Europe says US-Russia summit this week cannot decide on Ukraine land swaps
Ahead of the summit in Alaska on Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump suggested that a peace deal could include 'some swapping of territories,' but the Europeans see no sign that Russia will offer anything to swap. Europeans and Ukrainians so far are not invited to the summit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Miran calls Fed independence 'paramount' but declines to elaborate
(Reuters) -President Donald Trump's nominee to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors on Tuesday said the U.S. central bank's independence was 'of paramount importance' but declined to elaborate further, citing his coming approval process in the Senate. "I've always been clear that the independence of the Fed is of paramount importance," Stephen Miran, who is currently chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers and who last year laid out a case for increasing presidential control of the Fed Board, told CNBC. "But...I do have the nomination going in front of the Senate and I really can't speak about that and get ahead of the Senate process." Miran has called for a complete overhaul of the Fed's governance, making the case in a paper he co-authored last year for the Manhattan Institute for increasing presidential control of the Fed Board, including by shortening members' terms. He also wants to end the "revolving door" between the executive branch and the Fed, and nationalize the Fed's 12 regional banks. If confirmed by the Senate, he would take over from former Fed Governor Adriana Kugler following her surprise resignation earlier this month, as she returns to her tenured professorship at Georgetown University. He would become one of seven members on a Fed Board now helmed by Jerome Powell, against whom Trump repeatedly rails over the central bank's refusal to lower interest rates as Trump demands. Two other governors were appointed by Trump during his first term and the other three are Biden appointees. But the vacancy Miran would fill extends only to January 31. Trump said Miran would hold the seat while he and his advisers search for a successor to Powell, whose term as Fed chair expires next May. Miran, asked to respond to inflation data released earlier on Tuesday, said the president's tariff policies are not resulting in meaningful inflation. The Consumer Price Index advanced 2.7% year-on-year in July but an underlying measure was up 3.1% at the fastest since January. "I do think that inflation has been well behaved, particularly since the president took office," he said. The majority of Fed officials had until recently been concerned that tariffs would exacerbate inflation and that worry has been the main driver in their decision not to lower rates. But a weak jobs report for July has changed that narrative, and rate futures markets now expect rate cuts to start next month. Asked if he believed he would be confirmed by the Senate in time for the next Fed meeting in mid-September, Miran said: "That's up to the Senate, and...I can't speak for them." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Adam Schiff authorized classified intel leaks to smear Trump during Russiagate, whistleblower claims
A seasoned intelligence officer who aided Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee repeatedly alleged to the FBI that then-Rep. Adam Schiff approved leaking classified information to tarnish President Trump's image during the Russiagate probe, shocking newly released documents reveal. Now-Sen. Schiff (D-Calif.), then the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, openly discussed plans to reveal sensitive information about the Trump-Russia collusion probe starting soon after the 45th president's inauguration in 2017, the unidentified male whistleblower alleged. During an FBI interview in June 2023, the source recalled being part of an all-staff meeting called by Schiff, at which the Democrat 'stated the group would leak classified information which was derogatory to President of the United States Donald J. TRUMP. SCHIFF stated the information would be used to Indict President TRUMP.' Advertisement The whistleblower said he objected to Schiff's idea, a summary of the interview reveals, only to be told by other participants that 'they would not be caught leaking classified information.' Sometime later, the whistleblower said he was approached again about leaking against Trump and responded that they 'believed this activity to be unethical and treasonous.' The whistleblower later reached out to the FBI and was even invited to attend a mock grand jury hearing, only to later be told that the Justice Department would not investigate further. Advertisement Investigators believed Schiff, now 65, was protected by the Constitution's Speech or Debate Clause, which bars the apprehension of legislators for their professional activities except in the event of 'Felony, Treason and Breach of the Peace.' The whistleblower claimed during his June 2023 interview that he 'did not believe' Schiff's actions were covered by the Speech or Debate Clause. The whistleblower's claims were first reported by Just the News, with FBI Director Kash Patel confirming on X Monday night: 'We found it. We declassified it. Now Congress can see how classified info was leaked to shape political narratives – and decide if our institutions were weaponized against the American people.' Patel previously worked as a top aide to former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and authored a memo accusing FBI officials of abusing their power during the Trump-Russia investigation, which proceeded under the code name Crossfire Hurricane. Advertisement The whistleblower, who worked for Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee for 12 years after more than two decades in the intelligence community, was described as 'friends with both Schiff and Nunes' and someone who 'worked with senior political leaders from both major political parties.' However, an October 2017 FBI memo claimed that word was spreading among committee staff that the whistleblower had been fired for a 'perceived lack of party loyalty.' When a Republican staffer went to offer condolences, the memo relates, the whistleblower told them they had lost their job because 'there was an expectation of leaking and he refused to participate.' Over drinks that evening, the whistleblower claimed that Democrats on the intelligence committee had established a 'system' for leaking in which sensitive information would be given to Schiff, 'after which a decision was made as to who would leak the information.' One prominent oversharer, according to the whistleblower, was Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) another intel committee member. Advertisement In a December 2017 FBI interview, the whistleblower recounted how a 'particularly sensitive document' was seen by a small group of lawmakers and staff, including Schiff and Swalwell, but leaked out 'almost verbatim' within a day. The whistleblower allegedly claimed to have 'been warned to be careful because he [Swalwell] had a reputation for leaking classified information.' 4 Sen. Adam Schiff had drawn suspicions of leaking during the first Trump administration. AP 4 President Trump has seethed at Rep. Adam Schiff, who had been one of his top House Democratic adversaries during his first term. AP 4 Russiagate loomed large over the first Trump administration. REUTERS Schiff, who spearheaded the first impeachment of President Trump in 2019, had long been suspected by Republicans of leaking classified information during the Russiagate saga. He also infamously read key portions of the since-debunked Steele Dossier into the congressional record in 2017. In 2023, House Republicans voted to censure Schiff for his role in Russiagate, only for him to be elected to the Senate the following year. In the December 2017 interview, the whistleblower claimed that Schiff had been furious at Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton, believing he would have been tapped as CIA director had the Democrat won. Last week, The Post reported that a grand jury has been convened in Maryland to investigate whether Schiff 'falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms.' Advertisement 4 FBI Director Kash Patel turned over the bureau's findings on the whistleblower's accusations to Congress. REUTERS The California senator is accused of mortgage fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud and false statements to financial institutions for certifying a Maryland property as his primary residence while also claiming a California condominium as his main home for tax and mortgage purposes. The FBI earlier this month initiated an investigation into former CIA Director John Brennan and ex-FBI Director James Comey for any potential criminal actions taken as part of the Trump-Russia probe. Advertisement The Justice Department also launched a 'strike force' last month after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released a long-anticipated, 44-page report from the House Intelligence Committee that found 'egregious' errors committed by Brennan in the compiling of an assessment that claimed Moscow preferred Trump to defeat Clinton. Representatives for Schiff and Swalwell did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Los Angeles Times
10 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Land swaps with Russia are not only unpopular in Ukraine. They're also illegal
KYIV, Ukraine — A peace deal that requires Kyiv to accept swapping Ukrainian territory with Russia would not only be deeply unpopular. It also would be illegal under its constitution. That's why President Volodymyr Zelensky has categorically rejected any deal with Moscow that could involve ceding land after President Trump suggested such a concession would be beneficial to both sides, ahead of his meeting Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Zelensky said over the weekend that Kyiv 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done,' and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier.' The remarks came after Trump said a peace deal would involve swapping of Ukrainian territories by both sides 'to the betterment of both.' For Zelensky, such a deal would be disaster for his presidency and spark public outcry after more than three years of bloodshed and sacrifice by Ukrainians. Moreover, he doesn't have the authority to sign off on it, because changing Ukraine's 1991 borders runs counter to the country's constitution. For now, freezing the front line appears to be an outcome the Ukrainian people are willing to accept. A look at the challenges such proposals entail: Russia occupies about a fifth of Ukraine, from the country's northeast to the Crimean Peninsula, which was annexed illegally in 2014. The front line is vast and cuts across six regions — the active front stretches for at least 680 miles — but if measured from along the border with Russia, it reaches as far as 1,430 miles. Russia controls almost all of the Luhansk region and almost two-thirds of Donetsk region, which together comprise the Donbas, as the strategic industrial heartland of Ukraine is called. Russia has long coveted the area and illegally annexed it in the first year of the full-scale invasion, even though it didn't control much of it at the time. Russia also partially controls more than half of the Kherson region, which is critical to maintain logistical flows of supplies coming in from the land corridor in neighboring Crimea, and also parts of the Zaporizhzhia region, where the Kremlin seized Europe's largest nuclear power plant. Russian forces also hold pockets of territory in Kharkiv and Sumy regions in northeastern Ukraine, far less strategically valuable for Moscow. Russian troops are gaining a foothold in the Dnipropetrovsk region. These could be what Moscow is willing to exchange for land it deems more important in Donetsk, where the Russian army has concentrated most of its effort. 'There'll be some land swapping going on. I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody. To the good, for the good of Ukraine. Good stuff, not bad stuff. Also, some bad stuff for both,' Trump said Monday. Ukrainian forces are still active in the Kursk region inside Russia, but they barely hold any territory there, making it not as potent a bargaining chip as Kyiv's leaders had probably hoped when they launched the daring incursion across the border last year. Swapping Ukrainian controlled territory in Russia, however minuscule, will likely be the only palatable option for Kyiv in any land swapping scenario. Surrendering territory would see those unwilling to live under Russian rule to pack up and leave. Many civilians have endured so much suffering and bloodshed since pro-Moscow forces began battling the Ukrainian military in the east in 2014 and since the full-scale invasion in 2022. From a military standpoint, abandoning the Donetsk region in particular would vastly improve Russia's ability to invade Ukraine again, according to the Washington-based think tank Institute for the Study of War. Bowing to such a demand would force Ukraine to abandon its 'fortress belt,' the main defensive line in Donetsk since 2014, 'with no guarantee that fighting will not resume,' the institute said in a recent report. The regional defensive line has prevented Russia's efforts to seize the region and continues to impede Russia's efforts to take the rest of the area, ISW said. Ukraine's constitution poses a major challenge to any deal involving a land swap because it requires a nationwide referendum to approve changes to the country's territorial borders, said Ihor Reiterovych, a politics professor in the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. 'Changes in territorial integrity can be done only by the decision of the people — not the president, the cabinet of ministers or the parliament can change it,' he said. 'In the constitution it is written that only by referendum can changes to Ukraine's territory be conducted.' If during negotiations Zelensky agrees to swap territory with Russia, 'in the same minute he will be a criminal because he would be abandoning the main law that governs Ukraine,' Reiterovych said. Trump said he was 'a little bothered' by Zelensky's assertion over the weekend that he needed constitutional approval to cede to Russia the territory that it captured in its unprovoked invasion. 'I mean, he's got approval to go into a war and kill everybody, but he needs approval to do a land swap?' Trump added. 'Because there'll be some land swapping going on. I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody.' Oksana Markarova, Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S., brought a copy of her country's constitution to her interview on Sunday with CBS' 'Face the Nation,' and described how the president is 'the guarantor of the constitution' and cannot give away land under Article 133. Zelensky is still trying to regain the people's trust that was damaged when he reversed course on a law that would have diminished the independence of Ukraine's anti-corruption watchdogs. The move was a red line for those citizens who are protective of the country's institutions and are suspicious of certain members of Zelensky's inner circle. Analysts like Reiterovych dismiss a land swap as a distraction. Freezing the conflict along the current front line is the only option Ukrainians are willing to accept, he said, citing recent polls. This option would also buy time for both sides to consolidate manpower and build up their domestic weapons industries. Ukraine would require strong security guarantees from its Western partners to deter future Russian aggression, which Kyiv believes is inevitable. Still, freezing the conflict will also be difficult for Ukrainians to accept. Along with the illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the partial occupation of Luhansk and Donetsk after that, it would require accepting that the Ukrainian military is not able to retake lost territories militarily. Kyiv accepted its inability to retake these territories but never formally recognized them as Russian. A similar scenario could unfold in the new regions taken by Russian forces. It also is not a viable long-term solution. 'It is the lesser evil option for everyone and it will not provoke protests or rallies on the streets,' Reiterovych said. Kullab writes for the Associated Press. AP journalist Volodymyr Yurchuk contributed to this report.
