
China proposes new global AI cooperation organisation
China wants to help coordinate global efforts to regulate fast-evolving AI technology and share the country's advances, Premier Li Qiang told the annual World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai.
President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday released an AI blueprint aiming to vastly expand U.S. AI exports to allies in a bid to maintain the American edge over China in the critical technology.
Li did not name the United States but appeared to refer to Washington's efforts to stymie China's advances in AI, warning that the technology risked becoming the "exclusive game" of a few countries and companies.
China wants AI to be openly shared and for all countries and companies to have equal rights to use it, Li said, adding that Beijing was willing to share its development experience and products with other countries, particularly the "Global South". The Global South refers to developing, emerging or lower-income countries, mostly in the southern hemisphere.
How to regulate AI's growing risks was another concern, Li said, adding that bottlenecks included an insufficient supply of AI chips and restrictions on talent exchange.
"Overall global AI governance is still fragmented. Countries have great differences particularly in terms of areas such as regulatory concepts, institutional rules," he said. "We should strengthen coordination to form a global AI governance framework that has broad consensus as soon as possible."
The three-day Shanghai conference brings together industry leaders and policymakers at a time of escalating technological competition between China and the United States - the world's two largest economies - with AI emerging as a key battleground.
Washington has imposed export restrictions on advanced technology to China, including the most high-end AI chips made by companies such as Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab and chipmaking equipment, citing concerns that the technology could enhance China's military capabilities.
Despite these restrictions, China has continued making AI breakthroughs that have drawn close scrutiny from U.S. officials.
China's Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu told a roundtable of representatives from over 30 countries, including Russia, South Africa, Qatar, South Korea and Germany, that China wanted the organisation to promote pragmatic cooperation in AI and was considering putting its headquarters in Shanghai.
The foreign ministry released online an action plan for global AI governance, inviting governments, international organisations, enterprises and research institutions to work together and promote international exchanges including through a cross-border open source community.
The government-sponsored AI conference typically attracts major industry players, government officials, researchers and investors.
Saturday's speakers included Anne Bouverot, the French president's special envoy for AI, computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton, known as "the Godfather of AI", and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt.
Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab CEO Elon Musk, who has in past years regularly appeared at the opening ceremony in person or by video, did not speak this year.
Besides forums, the conference features exhibitions where companies demonstrate their latest innovations.
This year, more than 800 companies are participating, showcasing more than 3,000 high-tech products, 40 large language models, 50 AI-powered devices and 60 intelligent robots, according to organisers.
The exhibition features predominantly Chinese companies, including tech giants Huawei and Alibaba (9988.HK), opens new tab and startups such as humanoid robot maker Unitree. Western participants include Tesla, Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab and Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
12 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Zelensky thanks European allies for support ahead of Trump-Putin meeting
Mr Trump has said Friday's meeting in Alaska with his Russian counterpart was to discuss ending the more than three-year war. Mr Zelensky responded by thanking European allies and wrote on X on Sunday: 'The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people.' The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations. Ukraine values and fully supports the statement by President… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 10, 2025 Saturday's statement by top European leaders emphasising that peace cannot be achieved without Kyiv's involvement came after the White House confirmed the US president was willing to grant Mr Putin the one-on-one meeting Russia has long pushed for, and suggestions from Mr Trump that a peace deal could include 'some swapping of territories'. This raised fears Kyiv may be pressured into giving up land or accepting other curbs on its sovereignty. A White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity as they are not allowed to speak publicly, told The Associated Press that Mr Trump remained open to a trilateral summit with both the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, but for now, he will have a bilateral meeting requested by Mr Putin. Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance on Saturday met top European and Ukrainian officials at the UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy's weekend residence to discuss how to end the war. Mr Trump had earlier said he would meet Mr Putin even if the Russian leader would not meet with Mr Zelensky. The Trump-Putin meeting may prove pivotal in a war that began when Russia invaded its western neighbour and has led to tens of thousands of deaths, although there is no guarantee it will stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. Saturday's statement, signed by the president of the European Union and leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Finland, stressed the need for a 'just and lasting peace' for Kyiv, including 'robust and credible' security guarantees. 'Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities,' the statement said. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force,' the Europeans added. A month-long US-led push to achieve a truce in Ukraine has so far proved fruitless, with Kyiv agreeing in principle while the Kremlin has held out for terms more to its liking. Mr Trump had also moved up an ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia and introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil if the Kremlin did not move toward a settlement. The deadline was Friday. The White House did not answer questions on Saturday about possible sanctions. The Kremlin earlier this week reiterated demands that Ukraine gives up territory, abandons its bid to join Nato, and accepts limits on its military, in exchange for a withdrawal of Russian troops from the rest of the country. Mr Zelensky said on Saturday that Ukraine 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done' and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier'. Ukrainian officials previously told the AP privately that Kyiv would be amenable to a peace deal that would de facto recognise Ukraine's inability to regain lost territories militarily. But Mr Zelensky on Saturday insisted that formally ceding land was out of the question.


Geeky Gadgets
42 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
ChatGPT 5 & Cursor CLI vs Claude Code : Which AI Tool Should You Be Using?
What if the tools you use to code could not only save you hours of debugging but also transform the way you approach software development entirely? With the rise of AI-driven platforms like GPT-5, Claude 4.1, and the Cursor CLI, developers are witnessing a revolution in how projects are built, optimized, and scaled. Each tool brings its own flavor to the table: GPT-5 dominates with its unmatched coding precision and affordability, Claude 4.1 dazzles with its design-focused outputs, and the Cursor CLI offers a flexible, model-agnostic framework. But which one truly delivers on its promise, and how do they stack up against each other in real-world scenarios? The answer isn't as simple as it seems. In this feature, Rob Shocks explores the unique strengths and limitations of these innovative tools, from GPT-5's cost-efficient coding power to Claude 4.1's aesthetic prowess and the Cursor CLI's innovative adaptability. Whether you're a developer seeking performance, a designer prioritizing creativity, or a tech enthusiast curious about the future of AI in software, this comparison will shed light on how these tools are reshaping workflows and redefining possibilities. The choice between them isn't just about features—it's about understanding what you value most in your development process. AI Tools Transforming Development GPT-5: Setting the Standard in Coding and Affordability GPT-5 has established itself as a benchmark for AI-powered coding tools, consistently outperforming competitors like Claude 4.1 in critical areas. Its ability to handle complex tasks, such as CRM design and invoice data extraction, highlights its advanced tool-calling capabilities. With a significantly larger token context window, GPT-5 enables developers to engage in more detailed and extensive interactions, making it particularly well-suited for intricate and large-scale coding projects. One of GPT-5's most compelling advantages is its cost-effectiveness. Priced considerably lower than Claude 4.1, it provides developers with high performance at a fraction of the cost, making it an attractive option for both individual programmers and larger teams. Additionally, OpenAI's commitment to open source models has further enhanced accessibility, allowing developers to deploy AI locally. This not only reduces dependency on cloud-based solutions but also offers greater customization options to meet specific project requirements. Claude 4.1: Aesthetic Strengths, Functional Challenges Claude 4.1 distinguishes itself through its ability to produce visually appealing and design-focused outputs, making it a strong contender for creative applications. Its emphasis on aesthetics positions it as a valuable tool for projects where design quality takes precedence, such as user interface prototyping or branding tasks. However, when it comes to practical coding tasks like debugging, error resolution, and code styling, Claude 4.1 often falls short compared to GPT-5. Another factor that may deter developers is its higher price point. While its creative potential is undeniable, the combination of limited functionality and elevated costs makes it less appealing for developers who prioritize performance and affordability. Despite these challenges, Claude 4.1 remains a viable option for niche use cases where design aesthetics outweigh technical functionality. ChatGPT 5 & Cursor CLI vs Claude Code Watch this video on YouTube. Explore further guides and articles from our vast library that you may find relevant to your interests in ChatGPT-5. Cursor CLI: Flexibility with Room for Growth The Cursor CLI introduces a novel approach to AI-assisted coding by offering a model-agnostic framework. This design allows developers to seamlessly switch between multiple AI models, including GPT-5, tailoring their workflows to the specific demands of each project. Features such as real-time agent steering and integration with popular integrated development environments (IDEs) further enhance its utility, providing developers with a versatile and adaptable tool. However, as a beta product, the Cursor CLI is still in its developmental stages. It lacks several advanced features found in more mature tools, such as Claude Code, which limits its current competitiveness. Despite these shortcomings, the Cursor CLI's potential is evident. With continued development and refinement, it could emerge as a powerful option for developers seeking flexibility and customization in their coding workflows. Key Comparisons: Performance, Cost, and Flexibility When comparing GPT-5, Claude 4.1, and the Cursor CLI, several critical distinctions emerge that can guide developers in selecting the most suitable tool for their needs: Performance: ChatGPT-5 leads in coding benchmarks and practical functionality, while Claude 4.1 excels in design aesthetics, making it ideal for creative projects. ChatGPT-5 leads in coding benchmarks and practical functionality, while Claude 4.1 excels in design aesthetics, making it ideal for creative projects. Cost-Effectiveness: GPT-5 offers a more budget-friendly solution, providing high performance at a lower price compared to Claude 4.1. GPT-5 offers a more budget-friendly solution, providing high performance at a lower price compared to Claude 4.1. Flexibility: The Cursor CLI's model-agnostic framework allows developers to switch between AI models, offering versatility. However, it requires further refinement to match the capabilities of its competitors. These distinctions underscore the unique strengths and limitations of each tool, allowing developers to make informed decisions based on their specific project goals and priorities. Implications for Developers The advancements represented by GPT-5, Claude 4.1, and the Cursor CLI signal a fantastic shift in the software development landscape. These tools not only enhance productivity but also open up new possibilities for creativity and innovation. With improved performance, competitive pricing, and features like open source models and versatile command-line interfaces, developers now have access to a broader range of options for optimizing their workflows. As these technologies continue to evolve, they are likely to become even more integral to the development process. By carefully evaluating the strengths and limitations of each tool, you can select the one that best aligns with your technical requirements and project objectives. Whether you prioritize performance, design aesthetics, or flexibility, these AI tools offer valuable solutions to meet the diverse needs of modern software development. Media Credit: Rob Shocks Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

South Wales Argus
42 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Zelensky thanks European allies for support ahead of Trump-Putin meeting
Mr Trump has said Friday's meeting in Alaska with his Russian counterpart was to discuss ending the more than three-year war. Mr Zelensky responded by thanking European allies and wrote on X on Sunday: 'The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people.' The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations. Ukraine values and fully supports the statement by President… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 10, 2025 Saturday's statement by top European leaders emphasising that peace cannot be achieved without Kyiv's involvement came after the White House confirmed the US president was willing to grant Mr Putin the one-on-one meeting Russia has long pushed for, and suggestions from Mr Trump that a peace deal could include 'some swapping of territories'. This raised fears Kyiv may be pressured into giving up land or accepting other curbs on its sovereignty. A White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity as they are not allowed to speak publicly, told The Associated Press that Mr Trump remained open to a trilateral summit with both the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, but for now, he will have a bilateral meeting requested by Mr Putin. Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance on Saturday met top European and Ukrainian officials at the UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy's weekend residence to discuss how to end the war. Foreign Secretary David Lammy welcomed JD Vance to Chevening House in Kent on Friday (Suzanne Plunkett/PA) Mr Trump had earlier said he would meet Mr Putin even if the Russian leader would not meet with Mr Zelensky. The Trump-Putin meeting may prove pivotal in a war that began when Russia invaded its western neighbour and has led to tens of thousands of deaths, although there is no guarantee it will stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. Saturday's statement, signed by the president of the European Union and leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Finland, stressed the need for a 'just and lasting peace' for Kyiv, including 'robust and credible' security guarantees. 'Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities,' the statement said. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force,' the Europeans added. A month-long US-led push to achieve a truce in Ukraine has so far proved fruitless, with Kyiv agreeing in principle while the Kremlin has held out for terms more to its liking. Mr Trump had also moved up an ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia and introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil if the Kremlin did not move toward a settlement. The deadline was Friday. The White House did not answer questions on Saturday about possible sanctions. The Kremlin earlier this week reiterated demands that Ukraine gives up territory, abandons its bid to join Nato, and accepts limits on its military, in exchange for a withdrawal of Russian troops from the rest of the country. Mr Zelensky said on Saturday that Ukraine 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done' and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier'. Ukrainian officials previously told the AP privately that Kyiv would be amenable to a peace deal that would de facto recognise Ukraine's inability to regain lost territories militarily. But Mr Zelensky on Saturday insisted that formally ceding land was out of the question.