Outrage over Limpopo council's R3 million Warmbaths conference
The DA claims the money could have been best spent on addressing service delivery backlogs
A war of words has broken out between political parties in the Elias Motsoaledi local municipality in the Sekhukhune region in Limpopo over R3 million in alleged wasteful and irregular expenditures.
The fierce argument is between councillors from the ANC, DA, and the Bolsheviks party of South Africa.
At the centre of controversy are allegations that the ANC-led council spent more than R3 million on food, transport, and accommodation for about 300 councillors at the Belabela Aventura in Warmbaths for a councillors' conference in October last year.
DA councillor and caucus leader Sipho Mmaboko said the party has written to the office of the Auditor-General Tsakani Maluleke, asking her office to look into the alleged wasteful expenditure.
The party alleged the expenditure was exorbitant and that it could have been best spent on addressing service delivery backlogs, such as building municipal roads and bridges, collecting garbage and giving municipal buildings a new facelift.
A costly conference
About 400 councillors and staffers attended the conference, with the exception of the DA, as it protested the cost implications.
Some of the expenses incurred during the conference, according to the DA, included:
R1 030 773.75 for the accommodation of councillors,
R893 550 for the conference package at Forever Resorts Bela Bela
R513 532 for the supply and delivery of golf t-shirts for the ward committee conference
R142 011 for fifteen 22-seater taxis from all wards to transport ward committee members,
R 864 432 for 400 soft shell jackets for 310 ward committee members, 61 members of council and 29 officials for a ward committee conference, and
260 hiker hats for Extended Public Works Programme participants.
ALSO READ: Limpopo ANC conference rocked by membership manipulation claims
President of the Bolsheviks Seun Mogotji was outraged
'Sekhukhune is known in the province and beyond as a haven for both international and domestic tourists. The region boasts a wide range of sophisticated lodges, with breathtaking halls and kitchens unparalleled by any.
'We are baffled to the core that this council chose to hold their conference hundreds of kilometres away from home. What is it that Bela-Bela has that we don't have?
'This ANC-led council must hang their heads in shame. What are they saying about the local economy?
'They must just make sure they bring back the money. It belongs to the taxpayers. Otherwise, otla nkga goss bola [a Sepedi expression which loosely translates: all hell will break loose]'.
ALSO READ: Malema slams politicians exploiting 'blackness' to mask corruption and escape justice
Municipality defends conference
Municipality spokesperson Simon Makua said the primary function of ward committees was to promote accountable and participatory governance.
'These structures are essential for ensuring that the voices of community members are heard and represented in local decision-making processes'
'The selection of the venue for the conference was conducted through a competitive bidding process. This approach was taken to ensure that the municipality addresses the required capacity needs of the attendees while also being mindful of the associated cost.
'It is also important to note that due to capacity limitations within Sekhukhune, no local venue was able to accommodate the 390 delegates expected at the conference. This necessitated the selection of a venue outside the immediate area,' said Makua.
Makua said his municipality remained committed to transparency and accountability in all its operations.
'We adhere strictly to the bidding process and are dedicated to ensuring that the ward committee conference not only fulfils its objectives but also contributes to local economic empowerment,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
Ramaphosa cancels his trip to Spain in case DA decides to leave GNU
President Cyril Ramaphosa has cancelled his planned trip to Spain at the eleventh hour in anticipation of a major announcement by GNU partner the DA as the fallout over his axing of deputy minister Andrew Whitfield heightens. TimesLIVE understands that Ramaphosa has decided to stay in the country in case the DA decides to leave the government of national unity (GNU) on Saturday. The DA is said to be considering exiting the one-year-old coalition after Ramaphosa this week fired the party's deputy minister of trade and industry Whitfield without consultation. The blue party's federal executive is meeting on Saturday to decide the way forward after giving Ramaphosa 48 hours on Thursday to also fire ministers implicated in corruption, state capture and other forms of wrongdoing. Ramaphosa said he decided to axe Whitfield after he undertook a trip to the U.S at the height of the diplomatic tensions earlier this year without his authorisation. Whitfield argued he had asked Ramaphosa for permission to travel and decided to go after not getting a response after 10 days. The DA has taken a dim view of Ramaphosa's actions and has given him until 3pm on Saturday to reverse his decision to fire Whitfield. The DA said it would consider its continued participation in the GNU should he not reverse this decision. The DA believes Ramaphosa has been ill-treating the party by taking decisions without proper consultations including the signing of several laws. So aggrieved is the DA over its treatment that the party even voted against the proposed budget to hike VAT - a move that has created even further tensions in the GNU. Sources with intimate knowledge say Ramaphosa, who was expected to travel to Spain on Friday evening on a commercial flight, decided to miss the trip in case the DA's federal executive meeting on Saturday morning decides to leave the GNU. 'The president said he is not going any more, just in case the DA does funny things like leaving the GNU,' said a senior government insider. Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya on Saturday morning confirmed Ramaphosa had cancelled his trip. He said Ramaphosa's decision was informed by the possibility of the DA exiting the GNU. 'Indeed, the president has cancelled his trip to Spain to keep a close eye on developments at home ,' said Magwenya. The DA is expected to hold a press briefing at 3pm to inform the nation what it will be doing going forward after Ramaphosa said he would not meet the party's 48-hour deadline. TimesLIVE
The South African
4 hours ago
- The South African
Cyril Ramaphosa vs John Steenhuisen: Who's RIGHT over Andrew Whitfield axing?
President Cyril Ramaphosa has spoken out following his decision to remove Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Andrew Whitfield, from his position. Whitfield's removal – which was done in terms of section 93 (1) of the Constitution – was announced on Thursday. In a statement on Friday, President Cyril Ramaphosa said although it was not common practice for the President of the Republic of South Africa to provide reasons for either appointment or dismissals; 'several unfortunate statements and outright distortions by a number of people' have made it necessary to do so. 'Mr Whitfield was removed as a Deputy Minister because he undertook an international visit without the permission of the President. His travel to the United States was a clear violation of the rules and established practices governing the conduct of Members of the Executive. 'This requirement is known to all Ministers and Deputy Ministers. These rules and established practices were expressly communicated to all members of the Executive during the induction sessions at the commencement of the 7th administration,' he said. The President said the rules and practices 'were repeated in Cabinet in March this year by me as President'. 'All international travel by members of the executive must always be undertaken with the express permission of the President. This practice is rigorously observed and adhered to by all members of the Executive. However, Mr Whitfield deliberately chose to violate this rule and practice,' President Ramaphosa said. The President confirmed that prior to Whitfield's removal, he spoke to Democratic Alliance (DA) and fellow Government of National Unity (GNU) party leader, John Steenhuisen about his removal and 'I expect him to present to me for approval a replacement for Mr Whitfield from his party as the DA is entitled to a Deputy Minister as agreed'. 'In that discussion, Mr Steenhuisen informed me that Mr Whitfield had been expecting that he may be dismissed on the grounds that he had undertaken an international trip without the President's permission. 'This expectation, along with a perfunctory letter of apology that Mr Whitfield wrote to me following his travel to the USA without the required permission, indicated that he was aware that his actions had violated the rules and established practices governing the conduct of Members of the Executive,' he said. The President emphasised that previous Presidents had undertaken to remove ministers and deputy ministers before. 'During my discussion with Mr Steenhuisen, he asked me if there was precedent for the action that I intended to take in relation to Mr Whitfield. I informed him that there was indeed prior precedent. 'I told him that in 1995, President Nelson Mandela dismissed the late Deputy Minister Madikizela-Mandela and that in 2007 President Thabo Mbeki dismissed then Deputy Minister Nosizwe Madlala-Routledge on the grounds of undertaking international travel without permission. 'Given all these circumstances, there is consequently no reasonable grounds for Mr Steenhuisen and the Democratic Alliance to issue ultimatums and threats when the President exercises his constitutional prerogative and responsibility. Nor are there any grounds to try link this with matters that have no bearing on the conduct of the former Deputy Minister,' he said. The President emphasised that there is 'no basis' to suggest that the former Deputy Minister's removal is 'related to any other reason than his failure to receive permission to travel and adhere to the rules and established practices expected of members of the Executive'. 'While Mr Steenhuisen asked that he be allowed to brief the Democratic Alliance Federal Executive prior to the removal letter being delivered to Mr Whitfield, this would have had no bearing on my decision. It is the responsibility and the prerogative of the President to determine the timing and manner of the appointment and removal of Members of the Executive. 'I am amazed at Mr Steenhuisen's intemperate reaction to the removal of Mr Whitfield. He knows very well that the blatant disregard of the rules and practices that govern the international travel of members of the executive is a serious violation that should not be permitted,' President Ramaphosa said. The President reminded that it remains the Constitutional prerogative of the President to appoint or remove Ministers and Deputy Ministers. 'It is unprecedented in the history of our democracy that the exercise by the President of his constitutional prerogative and responsibility with respect to a clear violation of rules and established practices governing the conduct of Members of the Executive has met with such irresponsible and unjustifiable threats and ultimatums from a member of the executive. 'Let it be clear that the President shall not yield to threats and ultimatums, especially coming from members of the Executive that he has the prerogative to appoint in accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,' President Cyril Ramaphosa said. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
SA not ready for fallout if Israel-Iran ceasefire fails, warns UJ professor
As the ceasefire between Iran and Israel holds, the world watches with bated breath to see what will happen next between the two regional powers. To gain insight into the situation, Caxton Local Media spoke to Dr Suzy Graham, professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Johannesburg. Discussing the ceasefire, Graham explained that although it is still early days, the truce holds real potential, though it remains inherently fragile. 'Its longevity hinges on disciplined diplomacy, credible inspections, and political will from all actors. If any of these break down, especially due to hardliners or indirect aggression via proxies, the truce could unravel quickly,' she said. For now, however, the signs are cautiously optimistic. A ceasefire on edge: What's holding it together? Graham believes the ceasefire was primarily driven by a rapid cycle of escalation and daring diplomacy aimed at avoiding further catastrophic conflict. Although the ceasefire appears to be working, she warned that initial breaches from either side could lead to its deterioration. She described the thought of a third world war as unthinkable. 'Despite social media speculation, the probability of a full-scale World War III remains low, but not zero,' Graham said. South Africa's position: Legal, vocal, and diplomatic Speaking about South Africa's stance on the Israel-Iran conflict and how it aligns with the country's broader foreign policy, Graham said South Africa will almost always call for dialogue in any conflict situation. 'The South African government has been vocal in strongly condemning the recent military strikes on Iran, describing the attacks as violations of international law. It has urged all parties, Iran, Israel, and the USA, to engage in UN-led dialogue, emphasising diplomacy, restraint, and nuclear inspection,' she explained. Regarding the potential impact on South Africa if the conflict reignites and becomes a wider regional crisis, Graham said the country would likely continue championing international law, human rights, and nuclear non-proliferation. She noted that South Africa could strengthen its moral leadership among Global South and Muslim-majority countries. 'At the same time, the country could face intense backlash from Israel and Western allies, particularly the USA, Germany, and the UK, especially if Pretoria doubles down on its International Court of Justice genocide case or calls for sanctions. 'South Africa could see reduced goodwill from Western investors or governments, especially if tensions rise over its international legal campaigns or alignment with Iran.' 'In the immediate term, South Africa would likely call for a ceasefire, condemn aggression, and activate international and legal channels. In the short term, it might push for UN and BRICS statements and engage the African Union and Global South partners. 'In the mid-term, it would need to manage economic fallout, reinforce public diplomacy, and maintain BRICS plus solidarity. In the longer term, South Africa could use the crisis to push for UN Security Council reform, nuclear disarmament, and multipolar global governance.' Graham emphasised that if South Africa is drawn into the conflict, its role would be principled, vocal, and legalistic, not military. 'It may be drawn in politically, but not militarily,' she said. 'The country's focus would remain on shaping the normative global order, not engaging in hard power projection.' What escalation could mean for South Africa Although South Africa would not be militarily involved, Graham said a wider Middle East conflict would hit its economy hard, particularly through rising fuel prices, increased trade costs, and inflation. 'An escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict could seriously disrupt global oil flows, and South Africa, as an energy-importing nation, would feel the effects quickly and deeply. 'The country's inflation rate, currency, fiscal stability, and household livelihoods would all come under pressure.' When asked if South Africa is prepared for possible knock-on effects of war, such as cyberattacks or disruptions in trade, Graham said the country is not fully ready for the complex and interconnected consequences of a major regional war involving Iran and Israel. 'While it has some institutional frameworks and economic policy tools, South Africa lacks a coordinated national resilience strategy, particularly for cyber threats and maritime trade disruptions. 'A greater focus on strategic planning, inter-agency coordination, and public-private resilience building is urgently needed.' Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
