logo
Brad Pitt is at His Most Charismatic in Summer's Must-See Film, ‘F1 The Movie'

Brad Pitt is at His Most Charismatic in Summer's Must-See Film, ‘F1 The Movie'

Yahoo10 hours ago

Brad Pitt is at his charismatic best in F1 as Sonny Hayes, a Formula 1 once-was who's now a has-been. A gambling addict, he's been living in a trailer and surviving by slumming it as an occasional driver for NASCAR events.
But he gets a second chance when an old friend, the owner of a struggling F1 team (Javier Bardem), convinces him to mentor up-and-comer Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris).
Of course, the rookie and the old-timer clash almost immediately, as do Sonny and Kate (Kerry Condon), the team's technical director…until their sparks catch fire, romantically speaking.
F1 has all the hallmarks of a must-see summer popcorn movie — a blockbuster-size budget (reportedly $300 million, making it one of the most expensive films ever), edge-of-your-seat action scenes and a tug-at-your-heartstrings story of redemption.
| In theaters Friday, June 27 PG-13

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Regardless of Ace Bailey's desires, Jazz made right move drafting him
Regardless of Ace Bailey's desires, Jazz made right move drafting him

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Regardless of Ace Bailey's desires, Jazz made right move drafting him

On Wednesday night, the Utah Jazz did the necessary: They used the No. 5 pick of the NBA Draft to select Ace Bailey, a move that, for the first time in more than a year, sent real waves of hope through their fan base. The Jazz had to do that. They lost 65 games in grand fashion this past season. They were arguably the worst team in the league. And then, they got very unlucky in the lottery, falling to the fifth pick, which was their worst case. They needed to leave the draft with a player who has All-Star and All-NBA potential. Bailey has some major warts as a player, warts that give him a low floor to go with his high ceiling. But nobody can argue with the ceiling. At 6-foot-9 and one of the best shooters in the draft, Bailey has as much potential as almost anyone in the field. Advertisement On Thursday night, reports surfaced that Bailey is having second thoughts about reporting to the Jazz, which has forced the Jazz to address the situation. The Rutgers product was clearly and visibly not happy being selected by Utah. In the days and weeks leading up to the draft, it became clear that Bailey and his representation were trying to force a desired outcome from Wednesday night. Bailey didn't work out for a single team, the only lottery prospect to not do so. He had a workout scheduled with the Philadelphia 76ers, but that workout was canceled. On Thursday night, Avery Bradley, Utah's vice president of player development, seemed unbothered by the situation. But the fact that the situation is being talked about forced him to talk about it. 'For me, it is my understanding that all of our draft picks will be here this weekend and preparing for summer league,' Bradley said. If you look at things with common sense, it seems very far-fetched that Bailey would do anything other than report to the Jazz and begin his professional basketball career. The Jazz front office is run by Austin Ainge, Danny Ainge and Justin Zanik. When Zanik traded Donovan Mitchell, Mitchell was dealt to the Cleveland Cavaliers when there was immense pressure to trade him to the New York Knicks. And when has anyone known someone with the last name of Ainge to be intimidated? The Jazz knew through the actions of Bailey's representation that Bailey wouldn't do backflips if Utah selected him. The Jazz didn't care. They took him anyway. And that's exactly what they should have done. Utah is not a destination in free agency among star players. The Jazz, in the past three years, have tried to trade for players, only for their agents to step in and tell them that player wouldn't sign an extension. Those are some of the things that Utah's front office can't control. Ace in the hole, out west 🏔️💜#TakeNote | #NBADraft — Utah Jazz (@utahjazz) June 26, 2025 But drafting a player? That's the one avenue of player acquisition that's completely within Utah's control. In many ways, this is the plight of the small-market team in the NBA. There are some outlier destinations, such as the San Antonio Spurs. But for the most part, the NBA is agent-driven when it comes to the free-agency market and the trading of significant players who are on short-term contracts. Player empowerment is a good thing. That being said, Bailey's situation seems extreme. Advertisement On Thursday night, the Jazz should have been taking victory laps for a strong draft that includes Florida star Walter Clayton Jr., one of the most dynamic guards of the first round. And the masses should be talking about how Bailey fits into head coach Will Hardy's system. Most likely, it will turn out that way because there is little recourse for a player once a franchise drafts him and assumes team control. But even a smidgeon of doubt is something the Jazz and a fan base starving for something good to latch on to shouldn't have to deal with. 'I think there is always going to be outside noise,' Bradley said. 'But Ace's dream was to get drafted, and he's blessed to have been drafted by the Utah Jazz. We are excited to have him. We are excited to get him here and excited to get him a part of our family, so he can begin to show who he is as a player.' If nothing else, this shines a light on the cat-and-mouse game of the predraft process. Bailey's situation has been extreme. But in terms of the predraft game of chicken his representation played, led by agent Omar Cooper, it isn't all that atypical. A decade ago, the Jazz had to deal with a prospect openly not wanting to be drafted by them. A young Dante Exum told reporters that he wouldn't work out in Utah because the Jazz already had Trey Burke playing point guard, who was a lottery pick the year before. Utah, ironically, had the No. 5 pick in that draft. The Jazz front office scoffed at the notion of being scared off and, sure enough, took Exum because he was the top player on its board. Now, given the results of that draft, they probably should have taken Marcus Smart or Julius Randle. But that's a conversation for another day. The point is the Jazz front office has a history of not giving in to what a prospect wants. The irony of it all, from a basketball standpoint, is that Bailey and his representation should be overjoyed with where he landed. Bailey's team made it clear during the predraft process that it wanted Bailey to be in a situation where he could make a significant impact in his rookie season. Depending on what Utah does in free agency, Bailey has a real chance to start at small forward or shooting guard on opening night. Bailey's ability to shoot, with or without movement, is something that Hardy has been able to unlock in the past. It is no coincidence that Lauri Markkanen became an All-Star level player under Hardy, and his system of playing with the pass, instead of playing with the dribble. Bailey is arguably one of the two best shotmakers in the draft, with Tre Johnson his competition. His size allows him to play to spots and shoot over defenders. He is a very good vertical athlete and someone who, by all accounts, will work hard to improve his game. In a basketball sense, Bailey and Utah are a terrific match. Advertisement The question of whether players want to land in Utah is one that's been around for generations. And the irony is that multiple players who have left the Jazz over the years have expressed remorse concerning their choices. Deron Williams, a star point guard under the late and great Jerry Sloan, is the best example. What the Jazz have going for them is opportunity. Their facilities are top-notch, in comparison to the rest of the league. The Jazz try hard to make their players feel comfortable within the team and the community. Obviously, the appeal of the big market and the big city isn't there. Players love nightclubs and nightlife. Salt Lake City, as a city, is more cultural and more active than it will ever get credit for. But even with a district of clubs, led by Lake Effect on Saturday nights, that are terrific and draw a bunch of people weekly, can SLC compare to a New York or Los Angeles? Of course not. And players want to be a part of that. You can't blame twentysomethings for wanting the life of twentysomethings. Agents know this, and that's why the predraft process gets messy. Players decline to work out. Agents decline to provide medicals for teams. Agents try to steer players toward desired destinations. It's a tale as old as time. But usually, once a player gets drafted, he gets drafted. The shenanigans stop. Of course, there are times when player reaction makes for a funny story on draft night. Bailey looked like he needed to blink twice because he was in danger when shaking commissioner Adam Silver's hand Wednesday night. Collin Murray-Boyles looked less than pleased that he was drafted by the Toronto Raptors. A decade ago, Zach Lavine looked heated when he was drafted by the Minnesota Timberwolves. Way back when, Steve Francis looked distraught to be drafted by the then-Vancouver Grizzlies. These things happen, and for whatever reason. A position and pathway to playing time may not be there. Maybe the player doesn't like snow. Maybe the state taxes are high. There are differing reasons. But usually, the player realizes the money that's at stake, shows up and begins the countdown toward unrestricted free agency. In all likelihood, that's what will happen with Bailey and the Jazz. And if that happens, Bailey is talented enough to become a terrific NBA player. But the fact that this has been a thing is something that may spark conversation at the highest levels of the NBA. And it shines a light on what has become a dirty game behind the scenes during the predraft process. And, make no mistake. It's a game that's been played for generations. Bailey's game was played out for the public to digest. That's the only difference.

Anna Wintour stepping back as US Vogue's editor-in-chief
Anna Wintour stepping back as US Vogue's editor-in-chief

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Anna Wintour stepping back as US Vogue's editor-in-chief

Dame Anna Wintour is stepping back as editor-in-chief of American Vogue after 37 years. The British-born fashion magnate, 75, is leaving the role she has held longer than any other editor, but will retain senior positions at its publisher. Dame Anna will continue as Vogue's global editorial director, as well as chief content officer for its parent company Conde Nast. She was made a dame by the late Queen Elizabeth II for services to fashion and journalism in 2017, and was made Companion of Honour by King Charles earlier this year. Dame Anna announced to staff on Thursday that a new role, head of editorial content, would be introduced at American Vogue. According to an account published by the company, Dame Anna told staff she wanted to help "the next generation of impassioned editors storm the field with their own ideas" as she announced her departure from the editor-in-chief role. She said she would continue with many of her responsibilities, and that "it goes without saying that I plan to remain Vogue's tennis and theatre editor in perpetuity". Raised in London, Dame Anna was the editor of British Vogue before she took the helm at its US sister publication in 1988. She is credited with giving American Vogue a new lease of life, turning it into one of the world's top fashion publications and was credited with overhauling its output, including featuring less well-known models and mixing inexpensive clothes with couture. Over her long career, Dame Anna has become one of the most recognisable and influential figures in the fashion industry. Outside of her work with Vogue, she has also organised the Met Gala, a New York fundraiser which attracts high-profile celebrities, since 1995. She is known for her trademark bob and dark glasses. Last December, she told the BBC's culture editor Katie Razzall the signature shades were a "prop", and "they help me see and they help me not see". Dame Anna's tenure as editor-in-chief of US Vogue is also widely rumoured to have inspired the tyrannical but revered character of Miranda Priestly in the Devil Wears Prada - a novel by a former assistant of Wintour, Lauren Weisberger. Earlier this year, King Charles asked Dame Anna whether she would stop working - to which she said she replied "firmly no". Get our flagship newsletter with all the headlines you need to start the day. Sign up here. 'The glasses are a prop': Anna Wintour on her style and being told 'no' I will not stop working, Anna Wintour tells King

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store