Trump's relentless tariff strategy finally crashes into delicate geopolitical reality
Phil Mattingley
, CNN
US President Donald Trump delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs during an event in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, DC, on April 2, 2025.
Photo:
AFP / Brendan Smialowski
Analysis
: President Donald Trump's relentless use of tariffs to coerce foreign counterparts into favourable deals is about to run headlong into the limits of geopolitical reality.
Trump's willingness to dramatically escalate the long-running US economic warfare in response to Russia's war on Ukraine is real, advisors say. His threat to accelerate sweeping tariffs on India is certain to come to fruition, they insist. But he also faces the backdrop of a looming deadline to extend a trade truce with the world's second-largest economy that requires a degree of caution as White House deliberations come to a head.
"He's pissed," one person close to Trump said of his rapidly deteriorating view of
Russian President Vladimir Putin
in recent weeks. "But he's also aware of the competing priorities here."
Trump faces a unique challenge balancing all of his simultaneous demands: He is threatening punishing sanctions on the Russian energy production that serves as the financial linchpin of Putin's war machine at the same moment he is seeking leverage in trade talks with India while maintaining a fragile trade détente with China.
The convergence of conflicting priorities has driven intensive discussions inside the West Wing about the range and scope of the options Trump could trigger as soon as today - and put a significant amount of weight on
the meeting between Putin and Steve Witkoff, his trusted foreign envoy
, underway in Moscow.
Trump has threatened sweeping secondary sanctions on Russian energy that would primarily hit China and
India, the two largest purchasers of Russian energy
. But he's also considering more tailored options, including sanctions that target specific tankers - known inside the government as the "shadow fleet" - that are utilised to skirt the existing Western sanctions regime in the transport of Russian oil, two US officials with the knowledge of the matter said.
Russia's President Vladimir Putin
Photo:
AFP
The Biden administration's evolving sanctions actions found success in blacklisting the vessels critical to Putin's sanctions evasion efforts. Secondary sanctions tailored specifically to India in some form have also been discussed, the officials said.
Trump feels empowered to trigger those secondary sanctions that were long weighed by his predecessor, but never deployed due to soaring inflation and concerns about a significant increase in domestic gas prices.
That is a problem Trump simply doesn't have right now, as waning global demand and a steady increase in output by the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies have mitigated the concern about the energy price spikes that bedevilled the Biden administration.
For the Trump administration, that has created leverage as frustration with Putin's refusal to come to the table has dashed Trump's envisioned quick end to the three-plus year conflict.
Those dynamics also played directly into the recent breakdown in long running and intense trade negotiations between the US and India, advisors say.
While there is obvious overlap between Trump's escalating threats targeting Russia and
his explicit warnings about India's energy purchases
, the dispute with the world's fifth-largest economy is specific to the trade talks, the officials say.
"We consider a wide range of options, but this is a situation more of convenient coincidence than overarching strategic long-game," one of the officials said.
Donald Trump and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi has soured compared with this warm embrace in February 2020.
Photo:
Mandel Ngan / AFP
Trump has acknowledged as much.
"The sticking point with India is that tariffs are too high," Trump said in an interview on Tuesday with CNBC. Peter Navarro, Trump's senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, has called India as "the Maharaja of tariffs," underscoring a long-running view that India's expansive protection of its domestic markets has been a significant frustration for Trump and his trade team.
As the clock ticked toward Trump's 1 August "reciprocal" tariff deadline and foreign partners offered significant concessions on US market access, India was a notable exception, officials said.
"The president wanted deals that substantially opened markets - everything or near everything," a senior administration official said. "They were interested in opening some of their markets, but not nearly ambitious enough to meet the president's view of what would constitute a good deal."
So while India's purchases of Russian energy and Russian military equipment was well known on the periphery, Trump elevated those friction points to the forefront as he sought to pressure Indian negotiators, the official said.
Any large-scale effort to trigger secondary sanctions, however, would crash directly into the delicate maintenance of US-China trade talks which have seen both countries utilise economic statecraft, sanctions and export controls to exert or ease pressure on the bilateral relationship over the course of months.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned his Chinese counterparts directly, during the third round of face-to-face talks last week, that Trump was serious about secondary sanctions and it was something Chinese officials needed to prepare for in the weeks ahead.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent at the White House.
Photo:
MANDEL NGAN/AFP
But as US and Chinese officials have quietly continued discussions over the technical details of an agreement to extend their existing trade truce, the concern about the impact secondary sanctions would have on those dynamics has been a factor inside the administration, officials say.
Trump has yet to officially sign off on an extension, even as his top advisors made clear it was only a matter of time before Trump blesses it.
For Trump, who has operated throughout his second term in a perpetual state of running deadlines, that clock is ticking concurrently with his deadline for Putin.
The decision on the latter now weighs heavily on the status of the former.
-CNN
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
The White House considering inviting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to Alaska
United States' President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky meet in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on 28 February 2025. Photo: AFP / SAUL LOEB The White House is considering inviting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to Alaska, where United States' President Donald Trump is scheduled to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on 15 August, NBC News has reported. The report cited a senior US official and three people briefed on the internal discussions. "It's being discussed," one of the people briefed on the talks was quoted as saying. The report added that no Zelensky visit was finalised and that it was unclear if the Ukrainian leader would ultimately be in Alaska for meetings but it remained a possibility. - Reuters

RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Mediawatch: 'Surprise' rise in Trump's trade tariff?
One of many headlines calling the 15 percent tariff rate imposed by the US 'a surprise'. Photo: The Post "If the name of New Zealand is seriously so threatened, why didn't New Zealand First introduce this bill 12 months ago? Why not six years ago? Why not negotiate it into the coalition agreement when they formed a government?" Jack Tame asked on his Newstalk ZB show last weekend . He was talking about the New Zealand (Name of State) Bill freshly proposed by NZ First MP Andy Foster, which would legislate New Zealand as the official name of the country. "Could it possibly be that a few hours before ... Australia and the UK achieved lower trade tariffs with the United States, while our government's top officials were apparently surprised to learn that our tariff had been increased?" he asked. Party leader Winston Peters didn't like it. On social media, he pointed out that on the same show five years ago, Jack Tame had backed 'Aotearoa New Zealand' as the official name for our nation. In a long interview about the Bill on the alternative news platform The Platform, Peters said he was delighted his "counter-attack" on Jack Tame was getting good online engagement. The hike in US trade tariffs didn't come up until Peters himself mentioned it at the very end. "Before you go, you know, we've got this thing with the United States and everybody's alarmed. I've seen all the headlines on Radio New Zealand and all the newspapers today. We'll turn this thing around. You watch," the foreign minister said. Since 5 April, US importers of New Zealand products have been paying a 10 percent tariff on all goods - and 25 percent on steel and aluminium. While Tame said the 15 percent tariff the US confirmed late last week seemed to be a surprise to our government and trade officials, the media seemed surprised too. Many news stories - and many headlines - called it a 'surprise' rise . But ahead of that, Trade Minister Todd McClay himself said the tariff could rise to 15 percent. At a media conference earlier, President Trump himself told reporters that the universal tariff could increase to 15 or 20 percent for countries that had not struck deals with the US. Todd McClay also told reporters last week, if the tariff rate goes to 15 percent our exporters have already adjusted and will be able to deal with it. If so, they adjusted a bit better than the surprised media this past week. On Newstalk ZB, Mike Hosking told his listeners the lower rate charged across the Tasman was the real shock. "Australia can land their beef and their wine at 10 percent, we land ours at 15," he complained. But to those surprised by that, Scoop's Gordon Campbell said they shouldn't have been. "We sell them more than they buy from us. In Trumpland, any country that runs a trade surplus with the US is a bad country that is ripping the US off. How bad have we been? Pretty bad, in Trumpian terms," New Zealand is a victim of its own export success, Gordon Campbell said - a bit like butter buyers in our duopolistic supermarkets. Trade Minister Todd McClay also confirmed that 15 percent was no surprise on NZME's rural show The Country . "If we had run a trade deficit with the US like Australia, would we have got 10 percent?," host Jamie McKay asked McClay on Wednesday, in Bangkok en route to Washington to plead our case. "It is as simple as that," the trade minister replied, confirming he had been told as much previously by US trade representative Jamieson Greer. "He said it didn't matter if you had camped out here in Washington, if you'd had a trade deal or you're negotiating one. For any country that had a trade surplus against the US last year - it is 15 percent or more," McClay said. Todd MaClay dodged the next question, about whether we would agree to buy more stuff from the US to reduce our trade deficit. This week McClay and columnist Gordon Campbell both pointed out that the trade surplus has in previous years been flipped by one-off purchases of big-ticket items like aircraft. The deal Trump struck with the EU earlier this month included billions of dollars-worth of energy and military equipment. Many people in many industries are now watching this space, including the media - surely not so surprised by now. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Zelensky rejects land concessions ahead of Trump-Putin talks
By Olena Harmash and Suban Abdulla, Reuters Volodymyr Zelensky says Ukraine will not cede its land to Russia, ahead of US President Donald Trump's talks with Vladimir Putin. Photo: JULIEN DE ROSA / AFP Ukraine will not cede its land, President Volodymyr Zelensky says, rejecting US suggestions that a deal with Russia could involve swapping territories as Washington and Moscow prepared for talks between their leaders on ending the war. US President Donald Trump announced on Saturday (New Zealand time) that he would meet his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15, saying the parties, including Zelensky, were close to a deal that could resolve the three-and-a-half-year conflict. Details of the potential deal have yet to be announced, but Trump said it would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". It could require Ukraine to surrender significant parts of its territory - an outcome Kyiv and its European allies say would only encourage Russian aggression. "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier," Zelensky said in a video address, adding that Ukraine's borders were fixed in the country's constitution. "No one will deviate from this - and no one will be able to," he said. US Vice President JD Vance will meet Ukrainian and European on Saturday to discuss Trump's push for peace, Downing Street said, adding that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had spoken about it with Zelensky. "They agreed this would be a vital forum to discuss progress towards securing a just and lasting peace," the Downing Street spokesperson added. Zelensky has made a flurry of calls with Ukraine's allies since Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff's visit to Moscow on Wednesday which Trump described as having achieved "great progress". "Clear steps are needed, as well as maximum co-ordination between us and our partners," Zelensky said in a post on X after his call with Starmer. "We value the determination of the United Kingdom, the United States, and all our partners to end the war." Ukraine and the European Union have pushed back on proposals that they view as ceding too much to Putin, whose troops invaded Ukraine in February 2022, citing what Moscow called threats to Russia's security from a Ukrainian pivot towards the West. Kyiv and its Western allies say the invasion is an imperial-style land grab. Moscow has previously claimed four Ukrainian regions - Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson - as well as the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, which was annexed in 2014. Russian forces do not fully control all the territory in the four regions and Russia is demanding that Ukraine pull out its troops from the parts of all four of them that they still control. Ukraine says its troops still have a small foothold in Russia's Kursk region a year after its troops crossed the border to try to gain leverage in any negotiations. Russia said it had expelled Ukraininan troops from Kursk in April. Tatiana Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, described the current peace push as "the first more or less realistic attempt to stop the war". "At the same time, I remain extremely sceptical about the implementation of the agreements, even if a truce is reached for a while. And there is virtually no doubt that the new commitments could be devastating for Ukraine," she said. Fierce fighting is raging along the more than 1000 kilometre front line along eastern and southern Ukraine, where Russian forces hold around a fifth of the country's territory. Russian troops are slowly advancing in Ukraine's east, but their summer offensive has so far failed to achieve a major breakthrough, Ukrainian military analysts say. Ukrainians remain defiant. "Not a single serviceman will agree to cede territory, to pull out troops from Ukrainian territories," Olesia Petritska, 51, told Reuters as she gestured to hundreds of small Ukrainian flags in the Kyiv central square commemorating fallen soldiers. Additional reporting Maxim Rodionov, Andrea Shalal and Dheeraj Kumar. - Reuters