France and New Caledonia Have Reached a Compromise. Will It Work?
In mid-July, after many months of tense negotiations between France and New Caledonia's pro- and anti-independence parties, a new agreement was finally reached. Named for the town outside Paris where the last round of talks took place, the Bougival Accord would make New Caledonia, which France annexed in 1853, a state within the French Republic that other countries could recognize. But the agreement falls short of granting the independence long sought by the territory's Indigenous Kanak people.
Some headlines have made it sound like the arrangement is set in stone and New Caledonia has already been declared a state, but that's not true. Before the accord can enter into force, it must be approved in a referendum, which is slated for February 2026. It must also be approved by the French Parliament and enshrined in the constitution.
The agreement required concessions from both New Caledonia's loyalists and its pro-independence parties, and it remains to be seen if it will be accepted by voters. Moreover, additional deals regarding social issues and nickel – the main sector in New Caledonia's economy, which has been struggling since unrest last year – have yet to be negotiated.
The deal will likely prompt 'extensive debate' both in New Caledonia and France, according to Australian journalist Nic Maclellan, and 'many provisions will be contested by both supporters and opponents of independence in coming months.' According to Denise Fisher, a former Australian diplomat who served as consul-general in Nouméa, 'The next steps will each demand cooperation between deeply divided parties.'
If recent years are any indication, the electorate remains sharply divided on the question of New Caledonia's future political status. The territory has voted in three independence referendums, in 2018, 2020, and 2021. The first two referendums narrowly rejected independence, with the pro-independence side gaining ground from 2018 to 2020, winning 43 percent and 46 percent of the vote, respectively, while turnout rose from 81 to 85 percent.
It looked like the pro-independence vote might increase further in the next vote and perhaps even bring victory, but that's not what happened. In the winter of 2021, during a surge of the COVID-19 pandemic that disproportionally hurt Kanak communities, pro-independence parties recommended that the third referendum be pushed back to 2022. France refused. As a result, the pro-independence coalition boycotted the vote, and it had only 44 percent turnout, with 96 percent supporting the status quo.
According to New Caledonia's anti-independence parties and French President Emmanuel Macron, the three referendum results showed that the territory wanted to remain part of France. However, the votes were hardly decisive. New Caledonia's pro-independence parties see the third referendum as illegitimate due to the overwhelming non-participation of the colonized people. That is a perspective shared by the Pacific Islands Forum, where the Kanaks' anti-colonial struggle resonates with countries that were former colonies themselves.
The third referendum isn't the only recent controversy. Last year, as pro-independence parties sought discussions for a comprehensive agreement on the territory's future political status, the French government attempted to force through a constitutional amendment to radically change the special electoral roll. The amendment, which would have exacerbated the disenfranchisement of Kanaks, sparked widespread protests. Initially peaceful, the protests turned violent, leading to 14 deaths, more than 2,000 arrests, and a severely weakened economy.
The French government blamed outside forces for the unrest, an argument that holds little water and ignores the main causes of the violence, like the tensions that have been growing since 2021, the territory's longstanding race and class inequalities, and France's heavy-handed tactics with the electoral roll. Paris received further criticism, both in New Caledonia and across the Pacific region, for its militarized response to the crisis. The French government was seen by pro-independence parties as abandoning the spirit of the Nouméa Accord, the historic agreement that allowed the referendums to take place.
In this context – and after loyalists attempted to scuttle the talks – the fact that France and New Caledonia's two polarized factions managed to reach a compromise at all is impressive (Papua New Guinea and Bougainville haven't been able to get there). However, the accord also comes at a time when, for part of the electorate, trust in the French government appears to be at its lowest level in years, if not decades. Those who want independence won't give up the cause; if they accept the new agreement next year, they are unlikely to see it as the end of the line, but rather a stepping stone to full sovereignty.
The Bougival Accord would create a New Caledonian nationality and allow dual French and New Caledonian nationality, a provision sure to rile anti-independence voters. It would partly open the electoral roll to 10-year residents and some residents' spouses, a more moderate provision than what France tried to pass last year, but still a concession for pro-independence parties. It would make some changes to New Caledonia's parliament, with reduced representation from several Kanak-majority areas. The transfer of some sovereign powers would also be allowed, such as foreign affairs, but not defense, justice, or currency.
In his analysis, Maclellan identified foreign affairs as a particular area of friction. The agreement states that New Caledonia must conduct its diplomacy 'in accordance with the international commitments and interests of France,' which Maclellan said could lead to disputes over a range of issues, including nuclear disarmament, maritime boundaries, trade policy, the nickel industry, and West Papua. France recently strengthened its defense ties with Indonesia, while New Caledonia's pro-independence coalition has long criticized Indonesia's human rights abuses in West Papua and called for West Papuan self-determination.
In other words, whether the accord is adopted or not, friction will likely continue between Nouméa and Paris. Nor is adoption of the agreement a foregone conclusion, and members of both the pro- and anti-independence coalitions will find plenty to object to in it. Meanwhile, despite the adamant statement from Overseas Minister Manuel Valls that the Bougival Accord is only for New Caledonia, the deal naturally raises questions for France's other overseas territories, including French Polynesia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
8 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Fires US Labor Official over Data and Gets Earlier Than Expected Chance to Reshape Fed
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK, Aug 1 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump on Friday fired a top Labor Department official on the heels of a market-shocking weak scorecard of the U.S. job market, accusing her without evidence of manipulating the figures and adding to already growing concerns about the quality of economic data published by the federal government. In a second surprise economic policy development, the door for Trump to make an imprint on a Federal Reserve with which he clashes almost daily for not lowering interest rates opened much earlier than anticipated when Fed Governor Adriana Kugler unexpectedly announced her resignation on Friday afternoon. The two developments further rattled a stock market already reeling from his latest barrage of tariff announcements and the weak jobs data. The benchmark S&P 500 Index .SPX sank 1.6% in its largest daily drop in more than two months. Trump accused Erika McEntarfer, appointed by former President Joe Biden, of faking the jobs numbers. There is no evidence to back Trump's claims of data manipulation by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the statistical agency that compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price data. A representative for the BLS did not respond to a request for comment. Friday began with BLS reporting the U.S. economy created only 73,000 jobs in July, but more stunning were net downward revisions showing 258,000 fewer jobs had been created in May and June than previously reported. 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. DATA CONCERNS A Trump administration official who requested anonymity said that while all economic data is noisy, the White House has been dissatisfied with how large the revisions have been in the recent data and issues with lower survey responses. The problem started during COVID and has not been addressed in the years since. 'There are these underlying problems that have been festering here for years now that have not been rectified,' the person said. 'The markets and companies and the government need accurate data, and like, we just weren't getting that,' the official said. The BLS has already reduced the sample collection for consumer price data as well as the producer price report, citing resource constraints. The government surveys about 121,000 businesses and government agencies, representing approximately 631,000 individual worksites for the employment report. The response rate has declined from 80.3% in October 2020 to about 67.1% in July, BLS data shows. A Reuters poll last month found 89 of 100 top policy experts had at least some worries about the quality of U.S. economic data, with most also concerned that authorities are not addressing the issue urgently enough. In addition to the concerns over job market data, headcount reductions at BLS have resulted in it scaling back the scope of data collection for the Consumer Price Index, one of the most important gauges of U.S. inflation, watched by investors and policymakers worldwide. Trump's move fed into concerns that politics may influence data collection and publication. 'Politicizing economic statistics is a self-defeating act,' said Michael Madowitz, principal economist at the Roosevelt Institute's Roosevelt Forward. 'Credibility is far easier to lose than rebuild, and the credibility of America's economic data is the foundation on which we've built the strongest economy in the world. Blinding the public about the state of the economy has a long track record, and it never ends well.' FED CHANGE SOONER THAN EXPECTED Meanwhile, Kugler's surprise decision to leave the Fed at the end of next week presents Trump an earlier-than-expected opportunity to install a potential successor to Fed Chair Jerome Powell on the central bank's Board of Governors. Trump has threatened to fire Powell repeatedly because the Fed chief has overseen a policymaking body that has not cut interest rates as Trump has demanded. Powell's term expires next May, although he could remain on the Fed board until January 31, 2028, if he chooses. Trump will now get to select a Fed governor to replace Kugler and finish out her term, which expires on January 31, 2026. A governor filling an unexpired term may then be reappointed to a full 14-year term. Some speculation has centered on the idea Trump might pick a potential future chair to fill that slot as a holding place. Leading candidates for the next Fed chair include Trump economic adviser Kevin Hassett, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh and Fed Governor Chris Waller, a Trump appointee who this week dissented with the central bank's decision to keep rates on hold, saying he preferred to start lowering them now. Trump, as he was leaving the White House to spend the weekend at his Bedminster, New Jersey, estate, said he was happy to have the open slot to fill. 'I would not read any political motivation into what [Kugler is] doing, although the consequence of what she's doing is she's calling Trump's bluff,' said Derek Tang, an analyst at LH Meyer, a research firm. 'She's putting the ball in his court and saying, look, you're putting so much pressure on the Fed, and you want some control over nominees, well, here's a slot.'
Asahi Shimbun
a day ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Survey: Student test scores drop dramatically in all subjects
Education officials are puzzled and alarmed by an academic survey released on July 31 that shows younger students' academic test scores dropped precipitously between fiscal 2024 and the last survey taken in fiscal 2021. 'Scores have never dropped this significantly before,' said a senior education ministry official. The education ministry stated that it cannot clearly specify the factors behind the decline although one possibility is the COVID-19 pandemic impacted English scores for junior high students. In a separate survey of parents, they reported that their children's smartphone and game playing time increased, and many have placed less emphasis on them achieving top grades. The survey conducted by the government in fiscal 2024 sought to understand and analyze changes in the academic abilities of children nationwide and to contribute to the evaluation and improvement of future educational policies. According to the analysis, scores declined in all subjects compared to the previous survey conducted in fiscal 2021. In the most recent survey, the results from approximately 30,000 sixth-grade elementary students and about 70,000 third-grade junior high students, randomly sampled nationwide, were analyzed. The subjects tested were Japanese and arithmetic for sixth-grade elementary students, and Japanese, mathematics and English for third-grade junior high students. Until now, the analysis results had been reported mainly to expert committees. However, this time, the education ministry released the findings publicly, emphasizing the need for broader discussion of the issues identified. The results were presented using a score standardized on a base of 500. The average scores of participants were as follows: Sixth-grade elementary students: Japanese 489.9 (a decrease of 15.9 points from the previous survey), arithmetic 486.3 (a decrease of 20.9 points) Third-grade junior high students: Japanese 499.0 (a decrease of 12.7 points from the previous survey), mathematics 503.0 (a decrease of 8.0 points), English 478.2 (a decrease of 22.9 points) In the previous survey, there were no subjects in which the scores had decreased. The ministry pointed to the possibility that the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected junior high school students' English scores. For third-year junior high students, the period when they began learning a foreign language in elementary school overlapped with the pandemic. The ministry believes that the inability to actively engage in 'speaking' may have had an effect. However, the ministry has expressed a cautious stance on the significant decline, stating that 'continuous analysis is necessary.' Hiroaki Mimizuka, an emeritus professor of educational sociology at Ochanomizu University who has long been involved in the ministry's expert panel on academic ability, said he was surprised by the results. 'The causes are complex and a thorough investigation of each factor is necessary,' he said. A survey of parents was also conducted simultaneously. According to the results, the amount of time children spent playing games and using smartphones increased compared to the previous survey, while the time spent studying outside of school decreased. Additionally, there was an increase in the number of parents who were less focused on their children achieving high academic grades. The government's academic survey is conducted, in principle, once every three years. This is different from the national academic achievement survey, which is conducted annually for all sixth-grade elementary and third-grade junior high school students. Each time, nearly the same set of questions, which are not publicly disclosed, is administered, allowing for comparison of the three survey rounds conducted since fiscal 2016.
The Diplomat
a day ago
- The Diplomat
France and New Caledonia Have Reached a Compromise. Will It Work?
The new agreement must be approved by referendum to take effect, and even then friction will likely continue between Nouméa and Paris. In mid-July, after many months of tense negotiations between France and New Caledonia's pro- and anti-independence parties, a new agreement was finally reached. Named for the town outside Paris where the last round of talks took place, the Bougival Accord would make New Caledonia, which France annexed in 1853, a state within the French Republic that other countries could recognize. But the agreement falls short of granting the independence long sought by the territory's Indigenous Kanak people. Some headlines have made it sound like the arrangement is set in stone and New Caledonia has already been declared a state, but that's not true. Before the accord can enter into force, it must be approved in a referendum, which is slated for February 2026. It must also be approved by the French Parliament and enshrined in the constitution. The agreement required concessions from both New Caledonia's loyalists and its pro-independence parties, and it remains to be seen if it will be accepted by voters. Moreover, additional deals regarding social issues and nickel – the main sector in New Caledonia's economy, which has been struggling since unrest last year – have yet to be negotiated. The deal will likely prompt 'extensive debate' both in New Caledonia and France, according to Australian journalist Nic Maclellan, and 'many provisions will be contested by both supporters and opponents of independence in coming months.' According to Denise Fisher, a former Australian diplomat who served as consul-general in Nouméa, 'The next steps will each demand cooperation between deeply divided parties.' If recent years are any indication, the electorate remains sharply divided on the question of New Caledonia's future political status. The territory has voted in three independence referendums, in 2018, 2020, and 2021. The first two referendums narrowly rejected independence, with the pro-independence side gaining ground from 2018 to 2020, winning 43 percent and 46 percent of the vote, respectively, while turnout rose from 81 to 85 percent. It looked like the pro-independence vote might increase further in the next vote and perhaps even bring victory, but that's not what happened. In the winter of 2021, during a surge of the COVID-19 pandemic that disproportionally hurt Kanak communities, pro-independence parties recommended that the third referendum be pushed back to 2022. France refused. As a result, the pro-independence coalition boycotted the vote, and it had only 44 percent turnout, with 96 percent supporting the status quo. According to New Caledonia's anti-independence parties and French President Emmanuel Macron, the three referendum results showed that the territory wanted to remain part of France. However, the votes were hardly decisive. New Caledonia's pro-independence parties see the third referendum as illegitimate due to the overwhelming non-participation of the colonized people. That is a perspective shared by the Pacific Islands Forum, where the Kanaks' anti-colonial struggle resonates with countries that were former colonies themselves. The third referendum isn't the only recent controversy. Last year, as pro-independence parties sought discussions for a comprehensive agreement on the territory's future political status, the French government attempted to force through a constitutional amendment to radically change the special electoral roll. The amendment, which would have exacerbated the disenfranchisement of Kanaks, sparked widespread protests. Initially peaceful, the protests turned violent, leading to 14 deaths, more than 2,000 arrests, and a severely weakened economy. The French government blamed outside forces for the unrest, an argument that holds little water and ignores the main causes of the violence, like the tensions that have been growing since 2021, the territory's longstanding race and class inequalities, and France's heavy-handed tactics with the electoral roll. Paris received further criticism, both in New Caledonia and across the Pacific region, for its militarized response to the crisis. The French government was seen by pro-independence parties as abandoning the spirit of the Nouméa Accord, the historic agreement that allowed the referendums to take place. In this context – and after loyalists attempted to scuttle the talks – the fact that France and New Caledonia's two polarized factions managed to reach a compromise at all is impressive (Papua New Guinea and Bougainville haven't been able to get there). However, the accord also comes at a time when, for part of the electorate, trust in the French government appears to be at its lowest level in years, if not decades. Those who want independence won't give up the cause; if they accept the new agreement next year, they are unlikely to see it as the end of the line, but rather a stepping stone to full sovereignty. The Bougival Accord would create a New Caledonian nationality and allow dual French and New Caledonian nationality, a provision sure to rile anti-independence voters. It would partly open the electoral roll to 10-year residents and some residents' spouses, a more moderate provision than what France tried to pass last year, but still a concession for pro-independence parties. It would make some changes to New Caledonia's parliament, with reduced representation from several Kanak-majority areas. The transfer of some sovereign powers would also be allowed, such as foreign affairs, but not defense, justice, or currency. In his analysis, Maclellan identified foreign affairs as a particular area of friction. The agreement states that New Caledonia must conduct its diplomacy 'in accordance with the international commitments and interests of France,' which Maclellan said could lead to disputes over a range of issues, including nuclear disarmament, maritime boundaries, trade policy, the nickel industry, and West Papua. France recently strengthened its defense ties with Indonesia, while New Caledonia's pro-independence coalition has long criticized Indonesia's human rights abuses in West Papua and called for West Papuan self-determination. In other words, whether the accord is adopted or not, friction will likely continue between Nouméa and Paris. Nor is adoption of the agreement a foregone conclusion, and members of both the pro- and anti-independence coalitions will find plenty to object to in it. Meanwhile, despite the adamant statement from Overseas Minister Manuel Valls that the Bougival Accord is only for New Caledonia, the deal naturally raises questions for France's other overseas territories, including French Polynesia.
