I pay $2,800 every month toward my student loans. Although I only have $200 left each week to spend, I'll be debt-free this year.
The minimum payments on my student loans didn't make a dent in my balance.
I decided to live with my parents and pay $2,800 to my student loans each month.
Although I sometimes struggled with only $200 a week, I'm proud I'll be debt-free this year.
As a college graduate walking the stage in 2023, I crossed the invisible threshold into what everyone calls "the real world."
I said goodbye to the friends I had spent every moment of the last four years with and welcomed my new best friend, student loan debt.
Living in the beautiful coastal town of Newport, Rhode Island, during college was the best experience of my life thus far, yet the worst thing for my bank account. I didn't bat an eye, dropping $20 every weekend to see a cover band, $15 to Uber downtown, and $16 for a salted caramel espresso martini.
With a one-year grace period after graduating, I thought I had time to build my bank account backup to start paying off the weight of debt on my shoulders. Yet, little did I know that the interest still grew while I was adjusting to adulting.
I knew I had to make drastic decisions — and fast.
Minimum payments didn't cut it
Fortunately, my parents were willing to let me live at home after graduating to get my feet on the ground. Moving back home under the same roof as my parents after years of freedom was far from my definition of fun, but it was ultimately the right move financially.
For the first few months, I made minimum payments toward my $53,000 loan debt and smiled as the number in my bank account grew with my new full-time post-graduate salary. What I didn't realize was that, due to the interest rate, my student loan payments were making zero progress on my loans.
One day, I logged into my account and saw that I owed $3,000 more than my original balance. It sent me into a complete spiral. I cried thinking I'd be in debt forever and would never be able to go on vacations or buy a new car.
As an English major, I was unfamiliar with economics and how interest rates worked.
With help from my boyfriend, I realized that minimum payments were not the answer to escaping rising interest rates and quickly becoming debt-free. I decided to devote about 80% of my monthly income, totaling $2,800, toward student loans, sometimes leaving me with only $200 to spend in a week.
Working with little money
With only $200 a week, I had to stop and think about the purchases I was making. Was an $8 grande iced vanilla latte with sweet cream foam from Starbucks really worth it, or could I just make a coffee at home? Was take-out necessary, or will a bowl of cereal suffice for dinner?
Thankfully, living at home, I didn't have to pay rent or utilities, so I could focus my spending on essential purchases, including gas, while still having enough for the nonessentials like a manicure. Sometimes I thought I'd have plenty of money until my next paycheck, but then a gym membership or Netflix payment would go through.
There were many days when I stressed about whether I could do normal things a postgraduate would, like spending money on takeout or buying a concert ticket. At times, I regretted my decision and wanted to lower my payments, but I never did.
Trusting my gut, I stuck through the payments and carefully considered all my purchases.
Debt-free in September
If my calculations prove to be correct, I will officially be debt-free in September.
There will be no more worrying about spending money on cocktails and coffee. I won't have to worry about my $1,400 bi-weekly payment clearing my account.
If I had to make this decision again, I wouldn't change a thing. Despite logging into my loan and bank accounts almost daily for two years, I managed to make it work and always had some money in my account, even if the amount was small.
What I originally thought would take 30 years to pay off is only taking two, which I am extremely proud of. Pushing through the stress and many tears was worth it, as I will now cross the threshold into financial freedom.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
A study shows Waymo is more expensive than Uber and Lyft, but some people are willing to eat the extra costs
Waymo's robotaxi competes with Uber and Lyft in some markets, including San Francisco. One study comparing about 90,000 prices found that the average ride in a Waymo is more expensive. Most people prefer the Waymo experience, but factoring in extra costs tells a different story. Waymo's robotaxi rides are more expensive than Uber and Lyft rides, but some people are still willing to pay the extra costs, a new study found. Obi, a rideshare price comparison platform, published a study that compared about 90,000 "offer records" — or quoted prices — between March 25 and April 25 in San Francisco. The platform compared prices between Waymo, UberX, and Lyft Standard. The study found that the average price of a Waymo ride is $20.43, which is $5.99 more than an average Lyft ride and $4.85 more than an average Uber ride. The average price of a Lyft was $14.44, while the average price of an Uber was $15.58." "Waymo rides cost 41% more than Lyft and 31% more than Uber on average when comparing pricing at the same time and across the same routes," the study said. The study also looked at price differences during peak hours. It found that during the evening rush hour between 5 p.m. and 6 p.m., a Waymo was about $11 more expensive than Lyft and nearly $9.50 more for an Uber. That Waymo is more expensive than Uber and Lyft is consistent throughout the entire day, with the smallest price gap occurring at around 5 a.m., the study said. Still, some people appear to be willing to bite the extra couple of bucks. Obi also distributed a consumer sentiment survey about Waymo to about 500 people, focusing on California and Phoenix, where robotaxis are available. A majority of respondents — about 70% — said they prefer "the experience of Waymo vs a regular rideshare with a driver," according to the study. When costs become a factor, 42.7% of respondents said they'd be willing to pay more, but it would depend on how much more it would cost. Around 16.3% of respondents said they'd pay up to $10 more, while 10.1% of respondents said they'd pay up to $5. Another 16.3% of respondents said they would only pay less than $5. Meanwhile, 39.1% of respondents said they would only pay the same or less for a Waymo and 26.8% of respondents said they wouldn't take one at all. While the study doesn't factor in tipping to the final cost of an Uber and Lyft, 26% of respondents said that they prefer Waymo because they don't have to leave a tip. Some Waymo fans who have previously spoken to Business Insider point to this flexibility and the overall experience of having a car to themselves. "Waymo is simply a better value," Kevin Hartz, a VC and early Uber angel investor, told BI back in February. Data published by the California Public Utilities Commission showed that the take-up by riders has quickly grown in the few years Waymo began to offer paid rides. In August 2023, the number of paid rides for the month was 12,617. By March 2025, the number increased by more than 5,500% to 708,180 rides. Waymo said in May that it has now provided more than 10 million paid rides across its operating cities in Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Austin. A spokesperson for Waymo, Uber, and Lyft did not respond to a request for comment. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
New Starbucks beverage goes after wellness market
"Remember to order a Starbucks drink after your workout," said no one ever. Starbucks has not always prioritized making its handcrafted beverages healthy. Some menu items have masked the taste of coffee to appeal to a larger audience, loading up on whipped cream and decadent syrups containing an entire day's worth of sugar. Health-conscious customers did, of course, have better-for-you options such as a caffe latte with skim milk, nitro cold brew, or espresso macchiato. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter But now consumer trends are truly evolving, with older and younger generations alike prioritizing low caloric content and clean ingredients like never before. And Starbucks' latest move shows it's taking notice. Image source: Getty Images During the Starbucks Leadership Experience event in Las Vegas, the company revealed that it is testing a new Banana Protein Cold Foam. This potential new menu addition tweaks the original cold foam by adding banana flavor and protein powder, which contains around 15 grams of protein per serving. This is not the first time Starbucks (SBUX) has introduced protein to its menu. In 2018, it launched the Protein Blended Cold Brew in Almond and Cocoa flavors, which blended cold brew, almond milk, plant-based protein, almond butter, banana date fruit blend, and ice to create the beverage. Related: Starbucks faces huge new rival The protein-packed drinks were only available for a limited time and were eventually discontinued months later, never to be seen again. At the Las vegas event, the coffee giant also introduced the Starting 5, a new program in which five stores will be chosen to test potential new menu items before rolling them out across all locations nationwide. This program is part of the "Back to Starbucks" strategy, in which the company aims to revamp its menu by "reimagining and modernizing its beverages and food to build a relevant, hype-worthy global menu that will resonate with customers," as stated in a press release. More Food News: Chick-fil-A quietly launches unexpected new menu itemsPopular Mexican restaurant adds new menu, new store conceptTaco Bell announces new menu items to battle McDonald's However, Starbucks isn't focusing solely on healthier menu items. The coffee chain has also been working overtime to test new food menu items currently under development. These include a new Butter Croissant, Raspberry Croissant, and Double Chocolate Cookie. Starbucks has not announced an official day for when the tested menu items will hit stores nationwide, but it has been making changes quickly, so if successful, these innovations could launch very soon. The chain's "Back to Starbucks" turnaround strategy aims to improve customers' overall experience by redesigning stores, optimizing efficiency, prioritizing coffee quality, simplifying its menu, and empowering its baristas. The coffee giant recently began simplifying its menu by reducing customization options and eliminating extra charges for milk alternatives. Related: Starbucks makes huge investment to solve a key problem In February, Starbucks discontinued nine beloved Frappuccinos from the coffee-based and crème categories, as well as other beverages and food items, nearly halving the available options. Although many might have thought the company's shrinking menu meant no more seasonal or permanent launches, this drastic move seems to have made room for more innovation. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starbucks Corporation (SBUX): 'This Man Is Taking Action,' Says Jim Cramer
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) stands against other stocks that Jim Cramer discusses. Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) is a coffee chain that is currently in the midst of a turnaround effort led by CEO Brian Niccol. The firm's shares are up by a modest 1% year-to-date after having dipped by a massive 19.8% in April. Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX)'s shares sank after President Trump's Liberation Day tariffs generated jitters about firms with exposure to China. The stock then tumbled by 11% in late April after the firm's second-quarter earnings miss added fuel to the firm and created doubts about the turnaround strategy. Cramer commented on both, the China exposure and the earnings: 'Last quarter, Starbucks, Brian Niccol, people thought he laid an egg. It was awful. Stock broke to 75. We stuck by it, David, and I just think this is what happens if you stick by quality management with a quality product. This morning, the FT has a piece that says Starbucks had received a lot of interest, according to Brian Niccol, in the sale of a stake in the China business and it's very very bullish and it talks about how there are a number of people who would like to buy a stake. The good news, they've got a lot of interest, a lot of interest, said Niccol and I'm going to leave it to you on your M&A front to see well what could this mean. But I think that it's very positive. A barista pouring freshly brewed coffee from an espresso machine to a cup in a bustling cafe. Cramer's an ardent believer in Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) CEO Brian Niccols. Here's what he recently said: 'I see the name Starbucks Corp (NASDAQ:SBUX) stock down five and change and I'm boiling. I got—I'm steamed. Not the company or the CEO Brian Niccol or even the coffee. No, I was steamed because of the stupid sellers who are furiously dumping the stock as fast as they could. Sell, sell. There's Brian Niccol. How dare they. The market opened up hideously off an awful gross domestic product number this morning—showed the economy actually shrinking. Oh my god. 3% in the first quarter. So Starbucks Corp (NASDAQ:SBUX) was just part of the red ink that drenched us. While we acknowledge the potential of SBUX as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data