
They Inhaled a Gas and Scaled Everest in Days. Is It the Future of Mountaineering?
Climbing Mount Everest typically takes weeks, with most of that time spent at the foot of the mountain adjusting to the thin air. But four British men last week shrank that timeline dramatically, traveling from London to the summit and back in less than a week, according to the organizer of their expedition.
They skipped the adjustment period, in part, by inhaling a secret weapon: xenon gas.
Their feat has roiled the world of mountaineering and prompted an investigation by the Nepalese government, as use of the gas is fiercely debated. Some research has shown that xenon can quickly acclimatize people to high altitudes, even as some experts say the benefits, if any, are negligible and the side effects of its use remain unclear.
Organizers said the gas was key to the speed of the climb, but their approach has prompted a broader debate that strikes at the core of mountaineering: Should scaling Mount Everest, one of sporting's greatest accomplishments, be made easier — available to more people during a quick vacation — with the help of a performance enhancer?
'It is a provocation, especially for traditional mountaineers, who feel bad about this idea that you can climb Everest in less than a week,' Lukas Furtenbach, who organized the exhibition, said in a phone interview from the base of the mountain. 'This showed that it can work.'
Mr. Furtenbach said that beginning in 2026 he planned to offer two-week round-trip excursions to Mount Everest using xenon gas, cutting the typical time needed to scale the mountain by several weeks.
'This can be the future of commercially guided mountaineering on Mount Everest,' he said.
With Xenon, 'you feel better.'
For those who live at lower elevations and have traveled to the mountains, the discomfort of altitude sickness is all too clear. Symptoms include nausea, headaches and disrupted sleep, and in some cases it can lead to brain swelling, or even death.
As you go higher, less oxygen is absorbed into the bloodstream with each breath. That is why so many people who climb Everest use supplemental oxygen.
Xenon, an odorless gas, has been known for years to activate a molecule called the hypoxia-inducible factor, which is also turned on when people acclimate to low oxygen, said Hugh Montgomery, a professor of intensive care medicine at University College London and a mountaineer who led an expedition to Mount Everest to study how humans respond to low oxygen.
'So what these people claim to have done,' he said, 'is basically found a way to switch on the adaptation to low oxygen levels.'
The group took what was known from medical science, he said, 'and have now applied it, recreationally, to sport mountaineering.'
Professor Montgomery said scientists were still unsure how xenon triggers this response.
While some doctors have used the gas in the past to 'precondition' patients to low oxygen levels — for example, before major heart surgery — the practice hasn't really caught on because 'it hasn't been as protective as one would hope,' he said.
Mike Shattock, a professor of cellular cardiology at King's College London, said 'xenon probably does very little and there is virtually no reputable scientific evidence that it makes any difference.'
Experts also cautioned that self-medicating with xenon, which has the effects of anesthesia, could lead to overdose or death, and more study was needed to understand how the gas works and its use in mountaineering.
On Mount Everest, the weeks of training and acclimation on the lower levels of the mountain are typically required to survive the 'death zone,' the area above 26,000 feet where the air is particularly thin.
The British group, which included four former special forces members, took a different approach.
About 10 weeks before the expedition, the men began sleeping in hypoxic tents, which lower oxygen levels in the air and gradually acclimatized the hikers to conditions on Mount Everest, Mr. Furtenbach said.
While hypoxic tents have been used by some climbers for years, the big innovation for the British expedition came two weeks before the excursion, when the men flew to Limburg, Germany, outside Frankfurt, where a doctor, Michael Fries, had been experimenting with inhaled gases in his clinic.
The men wore masks hooked up to ventilators as an anesthesiologist slowly introduced higher levels of xenon into their systems.
Mr. Furtenbach, who has tried xenon gas on his own mountaineering trips since 2020, said that after the treatment, users experienced enhanced breathing and the sensation of more lung volume, and 'when you do your workout or training, you feel better.'
After arriving at the base of Everest, the British group climbed to the summit in less than three days, which Mr. Furtenbach said was one of the fastest times for a group that hadn't acclimatized on the mountain. (According to the Nepalese government, the record for the fastest climb overall is held by Lakpa Gelu, a Sherpa, who reached the top of the mountain in just under 11 hours.)
The rapid climb by the British expedition and the use of the gas caught the eye of the Nepalese government, and the fallout has been swift.
The use of the gas is 'against climbing ethics.'
Himal Gautam, the director of Nepal's tourism department, which is responsible for regulating expeditions on the nation's mountains, said in an interview that using the gas was 'against climbing ethics,' and that it would hurt the country's tourism industry and the Sherpas who help climbers by reducing their time on the mountain.
Mr. Gautam said his department was looking into the use of the gas by the British climbers, one of whom, Alistair Carns, is also a member of Parliament.
In an interview, Mr. Carns said that his expedition has been in touch with the ministry, and clarified with the department that it had not taken the gas on the mountain.
He added that many people who want to climb Mount Everest don't have the time to spend multiple weeks acclimating.
'The reality is if I had six to eight weeks to climb Everest, I would, but I'm a government minister and I don't have time,' he said. 'What we've done is we've proven that you can reduce the timeline safely.'
Others in the mountaineering community have warned against the use of the gas.
In January, the International Climbing and Mountaineering Federation, a global network that promotes and protects the sport, released a statement that said there was no evidence that xenon gas improved performance, adding that 'inappropriate use can be dangerous.'
The federation noted that xenon has been on the World Anti-Doping Agency's list of banned substances since 2014 and is not approved in all countries.
'From a medical point of view, off-label use without a scientific basis and with unknown health risks must be rejected,' the statement said.
Mr. Furtenbach argued that his expeditions were still using Sherpas — five accompanied the British climbers to the summit — and that shorter times on the mountain were safer, as they reduce the chance that climbers will be exposed to other health threats, including avalanches, hypothermia or falls.
He said the prohibition of the gas by the World Anti-Doping Agency didn't apply to mountaineering because it is not a regulated competitive sport.
Use of the gas gets at a core question about why people climb big hills in the first place, Professor Montgomery said.
'Is it really a good idea that we can all have what we want, when we want, as quick as we want?' he asked. 'Are we missing out on the sacrifice you sometimes have to make to get the achievement?'
'I'm not a critic,' he added. 'But maybe just bagging every hill at speed means you miss out on the joy you could have had.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
19 minutes ago
- CNN
Japan's annual births fall to record low as population emergency deepens
The number of newborns in Japan is decreasing faster than projected, with the number of annual births falling to another record low last year, according to government data released Wednesday. The health ministry said 686,061 babies were born in Japan in 2024, a drop of 5.7% on the previous year and the first time the number of newborns fell below 700,000 since records began in 1899. It's the 16th straight year of decline. It's about one-quarter of the peak of 2.7 million births in 1949 during the postwar baby boom. The data in a country of rapidly aging and shrinking population adds to concern about the sustainability of the economy and national security at a time it seeks to increase defense spending. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has described the situation as 'a silent emergency' and has promised to promote more flexible working environment and other measures that would help married couples to balance work and parenting, especially in rural areas where family values tend to be more conservative and harder on women. Japan is one of a number of east Asian countries grappling with falling birth rates and an aging population. South Korea and China have fought for years to encourage families to have more children. Also on Wednesday, Vietnam scrapped decades-old laws limiting families to two children in an effort to stem falling birth rates. The health ministry's latest data showed that Japan's fertility rate – the average number of babies a woman is expected to have in her lifetime – also fell to a new low of 1.15 in 2024, from 1.2 a year earlier. The number of marriages was slightly up, to 485,063 couples, but the downtrend since the 1970s remains unchanged. Experts say the government's measures have not addressed a growing number of young people reluctant to marry, largely focusing on already married couples. The younger generation are increasingly reluctant to marry or have children due to bleak job prospects, a high cost of living and a gender-biased corporate culture that adds extra burdens for women and working mothers, experts say. A growing number of women also cite pressure to take their husband's surname as a reason for their reluctance to marry. Under Japanese law, couples must choose a single surname to marry. Japan's population of about 124 million people is projected to fall to 87 million by 2070, with 40% of the population over 65.


CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
Japan's annual births fall to record low as population emergency deepens
The number of newborns in Japan is decreasing faster than projected, with the number of annual births falling to another record low last year, according to government data released Wednesday. The health ministry said 686,061 babies were born in Japan in 2024, a drop of 5.7% on the previous year and the first time the number of newborns fell below 700,000 since records began in 1899. It's the 16th straight year of decline. It's about one-quarter of the peak of 2.7 million births in 1949 during the postwar baby boom. The data in a country of rapidly aging and shrinking population adds to concern about the sustainability of the economy and national security at a time it seeks to increase defense spending. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has described the situation as 'a silent emergency' and has promised to promote more flexible working environment and other measures that would help married couples to balance work and parenting, especially in rural areas where family values tend to be more conservative and harder on women. Japan is one of a number of east Asian countries grappling with falling birth rates and an aging population. South Korea and China have fought for years to encourage families to have more children. Also on Wednesday, Vietnam scrapped decades-old laws limiting families to two children in an effort to stem falling birth rates. The health ministry's latest data showed that Japan's fertility rate – the average number of babies a woman is expected to have in her lifetime – also fell to a new low of 1.15 in 2024, from 1.2 a year earlier. The number of marriages was slightly up, to 485,063 couples, but the downtrend since the 1970s remains unchanged. Experts say the government's measures have not addressed a growing number of young people reluctant to marry, largely focusing on already married couples. The younger generation are increasingly reluctant to marry or have children due to bleak job prospects, a high cost of living and a gender-biased corporate culture that adds extra burdens for women and working mothers, experts say. A growing number of women also cite pressure to take their husband's surname as a reason for their reluctance to marry. Under Japanese law, couples must choose a single surname to marry. Japan's population of about 124 million people is projected to fall to 87 million by 2070, with 40% of the population over 65.


Medscape
39 minutes ago
- Medscape
How a Lawsuit Can Break a Doctor — and What to Do About It
In 2018, Samuel Kaufman, MD, specialist in gynecology and obstetrics, published a book titled Delivering Justice , in which he recounted his 15-year ordeal through a legal battle that he ultimately won — but at great emotional cost. The introduction notes that the physician became emotionally involved in the case and was pulled out of his comfort zone, and that the anxiety experienced during legal proceedings as a defendant was exhausting. In many parts of the world, lawsuits for medical malpractice have become increasingly common. In Mexico, for example, standards of accountability in healthcare have broadened, and there are now multiple legal avenues through which patients can file complaints when they feel inadequately treated. This has led to malpractice suits becoming more routine. A review conducted in India in 2024 explored the intersection of terms such as negligence, malpractice, litigation, and consequences. The review identified 17 relevant articles and concluded that legal cases involving healthcare professionals have a significant negative emotional impact. Not only can these situations lead to stress and guilt, but in extreme cases, they have even been associated with suicide. The authors argue that more research is needed to better understand how these proceedings affect health professionals. In 2000, Albert Wu, MD, MPH, professor of health policy and management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, coined the term 'second victim syndrome' to describe a condition experienced by healthcare workers who have committed a medical error and suffer psychological trauma as a result. The symptoms often include emotional distress, cognitive disruptions, and burnout, which can increase the likelihood of future errors. Although second victim syndrome and stress resulting from a medical negligence case are not the same, it's clear that both errors and legal issues in day-to-day practice can harm clinicians' mental health. A 2009 article described the natural course of recovery from second victim syndrome, outlining six phases: Chaos and response to the incident; Intrusive reflections; Restoring personal integrity; Enduring the inquisition; Receiving emotional first aid; and Moving forward. Today, it is increasingly likely that healthcare professionals will, at some point, face legal proceedings related to medical negligence. This makes it all the more important to understand the emotional toll of these processes and how to respond to them. Some hospitals have introduced morbidity and mortality conferences where clinicians' decisions are reviewed and mistakes are openly analyzed. Such discussions are valuable for improving the quality of care and preventing future errors, but little attention is paid to the emotional and psychological impact on the physicians involved. Sometimes, as in cases of second victim syndrome, negative emotional responses can occur even in the absence of a lawsuit. It is crucial that we continue discussing clinical errors within healthcare institutions while ensuring these conversations do not further heighten emotional distress for the people involved. These meetings should not feel like an inquisition. With regard to medical liability, much research has focused on the specialties most often sued, the economic impact of claims, and the relationship between quality of care and liability judgments. However, there is a notable lack of research on how litigation affects healthcare workers and their performance after they are notified of a legal complaint. It is difficult to offer general recommendations on this issue, because each case is unique. In my opinion, feelings of guilt or anxiety after a serious error or in the face of litigation are normal. Personally, I would be concerned about someone who felt no such emotions at all — or who felt them only minimally. My first recommendation is to seek psychological support. The second is to obtain medical liability insurance, especially because many malpractice cases are handled in civil court and carry financial consequences. If we can reduce the fear of losing our assets through proper insurance, that may help alleviate some of the stress of being involved in legal proceedings. Today, lawyers need primary care physicians just as much as physicians need legal counsel. Mauricio Sarmiento Chavero is a physician, lawyer, and author. He currently runs a medical liability law practice. His latest published book is El estatus jurídico del médico residente en México (The Legal Status of Medical Residents in Mexico).