's war on Middle England: Rural areas could foot the bill to pay for Rayner's reforms of council tax

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour's war on Middle England: Rural areas could foot the bill to pay for Rayner's reforms of council tax

Middle England will be hit by the highest possible increases in council taxes to pay for 's reforms to the system, town hall leaders have warned. Households in the countryside will reportedly be charged at unfairly high levels to pay for residents of cities under the Communities Secretary's 'fair funding' plans. Last night, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch branded it a 'spiteful' move that will push more cash into traditional Labour areas. Analysis by the County Councils Network (CNN) found rural and county local authorities will lose close to half a billion pounds in Government cash over the next three years thanks to Ms Rayner's attempt to level up the system. This will force them to cut vital services and hike bills for hard-pressed residents by the maximum 5 per cent allowed. The CCN demanded an urgent injection of cash from Whitehall to fill the gap, warning town halls on the brink would otherwise be unable to provide crucial care for the elderly and vulnerable children. It comes after almost all town halls raised bills by the maximum amount earlier this year to deal with soaring demand and costs, taking the average bill to £2,280. Chairman of the group, councillor Tim Oliver, said: 'Some 16 county and rural councils will see reductions in grant funding, while the Government's proposals place a disproportionate burden on taxpayers in county areas to fund local services and redistribute funding to urban areas. 'It's vital the Government makes more money available to mitigate the impact of these reforms.' Ms Badenoch said: 'Yet again the Labour Government is showing utter contempt for people living in rural Britain. 'The family farms tax has been devastating, and scrapping the rural services grant has put rural councils under enormous pressure. 'This latest change will steal more money out of the hands of county councils and send it straight into Labour-run urban areas.' Under Ms Rayner's Fair Funding Review 2.0, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) will make major changes to how English councils are funded. Her updated formula will allocate cash based on local areas' needs and their ability to raise council tax compared to others around the country. The Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank has already warned it will create big winners and losers, with those in the home counties likely to suffer budget cuts unless council taxes rise. In its response to the MHCLG consultation, published last night, the CCN said it would mean 16 authorities – including some in the Midlands and North – losing £470million of funding over the next three years. In total, county and unitary councils' grant funding will rise by just £374million. Unless 33 of the 38 town halls impose the maximum 5 per cent council tax rises, they will see a real-terms cut in funding, according to the CCN. Metropolitan authorities will get £1.2billion, and a proposal to redistribute £1.6billion in council tax income will benefit urban areas at the expense of the countryside. An MHCLG spokesman said: 'We do not recognise this analysis. We are taking decisive action to reform the funding system.'

Japan June machinery orders rise 3.0% month-on-month
Japan June machinery orders rise 3.0% month-on-month

Reuters

time29 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Japan June machinery orders rise 3.0% month-on-month

TOKYO, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Japan's core machinery orders rose 3% in June from the previous month, government data showed on Wednesday. That compared with a 1.0% drop estimated by economists in a Reuters poll. On a year-on-year basis, core orders, a highly volatile data series regarded as a leading indicator of capital spending in the coming six to nine months, grew 7.6%, versus a forecast for a 5.0% rise, the data showed. For the full table, go to the website of the Cabinet Office: opens new tab

Japan's exports fall more than expected in July on US tariff pressures
Japan's exports fall more than expected in July on US tariff pressures

Reuters

time29 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Japan's exports fall more than expected in July on US tariff pressures

TOKYO, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Japan's exports dropped for a third straight month in July, government data showed on Wednesday, as U.S. tariffs continued to weigh on manufacturers, raising concerns about the outlook for the country's export-reliant economy. The outcome follows unexpectedly strong growth in gross domestic product (GDP) in the April-June quarter, separate data showed last week, fuelled by surprisingly resilient exports and capital expenditure. Total exports from the world's fourth-largest economy dropped 2.6% year-on-year in July in value terms, more than a median market forecast for a 2.1% decrease and following a 0.5% drop in June. Exports to the United States in July fell 10.1% from a year earlier, while those to China were down 3.5%, the data showed. Imports in July dropped 7.5% from a year earlier, compared with market forecasts for a 10.4% fall. As a result, Japan ran a deficit of 117.5 billion yen ($795.4 million) in July, compared with a forecast of a 196.2 billion yen surplus. The United States imposed 25% tariffs on automobiles and auto parts in April and threatened 25% levies on most of Japan's other goods. It later struck a trade deal on July 23 that lowered tariffs to 15% in exchange for a U.S.-bound $550 billion Japanese investment package. The agreed tariff rate on automobiles, Japan's largest export sector, is still far higher than the original 2.5%, exerting pressure on major automakers and parts suppliers. Japanese automakers have mostly absorbed additional tariff costs by cutting prices to protect shipment volumes. But economists expect them to eventually pass on costs to U.S. consumers, which could hamper their sales in the U.S. market. ($1 = 147.7200 yen)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store