logo
The Best Beaches Near NYC to Explore This Summer

The Best Beaches Near NYC to Explore This Summer

Vogue13-05-2025

To say New York City's beaches are unrivaled would be stretching the truth a bit. Crowded shorefronts and lack of remoteness might dissuade some from planning a day by the water. But that would be a mistake! Despite a few downsides that inherently come with outdoor spaces near big cities, the best beaches near NYC are a quintessential part of experiencing the region during the summer months.
For starters, the people watching is in a league of its own. Head for destinations like Rockaway or Orchard Beach to witness New York City culture on full, charismatic display. If somewhere you can finish your book and lower your blood pressure is more the vibe, Long Island's tranquil swaths of sand should do just fine. And if an archetypal NYC experience is what you're chasing, Coney Island and adjacent Brighton Beach are waiting with open arms and hot dogs aplenty.
There are no doubt many pristine beaches within a few hours' drive of the city (Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, and those dotted along The Hamptons), but we presume if you're searching for beaches near NYC, sunny coastlines that can be reached as swiftly as possible are the ticket (extra points for those accessible by public transit). Escape the muggy heat and put your straw hat to work at the 11 best beaches near NYC below.
Fort Tilden, Queens

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Northern Lights Alert: 13 States May See Aurora On Monday And Tuesday
Northern Lights Alert: 13 States May See Aurora On Monday And Tuesday

Forbes

time27 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Northern Lights Alert: 13 States May See Aurora On Monday And Tuesday

Wisconsin's night sky is glowing with the Northern Lights, as a geomagnetic storm is bringing ... More vibrant pink and green colors. (Photo by Ross Harried/NurPhoto via Getty Images) The Northern Lights may be visible from 13 U.S. states on Monday, June 2 through Tuesday, June 3, 2025, after a G1 geomagnetic storm was forecast by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. It comes in the wake of an 'extreme' G5 geomagnetic storm last weekend that saw aurora borealis seen from as far south as California. As Earth approaches the solstice on June 21, the U.S. is currently one of the best places to see the Northern Lights. The agency's three-day forecast has a geomagnetic storm, measured at a value of G1 on a scale of G1 to G5, potentially occurring on Monday night through Tuesday morning in North America. NOAA's aurora viewlines have potential aurora displays that are possible in northern U.S. states and Canada. A total of 13 U.S. states have a chance of seeing the aurora on the northern horizon, with those on the U.S.-Canada border having a higher chance. According to NOAA, this display may be seen from Washington, northern Idaho, Montana, northeast Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. Regions closest to the border with Canada will have the highest possibility of seeing the aurora. NOAA's forecast for the aurora viewline on Monday, June 2, 2025. According to NOAA's forecast, the Kp index — which provides a rough guide to the intensity of aurora displays — may reach 5, seeing the auroral oval stretch farther south. Kp 5 equates to a G1-class geomagnetic storm. For a Kp in the range of 3 to 5, 'The aurora will move further from the poles, it will become brighter, and there will be more auroral activity (motion and formations)," according to NOAA. "If you are in the right place, these aurora can be quite pleasing to look at.' The geomagnetic storm on May 10, 2024, which saw aurora as far south as Florida, was rated as G5 and had Kp 9 intensity. It was the most powerful since 2003. Although it's forecast for Monday night through Tuesday morning in North America, exactly when and where aurora becomes visible this week will be down not to predictions but data coming in from NASA's DSCOVR and ACE satellites. Orbiting the sun from around a million miles from Earth, they give a roughly 30-minute warning of aurora displays after measuring the solar wind's speed and magnetic intensity. Check NOAA's 30-minute forecast or use the Glendale App for up-to-the-minute forecasts. People visit St Mary's lighthouse to see the aurora borealis, commonly known as the northern lights, ... More on May 10, 2024 in Whitley Bay, England. (Photo by) If your smartphone has a 'Night Mode' feature, that should be good enough to get a more than impressive souvenir shot of the aurora. It likely means a long exposure of between five and 10 seconds, which will look much better if you do three things: The Northern Lights are caused by the solar wind, a stream of charged particles from the sun interacting with Earth's magnetic field. Although the magnetic field deflects much of it, some charged particles accelerate along the magnetic field lines toward the polar regions, where they collide with oxygen and nitrogen atoms, exciting them and causing them to release energy as light. The possibility of displays of the aurora borealis at more southerly latitudes comes from a spike in solar activity, which is currently at a 23-year high due to the current solar maximum period. Geomagnetic storms and aurora are expected to continue through 2025 and 2026. Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.

Airline passenger sparks heated debate about 'rarely enforced' baggage policy on flight
Airline passenger sparks heated debate about 'rarely enforced' baggage policy on flight

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Airline passenger sparks heated debate about 'rarely enforced' baggage policy on flight

A flight passenger who boarded a late-night flight out of Atlanta, Georgia, shared frustrations about the baggage-related actions of some fellow flyers. Posting in the "r/delta" Reddit forum with the title, "Another rant about carry-ons and personal items," the user wrote to others, "Seriously, why have a 'rule' about one carry-on and one personal item when it's rarely enforced." The user added, "I watch[ed] a person with two, what I would call, large roll bags and no personal items put both rollers in an overhead bin while an FA [flight attendant] watched him do it." The user then added, "[Since] I paid to check my bag, I figured I'd put my backpack above my seat and the same FA [then] tells me that I can't do that." The person continued, "I mention to the FA that we just watched a person put two rollers in the overhead and why is that OK. The FA ignores me, moves on." The user said the flight attendant then put the bag under the seat in front. Reddit users took to the comments section to speculate about the actions of the traveler with two suitcases, plus bag policy habits. "Just from a personal experience, I once was asked about my two roller bags and my backpack as I was going to my seat," said one user. "I handle my mom's luggage when she gets on a plane because she can't. [So] it is very possible [this person was] doing the same." Another user pointed out other issues: "Let's talk about the real problem: baggage fees. This is why everyone uses a carry-on now. Which in turn makes boarding and deplaning take waaaay longer." Said yet another person, "Airlines need to start allowing a more generous checked baggage policy and start charging for carry-on luggage. That would solve several problems." One Redditor added, "I stopped traveling with a backpack because I got tired of having to sacrifice my legroom due to FAs screeching about backpacks going under the seat (even though it was usually my only carry-on)." One snarky user told the original poster, "Maybe you shouldn't be trying to police others, and [instead] should put your personal item under the seat in front of you where it [belongs]." "I'm [a member of a] flight crew who frequently travels as a passenger on commercial airliners," claimed one user. The person continued, "Rule of thumb is that if I'm not in uniform, I'm not allowed to bring more than the standard bag allowance for any passenger, whether crew or not." "If the flight is not full, oftentimes this rule is overlooked." Said another person on Reddit, "If I only have one item, that's my carry-on regardless of size, and I'm definitely putting it in the overhead and not under the seat in front of me." Former flight attendant and etiquette expert Jacqueline Whitmore of Florida told Fox News Digital the flight attendant may have been in the wrong in the case in question. "I'm not sure why this passenger was not allowed to put her backpack in the overhead bin. That's perfectly acceptable unless the bins are full," said Whitmore. She added, "The airlines have a policy that passengers can take one bag (of a certain size) and a personal item onboard the plane. If the flight is not full, oftentimes this rule is overlooked."

British Airways Owner Sees Transatlantic Slowdown Recovering
British Airways Owner Sees Transatlantic Slowdown Recovering

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

British Airways Owner Sees Transatlantic Slowdown Recovering

IAG SA said the weaker demand on transatlantic routes has shown signs of easing over the past three weeks as the travel outlook begins to stabilize following a period of uncertainty. The British Airways owner noticed 'several weeks' of demand softness in its economy cabins from the US, though the situation is now recovering, IAG Chief Executive Officer Luis Gallego said on Monday in a Bloomberg TV interview. Some corporate travel also slowed after the US announced tariffs and business passengers delayed some travel as a result, he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store