Oxpens bridge: Oxford Thames crossing judicial review dismissed
A judicial review of plans for a new bridge over the Thames has been dismissed by the High Court.The £10m pedestrian and cycle crossing was proposed by Oxford City Council and would involve clearing a section of the city's Grandpont Nature Park.Campaigners have argued it would lead to irreversible biodiversity loss on the site, and challenged the legality of the council's decision. Responding to the court's judgement, city council leader Susan Brown said: "We welcome this outcome, which upholds our planning decision in full."
The authority gave the go-ahead for the Oxpens River Bridge in April.In submissions to the High Court, the Friends of Grandpont Nature Park group argued the committee was misled on key facts and had not considered vital information.But Deputy Judge Dan Kolinsky KC rejected all five of the group's challenges in his written judgement issued on Monday.The bridge would connect the Osney Mead industrial estate and the Oxpens area with the city centre.It is being funded using £8.8m from the Housing and Growth Deal programme, and £1.5m from the Housing and Infrastructure Fund.
Ms Brown said: "While it is important that people have the right to challenge decisions through the legal process, the government has been clear judicial reviews should not be used to block much-needed infrastructure that benefits communities."With the decision made, we can now focus council time and public money to progress delivery of the bridge. "Once complete, it will provide an essential, safe, and attractive walking and cycling route linking new homes and jobs at Oxpens and Osney Mead with the city centre."The Friends of Grandpont Nature Park were contacted for comment.
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
17 hours ago
- Telegraph
Oxford could become first city in 20 years to launch congestion charge
Oxford, which has many narrow medieval streets, has been named as one of the most congested cities in the UK. The county council, run by the Liberal Democrats, has previously taken controversial steps to tackle the issue, including launching low-traffic neighbourhoods in parts of the city. Its cabinet will vote on the congestion charge proposal on June 17. If approved, a public consultation will begin on June 23, with the measures potentially being introduced by the autumn. The scheme would be enforced using automatic number plate recognition cameras at six key locations in the city but would only apply to cars. Other motor vehicles, including vans, HGVs and coaches, and cars with a permit, would be exempt. The council said it would help improve bus services in the area and make it easier for those with permits, including carers, traders and blue badge holders, to travel by car around the city. It insisted the charge would be temporary and would eventually be replaced by traffic filters, which limit through-traffic along a section of a road to certain modes of transport such as cars. A fine of £70 would apply to those who break the rules. The filters are intended to be introduced when Botley Road, a major street in the city that has been closed for more than two years, reopens in August 2026. Councils clash Oxford city council, a separate local authority, criticised the scheme. Susan Brown, the council's leader, said on Monday: 'There has been no engagement with businesses, residents or the city council until today – yet again the city is being done to rather than engaged with in preparing transport proposals. 'We are concerned that this scheme allows people who can afford to do so to buy access to our streets. Those who can't will struggle.' Andrew Gant, the county council's transport chief, described the city council's comments as 'disappointing'. He added: 'They may be reassured as they learn more about proposals to manage traffic in and around the city. The city council has asked us to take action and that is exactly what this is. 'The recommendation is to engage with businesses, residents and organisations on this idea for a congestion charge to improve bus services and travel around the city for everyone. 'Any revenue from this scheme would by law be spent on improving travel. This is a bespoke idea for Oxford, it is not the same as a London congestion charge.'
North Wales Chronicle
2 days ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Dale Vince's High Court claim against Daily Mail publisher thrown out
Mr Vince brought legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) over an article headlined 'Labour repays £100,000 to sex pest donor', published in June 2023. The story reported that the Labour Party was handing back money to donor Davide Serra with a picture showing Mr Vince holding a Just Stop Oil banner. This picture, published in print and on The Mail+ app, was changed to one of Mr Serra online 47 minutes after publication, while the original picture of Mr Vince remained in the print version. An employment tribunal in 2022 heard Mr Serra had made sexist comments to a female colleague which were found to amount to unlawful harassment related to sex. Mr Vince claimed ANL misused his personal data and that the publication of his photograph with this story would lead readers to believe he had been accused of sexual harassment. ANL had defended the claim, with its lawyers previously telling the High Court in London that it was an abuse of process and a 'resurrection' of a libel claim that was dismissed last year. In a judgment on Monday, a High Court judge threw out the data protection claim. Mr Justice Swift said: 'There is no real prospect that Mr Vince will succeed on his claim. 'As in the defamation proceedings, it is accepted that on reading the text of the article published in Mail+ and the Daily Mail any ordinary reader would very quickly realise that Mr Vince was not being accused of sexual harassment. 'Considered on this basis the personal data relating to Mr Vince was processed fairly.' He said there was 'every reason' why the data protection claim should have been heard with the defamation claim last year. 'Both claims arose out of the same event, the publication of the article in Mail+ and the Daily Mail,' he added. 'Both claims rely on the same factual circumstances, namely the juxtaposition of the headline, photographs and caption, and the contention that the combination of the headline and the photograph created the misleading impression that Mr Vince had been accused of sexual harassment.' Following the decision, Mr Vince said he planned to appeal. He said: 'What we're dealing with here is a media law that predates the internet. Think about that. Essentially, UK law says that people read entire articles and not just headlines. 'We all know this is untrue, the internet has changed everything, modern attention spans are famously small and shrinking, dwell times on articles are measured in seconds and media organisations have an abundance of data on this.' He continued: 'The judge said if you read the whole story, you'd realise the headline was not about me, begging the question why was my face highlighted in the articles perhaps. 'But more importantly, people don't read entire articles, the law assumes it – but does so wrongly, against all data and against common sense.'
STV News
5 days ago
- STV News
Trial date set for three men charged over fires at Keir Starmer properties
A trial date has been set for three men charged in connection with arson attacks on two properties and a car linked to Sir Keir Starmer. Ukrainian national Roman Lavrynovych, 21, and Romanian national Stanislav Carpiuc, 26, appeared together at the Old Bailey on Friday. Ukrainian national Petro Pochynok, 34, refused to attend the hearing. Two of the fires took place in Kentish Town, north London – one in the early hours of May 12 at the home where Sir Keir lived before he became Prime Minister and moved into Downing Street. The entrance to Sir Keir Starmer's house in Kentish Town. / Credit: James Manning/PA A car was set alight in the same street four days earlier on May 8. The other fire was on May 11 at the front door of a house converted into flats in Islington. Lavrynovych, of Lewisham, south-east London, has been charged with three counts of arson with intent to endanger life on May 8, May 11 and May 12. Carpiuc, from Romford, east London, and Pochynok, of Islington, north London, are each accused of one count of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life between April 17 and May 13. Lavrynovych and Carpiuc appeared at the hearing via videolink from HMP Belmarsh, and spoke only to confirm their identities and dates of birth via an interpreter. Ms Justice Cheema Grubb told the court that Pochynok had refused to leave his cell for the preliminary hearing. All three defendants were remanded in custody to next appear for a plea and trial preparation hearing at the same court on October 17. A provisional trial date was set for April 27 next year in front of a High Court judge. A fourth person, a 48-year-old man, was arrested by police at Stansted Airport on Monday on suspicion of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life in connection with the incidents. The Metropolitan Police said he had been released on bail until next month. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
