Hearing on deadly Texas floods reveals local officials missed emergency planning briefing
Crews work to clear debris July 10 on the Cade Loop Bridge after flooding along the Guadalupe River in Ingram, Texas.
Photo:
Joshua A. Bickel/AP via CNN Newsource
All key leading officials from the Texas county hardest hit by the July 4
flash flooding that killed at least 136 people
were absent from an emergency briefing call held before the tragedy unfolded, questioning from state lawmakers on Thursday revealed.
Kerr County officials were sharply confronted during the committee hearing in Kerrville, Texas, about their disaster preparedness and response following the deadly storm that swept away homes, children's camps, and RVs primarily in their county, killing 37 children and 71 adults. Two people are still missing.
The officials faced strong criticism as lawmakers pressed for accountability in the aftermath of the catastrophe, intensifying their scrutiny since last week's 12-hour special hearing over whether more should have been done prior to the storm or how efficiently life-saving efforts were carried out. Over 100 people signed up to speak during the public comment portions of Thursday's hearing.
Emails from the Texas Division of Emergency Management - two asking local leaders to be on briefing calls about the weather and one showing predicted danger areas - are part of a series of opportunities local officials had to prepare.
"I didn't see those emails," Kerrville Mayor Joe Herring Jr. told CNN on Thursday. "I wish I had seen it. I didn't see it."
Flood waters left debris including vehicles and equipment scattered in Louise Hays Park on 5 July 2025 in Kerrville, Texas.
Photo:
Eric Vryn / Getty Images / AFP
The Kerr County emergency management coordinator, who had been accused of being asleep in the critical morning hours of the deadly flood, said he also missed the emergency briefings because he was home sick.
"In my absence, my supervisors and sheriff's office leadership were aware that I was off duty," William B. "Dub" Thomas told a hearing in Kerrville of the state Select Committees on Disaster Preparedness and Flooding.
The emergency management coordinator said he stayed in bed throughout July 3 and did not participate in the regularly scheduled 10am and 3pm Texas Emergency Management coordination center coordination calls.
Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick called out Kerr County Judge Rob Kelly specifically following his testimony, highlighting the judge's absence on July 4, while also mentioning several officials who were there.
"I don't know where you were on day one on July 4, but you should have been here. You should have been here directing that response. That's your responsibility," Patrick said. "Everyone was here that day, working their a** off, and you were nowhere to be found." The lieutenant governor's comments were met with applause from the audience.
In Texas, county judges are elected and act as the head of county governments.
Texas Rep. Ann Johnson pointed out that "the three guys in Kerr County, who were responsible for sounding the alarm, were effectively unavailable" in the midst of the emergency, she said in the hearing.
A volunteer looks for missing people, following severe flash flooding that occured during the 4 July holiday weekend, in Hunt, Texas
Photo:
RONALDO SCHEMIDT / AFP
The Kerr County judge was away, the sheriff didn't wake up until 4:20am and the emergency management coordinator was sick, she said.
"We cannot go back in time and save these children," Johnson said, "but knowing now, what you know, is there a protocol that needs to be put in place that if the three folks who are responsible are not available at this moment for whatever reason, what should we do?"
Another local official in Travis County, Texas, also noted the important absence of a National Weather Service employee who was crucial in conveying to local officials how serious a weather event was going to be.
The employee left three to four months ago and hasn't been replaced. His absence was felt during this major weather event, Travis County Judge Andy Brown told officials.
"He was the person who would say, 'Hey Travis County, I know you get flash flood alerts, thunderstorm alerts all the time, but this is a big one. You need to pay attention,'" Brown said, adding that his number one request would be to fill that position.
At Thursday's hearing, lawmakers heard emotional public testimony from grieving residents who called for a more reliable system to warn the public about potential life-threatening floods.
Alicia Jeffrey Baker, whose parents and 11-year-old daughter Madelyn "Emmy" Jeffrey were killed in the flood, testified that officials should put in place a more effective audible alert system for flash flooding, particularly since some residents in the area lack cell and Wi-Fi service.
"My suggestion would be that instead of just sirens, we actually have sensors in the water that would then alert sirens to go off," Baker said. "If we have gauges in water already, put a sensor on them. If it gets to a certain point, that's when the siren goes off."
"That's my suggestion as someone living through a nightmare," she added. "We need to do better for the people in this community, for the people that are suffering."
Sobbing, Baker described the agonizing hours after the flood, when there was little communication about the whereabouts of her family. Her parents were identified that Sunday, and her daughter on Thursday, July 10, over a week after she went missing.
"The only thing that identified her at all was her charm bracelet," Baker said.
A large truck is impaled onto a tree after flash flooding on the bank Guadalupe River on 5 July 2025 in Center Point, Texas.
Photo:
Jim Vondruska / Getty Images / AFP
Bud Bolton, a resident of Hunt, Texas, joined Baker in calling for a better alert system, highlighting the area's lack of cell service as a major concern - he said he didn't get an alert, instead he witnessed the chaos outside.
He recalled watching over 100 RVs float past him, while hearing the screams of children trapped inside, he said.
"(I heard them) screaming and hearing crashes and crashes, then tiny homes crashing and more crashing, gets dead silent and more crashes and more screams, and that went on for 15, 20 minutes," Bolton said. "We got an alert to evacuate, after all the homes were gone. That's when our alert came in."
Rosa Toller, a resident of the Bumble Bee Hills neighborhood in Ingram, Texas, echoed a similar experience the night of the floods. "Our warning was screaming down the road. That was our warning, our screaming neighbors," she said.
Williamson County Judge Steven Snell told legislators about a heroic 911 call from Sherry Richardson, a resident who was trapped in her home by rising floodwaters but begged first responders to help a home for disabled children farther up the road first.
"Few minutes later, the house was swept away by the flood waters, and she perished in the flood, but not before we were able to mobilize teams," Snell said. "We were able to evacuate and rescue all 13 children that were residents and three nighttime workers from the home, thanks to the pleading in the 911 call of Sherry Richardson."
Nancy Zdunkewicz and her family consider themselves lucky to have survived, she added, as many of their lifelong friends and relatives did not survive the night of the flooding. She and her 66-year-old mother clung to a tree for hours in Hunt.
"Had there been early detection of the rising water and sirens, we may have been able to leave in time to get to higher ground safely," Zdunkewicz said. "I've heard someone else say, they didn't think that was necessary or would save lives in Hunt, and they are dead wrong."
Mike Richards, a Bandera resident whose daughter lives in Kerr County and discovered a deceased body near her home the morning after the flood, said during the hearing he recovered 10 bodies on his own, without any government assistance.
"I think the state involvement, as far as I'm concerned, is pathetic," Richards said, also criticizing the Federal Emergency Management Agency for turning people away. FEMA had said it was inundated with a high volume of calls and not able to answer them at the peak of the flooding.
Richards recounted his attempt to secure an excavator to help recover the bodies more efficiently, but he said he was told the state would not allow him access to one.
"I ain't worried about no laws, man, I'll break them if you bring your equipment over just just to go out and look for these people," he added. "I'm talking about finding bodies."
"It was two days before I got some help. It was not from the state, not from the government. It was some good-hearted people."
A view inside of a cabin at Camp Mystic, the site of where at least 20 girls went missing after flash flooding in Hunt, Texas.
Photo:
RONALDO SCHEMIDT / AFP
Keli Rabon, whose two sons, ages 7 and 9, survived the floods that
tore apart Camp La Junta
, said her younger son, Brock, lives in a constant state of anxiety and is in need of mental heath care.
"Today, my sons are physically safe, but for our family, the storm is not over," Rabon said.
"Brock scans every room for higher ground. He checks the weather constantly. He battles nightmares of water dripping from the ceiling or his mattress being wet. His fear is so profound that he's now anxious about the tsunami in Hawaii. He lives with the terror that no child or any person should have to carry but so many of us now do."
Rabon said she requested help to find mental health resources for her children from FEMA but was told they cannot help.
"I shouldn't have to rely on a Facebook group of volunteers to find trauma care for my children," she added. "I pray that these hearings are more than just for show, because every day that we just focus on political posturing instead of people is another day that families like mine are falling through the cracks.
Rabon made three "simple, urgent requests": immediately release emergency funds for recovery, make mental health care a core part of the state's official disaster response and ensure all camps have publicly accessible emergency plans.
- CNN
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Higher US tariffs kick in for dozens of trading partners
By Beiyi Seow Donald Trump holds a signed executive order after delivering remarks on reciprocal tariffs during an event in the Rose Garden entitled "Make America Wealthy Again" at the White House in Washington, DC, on 2 April, 2025. Photo: AFP The United States has begun charging higher tariffs on goods from dozens of trading partners, in a major escalation of President Donald Trump's drive to reshape global commerce in America's favour. Shortly before the new levies kicked in, Washington separately announced it would double Indian tariffs to 50 percent and hit many semiconductor imports from around the world with a 100-percent levy. As an executive order signed last week by Trump took effect, US import duties rose from 10 percent to levels between 15 percent and 41 percent for a list of trading partners. Many imports from economies including the European Union, Japan and South Korea now face a 15-percent tariff, even with deals struck with Washington to avert steeper threatened levies. But others like India face a 25 percent duty - to be doubled in three weeks to 50 percent - while Syria, Myanmar and Laos face staggering levels at either 40 percent or 41 percent. Switzerland's government, which failed to convince Trump not to impose a stinging 39 percent tariff, was set to hold an extraordinary meeting later on Thursday (local time). Taking to his Truth Social platform just after midnight, Trump posted: "IT'S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW FLOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!" The latest wave of "reciprocal" duties, aimed at addressing trade practices Washington deems unfair, broadens the measures Trump has imposed since returning to the presidency. On the eve of his latest salvo, he doubled planned duties on Indian goods to 50 percent, citing New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil. The new levy - up from 25 percent now - would take effect in three weeks. The Federation of Indian Export Organisations called the move a "severe setback for Indian exports, with nearly 55 percent of our shipments to the US market directly affected." For New Delhi, one of the main sticking points has been Washington's demand to access India's vast agricultural and dairy market. "We will not compromise with the interests of our farmers, our dairy sector, our fishermen," Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Thursday. Trump's order also threatened penalties on other countries that "directly or indirectly" import Russian oil, a key revenue source for Moscow's war in Ukraine. Washington has already separately stuck tariffs on sector-specific imports such as steel, autos and pharmaceuticals. Trump said Wednesday he also planned an "approximately 100 percent tariff" on semiconductor imports, but with "no charge" for companies investing in the United States or committed to do so. Shares in Taiwanese chip-making giant TSMC surged as Taipei said it would be exempt, but some other Asian manufacturers took a beating. Companies and industry groups warn the new levies will severely hurt smaller American businesses, while economists caution that they could fuel inflation and hit growth. With the dust settling on countries' tariff levels, at least for now, Georgetown University professor Marc Busch expects US businesses to pass along more of the bill to consumers. An earlier 90-day pause in these higher "reciprocal" tariffs gave importers time to stock up, he said. But although the wait-and-see strategy led businesses to absorb more of the tariff burden initially, inventories are depleting and it is unlikely they will do this indefinitely, he told AFP. "With back-to-school shopping just weeks away, this will matter politically," said Busch, an international trade policy expert. The tariffs leave lingering questions for partners that have negotiated deals with Trump recently. Tokyo and Washington, for example, appear at odds over key details of their pact, in particular on when lower levies on Japanese cars will take place. Generally, US auto imports now face a 25-percent duty under a sector-specific order. Toyota has cut its full-year profit forecast by 14 percent because of the tariffs. Japan and the United States also appear to differ on whether the "reciprocal" tolls of 15 percent on other Japanese goods would be on top of existing levies or - like the EU - be capped at that level. China and the United States, meanwhile, currently have a shaky truce in their stand-off but that is due to expire on 12 August. Chinese exports to the United States tumbled 21.7 percent last month, official data showed, while those to the European Union jumped 9.2 percent and to Southeast Asia by 16.6 percent. The EU is seeking a carveout from tariffs for its key wine industry. In a recent industry letter addressed to Trump, the US Wine Trade Alliance and others urged the sector's exclusion from tolls, saying: "Wine sales account for up to 60 percent of gross margins of full-service restaurants." Trump has separately targeted Brazil over the trial of his right-wing ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro , who is accused of planning a coup. US tariffs on various Brazilian goods surged from 10 percent to 50 percent Wednesday, but broad exemptions including for orange juice and civil aircraft are seen as softening the blow. Still, key products like Brazilian coffee, beef and sugar are hit. - AFP

RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
NASA to fast-track plan to put nuclear reactor on the Moon by 2030
By Audrey Courty A nuclear reactor would be useful for long-term stays on the Moon. Photo: 123RF Analysis - US Transport Secretary Sean Duffy has announced the US wants to be the first nation to put a nuclear reactor on the Moon after an internal directive showed he ordered the space agency NASA to fast-track the plan. "We're going to bring nuclear fission to the lunar surface to power our base," Duffy wrote on social media X on Thursday, local time. "If you lead in space, you lead on Earth." A directive written by Duffy - first reported by Politico and seen by Agence France Presse (AFP) - demands that NASA build a nuclear reactor that could be used to generate power on the Moon within five years. It is the first major policy change by Duffy since President Donald Trump appointed him as acting head of the space agency, and it comes just three months after China and Russia announced they were considering a joint effort to also put a nuclear power station on the Moon. But what would a nuclear reactor help achieve? And what is driving this new space race? Here's what to know. Nuclear reactors are the heart of a nuclear power plant. They create electricity by producing a carefully controlled nuclear chain reaction. Over the years, NASA has funded multiple nuclear reactor research projects. Photo: ABC Four Corners: Ryan Sheridan According to the New York Times , Duffy's directive calls for the agency to solicit proposals from commercial companies for a reactor that could generate 100 kilowatts of power and would be ready for launch in late 2029. That's enough electricity to power between 50 and 100 Australian households at once. As extraordinary as it sounds, this idea to use nuclear energy in space is not new. Since 2000, NASA has been investing in nuclear reactor research, including in 2022, when it awarded three US$5 million contracts to develop initial designs for the Moon. But those designs were smaller, producing 40 kilowatts, and were for demonstration purposes to show nuclear power "is a safe, clean, reliable option," NASA said at the time. A nuclear reactor would be useful for long-term stays on the Moon, as the Trump administration looks to revitalise space exploration. One lunar day lasts four weeks on Earth, with two weeks of continual sunshine followed by two weeks of cold darkness. This cycle makes it difficult for a spacecraft or a Moon base to survive with just solar panels and batteries. Having a source of power independent of the Sun would be key to a sustained human presence on the lunar surface for at least 10 years, NASA has previously said. In the internal directive, Duffy also cites China and Russia's plans to put a reactor on the moon by the mid-2030s. "The first country to do so could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first," he writes, according to AFP. Artemis is a reference to NASA's Moon exploration program, which aims to send four astronauts to the lunar surface in 2026 to establish a lasting presence near the south pole. Further, Duffy notes it would pave the way for Mars exploration efforts. "To properly advance this critical technology to be able to support a future lunar economy, high-power energy generation on Mars, and to strengthen our national security in space, it is imperative the agency move quickly," he reportedly says. Amid renewed competition for space dominance - more than 50 years after the Cold War spurred the first man to walk on the Moon - it is worth noting that a 1967 UN agreement says no nation can own the Moon. Duffy's comments about the potential for another country to declare a "keep-out zone" on its surface appear to be referring to an agreement called the Artemis Accords. In 2020, seven nations initially signed the agreement to establish principles on how countries should cooperate on the Moon. Since then, 49 more have done so, including Australia, but China is noticeably absent from the list. These principles include so-called "safety zones" to be established around operations and assets that countries build on the Moon to prevent interference. The race to the Moon is driven by scientific knowledge and technological advances, as well as the prospect of accessing valuable resources. In a 2015 article published on its website, NASA explains why it plans to mine the Moon and how the "lunar gold rush" could work. Citing data from geological surveys, the space agency says the Moon contains three crucial elements: water, helium and rare earth metals. The water reserves frozen inside shadowed craters could be used for drinking, and could even be converted into rocket fuel to support future missions to Mars, according to NASA. The agency says helium would support developments in the energy sector, like nuclear fusion. As for rare earth metals, it says they would boost the supplies needed for emerging technologies, like smartphones, computers and medical equipment. China has also tapped the Moon's potential and made giant leaps in space exploration and technology in recent years. It has built a space station that is manned by taikonauts, landed a rover on Mars, and became the first nation to touch down on the far side of the Moon. China, too, wants to set up a lunar base and send people to Mars, adding a layer of political rivalry to the race. - ABC

RNZ News
20 hours ago
- RNZ News
Trump's relentless tariff strategy finally crashes into delicate geopolitical reality
By Phil Mattingley , CNN US President Donald Trump delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs during an event in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, DC, on April 2, 2025. Photo: AFP / Brendan Smialowski Analysis : President Donald Trump's relentless use of tariffs to coerce foreign counterparts into favourable deals is about to run headlong into the limits of geopolitical reality. Trump's willingness to dramatically escalate the long-running US economic warfare in response to Russia's war on Ukraine is real, advisors say. His threat to accelerate sweeping tariffs on India is certain to come to fruition, they insist. But he also faces the backdrop of a looming deadline to extend a trade truce with the world's second-largest economy that requires a degree of caution as White House deliberations come to a head. "He's pissed," one person close to Trump said of his rapidly deteriorating view of Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. "But he's also aware of the competing priorities here." Trump faces a unique challenge balancing all of his simultaneous demands: He is threatening punishing sanctions on the Russian energy production that serves as the financial linchpin of Putin's war machine at the same moment he is seeking leverage in trade talks with India while maintaining a fragile trade détente with China. The convergence of conflicting priorities has driven intensive discussions inside the West Wing about the range and scope of the options Trump could trigger as soon as today - and put a significant amount of weight on the meeting between Putin and Steve Witkoff, his trusted foreign envoy , underway in Moscow. Trump has threatened sweeping secondary sanctions on Russian energy that would primarily hit China and India, the two largest purchasers of Russian energy . But he's also considering more tailored options, including sanctions that target specific tankers - known inside the government as the "shadow fleet" - that are utilised to skirt the existing Western sanctions regime in the transport of Russian oil, two US officials with the knowledge of the matter said. Russia's President Vladimir Putin Photo: AFP The Biden administration's evolving sanctions actions found success in blacklisting the vessels critical to Putin's sanctions evasion efforts. Secondary sanctions tailored specifically to India in some form have also been discussed, the officials said. Trump feels empowered to trigger those secondary sanctions that were long weighed by his predecessor, but never deployed due to soaring inflation and concerns about a significant increase in domestic gas prices. That is a problem Trump simply doesn't have right now, as waning global demand and a steady increase in output by the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies have mitigated the concern about the energy price spikes that bedevilled the Biden administration. For the Trump administration, that has created leverage as frustration with Putin's refusal to come to the table has dashed Trump's envisioned quick end to the three-plus year conflict. Those dynamics also played directly into the recent breakdown in long running and intense trade negotiations between the US and India, advisors say. While there is obvious overlap between Trump's escalating threats targeting Russia and his explicit warnings about India's energy purchases , the dispute with the world's fifth-largest economy is specific to the trade talks, the officials say. "We consider a wide range of options, but this is a situation more of convenient coincidence than overarching strategic long-game," one of the officials said. Donald Trump and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi has soured compared with this warm embrace in February 2020. Photo: Mandel Ngan / AFP Trump has acknowledged as much. "The sticking point with India is that tariffs are too high," Trump said in an interview on Tuesday with CNBC. Peter Navarro, Trump's senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, has called India as "the Maharaja of tariffs," underscoring a long-running view that India's expansive protection of its domestic markets has been a significant frustration for Trump and his trade team. As the clock ticked toward Trump's 1 August "reciprocal" tariff deadline and foreign partners offered significant concessions on US market access, India was a notable exception, officials said. "The president wanted deals that substantially opened markets - everything or near everything," a senior administration official said. "They were interested in opening some of their markets, but not nearly ambitious enough to meet the president's view of what would constitute a good deal." So while India's purchases of Russian energy and Russian military equipment was well known on the periphery, Trump elevated those friction points to the forefront as he sought to pressure Indian negotiators, the official said. Any large-scale effort to trigger secondary sanctions, however, would crash directly into the delicate maintenance of US-China trade talks which have seen both countries utilise economic statecraft, sanctions and export controls to exert or ease pressure on the bilateral relationship over the course of months. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned his Chinese counterparts directly, during the third round of face-to-face talks last week, that Trump was serious about secondary sanctions and it was something Chinese officials needed to prepare for in the weeks ahead. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent at the White House. Photo: MANDEL NGAN/AFP But as US and Chinese officials have quietly continued discussions over the technical details of an agreement to extend their existing trade truce, the concern about the impact secondary sanctions would have on those dynamics has been a factor inside the administration, officials say. Trump has yet to officially sign off on an extension, even as his top advisors made clear it was only a matter of time before Trump blesses it. For Trump, who has operated throughout his second term in a perpetual state of running deadlines, that clock is ticking concurrently with his deadline for Putin. The decision on the latter now weighs heavily on the status of the former. -CNN