
Can Your Relationship Pass the Gas Test?
June 12, 2025 – Some say passing gas in front of your partner is a sign of a healthy relationship. But does that notion pass the smell test?
Experts say yes. But what really matters is a shared understanding between partners about how to handle these inevitable – and sometimes awkward – moments.
"For one person, it might just be a normal human experience; and for another, it might be insulting and rude," said William Schroeder, LPC, a co-owner and counselor at Just Mind Counseling. "It could be seen as someone not having boundaries – or it could be seen as erotic."
As a therapist, he said, "I don't think any response is correct or incorrect, but it can help to make sure you are on the same page."
Some of this depends on gender and generation.
While the flatulence field isn't quite as well-researched as, say, heart disease or cancer, surveys suggest that the younger crowd may be more comfortable with this particular aspect of intimacy. One survey by online media company MIC found that 3 out of 4 people in their 20s and 30s regularly broke the "fart barrier" within the first year of dating. And an eHarmony survey of about 1,000 Australians found the average Aussie waited six months to pass gas in front of their partner – three months longer than it took to declare "I love you." Even then, those under the age of 24 were more likely than older respondents to break wind in the first three months of a relationship.
"I've talked about this in one-on-one conversations personally and professionally, and I found that at some point or another, people feared how they would burp and fart in front of each other," said Michelle Mouhtis, LCSW, who focuses on dating and relationships in her counseling business, That Millennial Therapist.
Boomer women were taught farting wasn't acceptable or "ladylike" and may have passed some of these ideas to their children, especially their daughters, she said. "That could be why in most heterosexual relationships, men tend to break the ice first, since these pressures weren't passed to them."
That's what Mouhtis expected in her own relationship. When she started dating her now-husband, she wanted him to cross that milestone first. When she asked, he admitted belching and passing gas grossed him out. After moving in together, Mouhtis discovered growing resentment and a mounting reliance on Gas-X.
After talking to friends and considering her actions, Mouhtis realized that not flatulating in front of her partner was a bellwether.
"I was actually holding back from him in other ways," she said.
Is Passing Gas in Front of a Partner a True Test of a Healthy Relationship?
While Mouhtis pegged her own avoidance to deeper issues, that's not always the case. People's reactions to passing gas – and the reasons behind them – can vary widely, depending on how they were socialized.
"For some, it's a sign of intimacy and ease – like you've moved from performance mode to true connection. For others, it might break the fantasy or signal a drop in romantic effort," said Jeff Guenther, LPC, who creates content under the handle @therapyjeff and hosts a podcast called Problem Solved. "Neither is right or wrong, but how each partner feels about it is important. The key is shared meaning, not shared gas."
Finding that shared meaning can be hard when couples are sharply divided. "People don't just have an opinion – they have an identity," Guenther said. For some, "it can be seen as a lack of respect or even a value system difference," said Schroeder.
For others, particularly long-term couples, "I have seen it come up as an issue on the periphery – like how someone won't leave the room or go to the bathroom and instead farts in front of them and it frustrates their partner," Schroeder said. "Most often it's [more] a metaphor for the relationship than it is the actual issue."
The meaning for you may be worth considering. "Are you holding back from your partner in other aspects of your relationship – like sharing what's bothering you?" Mouhtis said. "Is there a fear if you're fully yourself, you won't be accepted for who you are? Or are you afraid of criticism or rejection from your partner?"
How you were raised to deal with bodily functions can have a big impact too. Different cultures treat passing gas differently, Schroeder said. Many put added restrictions on women.
Talking about it can help. "Opening a dialogue about how it was treated in your own family of origin can actually lead to deeper understanding and empathy in your relationship – ultimately bringing you closer," Mouhtis said.
Talking to Your Partner About Gas
Most people don't have a direct conversation about flatulence and boundaries, therapists said. Instead, they deal with the fallout after one slips out.
"If one partner breaks the ice and farts first, and treats it with humor, it gives the other partner permission to do the same," Mouhtis said.
One approach to the subject: Take a 15-minute post-dinner "fart walk."
The "fart walk" became a 2024 online trend when influencer and cookbook author Mairlyn Smith promoted it as a healthy way to prevent bloating.
Smith's cheeky "#fartwalk" is backed by science. Several studies show that a short post-dinner walk helps lower blood sugar for people with diabetes. A 2021 study showed walking after eating helped ease symptoms of bloating.
"It's kind of the perfect setting to casually bring up bodily stuff without it feeling like a big deal," Guenther said. "Way less awkward than trying to have a fart talk while maintaining eye contact on the couch."
Bloating – that feeling of fullness or pressure in the belly area because of gas in the intestines – is common. A 2023 survey of more than 88,000 Americans found that 1 in 7 dealt with bloating in a week, with women and those with conditions like irritable bowel syndrome, celiac disease, and Crohn's disease most likely to have symptoms.
People dealing with such chronic conditions might find it necessary to talk about uncomfortable body issues earlier in relationships than others.
"For folks with GI issues, chronic conditions, or disabilities – talking about it early is not just practical, it's a sign of emotional maturity," Guenther said.
You could propose a "fart pact" with your partner, he said. "I'd describe it as a mutual agreement that we're doing this now – as in, farting in front of each other. We're not pretending we don't fart anymore."
This type of conversation, whether about flatulence or other bodily issues, is natural and important in long-term relationships, Schroeder said.
"Bodily experiences are a huge part of life, and sometimes that's around illness, caregiving, and respect for those we love," he said. "Humor and empathy are such important parts of human connection, and it helps to have hard discussions so we can find the balance we need in relationships."
Studies on Flatulence
Aging can change how often you pass gas. Though the term "old fart" is well known, a study published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology showed flatulence notably decreased with age.
The analysis of 16,000 Americans self-reporting various digestive symptoms showed younger people (ages 18 to 24) passed gas more often than older people (ages 45 to 64, and older). The report's authors theorize this could have to do with younger people eating more fermentable carbohydrates, moving more, and taking fewer medications that are known to slow intestinal movement.
Though less gas might be seen as a sign of health, some recent animal studies showed exposure to hydrogen sulfide, the chemical that makes gas smell, aided various body cells. Scientists tested artificial hydrogen sulfide and found the gas could potentially help people who get liver transplants and widen blood vessels.
While further research into hydrogen sulfide's effect on human cells is needed, there's no need to hide from a partner's smelly gas or blame yours on the dog.
Guenther said he's seeing a change with younger generations embracing acceptance.
"That dynamic seems to be shifting with Millennials and Gen Z, who are generally more body-positive and down to destigmatize stuff like this," he said.
Whichever side you land on, the health of the relationship comes down to open communication and understanding.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Confronting picture could 'embarrass' Australia on world stage
Inside a large cage is not where most Aussies picture a wild animal, but behind its steel bars is one of the only places the dingo is safe. An image of the creature inside its nighttime quarters has captured the world's attention, as it made the shortlist of an international photography competition. Taken by wildlife photojournalist Doug Gimesy, the plan was to show both the dingo and Lyn Watson from the Australian Dingo Foundation 'trapped', because governments in Australia promote the trapping, poisoning and shooting of our native apex predator. They have been completely wiped out across much of the landscape. "I wanted to create a picture that makes people stop and think, what's going on?" Gimesy told Yahoo News. "It is sad that a lot of our wildlife seems to only be 100 per cent safe when it is in an enclosed area, which is an affront to the term wild-life." During the day, the dingoes are able to roam free on a custom-fenced property, but at night they return to their pens. Gimesy's image was taken early in the morning before they were let outside into the sunshine. Setting up the right angle and perfect lighting took close to an hour because focusing on the eyes of two subjects behind metal bars is technically tough. Gimesy wanted the image to be both beautiful and shocking. The picture, named 'On their side', was a finalist in the 'Human/Nature' category of the prestigious BigPicture: Natural World Competition. It's one of two pictures he was nominated for — the other, 'Baby on Board' shows another threatened species, a grey-headed flying fox carrying its young as she flies. Despite their numbers continuing to decline, the species continues to be forced out of its habitat due to noise, mess, and claims about damage to trees. Gimesy hopes his images will help Australians see native animals in new ways. "When our wildlife are put on the world stage, it can sometimes nudge policy just a little bit, because people may be embarrassed about what we're doing," he said. "All imagery that I shoot is really about trying to change attitude and behaviour." Dingo culling continues in Victoria because some farmers believe they kill sheep. Watson, the subject of Gimesy's portrait, believes they much prefer to eat native animals, and will only eat sheep as a last resort when they've been shorn. "If I put down a bowl of crickets and a bowl of lamb, the lamb won't get touched because it's so fatty," she said. Although dingoes are threatened with extinction across the state, in 2024 the Victorian government extended a culling program until 2028. The program will mean that a genetically distinct population of Victoria's alpine dingoes which numbers fewer than 2,640 individuals, will continue to be killed. Although a population in the northwest that numbers just 40 is now protected. However, they were put at risk earlier this year when a contractor mistakenly dropped baits in their known habitat. Watson compares the dingoes' situation in modern Australia to that of wolves in Europe during the 19th and 20th centuries, where they were hunted to near extinction. "Nobody even knows how many dingos we started with in Australia, before they started killing them wholesale," she said. "I wish we didn't have to keep our sanctuary, but it's the safest place in Victoria for them." Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Outrage after Aussie farmer cops $398 fine for helping drought-stricken neighbour
Aussies are fuming after a farmer recently copped a $398 fine for moving two bales of hay across a road to a help out his drought-stricken neighbour. Graham Thomson, a hay contractor based in Condah, in Victoria's extremely dry southwest, was lugging the sheep feed on his tractor forks when a National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR) officer's flashing lights brought him to a halt. The long-time local said he had checked there were no other vehicles in sight before he travelled the 600 metres down the road, and across the Henty Highway. However, Mr Thomson said the officer informed him he wasn't allowed to haul anything on the front-end loader on a public road, and issued him the hefty fine for 'not restraining' the hay. 'I'm meant to have a load binder over them. I've been farming for about 50 years and I didn't know that,' he told Sheep Central, adding the officer said he would need to place the hay on a truck to transport it on the road. 'I didn't say anything, but one minute he says I can't carry anything on the road and then he books me for carrying something on it that's not restrained. So that didn't make sense to me.' The incident — which reportedly occurred the same day a mental health event for farmers was held at the Condah Hotel — has infuriated others, with another local farmer Andy Satchell slamming the decision online. A video uploaded to his Facebook shows the unsecured load in question. 'To say Thommo was upset would be an understatement,' he wrote. 'Surely farmers have a right to keep their livestock fed.' The clip has since gone viral, with thousands of Aussie sharing their frustration over the 'ridiculous' fine. 'Every farmer is breaking the law as soon as they put a round roll or a square bale on those forks to go across a road,' Mr Thomson told Sheep Central. 'The fine was worth more than the value of the hay.' A GoFundMe page set up on Mr Thomson's behalf is raising money to help him fight the fine in court. 'Thommo is choosing to contest the fine in court because he believes that, after 60+ years in the industry, helping a neighbour feed their livestock shouldn't be penalised,' the fundraiser reads. Another aim of the fight is to make sure the voices of famers are heard, the page says. Mr Thomson has requested all excess funds be donated to the National Centre for Farmer Health. 'Due to farmers experiencing environmental factors, such as drought and floods, I'd like any excess funds to go to farmer mental health, as we need to keep the food chain going,' Mr Thomson said. 🚘 Major road rule changes coming into effect on July 1 across Australia 👮 New laws with up to $80,000 fine that many don't know is illegal 🐑 Incredible rural scene brings 'glimmer of hope' to struggling Aussies A NHVR spokesperson told Yahoo News safety on Australian roads is a "top priority" and it's their job to prevent road accidents. 'On 8 June, SCOs intercepted a tractor carrying two double stacked large hay bales on the Henty Highway in Condah, with one of the bales not restrained. The SCOs applied both an engagement and enforcement method, by providing education to the driver on his registration conditions in regard to carrying a load on the highway, and the driver was also issued a minor load restraint infringement for the unrestrained bale,' the spokesperson said. 'Though the NHVR is committed to its 'inform and educate' approach, road safety is always the highest priority and enforcement action may be taken when necessary to help ensure all road users, including both the heavy vehicle driver and other motorists, make it to their destination safely.' According to the state's Heavy Vehicle National Law schedule of penalties, Mr Thomson was hit with the minimum fine for breaching mass, dimension or loading requirements. The maximum penalty is an eye-watering $13,310. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

Wall Street Journal
4 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
What Would All Y'all Say?
Steve Follin purports to offer 'A Lesson in Southern Lingo' (Letters, June 12), but his instructions don't track with my North Carolina upbringing. In my experience, 'you' is singular and 'y'all' the usual plural. 'All y'all,' however, is limited for special circumstances. One could approach a group and say: 'John and George, I need y'all' without ambiguity. Yet if he were to approach a group of six in which he needed only four, he would say: 'I need all y'all, except for Bill and Joe.' Separately, 'All my love to you and yours' would usually refer to the immediate family, whereas 'Give my love to all y'all' would imply a large immediate or extended family. Andy Smith