
California parents have a new option to save for K-12 private school — but there's a catch
As students head back to school this month, a disproportionate number in the Bay Area will be at private schools: In several counties, rates of attendance are more than double the 8% statewide average. Nearly one-third of K-12 students in San Francisco attend a private school, according to data website Private School Review.
That attendance comes with a hefty price tag. The average amount a family would spend to send their child to private school in San Francisco from kindergarten through high school graduation is about $520,000, according to a Chronicle data analysis.
To help cover those costs, parents will soon be able to leverage an increased amount from 529 education savings plans.
What are 529 plans and how are they changing?
Created by Congress in 1996 and named for a section of IRS code, 529 plans are tax-advantaged investment accounts operated by states or educational institutions designed to help save for a child's education.
They were originally intended to cover college or trade school costs, but since 2018, the law has allowed families to withdraw up to $10,000 annually from 529 plans for K-12 tuition without paying a penalty or federal taxes on the growth.
Starting next year, under the tax and spending bill signed by President Donald Trump on July 4, the K-12 withdrawal limit increases to $20,000.
The bill also expanded what K-12 expenses could be covered. Under previous law, only tuition for K-12 was eligible for federal penalty-free 529 withdrawals; under the new law, expenses like books, tutoring, standardized and AP test fees, and educational therapies for students with disabilities are all considered qualified expenses.
Some states have changed their laws so parents don't pay a state penalty or tax on those K-12 withdrawals either. But not in California. K-12 expenses are still considered nonqualified expenses, so you'll pay a 2.5% penalty plus state income taxes (as high as 13.3%, depending on your household income) on the taxable growth when you withdraw 529 funds for those purposes.
Given that, does it ever make sense in this state to use your kid's 529 funds to pay for their private school tuition or other pre-college educational costs in California? It could. Here's what experts say.
The case against using a 529 for K-12 expenses
Richard Pon, a certified public accountant and certified financial planner, has a son who's enrolled in private school in San Francisco. He said he doesn't use 529 money to pay for it.
The first reason is the state income taxes and the 2.5% penalty. The other reason is the flexibility of 529 funds: Even if your child gets a free ride to college with room and board paid for, those funds could be used to pay for graduate school, professional certifications like a CPA license or nursing license, or get rolled into an IRA. You could also roll the 529 funds into an account for another child or relative, or a friend.
And if you're using 529 funds to pay for elementary school, that means they don't have time to grow in the market before your child goes to college — though, of course, there's always a chance they could drop between now and then, too.
If you're really in a financial bind and paying for your kid's private school tuition from their 529 means the difference between paying your mortgage or not, then yes, it could make sense to tap those funds — though many 529 accounts are protected by federal law in bankruptcies, so if you're truly at the edge of financial peril, you may want to leave the money in that account alone.
In general, Pon said, 'I would think about holding this (money) as long as possible instead of saying, 'Hey, I'll use it for K-12.''
The case for using a 529 to pay K-12 expenses
For some families in California, it might make sense to pay K-12 educational costs from a 529, said Sean Pyles, a certified financial planner and the host of NerdWallet's 'Smart Money' podcast. He said to think of 529s less as college savings accounts and more like flexible education savings accounts.
When it comes to the tax question, parents can do the math and see if using the funds for K-12 expenses pencils out.
'What it's going to come down to for each person is figuring out whether they are going to be coming out ahead by actually reaping tax benefits from this account, or if, given the amount (of taxes and penalties) that California imposes, it's just not going to be financially beneficial to them at this point,' he said.
For parents making the investment in private schools for their kids, it's probably worth checking with an accountant, financial planner or other tax pro to see if the math makes sense.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's Peace-Deal Demands Leave Zelenskiy With Only Bad Options
Volodymyr Zelenskiy finds himself in an impossible bind: risk Donald Trump's wrath or accept a quick deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine by paying the disastrous price of ceding territory for vague security guarantees that could see Moscow come back stronger in a few years' time. This is the existential dilemma confronting the Ukrainian leader as he travels to Washington for talks with the US president on Monday. Fresh off a summit in Alaska with Vladimir Putin that bypassed a ceasefire, Trump has left Zelenskiy little room to maneuver.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump approval rating takes another hit in latest poll
President Donald Trump's approval rating slipped again in the latest Pew Research Center poll released Thursday. The Pew Research Center poll found that Trump's approval rating has dropped three percentage points over the past two months and is down nine points since shortly after he took office. The poll ultimately found that Trump had a 38% approval rating among all Americans, which is down from the 47% approval rating in January. The poll found Trump's approval rating also dropped among those who voted for him since taking office earlier this year. Trump's approval rating among his own supporters fell from 95% recorded earlier this year to 85% in the latest poll. The Pew Research Center found that an overwhelming majority of those who identify as strong Republicans still approve of how he is handling his job as president. About 93% approve of his job performance, slightly down from the 96% who said the same shortly after he took office. The research center highlighted a significant change in approval among certain Republican-leaning groups. The research center noted that there has been 'substantial erosion in his approval over this period among those who identify as Republicans but not strongly, as well as among independents who lean toward the GOP.' 'About six-in-ten of those in these groups approve of Trump's performance today, down from roughly three-quarters at the start of his second term,' the research center wrote in its press release. The Pew Research Center also found that public assessments of Trump's personality traits have also fallen off since 2024. More from the research center: Fewer now say he cares about the needs of ordinary people (37% today, 42% last summer), is a good role model (29% now, 34% then) or is mentally sharp (48% now, 53% then). Trump is widely described as standing up for what he believes in: 68% say this today, identical to the share who said this last summer. The poll was conducted among 3,554 adults from Aug. 4 to 10, 2025. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 1.8 percentage points. Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to

Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NATO-like protection for Ukraine in focus as Zelensky, European leaders head for Trump meeting
European and NATO leaders are joining Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington on Monday to present a united front in talks with President Donald Trump as US special envoy Steve Witkoff on Sunday said Russia is open to the idea of the US and its European allies offering Ukraine a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defence mandate. European leaders said Sunday they would join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in talks with US President Donald Trump on Monday, as they try to find a way to end Russia's offensive. Trump met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday but the talks failed to yield any breakthrough on a ceasefire – though White House envoy Steve Witkoff said both leaders had agreed to provide "robust security guarantees" to Ukraine. Read moreRed carpet welcome but no Ukraine deal: key takeaways from the Trump-Putin summit Witkoff, who took part in the Trump-¨Putin talks in Alaska, said it 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that' and called it 'game-changing.' 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO," Witkoff told CNN's 'State of the Union.' Witkoff offered few details on how such an arrangement would work. But it appeared to be a major shift for Putin and could serve as a workaround to his deep-seated objection to Ukraine's potential NATO membership, a step that Kyiv has long sought. It was expected to be a key topic Monday as Zelensky and major European leaders meet with Trump at the White House. Article 5, at the heart of the 32-member trans-Atlantic military alliance, says an armed attack against one or more member nations shall be considered an attack against them all. What needed to be hammered out at this week's talks were the contours of any security guarantees, said Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who also participated in the summit. Ukraine and European allies have pushed the US to provide that backstop in any peace agreement to deter future attacks by Moscow. 'How that's constructed, what we call it, how it's built, what guarantees are built into it that are enforceable, that's what we'll be talking about over the next few days with our partners," Rubio said on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' It was unclear, however, whether Trump had fully committed to such a guarantee. Rubio said it would be 'a huge concession." The comments shed new light on what was discussed in Alaska. Before Sunday, US officials had offered few details even as both Trump and Putin said their meeting was a success. Zelensky hails 'historic' US security guarantees reports European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday hailed the reports of robust security guarantees for Ukraine. But Zelensky, speaking alongside her at a news conference in Brussels, rejected the idea of Russia offering his country security guarantees. "What President Trump said about security guarantees is much more important to me than Putin's thoughts, because Putin will not give any security guarantees," he said. Zelensky later said on social media that the US offer regarding security guarantees was "historic". Moscow denounces Macron French President Emmanuel Macron, who will take part in the Washington meeting along with von der Leyen and others, said European leaders would ask Washington "to what extent" they were ready to contribute to the security guarantees offered to Ukraine in any peace agreement. Read moreUkraine and Europe must present 'united front', says Macron ahead of White House meeting Of Moscow's position, he said: "There is only one state proposing a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia." Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova called that an "abject lie" in a statement on Telegram later Sunday. Moscow had been proposing a "peaceful resolution" of the conflict for seven years under the terms of the Minsk Accords, she said. Macron, she added, was trying to convince Ukraine that it could win on the battlefield even when he knew that that was "impossible". Hopes for 'productive meeting' Trump, who pivoted after the Alaska meeting to say he was now seeking a peace deal rather than a ceasefire, on Sunday posted "BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. STAY TUNED!" on his Truth Social platform, without elaborating. Trump's sudden focus on a peace deal aligns with the stance long taken by Putin, one which Ukraine and its European allies have criticised as Putin's way to buy time while trying to make battlefield gains. Zelensky also said he saw "no sign" the Kremlin leader was prepared to meet him and Trump for a three-way summit, as had been floated by the US president. The leaders heading to Washington on Monday to appear alongside Zelensky call themselves the "coalition of the willing". As well as von der Leyen and Macron, they include British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. Also heading to Washington will be Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Finnish President Alexander Stubb, who get on well with Trump. On Sunday they all held a video meeting to prepare their joint position. (FRANCE 24 with AFP and AP)