Ranya Rao jailed for gold smuggling under COFEPOSA; no bail for Kannada actor
Ranya Rao
has been sentenced to one year in prison under the stringent COFEPOSA Act in connection with a gold smuggling case. The Advisory Board overseeing the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA) recently ruled that she will not be eligible for bail throughout the duration of her detention.
Previously, on May 20, a city court had granted default bail to both Ranya and her co-accused Tarun Raju, after the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) failed to file a chargesheet within the required timeframe.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
MBA
MCA
Public Policy
Management
Data Science
others
Operations Management
healthcare
Technology
Project Management
CXO
Leadership
Cybersecurity
Healthcare
Product Management
Data Analytics
Degree
Others
Finance
PGDM
Artificial Intelligence
Data Science
Digital Marketing
Design Thinking
Skills you'll gain:
Financial Management
Team Leadership & Collaboration
Financial Reporting & Analysis
Advocacy Strategies for Leadership
Duration:
18 Months
UMass Global
Master of Business Administration (MBA)
Starts on
May 13, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Analytical Skills
Financial Literacy
Leadership and Management Skills
Strategic Thinking
Duration:
24 Months
Vellore Institute of Technology
VIT Online MBA
Starts on
Aug 14, 2024
Get Details
However, despite the bail being sanctioned on a bond of ₹2 lakh along with surety conditions, both remained in custody due to a preventive detention order under COFEPOSA, which allows for detention of up to a year without formal charges, solely based on suspicion of smuggling.
The case dates back to March, when Ranya arrived from Dubai and attempted to pass through the green channel at Kempegowda International Airport, which is designated for passengers with no dutiable goods. Her nervous demeanor raised suspicion among DRI officials, prompting a thorough search conducted by female officers.
During the search, authorities recovered 14.2 kilograms of gold worth approximately ₹12.56 crore. She was taken into custody immediately.
Live Events
Ranya's prior attempts to secure bail were rejected multiple times—twice by local courts and later by the Karnataka High Court.
[Inputs from PTI]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 hours ago
- Time of India
'25 likes & 5 comments': Cops book Facebook page, users for post targeting Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah
Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah (File photo) BENGALURU: A routine social media monitoring exercise by cybercrime police has led to a suo motu case against a Facebook page and users for interacting on an allegedly derogatory post targeting CM Siddaramaiah. The post, written in Kannada and uploaded on July 21 on 'True Secular' page, accused Siddaramaiah of targeting religious institutions across his terms in office. It claimed he had acted against the Udupi Sri Krishna Mutt during his first term, attempted to alienate the Lingayat community from Hinduism, and was now targeting Dharmasthala. The post had drawn 25 likes & five comments - some of which included alleged derogatory remarks about the CM's leadership. These engagements are now part of the FIR, with the names of those who commented & some who liked the post also listed. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Post found during regular monitoring by cops Police said the post was spotted on July 23 during regular monitoring by sub-inspector Kubera from the cybercrime station attached to the commissioner's office. A senior police officer said the case has been booked under the Information Technology Act, 2000, andSection 299 of BNS, which pertains to deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings. The development comes days after the state govt announced a special investigation team to probe allegations of serial rapes and murders in Dharmasthala — a move that has triggered political reactions and sharp commentary online.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Ranya Rao gold smuggling case: Fourth suspect arrested
Bengaluru: Sleuths from DRI arrested a 52-year-old jeweller from Nellore in Andhra Pradesh on charges of aiding Ranya Rao in disposing of the smuggled gold in the country and carrying out hawala transactions. The accused is Bharat Jain. Hailing from Rajasthan, Bharat Jain is a close relative of Sahil Sakaria Jain, arrested this March on alleged charges of aiding Ranya Rao in selling 49 kgs of smuggled gold worth over Rs 40 crore and carrying out a hawala transaction of around Rs 38 crore. "Sakaria Jain spilled the beans, stating how Bharat played a vital role in helping Ranya. Soon after DRI arrested Sakaria, Bharat went incommunicado. However, on July 22, a DRI team spotted him in Hyderabad and issued a notice, directing him to appear before them in Bengaluru for investigation. Accordingly, Bharat appeared on July 23, and DRI arrested him. Currently, he is in the judicial custody of Bengaluru central prison," sources said.
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
SC pulls up Karnataka HC over bail granted to Darshan in 2024 murder
The Supreme Court on Thursday said the manner in which the Karnataka high court granted bail to Kannada actor Darshan and others in the Renukawamy murder case was 'troubling' and wondered if the high court has applied its 'mind judicially' while using its discretion. Darshan was arrested on June 11, 2024, two days after the body of Renukaswamy, a fan of the actor, was discovered in a drain. In the police charge sheet, filed in September 2024, Gowda is named as the prime accused and Darshan as the second accused. (ANI) A bench of justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan reserved its verdict on the Karnataka government's appeal seeking cancellation of the high court's December 13, 2024 order granting bail to the actor and co-accused. 'What is troubling us is the approach of the high court. Look at the manner in which the matter (of bail) has been dealt with…We are sorry to say this, but does the high court dictate similar orders in all bail applications,' the bench remarked. The bench questioned the high court judge's approach in seeking grounds of arrest in a murder case. 'Lastly, he (the high court judge) says grounds of arrest not provided in a murder case. Is this his understanding? This is a high court judge. We want to understand while exercising discretion has the high court rightly applied its mind judicially,' it added. Earlier, the top court on July 17 expressed its reservation over the high court granting bail to the accused and said it was 'not at all convinced' by the manner in which the discretionary power was exercised. Darshan, along with actress Pavithra Gowda and several others, is accused of abducting and killing 33-year-old Renukaswamy, a fan who allegedly sent obscene messages to Pavithra. The state government moved the apex court against the bail to Darshan and six other accused on January 6. Senior advocate Siddharth Dave, appearing for Darshan, argued that evidence in the case raises doubts on the prosecution story as he pointed out the long delay of 12 days by one of the two eyewitnesses in recording evidence before the police. Terming the discretion adopted by the judge to be 'perverse', the top court bench asked Dave: 'On a lighter vein, do you not think the high court has given an order of acquittal? … We are not going to commit the same mistake that the high court committed by deciding conviction or acquittal.' The Karnataka government, represented by senior advocate Siddharth Luthra and others, argued that the bail granted by the high court was unjustified, especially in a case involving serious charges under Section 302 (murder) of the IPC. Luthra argued the high court effectively granted a 'pre-trial acquittal' without properly examining key evidence, including statements of eyewitnesses and forensic findings. Pavitra Gowda's lawyer sought to claim her innocence in the case alleging that no injury or blow to the deceased was attributable to her. The bench dismissed the claim, saying: 'All this has happened because of you. If you had not been there, A2 (Darshan) would not have been interested and neither would others have been interested. You are the root cause.' Darshan was arrested on June 11, 2024, two days after the body of Renukaswamy, a fan of the actor, was discovered in a drain. In the police charge sheet, filed in September 2024, Gowda is named as the prime accused and Darshan as the second accused. Police alleged that Renukaswamy was harassing Gowda with lewd texts and images, apparently blaming her for Darshan's marital discord.
