Australian antisemitism report proposes university funding cuts, deportations
An Australian report on combating antisemitism has recommended cutting funding for universities that fail to protect Jewish students and screening visa applicants and non-citizens for extremist views.
The plan, led by Australia's special envoy on antisemitism Jillian Segal, responds to a sharp rise in antisemitic incidents across Australia since the beginning of Israel's war in Gaza in late 2023.
The report proposes a sweeping set of reforms across education, public institutions, online spaces, media and immigration to 'push (antisemitism) to the margins of society'.
'The plan is an overarching one covering many areas where urgent action is needed,' Segal said in a news conference on Thursday.
'We have seen cars being torched, synagogues being torched, individual Jews harassed and attacked. That is completely unacceptable.'
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government welcomed the plan and would consider Segal's recommendations.
'There's a number of things that can be implemented quickly,' he said. 'There are a number of things that will require work over a period of time. This is something that government needs to work with civil society on at all levels.'
Segal was appointed as Australia's special envoy in July 2024 to develop strategies to combat antisemitism and her report comes days after an arson attack on a Melbourne synagogue.
The report singled out universities as a central focus of reform, warning antisemitism had become 'ingrained and normalised' within academia, university courses and campuses.
It recommended universities face a 'report card' system that assessed whether their campuses were safe for Jewish students and staff.
It said universities that failed to act on antisemitism should have funding withheld, and public grants to researchers or academics should also be terminated if they engaged in antisemitic conduct or hate speech.
Universities Australia, which represents the 39 universities in the country, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In February, its members agreed to adopt a new definition of antisemitism after consultation with Segal.
The report also said funding for cultural bodies and festivals should be cut 'where the institution or festival promotes, facilitates or does not deal effectively with hate or antisemitism'.
It also called for visa applicants to be screened for antisemitic affiliations. 'Non-citizens involved in antisemitism should face visa cancellation and removal from Australia,' it said.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
20 hours ago
- Japan Today
Israel evacuates diplomatic staff in the UAE, Israeli media say
By Yomna Ehab and Enas Alashray Israel is evacuating most of its diplomatic mission staff in the United Arab Emirates, Israeli media reported late on Thursday, after Israel's National Security Council sharpened its travel warning for Israelis staying in the Gulf country. The UAE's Israeli and Jewish community has grown more visible since 2020, when the UAE became the most prominent Arab state in 30 years to establish formal ties with Israel under a U.S.-brokered agreement dubbed the Abraham Accords. "We are emphasizing this travel warning given our understanding that terrorist organizations (the Iranians, Hamas, Hezbollah and Global Jihad) are increasing their efforts to harm Israel", the NSC said in a statement. The NSC warned of possible attempts to target Israeli and Jewish individuals in the UAE, especially around Jewish holidays and Shabbat. The Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. There was no immediate comment from the UAE's foreign ministry. Israel is concerned about retaliatory attacks following its recent military operation against Iran and as it faces mounting international pressure over the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip. In March, the UAE sentenced three people to death for the murder of an Israeli-Moldovan rabbi who was killed in November in the Gulf country. Such crimes are rare in the UAE, which is largely viewed as one of the safest places in the Middle East. © (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025.
The Diplomat
a day ago
- The Diplomat
France and New Caledonia Have Reached a Compromise. Will It Work?
The new agreement must be approved by referendum to take effect, and even then friction will likely continue between Nouméa and Paris. In mid-July, after many months of tense negotiations between France and New Caledonia's pro- and anti-independence parties, a new agreement was finally reached. Named for the town outside Paris where the last round of talks took place, the Bougival Accord would make New Caledonia, which France annexed in 1853, a state within the French Republic that other countries could recognize. But the agreement falls short of granting the independence long sought by the territory's Indigenous Kanak people. Some headlines have made it sound like the arrangement is set in stone and New Caledonia has already been declared a state, but that's not true. Before the accord can enter into force, it must be approved in a referendum, which is slated for February 2026. It must also be approved by the French Parliament and enshrined in the constitution. The agreement required concessions from both New Caledonia's loyalists and its pro-independence parties, and it remains to be seen if it will be accepted by voters. Moreover, additional deals regarding social issues and nickel – the main sector in New Caledonia's economy, which has been struggling since unrest last year – have yet to be negotiated. The deal will likely prompt 'extensive debate' both in New Caledonia and France, according to Australian journalist Nic Maclellan, and 'many provisions will be contested by both supporters and opponents of independence in coming months.' According to Denise Fisher, a former Australian diplomat who served as consul-general in Nouméa, 'The next steps will each demand cooperation between deeply divided parties.' If recent years are any indication, the electorate remains sharply divided on the question of New Caledonia's future political status. The territory has voted in three independence referendums, in 2018, 2020, and 2021. The first two referendums narrowly rejected independence, with the pro-independence side gaining ground from 2018 to 2020, winning 43 percent and 46 percent of the vote, respectively, while turnout rose from 81 to 85 percent. It looked like the pro-independence vote might increase further in the next vote and perhaps even bring victory, but that's not what happened. In the winter of 2021, during a surge of the COVID-19 pandemic that disproportionally hurt Kanak communities, pro-independence parties recommended that the third referendum be pushed back to 2022. France refused. As a result, the pro-independence coalition boycotted the vote, and it had only 44 percent turnout, with 96 percent supporting the status quo. According to New Caledonia's anti-independence parties and French President Emmanuel Macron, the three referendum results showed that the territory wanted to remain part of France. However, the votes were hardly decisive. New Caledonia's pro-independence parties see the third referendum as illegitimate due to the overwhelming non-participation of the colonized people. That is a perspective shared by the Pacific Islands Forum, where the Kanaks' anti-colonial struggle resonates with countries that were former colonies themselves. The third referendum isn't the only recent controversy. Last year, as pro-independence parties sought discussions for a comprehensive agreement on the territory's future political status, the French government attempted to force through a constitutional amendment to radically change the special electoral roll. The amendment, which would have exacerbated the disenfranchisement of Kanaks, sparked widespread protests. Initially peaceful, the protests turned violent, leading to 14 deaths, more than 2,000 arrests, and a severely weakened economy. The French government blamed outside forces for the unrest, an argument that holds little water and ignores the main causes of the violence, like the tensions that have been growing since 2021, the territory's longstanding race and class inequalities, and France's heavy-handed tactics with the electoral roll. Paris received further criticism, both in New Caledonia and across the Pacific region, for its militarized response to the crisis. The French government was seen by pro-independence parties as abandoning the spirit of the Nouméa Accord, the historic agreement that allowed the referendums to take place. In this context – and after loyalists attempted to scuttle the talks – the fact that France and New Caledonia's two polarized factions managed to reach a compromise at all is impressive (Papua New Guinea and Bougainville haven't been able to get there). However, the accord also comes at a time when, for part of the electorate, trust in the French government appears to be at its lowest level in years, if not decades. Those who want independence won't give up the cause; if they accept the new agreement next year, they are unlikely to see it as the end of the line, but rather a stepping stone to full sovereignty. The Bougival Accord would create a New Caledonian nationality and allow dual French and New Caledonian nationality, a provision sure to rile anti-independence voters. It would partly open the electoral roll to 10-year residents and some residents' spouses, a more moderate provision than what France tried to pass last year, but still a concession for pro-independence parties. It would make some changes to New Caledonia's parliament, with reduced representation from several Kanak-majority areas. The transfer of some sovereign powers would also be allowed, such as foreign affairs, but not defense, justice, or currency. In his analysis, Maclellan identified foreign affairs as a particular area of friction. The agreement states that New Caledonia must conduct its diplomacy 'in accordance with the international commitments and interests of France,' which Maclellan said could lead to disputes over a range of issues, including nuclear disarmament, maritime boundaries, trade policy, the nickel industry, and West Papua. France recently strengthened its defense ties with Indonesia, while New Caledonia's pro-independence coalition has long criticized Indonesia's human rights abuses in West Papua and called for West Papuan self-determination. In other words, whether the accord is adopted or not, friction will likely continue between Nouméa and Paris. Nor is adoption of the agreement a foregone conclusion, and members of both the pro- and anti-independence coalitions will find plenty to object to in it. Meanwhile, despite the adamant statement from Overseas Minister Manuel Valls that the Bougival Accord is only for New Caledonia, the deal naturally raises questions for France's other overseas territories, including French Polynesia.
Japan Today
2 days ago
- Japan Today
Australia wipes $10 billion off student loans, targeting cost of living relief
FILE PHOTO: Students walk past stalls during the orientation week at The University of Sydney, in Camperdown, Australia February 15, 2023. By Christine Chen Australia's parliament on Thursday passed a law to cut student loans by 20%, wiping more than A$16 billion ($10.31 billion) in debt for 3 million people, and fulfilling a key election promise to help mitigate the rising cost of living. The law is the first passed by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's centre-left Labor Party since being re-elected in May with one of the country's largest-ever majorities. 'We promised cutting student debt would be the first thing we did back in parliament – and that's exactly what we've done,' Albanese said in a statement. 'Getting an education shouldn't mean a lifetime of debt.' Education Minister Jason Clare said the measure would help 'take a weight' off the backs of young people. 'Young Australians don't always see something for them on the ballot paper, but they did this year and they voted for it in their millions,' he said at a press conference. 'And we're repaying now the trust that these young Australians have placed in us.' Millennials and Generation Z made up 43% of the 18 million people enrolled to vote in Australia's May general election, outnumbering Baby Boomers. Seizing on the generational shift, Labor made cutting student debt a key election promise, framing it as a measure to ease living costs and tackle intergenerational inequality. The government said reducing student loans by one-fifth was equivalent to more than A$16 billion in debt relief for three million Australians. It would mean a university graduate with an average loan of A$27,600 would have A$5,520 wiped, the government said, adding the changes would be backdated from June 1, 2025, before the loans were indexed 3.2% for inflation. The law would also raise the minimum repayment threshold from an income of A$54,435 to A$67,000, reducing the amount low-income earners would have to pay. © (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025.
