Lawmaker says Alligator Alcatraz is an ‘internment camp' after joint GOP-Dem visit: ‘Packed into cages'
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who represents Florida's 25th congressional district, said that pictures of the facility 'don't do it justice' and that detainees were being 'packed into cages.'
On Saturday Florida lawmakers from both parties took a state-arranged tour of the new 3,000-bed detention center that the state rapidly built on an isolated airstrip surrounded by swampland in the Everglades.
Speaking at a press conference following the tour, Wasserman Schultz said that the walk-through had been 'sanitized' but conditions were nonetheless 'appalling.'
'They are essentially packed into cages, wall-to-wall humans, 32 detainees per cage,' she told reporters. 'The only thing inside those cages are their bunk beds, and there are three tiny toilets.'
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who represents Florida's 25th congressional district, said that pictures of the 'Alligator Alcatraz' facility 'don't do it justice' and that detainees were being 'packed into cages' (AP)
On Saturday Florida lawmakers from both parties took a state-arranged tour of the new 3,000-bed detention center that the state rapidly built on an isolated airstrip surrounded by swampland in the Everglades (AP)
The units, Wasserman Schultz said, have sinks attached to the toilet resulting in detainees having to 'brush their teeth where they poop.' There was minimal privacy for any person inside, she added.
'This place needs to be shut the hell down. They're abusing human beings in cages,' the congresswoman later added in a post on X.
Donald Trump and his allies, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, have touted the makeshift detention center — an agglomeration of tents, trailers and temporary buildings constructed in a matter of days — as an efficient and get-tough response to the president's call for mass deportations.
Trump and his allies, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, have touted the makeshift detention center as an efficient and get-tough response to the president's call for mass deportations (AP)
Described as temporary, the detention center is meant to help the administration reach its goal of boosting the U.S. migrant detention capacity from 41,000 people to at least 100,000.
The Florida facility's remote location and its name — a nod to the notorious Alcatraz prison that once housed federal inmates in California — are meant to underscore a message of deterring illegal immigration.
President Donald Trump visits 'Alligator Alcatraz' in Florida with Governor Ron DeSantis and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem (AP)
Despite the outrage of Democrats like Wasserman Schultz, other Republicans who took the tour said the conditions were 'clean, air conditioned and well-kept.'
'The rhetoric does not match the reality,' said State Senator Blaise Ingoglia, a DeSantis ally. 'It's basically all political theater coming from the [Democrats]. What they're saying is pure bullshit.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's big bill offers $6K tax break for seniors — but not everyone gets a cut. Here's how much you may save
Donald Trump's big sweeping spending bill included a sweetener for many seniors across America. Starting this year, individuals over the age of 65 can claim $6,000 as a tax deduction in their next filing, according to the Internal Revenue Service. Those who file joint returns can claim this amount individually, which means a married couple could get deductions up to $12,000. Although this isn't the elimination of all income taxes on Social Security that he promised while campaigning, this new subsidy could still be a helpful financial boost for those who qualify. However, the real impact of this new deduction depends on your income bracket. Here's a closer look at how much you could save at different levels of income. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Low income Low-income seniors might not notice this new deduction because they already benefit from a standard deduction that reduces or eliminates the income taxes they owe. As of 2025, the standard deduction for someone over the age of 65 is up to $18,500 individually and up to $32,300 for joint filers. This category includes a significant number of American seniors. According to the KFF, one in three adults over the age of 65 had an income below $28,080 in 2022. Middle income Households with relatively modest incomes could see the most benefit from this new deduction. Because the deduction starts to phase out for single filers earning over $75,000 and married couples making over $150,000 — with full disqualification at incomes above $175,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples — the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center projects that middle- and upper-middle-income households stand to gain the most. Read more: Americans are 'revenge saving' to survive — but millions only get a measly 1% on their savings. Seniors with incomes between approximately $80,000 and $130,000 are expected to benefit the most from this provision, which would cut their taxes by an average of $1,100, or around 1% of their after-tax income, according to their calculations. High income With a full phase out of the deduction at individual incomes above $175,000 and joint incomes above $250,000, high income tax payers won't benefit from this new incentive at all. Caveats Given all the rules and limitations, this new tax rule could best be described as helpful but limited. Based on the income limits, the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center estimates that less than half of all seniors could see a tax reduction because of this new deduction. The rule is also time-limited and applies only to federal income taxes between 2025 and 2028. Altogether, the new deduction offers a modest cut to a highly specific group of seniors for a relatively short period of time. However, it does have a long-term impact on other government programs that many seniors rely on: Social Security and Medicare. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) projects that the new set of tax policies implemented by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) will hasten the insolvency of both the Social Security and Medicare trust funds, moving their depletion date up from 2033 to 2032 — a full year sooner than earlier forecasts. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of 'massive unemployment' in the US due to the 'biggest change' in history — and says this 1 group of 'smart' Americans will get hit extra hard. Are you one of them? How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US automakers exempted from fines for fuel efficiency non-compliance
US regulators have waived fines for automakers failing to meet fuel efficiency standards dating back to the 2022 model year, following a new law signed by President Donald Trump. This move, part of a tax and budget bill, puts an end to fines under the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) rules established by a 1975 energy law. In a letter obtained by Reuters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has informed automakers that it is re-evaluating its fuel economy regulations. The move aligns with other measures from Washington aimed at easing the production of gasoline vehicles and increasing the cost of electric vehicle (EV) sales. In the past, non-compliance with US fuel economy requirements has led to significant penalties for automakers. Stellantis, the parent company of Chrysler, incurred a $190.7m civil penalty for the 2019 and 2020 model years, adding to around $400m in fines from 2016 to 2019. Previously, General Motors (GM) paid $128.2m for 2016 and 2017. President Trump's recent actions also include nullifying California's goal to phase out gasoline-only vehicle sales by 2035. Meanwhile, Tesla has benefited from the situation, earning $2.8bn globally from regulatory credits through the sale of zero-emission EVs. The legislation signed this month by Trump states that vehicle fines will be eliminated for any year where NHTSA has not completed its rulemaking process. Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign director Dan Becker expressed disapproval of the decision, stating: "The Trump administration is reaching back in time to give an obscene gift to pollution law violators GM and Stellantis at the expense of the American taxpayer. 'The automakers lobbied hard for this 'get out of jail free' card. They get hundreds of millions in fines cancelled." GM and Stellantis have yet to respond to the development. Senate Republicans estimates that the law could 'save automakers' around $200m. The NHTSA under President Joe Biden proposed in 2023 to increase fuel economy standards through 2032, which would have cost the industry an estimated $14bn in fines, including $6.5bn, $3bn, and $1bn for GM, Stellantis, and Ford Motor, respectively. However, the final rule adopted last year significantly reduced these requirements, capping potential industry fines at $1.83bn from 2027 through 2031. "US automakers exempted from fines for fuel efficiency non-compliance" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
LA Mayor Bass dodges question on whether all illegal immigrants in city should be allowed to stay
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass repeatedly dodged answering directly on whether all illegal immigrants in the sanctuary city should be allowed to stay. In an interview with ABC's 'This Week,' Bass further criticized President Donald Trump's decision to federalize 4,000 National Guard troops and deploy about 700 Marines to Los Angeles amid anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) riots and protests. The Democratic mayor was questioned by ABC host Martha Raddatz on who she thinks should be deported – whether that should be just people convicted of crimes – given Los Angeles has about a million 'undocumented workers.' 'What should happen to those people?' Raddatz asked. 'Let me just say that, because we are a city of immigrants, we have entire sectors of our economy that are dependent on immigrant labor. We have to get the fire areas rebuilt. We're not going to get our city rebuilt without immigrant labor,' Bass claimed. 'And it's not just the deportations, it's the fear that sets in when raids occur, when people are snatched off the street. And I know you are aware that even people who are here legally, even people who are U.S. citizens, have been detained.' 5 Bass criticized Trump's decision to federalize 4,000 National Guard troops and deploy about 700 Marines to Los Angeles. ABC 'So they should not be deported?' Raddatz pressed. Bass responded, 'I don't think so. I think they should stay.' The ABC host interjected, noting that the mayor was discussing 'a million undocumented people.' 'No, let me just tell you, what I think we need is comprehensive immigration reform. I served in Congress for 12 years,' Bass said. 5 The Democratic mayor was questioned by ABC host Martha Raddatz on who she thinks should be deported. AFP via Getty Images Raddatz again interrupted the mayor, noting that Bass, as a congresswoman, did not ensure the passage of such immigration reform. 'And why didn't we get it? I mean, after I left, there was an immigration reform bill that had bipartisan support,' Bass said, attempting to blame Trump. 'This was during the campaign. The president decided he didn't want to have it happen because he didn't want immigration reform to happen, where he didn't take credit for it.' Noting the surge in border crossings under former President Joe Biden, Raddatz recalled asking a Border Patrol agent whether he felt badly for illegal immigrants. 5 Raddatz interrupted the mayor, noting that Bass, as a congresswoman, did not ensure the passage of such immigration reform. / MEGA His response, Raddatz said, was yes, but 'they're cutting in line in front of those people who want to do it legally in the right way.' 'Let me just tell you that the people that make that trek, many of whom walk from Central America and even South America up to our border, risk their lives. I don't believe that all of these people are sitting at home dreaming of coming to Los Angeles,' Bass said in response. 'They're coming here out of desperation.' Raddatz noted that 'hundreds of thousands' of people illegally crossed the border under the Biden administration. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) figures, however, recorded about 10.8 million border encounters and roughly two million more known 'got-a-ways' during Biden's term. Trump, meanwhile, has reported record-low border crossings since he began his second term. 5 Noting the surge in border crossings under Biden, Raddatz recalled asking a Border Patrol agent whether he felt badly for illegal immigrants. / MEGA When asked if there's 'anything good' she thinks the Trump administration has done in these six months at the border, Bass said, 'Well, I will keep praise on the administration for the first six months in Los Angeles with the fires. If you ask me, is there anything that they have done good in terms of immigration, I don't know. I don't think so. I think that the viewpoint has been punitive, has been, let's make it as miserable as possible so that these people don't come.' Bass said she has not recently had conversations with the Trump administration regarding immigration despite the National Guard presence in the city. 'I have put in a request and I hope to. I will always be open to a conversation,' the mayor said. 'I want to work with the administration to solve this problem. We have the World Cup in 11 short months here. We have Olympics and Paralympics coming in three short years. I know that these games are very important to the president and I look forward to working with him, and we have an extreme difference on this issue, but there's many issues for us to work on, and I will continue trying to outreach to the administration and hope that at some point they'll be responsive.' 5 Bass said she has not had conversations with the Trump administration regarding immigration despite the National Guard presence in the city. REUTERS The mayor also responded to how she hopes the next six months to two years will be for immigrants in Los Angeles, taking a dig at what she deemed the Trump administration's 'reign of terror.' The Pentagon last week announced it was pulling 2,000 National Guard troops from Los Angeles, citing how the 'lawlessness' seen in early June anti-ICE riots has subsided. 'Well, I am just hoping that this reign of terror ends. I'm hoping that the military leaves because they were never needed here to begin with,' Bass said. 'I hope that we can get back to normal.'
