logo
IV infusions and Medicare: Coverage details

IV infusions and Medicare: Coverage details

Original Medicare provides coverage for IV infusion therapy when a doctor determines it to be medically necessary, both in a clinic setting and at home.
Medicare Advantage (Part C) plans need to offer the same services as Original Medicare, though a person's out-of-pocket costs will differ and will depend on their plan.
This article discusses coverage options for IV infusions through Medicare. When does Medicare pay for IV infusions?
Medicare Part A, Part B, and Medicare Advantage (Part C) plans generally all cover IV infusions if these are medically necessary.
However, whether Medicare deems a person's IV infusion medically necessary depends on each case. That said, examples of medications or other liquids that healthcare professionals administer via an IV include :
chemotherapy drugs
Immunotherapy drugs
targeted therapy drugs
anti-nausea medicines
hydration fluids
antibiotics
Any IV infusion must last at least 15 minutes to qualify under Medicare. In addition, Medicare will cover hydration therapy when medically necessary with an IV infusion, which is considered part of the same treatment as long as the hydration therapy lasts 20 to 30 minutes or less. Does Medicare cover IV infusion at home?
Medicare Part B covers the equipment for home IV infusion under its durable medical equipment (DME) benefit.
In addition, Part B will cover the infusion drugs themselves and support the infusion through nursing visits, caregiver training, and patient monitoring. Are infusions covered by Medicare Part D?
Medicare Part D covers drugs that a person can administer themselves. Because individuals cannot administer their infusion, their IV infusion will fall under the coverage of Part B. How much does an IV infusion cost?
Original Medicare comprises parts A and B. Part A covers hospitalization and general Medicare care. A person receiving an IV infusion during their hospital stay must meet a 2025 deductible of $1,676 before coverage begins. In most cases, people do not pay a premium for Part A.
A person receiving infusion therapy under Part B must pay a premium that starts at $185, depending on their income, and meet a deductible of $257. After that, Part B pays for 80% of infusion costs.
A person enrolled in a Part D plan will get the same coverage as under Part A and Part B. However, private insurers manage these plans, which have different premiums, deductibles, and coinsurances.
According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the average monthly premium for Part C plans is around $17 in 2025. How much does home infusion therapy cost?
How much IV infusion, whether at home or in a medical setting, might cost out of pocket before and after insurance depends on the type someone needs and the duration of the treatment.
One 2023 review estimated the cost per day for home infusion to be $122 and for inpatient infusion to be $798.
This review also examined six studies, finding that home infusion therapy could save significantly more money than inpatient infusion. One study reported savings of over $40,000 per patient, while another projected nearly $3 billion in savings for Medicare over 5 years.
Medicare parts A, B, and C (Medicare Advantage) cover IV infusions if doctors deem them medically necessary.
Part B also includes home IV infusion equipment under the durable medical equipment benefit, including infusion medications, nursing visits, caregiver training, and patient monitoring. A person enrolled in Part C will get equivalent coverage to parts A and B.
A person needs to verify their hospital status — whether the hospital classifies them as an inpatient or outpatient — with their healthcare team. This can influence their out-of-pocket expenses and determine which part of Medicare will cover the services.
The information on this website may assist you in making personal decisions about insurance, but it is not intended to provide advice regarding the purchase or use of any insurance or insurance products. Healthline Media does not transact the business of insurance in any manner and is not licensed as an insurance company or producer in any U.S. jurisdiction. Healthline Media does not recommend or endorse any third parties that may transact the business of insurance.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Last chance for spring Covid-19 booster jab in Surrey
Last chance for spring Covid-19 booster jab in Surrey

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Last chance for spring Covid-19 booster jab in Surrey

The NHS in Surrey is reminding those who are eligible to get their spring Covid-19 boosters before the seasonal campaign ends in later this NHS says uptake in the latest round of boosters has been low, with just 49% of people eligible in Surrey having received their most recent booster eligible for the booster are adults aged 75 and over, residents in care homes for older adults, and individuals with weakened immune booster provides "vital protection against different strains of the Covid-19 virus" and helps to reduce the risk of serious illness and hospital admissions, the NHS says. Dr Charlotte Canniff, Surrey GP and joint chief medical officer at Surrey Heartlands Integrated Care Board, said: "It is not uncommon to see less people come forward for their booster over the spring and summer months."However, Covid-19 is still circulating, and it is important that vulnerable people are protected so that their risk of becoming seriously unwell is reduced."Appointments are available at pharmacies and GP practices across the county, with walk-in appointments also offered at various campaign ends on 17 June.

The Trump and Musk spat is turning them both into billion-dollar losers in every way
The Trump and Musk spat is turning them both into billion-dollar losers in every way

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

The Trump and Musk spat is turning them both into billion-dollar losers in every way

The boys are going at it. Like two heavies in the playground, the once richest man on Earth and one who thinks he is the most powerful are locked in a scrap. It's a bloke thing. Not long ago, the former bros used to spark off each other, rib each other while jointly belittling everyone else. Now the jocks, Elon Musk and Donald Trump, are grappling and so closely entwined were they and the organisations they lead, there can be no winner. It's possible that peace may prevail, but for how long? They've repeatedly raised the ante, which in male lore means backing down and letting bygones be bygones will be difficult. The fallout will hit them both. Trump says that Musk and his companies receive 'billions and billions of dollars' in government subsidies and contracts. He could cut them. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. One estimate puts the total that Musk's two main businesses, SpaceX and Tesla, receive in public benefits at $38bn (£28bn). SpaceX president and chief operating officer, Gwynne Shotwell, has said its tally alone is $22bn. The exact combined figure may never be known because many of the deals between Musk's firms and Washington are classified. For his part, Musk is the heaviest donor to the Republicans, giving $200m to the GOP. There was more. Musk said he would support Maga candidates in local primaries, to the tune of $10m a pop, against sitting Republicans, should they dare to oppose Trump. Meanwhile, Musk's space rockets fly Nasa astronauts to the orbiting shuttle – without that service, the Americans would have to do the diplomatically unthinkable and seek the wholesale assistance of Russia and its Soyuz vehicles. It's likely the love-in was always destined to fail. Trump demands complete adulation, any dissenters are quickly shown the door. Musk, for all his admiration of the president, disagreed with him profoundly on a number of key issues. In order for his companies to stay ahead and to keep reinventing and innovating, Musk must attract the best brains. Whatever Trump alleges, they do not all exist in America, Musk needs to draw talent from overseas. That ran up against Trump's anti-immigration policy. Musk is a renewable energy evangelist, he made his name with the high-performance Tesla electric car. Trump is anything but, clinging to the belief that fossil fuels still rule and have a future. Likewise, Musk's products rely on imported parts and materials. Trump has kiboshed global supply lines and delivered large-scale uncertainty with his adherence to new tariffs. Musk's position on these was well known. He said so, and Trump tolerated him. After all, he was doing the White House 's bidding on Doge, slashing perceived governmental waste. Trump was happy for him to take the rap, to be the fall guy or poster boy, depending on how it was viewed. Musk's Maga popularity may have soared, but among his investors and consumers, it plummeted. Both men are characterised by a stubborn refusal to climb down and a belief in their own might. Musk pressed on, regardless. They also speak their minds, as they find, again, convinced of their own brilliance. There was so much that Trump was prepared to forgive, but it was when Musk openly criticised Trump's central tax bill that the gloves finally came off. It is a priority of Trump's second term, and the measure requires congressional Republican backing to get through. By hailing it a 'disgusting abomination', Musk was sowing doubt among possible GOP waverers, and that simply would not do. The new distance between them was noticed, and the rot set in. Musk was exiting the building. The president exhibited his usual pettiness, so what sent Musk ballistic was when an ally had his nomination to run Nasa withdrawn. That pal, Jared Isaacman, came out and said he was a victim of revenge – his nomination was revoked on the very day that the 'first buddy' was saying his White House goodbyes. Far from damping down the speculation as to why his appointment was suddenly off, Isaacman raised it. 'I mean, people can draw their own conclusions, but I think the directions people are going in seems to check out to me,' he said. Isaacman was not any other candidate – the billionaire had been a close collaborator with Musk ever since he led the first chartered passenger flight on SpaceX in 2021. Musk, understandably, was riled. Now it was personal. Since then, we've been treated to the spectacle of gladiatorial combat, albeit resorting to childish insults as weapons. But each man has plenty to lose. Trump is a brooder; he does not forget easily, and Musk may have overstepped a mark by alerting the world's media and social media to something that might or might not be contained in confidential files regarding Epstein and Trump. That may just prove unforgivable. Certainly, in the absence of an explanation, the accusation could return to haunt Trump. There may be one. It could be trivial and of little consequence. Musk may merely have been having fun, being provocative, and he hasn't presented anything to substantiate the allegation. But until we know, we cannot be sure, and the gossip will continue. Meanwhile, Trump's longtime ally Steve Bannon suggested that the president 'should sign an executive order calling for the Defense Production Act and seize SpaceX'. And the President himself was said to be planning on dispensing with all traces of Elon Musk, including the Tesla he bought at full price in March. It's perverse that they should be reduced to this. But two large, bristling personalities, possessors of machismo in abundance, were probably always going to find sharing the same small classroom an enormous challenge. Despite deploying all the cynical disregarding and showboating they could muster, it was insurmountable and could come at an enormous cost.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store