Colorado Christian summer camp sues state for requiring access to gender identity-friendly facilities
"They feel like they're honoring God in what they're doing, and I feel like they should do that, to operate in a way that's consistent with that," camp volunteer and mother Leah Rohwer told CBS News in an interview.
The camp, known as Camp IdRaHaje, which is short for "I'd Rather Have Jesus," has refused to obey the state government's demands that it accommodate gender expression in camp facilities.
Kennedy Center Promotes First Explicitly Pro-christian Feature In Years As Part Of New 'Family-friendly' Focus
It is a conflict that is personal for Rohwer, who told CBS that she has a family member who identifies as transgender.
"I have a heart for the kids that feel like they don't fit in their body," Rohwer said. "I love those kids and I'm not saying anything bad about any of those kids or family members, whoever it might be, but I feel like we shouldn't stomp on someone's religious freedom to try and help those folks."
Read On The Fox News App
"Camp IdRaHaJe has faithfully served and ministered to Colorado children of all backgrounds and faiths since 1948 and has successfully maintained its resident camp license since it first received one in 1995," camp Executive Director Mike DeBoer said in a statement.
"The new policy of the Colorado Department of Early Childhood, however, is asking IdRaHaJe to choose between upholding its Biblical beliefs about biological sex and risk losing its license or abandoning its beliefs and mission by forcing girls and boys to shower, dress, and share sleeping quarters with campers of the opposite sex. We are asking the court to allow us to operate consistent with our beliefs and protect our campers from a gender ideology agenda," he added.
Afghan Christian Pastor Pleads With Trump, Warns Of Taliban Revenge After Admin Revokes Refugee Protections
Alliance Defending Freedom Legal Counsel Andrea Dill, who is representing the camp, said in a statement, "The government has no place telling religious summer camps that it's 'lights out' for upholding their religious beliefs about human sexuality."
"Camp IdRaHaJe exists to present the truth of the Gospel to children who are building character and lifelong memories. But the Colorado government is putting its dangerous agenda—that is losing popularity across the globe—ahead of its kids. We are urging the court to allow IdRaHaJe to operate as it has for over 75 years: as a Christian summer camp that accepts all campers without fear of being punished for its beliefs," she added.
Lisa Roy, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Early Childhood, provided a statement to CBS, saying, "The Department will continue working in partnership with faith-based providers and camps within the confines of the law to ensure maximum participation. As I'm sure you understand, we cannot comment on active litigation."
The Colorado Department of Early Childhood did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.Original article source: Colorado Christian summer camp sues state for requiring access to gender identity-friendly facilities
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Uganda denies pact with the United States concerning its deportation scheme
A top Ugandan official has denied rumors that the nation has agreed to accept illegal immigrants deported from the United States, disputing assertions that Kampala is part of Washington's larger effort to redirect migrants to third countries. Ugandan officials denied approval of an agreement to accept U.S. deportees. Reports suggest that broader U.S. efforts are underway to redirect migrants to third countries. Minister Okello Oryem emphasizes Uganda's infrastructure limitations to accommodate deportees. The statement came on Wednesday, after CBS News reported that Uganda and Honduras had reached deportation agreements with the United States authorities. According to the report, Honduras was slated to receive hundreds of deported individuals from Spanish-speaking nations, while Uganda agreed to accept an unspecified number of African and Asian migrants who had applied for asylum on the US-Mexico border. As per the reported agreement, Uganda agreed to welcome deported migrants as long as they do not have criminal records. The deals were tied to President Donald Trump's immigration policy, which aims to deport millions of illegal immigrants from the United States. However, Uganda has denied the report. "To the best of my knowledge, we have not reached such an agreement," Okello Oryem, state minister for foreign affairs, told Reuters by text message. "We do not have the facilities and infrastructure to accommodate such illegal immigrants in Uganda." The CBS story quoted confidential US government papers indicating that the Trump administration was broadening the scope of deportations, including plans to transfer asylum seekers and convicted criminals to third nations such as South Sudan and Eswatini. Similar incident between America and Eswatini This is hardly the first time an African country has been caught in the crossfire of Washington's deportation campaign. In July, Eswatini denied the United States' claim that deported ex-convicts who could not return to their own countries would be placed in the kingdom. Instead, Eswatini stated that it was collaborating with the United States and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) to guarantee that deportees were finally returned to their respective countries. Earlier reports said that a US deportation flight carrying immigrants from Yemen, Cuba, Laos, Vietnam, and Jamaica had arrived in Eswatini. The move is part of a policy reintroduced by the US Department of Homeland Security that enables migrants to be deported to third-party nations, even if those countries are not their home countries. The contentious policy gained traction in June when the United States Supreme Court decided in favor of the Trump administration, giving it expanded authority to deport migrants without allowing them to demonstrate that they suffer persecution or danger in their home countries. The United States hailed the judgment as a significant triumph in its fight against illegal immigration. However, critics contend that the approach violates international asylum rules and puts vulnerable migrants at risk by transferring them to nations with no linkages or support systems.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge rules Texas can't put the Ten Commandments in certain school districts' classrooms
Texas cannot require public schools in Houston, Austin and other select districts to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom, a judge said Wednesday in a temporary ruling against the state's new requirement. Texas is the third state where recent laws about putting the Ten Commandments in schools have been blocked by a court. A group of families from the school districts sought a preliminary injunction against the law, which goes into effect on Sept. 1. They say the requirement violates the First Amendment's protections for the separation of church and state and the right to free religious exercise. Texas is the largest state to attempt such a requirement, and U.S. District Judge Fred Biery's ruling from San Antonio is the latest in a widening legal fight that's expected to eventually go before the U.S. Supreme Court. 'Even though the Ten Commandments would not be affirmatively taught, the captive audience of students likely would have questions, which teachers would feel compelled to answer. That is what they do,' Biery, who was named to the bench by President Bill Clinton, wrote in the 55-page ruling that began with quoting the First Amendment and ended with 'Amen.' The ruling prohibits the 11 districts and their affiliates from posting the displays required under the state law. The law is being challenged by a group of Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Unitarian Universalist, and nonreligious families, including clergy, who have children in the public schools. Although Friday's ruling marked a major win for civil liberties groups, the legal battle is likely far from over. A broader lawsuit that names three Dallas-area districts as well as the state education agency and commissioner is pending in federal court. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he planned to appeal the ruling, calling it 'flawed.' 'The Ten Commandments are a cornerstone of our moral and legal heritage, and their presence in classrooms serves as a reminder of the values that guide responsible citizenship,' the Republican said in a statement, echoing sentiments from religious groups and conservatives who support the law. Texas has a Ten Commandments monument on the Capitol grounds and won a 2005 Supreme Court case that upheld the monument. The families were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation. 'Today's ruling is a major win that protects the constitutional right to religious freedom for Texas families of all backgrounds,' Tommy Buser-Clancy, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Texas, said in a statement. 'The court affirmed what we have long said: Public schools are for educating, not evangelizing.' A federal appeals court has blocked a similar law in Louisiana, and a judge in Arkansas told four districts they cannot put up the posters, although other districts in the state said they're not putting them up either. In Louisiana — the first state that mandated the Ten Commandments be displayed in classrooms — a panel of three appellate judges in June ruled that the law was the daily Crossword
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Federal judge temporarily blocks Texas schools from enforcing Ten Commandments law
A federal judge has temporarily blocked several Texas school districts from enforcing a law requiring public schools to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom. U.S. District Court Judge Fred Biery's Aug. 20 ruling came less than two weeks before the Texas law, known as SB10, is set to go into effect on Sept. 1. The Texas attorney general has vowed to appeal. The plaintiffs, a group of both religious and nonreligious families represented by organizations including the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the Freedom From Religion Foundation, sued an array of school districts in July, saying the law violated the First Amendment. Biery concurred, writing that the law favors Christian denominations over other traditions and is 'likely to burden Plaintiffs' exercise of their sincere religious or nonreligious beliefs in substantial ways.' He further said that the law would interfere with parents' rights to guide their children's upbringing and is 'likely to send an exclusionary and spiritually burdensome message' to children whose religious beliefs do not conform to the particular Judeo-Christian version of scripture required for the displays. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose office is representing the school districts, said he "will absolutely be appealing this flawed decision." "The Ten Commandments are a cornerstone of our moral and legal heritage, and their presence in classrooms serves as a reminder of the values that guide responsible citizenship," Paxton said. He said Texas "will always defend our right to uphold the foundational principles that have built this nation." The plaintiffs welcomed the ruling, with leaders from the ACLU of Texas calling it a 'major win' and Americans United for Separation of Church and State saying Biery's ruling sends a 'strong and resounding message across the country that the government respects the religious freedom of every student in our public schools.' 'Children's religious beliefs should be instilled by parents and faith communities, not politicians and public schools,' said Rabbi Mara Nathan, a plaintiff who is both a religious leader and public school parent. The ruling came weeks after a Louisiana judge blocked several school districts from implementing a similar law, calling it 'plainly unconstitutional.' BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment reporter at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@ USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
