
Is this deal between China and Saudi Arabia going to end dollar dominance in the world?
(File)
China Saudi Arabia Trade: The US Dollar (USD) is the the most dominant currency in global trade, accounting for nearly 54 percent of of foreign trade invoices worldwide, according to various reports. But US' main rival, China, aims to topple the dollar's dominance and promote its own currency, Renminbi (RMB), in bilateral trade.
According to reports, China has inked an 'oil for gold' agreement with Saudi Arabia, under which Beijing will pay for Saudi oil in RMB, and Riyadh will convert any trade plus into gold through the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE). As per reports, the SGE is building secure vaults in Saudi Arabia to make it easier for the oil-rich Kingdom to convert their trade surplus into gold. Challenge to dollar dominance?
While the China-Saudi Arabia deal is undoubtedly a major move on part of Beijing to increase the share of RMB in global trade, which stands at less than 5 percent at present, it is unlikely to cause any significant hit to the US Dollar, which is expected to remain the dominant currency for the foreseeable future, according to economists.
Experts believe the Saudi-China agreement will have little impact on the dollar as its use in global trade will decline only if its utility as a medium of exchange, reserve asset and unit of account plummets. Saudi-China deal not a step towards gold standard
The agreement to convert trade surplus into gold is also not a novel one, and has been used Central Banks globally for years. These banks have been converting their reserves into gold, and the trend has witnessed a surge in recent years, as per market experts.
According to experts, converting currency into gold is not a step towards establishing a gold-standard in the global market because this would require conversion at a fixed exchange rate as one of the pre-requisites. While China's RMB can be converted into gold at market value, this is no way implies that gold will replace the dollar as the medium of payment, they say. Why gold can't replace currency in global trade?
Experts also pointed how the elasticity of supply of flat currency gives it a major advantage over physical commodities like gold, as the currency supply can be moderated via fiscal and monetary policies, as mandated by the liabilities of the government and its regulated institutions.
Governments worldwide closely monitor the supply of flat currency, ensuring market prices remain stable and deflation does not occur. Central banks often set a target of about 2 percent for inflation, beyond which the attractiveness of the currency decreases, including its utility in terms of storing value.
As an example, if the dollar weakens, the real income of exporting countries who use it as a mode of payment, also goes down, while the purchasing power of their reserves also plumets.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
39 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India urges WTO to act on non-tariff barriers, ensure dispute resolution
India has called for action to curb non-tariff barriers, address trade distortions caused by non-market economies, and restore a strong dispute settlement mechanism at the WTO, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said on Wednesday. The minister also pitched for strengthening the current consensus-based approach at the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the special and differential treatment given to less developed countries and developing countries, and bringing back focus on issues that have already been finalised and mandated at previous ministerial meetings. "India made a strong pitch for addressing non-tariff barriers that certain countries use to deprive others of market access, take necessary action against non-market economies, ensure that we have a strong dispute settlement mechanism at the WTO so that finality can be brought and discipline can be maintained," Goyal told reporters here. The minister made these remarks in a meeting of about 25 ministers of WTO member countries, including Australia, Singapore, France and Nigeria. WTO Director General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala also participated in the meeting. This mini-ministerial informal gathering was called by Australia ahead of the 14th ministerial conference, scheduled in Cameroon in March next year. It was held on the margins of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) Ministerial Council Meeting here. The WTO deals with the global rules of trade between nations. Its main function is to ensure that trade flows as smoothly, predictably and freely as possible. It is a Geneva-based 166-member body. Since 2009, the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism has not been functioning properly as the US has stalled appointments of members in the appellate body. On earlier occasions, India has pressed for a two-tier dispute resolution system at the WTO. "All in all, the shared concerns of all the ministers were placed before the gathering today, and we have all resolved to collectively work to strengthen the working of the WTO, to ensure the core principles are respected and work towards global good and global growth in trade," he said. He added that it was agreed upon by the member nations to make an effort to bring back the mojo into the organisation as all countries recognise the importance of multilateralism. The other tracks which came up for discussion include resolving agri issues, including finding a permanent solution to the issues of public stockholding for food grains. "There is the track on finding solutions to address the concerns of overfishing and indiscriminate fishing that is leading to depletion of fish stocks, there are concerns about several JSIs (joint statement initiatives) (or) pluri-laterals, which some countries believe should be brought within the multi-lateral framework," he said. On the China-led proposal for an investment facilitation pact, he said, issues that have been mandated at the WTO should get priority and should be the first issues to be resolved. Issues going beyond trade (like this proposal) should not be brought into it as it would create further differences between member countries, he added. India is against this proposal. Whether any member raised the issue of MPIA (multi party interim appeal arbitration arrangement), the minister said only one or two members spoke about that. "But there does not seem to be very much consensus or any traction to that idea. I have not heard of any cases resolved through MPIA," he said. The MPIA is being pushed by certain members. It is an alternative mechanism to resolve WTO disputes that are appealed by a country in the absence of a functional WTO Appellate Body. Whether the WTO is facing an existential crisis, he said that one should not jump to the conclusion that an existential crisis has been created. "Challenges will come and situations will arise, we have to address such challenges, face these situations and within the ambit of the WTO framework," he said, adding "the WTO now is about 30 years old, what we need to do is work with an open mind and unlock possibilities".


India Today
42 minutes ago
- India Today
Explained: How India can benefit from striking trade deal with US
A trade deal between India and the United States might finally be around the corner. And while the headlines focus on tariffs and tricky negotiations, there's a bigger question at play: Can India turn this into a long-term win?Former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan believes the answer is yes, provided India plays its cards may be noted that US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick recently hinted that a long-pending trade agreement with India may be wrapped up in the coming On the surface, it might seem like New Delhi is being nudged to lower tariffs under pressure from Washington. But Rajan doesn't see it that an interview with India Today TV, Rajan was asked whether India should push back or play along, especially with US President Donald Trump stirring the pot again. He responded that there's no harm in cutting tariffs if it helps us in the long run.'Well, so long as we are careful about the areas which still need some support. I mean, certain parts of the agricultural sector will still need uh some support, so long as we are careful about that, broadly speaking, reducing our tariffs could be beneficial for us even as we make a play for becoming host to many of the supply chains that crisscross the world,' he in that I don't see it as a win-lose if India accepts lower tariffs and does a deal with the United States. I don't see it as us kowtowing to them but we have to do it with our interests in mind.'The idea, Rajan said, is not to give in, but to think strategically. And if done right, it could actually fire up Indian industry.'Where are the areas that we can easily afford to bring down tariffs? Our industry in many situations actually becomes more competitive when they're forced to compete with imports and uh compete on a global stage,' he said.'Remember in the early 2000s we were world beaters. Our industry felt it could take on the world. We need that kind of uh of um sort of enthusiasm again.'But that's not the only thing India has to consider. Rajan flagged a potential knock-on effect from US-China tensions. If the US sticks to steep tariffs on Chinese goods, where will those products go?'That said, you know even as the tariffs get sort of settled, there is the huge issue of if the tariffs on China remain high from the United States. Chinese goods will look for a home elsewhere and you know one of the homes will be India,' he puts India in a tricky spot. Lowering tariffs for the US might invite a flood of Chinese imports, unless India plans carefully. 'So we will have to figure out how we manage that without on the one hand reducing tariffs to the US but elevating tariffs to the rest of the world,' he added.'We need to be very clever about it. Where we benefit from Chinese imports and we should focus on keeping tariffs low but of course, and where there is dumping we have to be careful about having an open door,' Rajan put, Rajan's pitch is for smart economics. If India can use this moment to sharpen its trade strategy while protecting what matters, there's a real chance to come out Watch


News18
42 minutes ago
- News18
Gold Price Today, June 4: Yellow Metal Rises, Check 24 Carat Rates In Delhi, Mumbai, Other Cities
Gold Price Today, June 4: In Mumbai, the price of gold stood at Rs 90,900 per 10 grams for 22-carat and Rs 99,170 per 10 grams for 24-carat. Gold Rates Today In India, June 4: Gold prices on Wednesday rose as uncertainty over US-China trade relations and global economic concerns boosted safe-haven demand. In Mumbai, the price of gold stood at Rs 90,900 per 10 grams for 22-carat and Rs 99,170 per 10 grams for 24-carat. The price of silver rose by Rs 1,900 to Rs 1,02,000 per kg in Mumbai. On the MCX, gold was trading higher by 0.34 per cent to trade at Rs 98,048 per 10 grams. Silver was also trading up by 0.18 per cent to trade at Rs 1,04,400 per kg in the morning trade. Known for its unmatched purity, 24-carat gold continues to attract buyers seeking premium quality. Meanwhile, 22-carat gold, prized for its durability and timeless charm, remains a favourite among jewellery enthusiasts and investors alike, striking a balance between elegance and practicality. First Published: June 04, 2025, 09:47 IST