When money's no object, this is the architect to design your next home
Her brief for the house was remarkably succinct; just one page long. She wanted brick floors, a waxed finish on the plasterwork for the walls and the whole building had to be manually operated rather than relying on home technology. It needed to last a century and it should also be the best house in Sydney. 'Then I thought that's pretty limited so I said the best house in Australia,' says Neilson. 'Then I thought, no, it should be the best house in the world.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
9 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
ATO cuts tax penalty waiver approval rate from 90pc to 70pc
The Tax Office has revealed that it now approves about 70 per cent of taxpayer requests to have tax penalties waived, down from a COVID-era approval rate of more than 90 per cent. A spokesperson for the ATO said the agency had this year launched a review into its process for granting full or partial penalty waivers 'to ensure consistency in decision-making'. Taxation Ombudsman Ruth Owen is also reviewing the process and will report back by January 2026.
News.com.au
2 days ago
- News.com.au
Why hundreds of women are lining up in Sydney
An event that dates back to World War II is still drawing a huge crowd, as shoppers compete to get designer items from Hermes and Burberry for 10 per cent of the retail price. The Peter Pan Op Shop event, which has been running for 85 years, kicked off on Thursday and will be held until July 27 in Sydney. Videos from the event show hundreds of people lining up, wrapping around the block, before doors even opened on Thursday. Inside, clips showed hundreds of women digging through racks hoping to score a designer item they could cherish forever. Items on the racks include a mint green Christian Dior suit, which typically retails for more than $3000, selling for just $300. There was a Burberry suit worth $2000 being sold for $300 and a Louis Vuitton dress, valued at $1800, selling for $320. A fashion show kicked off the event before doors officially opened on Thursday, and hundreds of people have come through so far — and the interest doesn't appear to be slowing down. The same goes for the event itself, which seems to get bigger every year since it started in 1941. It began during a time when clothes were rationed, and women would put on a fashion show to model clothes they were looking to offload. Vicki Barrack, 62, is a volunteer on the Peter Pan Op Shop Committee and began her experience with the event as a shopper at the age of 28. 'I owned my own modelling agency at the time and I was just starting out and wanted to look fabulous but didn't have the money so I went to the op shops,' she told 'I'm an ex-model, so when I went to the op shops people used to follow us around asking, 'can we have what you don't want because you have such a good eye'. So we would help other people shopping and give recommendations on what they should try and buy.' Ms Barrack was then approached to be on the committee and helped set up the day. She said one of her favourite things about the event was the timeless treasures that could be found — and revealed she still has items she purchased from the first event she went to. Ms Barrack believes the event draws such a huge crowd every year because of the endless unknown possibilities. She said the committee was looking for younger volunteers to join, to keep the event going and bring fresh ideas, especially when it comes to social media. 'As our committee ages we need to keep reinvigorating and getting young people equally as excited about fashion and sustainable,' Ms Barrack said. 'If you have any kind of a love or interest in fashion, come to one of these and see what's available. 'Learn from different generations of other fashion lovers – you'll learn a lot. There are labels you may not have even heard of and they can explain the history of these garments and where they came from. 'There was a hat that came in yesterday that was from the queen's milliner — there's history people can learn.' Peter Pan Op Shop is run by Barnardos Australia, an organisation designed to help end child abuse and neglect by supporting families to keep children safe and at home. All the money raised is donating to their causes, such as Beyond Barbed Wire. Ms Barrack said when she first started on the committee, she remembered asking what was done with the money. 'She explained Beyond Barbed Wire to me, and I said 'Shouldn't we be taking clothes out to the women in the prisons and help them put outfits together so when they leave jail they have clothes to wear?'' Ms Barrack recalled. 'I organised for the committee to take clothes and we got names and sizing and a description of the women and we put together outfits for the women. That made everyone a lot more in touch with what we were doing — it helped the kids in the system with Bernardo's.'
7NEWS
2 days ago
- 7NEWS
Australian farmers desperate for answers over unrealised capital gains tax as Jim Chalmers works to overhaul super
Should you be required to pay tax on money that you haven't earned yet? That's the question being asked around a new tax brought in as part of the federal government's changes to superannuation. Treasurer Jim Chalmers is looking to overhaul the way super is taxed, changing concessions for super balances over $3 million. But the sticking point for farmers and farming families is the new tax on unrealised capital gains. This new tax will mean if an asset held in super goes up in value, the account holder will be required to pay tax on that increase. With the threshold for this change set at $3 million, it is being sold as a 'rich people tax' but that doesn't show the whole picture. Jack Neilson, a cattle farmer from western Queensland, said the new tax was going to hurt hard-working Australians — 'especially in agriculture'. 'Jim Chalmers needs to realise he's not just catching the yacht-owning yuppies with this $3 million rich people tax that they are trying to sell it as,' Neilson said. Neilson pointed to the difficulties in getting young people into agriculture, calling it a 'minefield'. 'What a lot of farming families do is that, mum and dad, the operators put the actual property into a self-managed super fund,' he said. 'That way it is then leased to the next generation so that the next generation gets going and starts their farming careers, essentially, and mum and dad still make, a little bit of an income.' Nationals Leader David Littleproud told farmers were doing what they could to keep their property in their family. 'Farmers' properties are their superannuation,' he said. 'And that's why when self-managed super funds came in, many farming families put their properties into these self-managed super funds, because that was a way — a vehicle — for them to be able to bring the next generation through.' The unpredictable nature of income as a farmer has raised questions about the practicality of paying tax on unrealised gains as an increase in the value of the land doesn't directly point to an increase in income for a farmer. Katie Nash, a farmer and rural advocate, has also questioned the policy. 'If the land value goes up but the income stays the same, how are they supposed to pay the tax without selling the farm?' she said. 'How are they supposed to survive that?' However not everyone is sympathetic to the situation. Graeme Samuel AC, a professor at Monash University's Business School in Melbourne, said putting property into super wasn't about inheritance — but tax avoidance. 'For those that are caught with unrealised gains, what I'd say is question number one: how did you get into this position in the first place? Why did you put these assets into a super fund? And be honest about it, don't give us the myth that it's all about providing for the next generation, because that's what family discretionary trusts are designed to do,' he said. The National Farmers' Federation estimates around 3,500 farmers will be directly impacted by the new tax. And they maintain that where income is made, tax should be paid. But when the gains are unrealised, they argue the tax just doesn't seem fair or justified. President of the National Farmers Federation David Jochinke said the law was going to force families to sell up. 'It just baffles me why we're even talking about something where we haven't got either the capacity to pay, or it's going to force family farms to have to sell an asset that not only the parents require for their retirement,' he said. 'It also takes away from that family farming unit, which we all know needs to stick together — especially in tough times — to survive.' Jochinke wants the government to reconsider the legislation. 'The principle of having to pay a tax on an uncystallised asset is completely wrong and what we consider un-Australian,' he said. 'Let's actually have a talk about how we can manage superannuation when the assets crystallise, when farmers have got the cash to pay. And that's what we're just calling for. Let's make this a common sense piece of legislation, not a ridiculous one.' Sarah Tulloch, a farmer from NSW who has seen first-hand the impact of the pressures farmers, said she was worried about adding another pressure on the industry. 'They will lose a lot more than just their properties. There's farmers committing suicide daily just with what they've got going on at the moment with droughts and floods,' she said. 'To add this extra pressure, for people who are already doing it tough ... yeah, it's just not going to have good consequences.' Treasurer Jim Chalmers has repeatedly said he is committed to an overhaul on super taxation, saying it will make a meaningful difference in funding other priorities. reached out to the federal government in response to the concerns from farmers and farming families. 'We listen respectfully to the NFF and farmers but this is a modest change, introduced in a methodical way, that won't affect the vast majority of Australians,' a spokesperson said. 'Our changes only apply to about half a per cent of people with more than $3 million in super, who will still get generous tax concessions, just slightly less generous ones. The changes are all about making our superannuation system fairer and more sustainable.'
