UAE says supply-chain accessibility is key to economic growth during G20 Trade and Investment working group
HE Juma Al Kait: 'We believe that trade is the main driver of economic development, positively impacting investment, industrialization, job creation and innovation, and it is incumbent on us to support a global trading system that is inclusive and accessible'.
Abu Dhabi – The UAE has reaffirmed its commitment to supporting an open, rules-based trading system that promotes sustainable economic development, employment, industrialization, and shared prosperity during a meeting of the G20 Trade and Investment Working Group. Participating in the session as a specially invited guest of South Africa, who holds the G20 presidency for 2025, the UAE delegation also expressed its support for the integration of developing economies into global supply chains, the importance of achieving a just green transition and the ongoing reform of the World Trade Organization (WTO) as a means of upholding a free, fair, and inclusive multilateral trading system.
The UAE delegation was headed by His Excellency Juma Al Kait, Assistant Undersecretary for International Trade Affairs at the Ministry of Economy, and included representatives of the Ministry of the Economy and the Ministry of Investment. In his remarks to the working group, HE Juma Al Kait said the UAE trade agenda is closely aligned with the priorities of South Africa's presidency, in particular the structural transformation of the African continent and the development of African Continental Free Trade Area. The UAE, he said, has now concluded Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreements with five African nations – Kenya, Central African Republic, Congo-Brazzaville, Morocco and Mauritius – and has opened discussions with many more to expand the benefits of free trade and boost investment in key sectors.
His Excellency Al Kait also underlined the UAE's investment into regional value chains, citing the UAE's Africa Economic Corridor Strategy, which aims to increase trade by supporting the development of new logistics hubs across Sub-Saharan Africa, and the contribution of Abu Dhabi Ports and DP World to the development of integrated logistics solutions for African businesses. This is in addition to the UAE's support for green industrialization, which is another core focus of South Africa's G20 presidency. His Excellency noted the UAE's significant investments in renewable energy ventures, with commitments of more than US$16.8 billion across 70 countries, the majority of them in the developing world.
In the final session, the UAE highlighted the importance of ensuring the WTO is able to fulfil its mandate as the custodian of the global trading system, especially in its ability to address economic asymmetries. He noted the unprecedented progress made on the areas of agriculture and fisheries at the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO, which was held in Abu Dhabi in February, 2024, and expressed hope that consensus could be found at MC14 in Cameroon next year.
His Excellency Juma Al Kait said the Working Group is an important opportunity to build consensus among the global trading community and make the case for open, rules-based trade: 'The United Arab Emirates believes that trade is the main driver of sustainable economic development, positively impacting investment, industrialization, job creation and innovation. It is incumbent on us to ensure the global trading system is inclusive and accessible – especially as we confront a rapidly evolving trading landscape. The G20's trade priorities for 2025 are fully aligned with our own foreign trade agenda, and the Ministry of Economy and the Ministry of Investment will continue to actively contribute to this year's TIWG sessions to ensure the benefits of trade are shared equally and equitably.'
The Trade and Investment Working Group, which was held virtually between March 18-20, was the first to be convened under South Africa's presidency of the G20. There will be three further Working Group meetings before the Ministerial Meeting on October 10 in Gqeberha, South Africa. The G20 Presential Meeting will take place in Johannesburg in November.
-Ends-
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
Trade unions from 36 countries protest against Saudi Arabia's treatment of migrant workers
Trade unions from 36 countries have filed a complaint with the International Labour Organization (ILO) over the treatment of migrant labourers in Saudi Arabia, The Guardian has reported. The joint submission called for a 'commission of inquiry' into labour rights in the kingdom - one of the most important tools available to the UN agency. 'This is a call for immediate action towards genuine, inclusive and collaborative reform,' said Luc Triangle, the secretary-general of the International Trade Union Confederation. 'We cannot tolerate another death of a migrant worker in Saudi Arabia. We cannot remain silent while migrant workers, especially construction and domestic workers, continue to face fundamental rights violations. This has to stop now.' The complaint comes as development and construction ramp up in Saudi Arabia ahead of its hosting the 2034 Fifa World Cup. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters This week, the kingdom signed a cooperation agreement with the ILO on the sidelines of its annual conference in Geneva. Under the agreement, which initially lasts for two years, Riyadh is expected to align its labour laws with international standards. The agreement reportedly includes measures to support fair recruitment, make it easier for labourers to switch jobs, introduce a minimum wage and include migrant workers on workers' representative committees. It also includes commitments to improve compensation for workers who are injured or killed. However, trade unionists from several delegations think the reforms did not go far enough. Unions from the UK, Japan, Canada, Australia and 13 African countries were among those to sign the complaint, which was fiercely opposed by the Saudis. 'Africans go to Saudi Arabia looking for life but come back in coffins,' said Omar Osman, the general secretary of the Federation of Somali Trade Unions and one of the signatories. The complaint, seen by The Guardian, lists several cases of alleged forced labour, human trafficking, wage theft, and sexual and physical abuse of migrant labourers. Migrant worker deaths Last month, a report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) found that scores of migrant workers in Saudi Arabia had died in horrific, avoidable workplace incidents - including falls from buildings, electrocutions and decapitations. Saudi Arabia relies heavily on foreign labour to power its economy. Of a population of around 34 million, over 13 million are migrants, primarily from South and Southeast Asia and parts of Africa, according to the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. These workers dominate sectors such as construction, domestic work, sanitation and hospitality - often performing some of the most dangerous and low-paid jobs in the country. 'Electrocuted, decapitated': Migrant worker deaths in Saudi Arabia revealed in HRW report Read More » Despite existing Saudi laws mandating occupational safety measures and employer accountability, the HRW report revealed systemic failures in protecting workers, investigating deaths and ensuring compensation. The report also documented disturbing patterns of deaths being misclassified as 'natural causes', even in cases where the fatal injuries occurred on worksites. HRW interviewed the families of 31 deceased workers, mostly from Bangladesh, India and Nepal, who died in Saudi Arabia between the ages of 23 and 52. In several cases, families reported they were left in the dark about the cause and circumstances of their relatives' deaths. Employers often delayed or refused to repatriate remains and personal belongings and, in some cases, pressured families to accept burial in Saudi Arabia in exchange for modest financial compensation. In one case, the son of a Bangladeshi man who died of electrocution said the employer made compensation conditional on agreeing to bury his father in Saudi Arabia. The family refused and had to borrow over $4,000 to repatriate the body, only to receive less compensation than their incurred debt. Most migrant workers enter Saudi Arabia under the kafala sponsorship system, which legally binds a worker's immigration status to a specific employer. Despite recent reforms that allowed some workers to change jobs without employer consent, many are still vulnerable to exploitation, forced labour, wage theft and harsh working conditions. A New York Times report in March found that at least 274 Kenyan workers, most of whom were women, had died in Saudi Arabia over the past five years despite being a young workforce in non-dangerous jobs. Large numbers of Ugandan workers had also died in the Gulf kingdom during that time. Every year, thousands of Ugandan and Kenyan women travel to Saudi Arabia to take up domestic jobs such as housekeepers and nannies. Many return with stories of unpaid wages, detention, beatings, starvation and sexual assault. Others return in coffins. Among those who died, autopsies often revealed evidence of trauma such as burns and electric shocks. However, Saudi authorities recorded the deaths as natural causes.
Arabian Post
a day ago
- Arabian Post
Switzerland Embarks on Crypto Data Sharing with 74 Nations
Switzerland has ratified a plan to commence the automatic exchange of information on cryptoassets with 74 partner countries from January 2026, aligning its financial transparency framework with the OECD's Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework . The inaugural data exchange is slated for 2027, contingent upon mutual agreement and adherence to OECD standards. The Federal Council's decision marks a significant expansion of Switzerland's Automatic Exchange of Information regime, previously limited to traditional financial accounts. Under the new framework, cryptoasset service providers, including exchanges and wallet operators, will be mandated to collect and report detailed information on their clients' holdings and transactions. This data will be transmitted to the Swiss Federal Tax Administration and subsequently shared with participating jurisdictions. The CARF, developed by the OECD in collaboration with G20 nations, aims to enhance tax compliance and combat illicit financial activities in the rapidly evolving digital asset sector. It requires Crypto-Asset Service Providers to implement stringent due diligence procedures, including the identification of users' tax residencies and the verification of taxpayer identification numbers. The framework encompasses a broad spectrum of digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and non-fungible tokens , while explicitly excluding central bank digital currencies . ADVERTISEMENT Switzerland's adoption of the CARF necessitates amendments to existing federal laws and ordinances governing the AEOI. The Federal Council initiated a consultation process in May 2024 to solicit feedback on the proposed legislative changes. A subsequent consultation in August 2024 focused on determining the partner states for the cryptoasset information exchange, with stakeholders given until November 15, 2024, to submit their comments. The selection of partner countries is predicated on their commitment to the CARF and their ability to ensure data confidentiality and security. The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes assesses the data protection measures of potential partner jurisdictions. Only those that meet the requisite standards will be eligible to participate in the information exchange. Notably, the United States and Saudi Arabia are currently excluded from the agreement. The implementation of the CARF in Switzerland introduces enhanced compliance measures, including criminal penalties for negligent violations of due diligence and reporting obligations. These provisions underscore the Swiss government's commitment to upholding international tax transparency standards and maintaining the integrity of its financial system. The integration of cryptoassets into the AEOI framework represents a paradigm shift in global tax reporting practices. By extending the scope of information exchange to encompass digital assets, Switzerland aims to mitigate the risks associated with tax evasion and money laundering in the crypto sector. The move also reinforces Switzerland's reputation as a cooperative and transparent financial hub. Swiss cryptoasset service providers are now tasked with adapting their operations to comply with the forthcoming regulations. This entails the implementation of robust client identification procedures, the establishment of secure data reporting mechanisms, and the alignment of internal compliance protocols with the CARF requirements. The transition period leading up to the 2026 implementation date is critical for ensuring a seamless integration of these new obligations.
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
'We don't want them': Trump issues latest iteration of controversial travel ban
US President Donald Trump instituted a long-anticipated travel ban on Thursday, prohibiting US entry to citizens from 12 countries and restricting the entry of citizens from seven others. Trump's proclamation 'fully' restricts nationals from largely African and Muslim countries, including Afghanistan, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, and Myanmar from entering the US. It also partially restricts nationals from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. In a video he released on social media on Thursday, Trump said the Colorado attack had 'underscored the extreme dangers posed by foreign nationals who are not properly vetted'. The suspect in the attack is alleged to be an Egyptian national who overstayed his visa and previously lived in Kuwait. Rumors had been circulating for months about what countries would be on the list after Trump signed an executive order on 20 January and gave the US State Department 60 days to identify countries for which 'vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters According to the Trump administration, the ban is designed to 'protect its citizens from aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes'. How does the ban work? The order goes into effect at midnight on 9 June, and both the full and partial bans apply to foreign nationals from the designated countries who are outside the country on 9 June and do not have a valid visa as of that day. The proclamation outlines that no visas issued before that date will be revoked. Citizens from countries facing a complete ban will not be issued any non-immigrant or immigrant visas. Countries facing a partial restriction will see the suspension of entry of all immigrants and the following temporary visas: B-1, B-2, B-1/B-2, F, M, and J visas. The order has made room for exceptions including the following: any lawful permanent resident of the United States; dual nationals; diplomats travelling on valid non-immigrant visas; athletes or members of an athletic team and immediate relatives; travelling for the World Cup, the Olympics or other major sporting event; immediate family immigrant visas; adoptions; Afghan special immigrant visas; special immigrant visas for United States government employees; immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran. 'Unecessary and ideologically motivated' Nihad Awad, national executive director of the Muslim civil rights organisation, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said in a statement released on Wednesday that Trump's new travel ban 'is overbroad, unnecessary and ideologically motivated'. 'Are they troublemakers?': Trump questions why Harvard has so many international students Read More » He criticised the targeting of mostly Muslim and African nations and said it raised 'the specter of more vague free speech restrictions'. "Automatically banning students, workers, tourists, and other citizens of these targeted nations from coming to the United States will not make our nation safer." He added that the screening tests being undertaken by the US government were "vague" and could easily be abused to ban immigrants based on religion or political activism. He said the new travel ban risks separating families, deprives students of educational opportunities, blocks patients from accessing unique medical treatment, and would create a chilling effect on travellers. 'Automatically banning anyone based on their nationality or vague allegations of 'hostile attitudes' to American culture or policies undermines our nation's values,' he added. World reacts Like Trump's controversial tariffs, the latest iteration of the travel ban has continued to ruffle feathers and wear leaders down. Venezuela's interior minister, Diosdado Cabello, lambasted the Trump administration as 'bad people' on state television, saying 'they are supremacists who think they own the world and persecute our people for no reason". "The truth is being in the United States is a big risk for anybody, not just for Venezuelans," he added. Meanwhile, the ban prompted Chad's president, Mahamat Deby, to issue a reciprocal ban on US citizens. In a statement, he said, 'Chad has no planes to offer, no billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and pride'. Republic of Congo government spokesman Thierry Moungalla told a news conference he thought it was 'a misunderstanding'. 'Congo is not a terrorist country, does not harbour any terrorists, is not known to have a terrorist inclination,' he said. The Somali ambassador to the US, Dahir Hassan Abdi, took a more resigned tone. He said in a statement that Mogadishu 'values its longstanding relationship with the United States. [Somalia] stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised'. Trump's history with travel bans Six of the countries on the new list were on different iterations of Trump's 2017 predominantly Muslim travel ban list, and continue to remain on the banned list. These countries include Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, and Venezuela. Trump upset national sensibilities when he issued a "Muslim" travel ban within a week of taking office during his first term in January 2017. The countries on his original list were seven Muslim-majority countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The order also indefinitely suspended the entry of Syrian refugees This order affected individuals regardless of their immigration status, including green card holders and those with employment-based visas. Travellers with valid visas and permanent residency were denied entry. Following large-scale protests and chaos at airports, courts pushed back on the ban, leading to the first ban being blocked by a temporary restraining order in Washington v. Trump in February 2017. US judge blocks Trump order banning foreign students at Harvard University Read More » Three more iterations of the ban followed, leading to numerous lawsuits being filed in federal court against the Trump administration. One of the most successful lawsuits was Trump v Hawaii, a lawsuit on behalf of the state of Hawaii, where the Muslim Association of Hawaii, Dr Ismail Elshikh, and two John Doe plaintiffs challenged the various iterations of the ban. After Trump issued the second iteration of the ban in March 2017, the Hawaii district court issued a nationwide injunction against the second version of the ban, which was affirmed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on 12 June 2017. The Court prohibited the government from enforcing the ban against foreign nationals who possess a 'bona fide relationship' with a person or entity in the US. But the government interpreted that ruling narrowly, issuing new guidance that would still ban 'grandparents, grandchildren, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, cousins, brothers-in-law and sisters-in-law, fiancés, and any other 'extended' family members' on the theory that they are not 'close' family. In July 2017, the Hawaii district court ruled that this definition 'represents the antithesis of common sense' and prevented the government from enforcing it. After a government appeal, the Ninth Circuit largely left the district court's order relating to travel, in place, while staying part of the order relating to refugees. Trump issued a third iteration of the ban in September 2017, and the lawsuit returned to the Hawaii district court. The court ruled that it violated the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Ninth Circuit affirmed, but the Supreme Court permitted Muslim Ban 3.0 to go into effect as appeals progressed. In January 2018, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case and eventually reversed the grant of a preliminary injunction after a 5–4 decision. The third iteration of the ban imposed full visa restrictions on citizens from eight nations, six of them predominantly Muslim. These countries included Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, Yemen, and Somalia. Iranian nationals were allowed to enter under valid student (F and M) and exchange visitor (J) visas, although such individuals were subject to 'enhanced screening and vetting requirements'. In January 2020, a fourth travel ban was instituted and included additional countries such as Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sudan, and Tanzania, which restricted applications to immigrants from those countries but did not restrict entry by non-immigrants.
