
'Israeli' demolitions continue in Tulkarm despite court order
This large-scale demolition marks a new phase in the ongoing military offensive in the area, forcing hundreds of Palestinian families from their homes.
On Wednesday, residents were observed in a hasty departure, loading their possessions onto vehicles, casting a final glance at the homes they were abandoning. Faisal Salama, a local official in the camp, stated that approximately 400 families now face homelessness due to these new demolition orders.
Late Wednesday, in response to an urgent request from Adalah, a Palestinian human rights group in 'Israel', 'Israel's' Supreme Court had temporarily frozen the planned demolitions, giving the army until September 2 to respond. However, as of late Thursday, none of the displaced residents had returned, and the 'Israeli' army declined to comment on the court order, with demolitions reportedly continuing.
The 'Israeli' military has justified its actions in Tulkarm by stating it operates in areas "with a high level of terrorism," asserting that the decision to demolish buildings was based on "operational necessity" to ensure forces' freedom of movement, and was made after considering other options.
According to a WAFA correspondent, Israeli Occupation Forces on Monday continued what was described as a "massive spree" of home demolitions in the Tulkarm refugee camp. This marks the 162nd day of military aggression on the camp and the nearby city of Tulkarm. Armored bulldozers were seen tearing down residential buildings in the al-Murabba'a neighborhood, reducing them to rubble, as part of the new plan to demolish 104 residential buildings, comprising approximately 400 houses.
Adalah, a non-governmental legal center, highlighted in a press release that the occupation forces informed the Israeli Supreme Court on July 6, 2025, of their intention to proceed with implementing wide-scale demolition orders. This notice followed an amended Supreme Court decision from July 3.
While the Court initially imposed a freeze on demolitions on July 2 based on Adalah's petition, the amended ruling now permits the military to carry out demolitions if it cites 'urgent combat needs or overriding security considerations.' Adalah argues this effectively grants the military vast discretion and significantly weakens judicial oversight.
In its response, the 'Israeli' military claimed that the planned demolitions were necessary to restructure the camp for "operational freedom of movement." However, Adalah's subsequent response to the Court on July 7 challenged this justification, arguing that "no combat activity is currently taking place in the area, and that the refugee camp has been largely emptied of residents, rendering the claim of urgent necessity baseless."
Adalah further contended that the military's stance "completely nullifies the rights of the protected residents," leaving them without means to challenge the demolition orders. The group is seeking to submit an additional expert opinion to further refute the military's rationale, highlighting how previous demolitions were more extensive than planned and caused irreversible damage to the camp's social and physical landscape.
'Israeli' raids have previously emptied and largely destroyed several urban refugee camps in the northern West Bank, such as Tulkarm and nearby Nur Shams, contributing to the tens of thousands displaced in the West Bank since 1967. Israel has indicated that troops may remain in some camps for up to a year.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Roya News
an hour ago
- Roya News
‘Israeli' army demands evacuation of medical officials, aid groups in northern Gaza
The 'Israeli' army announced on Thursday that it has begun issuing warning calls to medical personnel and international organizations in northern Gaza to prepare for the possible evacuation of Gaza City residents to the southern part of the Strip. According to an official statement, 'Israeli' military officers informed officials in the health sector and international organizations earlier this week to coordinate the transfer of civilians from north to south Gaza. Capt. Ella, an army spokesperson, shared a recording on X of a phone call between the IOF Gaza Coordination and Liaison officer and a senior health official in northern Gaza. In the call, the officer informed the official of a potential 'Israeli' entry into Gaza City and requested full preparations for the evacuation, emphasizing the need to move patients and medical resources south. Intense strikes 'Israeli' forces carried out heavy strikes on Gaza City and surrounding areas over the past hours, following the army's announcement of preliminary operations to take control of the city. On Wednesday, 'Israel' approved a military plan to seize Gaza City and called up 60,000 reservists, raising concerns about a worsening humanitarian crisis affecting over two million people in the besieged Palestinian territory. The government is expected to officially authorize the Gaza City operation later on Thursday. The army stated on Wednesday evening: 'We are not waiting; we have begun preliminary operations to take control of Gaza City. Our forces are already on the city's outskirts.'


Al Bawaba
2 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Hamas: Israel won't succeed in occupying Gaza City
ISTANBUL The Palestinian group Hamas said Wednesday that a planned Israeli offensive to take over Gaza City will fail just like previous attempts. 'The operation will fail just as its predecessors did. Israel will not achieve its objectives, and the occupation of Gaza will not be a picnic," it said. The statement came after Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz approved a plan on Wednesday to launch the offensive, dubbed Operation Gideon's Chariots 2, aimed at occupying Gaza City. Hamas said the plan represents a continuation of the genocide that has been ongoing in the Gaza Strip for more than 22 months and disregard for the efforts of mediators working on a ceasefire and prisoner swap deal. In its statement, Hamas stressed that while it has accepted a ceasefire proposal presented by mediators, the Israeli government insists on continuing its brutal war against innocent civilians in Gaza with the aim of destroying the city and displacing its people to the south. It added that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's disregard for and failure to respond to the mediators' proposal shows that 'he is the one undermining agreements, does not care about the lives of the captives, and is not serious about bringing them back.' It also called on the mediators to exert maximum pressure on Israel to stop the genocide against the Palestinian people. On Aug. 8, Israel's Security Cabinet approved a plan to occupy Gaza City in the northern part of the enclave. Prior to the Cabinet meeting, Netanyahu said in an interview that Israel aims to fully occupy the Gaza Strip. Katz also approved the plan to occupy Gaza City on Wednesday. According to the plan, around 1 million Palestinians will first be displaced to the south, while the city will be besieged and then occupied following heavy attacks. On Aug. 18, Hamas announced that it had accepted a ceasefire and prisoner swap proposal presented by Egypt and Qatar, but Israel has yet to respond to the offer.


Jordan News
2 hours ago
- Jordan News
Hebrew Media Reports Possible Israeli Delegation to Doha for Gaza Negotiations - Jordan News
Hebrew media reported Thursday that the Israeli negotiating team may travel to the Qatari capital, Doha, within days to resume indirect talks with Hamas on a ceasefire in Gaza and a prisoner exchange. اضافة اعلان According to Yedioth Ahronoth, citing four unnamed Israeli officials, Israel 'may send its negotiating delegation to Doha by the end of this week or early next week to discuss a ceasefire in Gaza,' without providing further details. The officials added: 'On the one hand, we are continuing with full force our ground campaign in Gaza City, and on the other, Israel has not given a clear answer regarding Hamas' approval of the mediators' ceasefire proposal. Although no delegation has yet left for Doha, there is a possibility that one will depart by the end of the week or early next week.' The newspaper noted that 'the Israeli government's stance on Hamas' acceptance of the mediators' proposal for a 60-day ceasefire remains unclear.' Quoting an unnamed Israeli security source, it reported: 'Everything now depends on Prime Minister Netanyahu and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer. If Netanyahu truly wants a deal, there is something to work with (the mediators' proposal accepted by Hamas). If not, he will dismiss it as partial and that will be the end of it.' The paper added that 'the United States is pressuring Israel to reach a comprehensive agreement with Hamas that would end the war and ensure the return of all hostages, even as the Israeli government prepares to approve an expansion of military operations in Gaza City.' An unnamed senior Israeli source was also quoted as saying: 'U.S. President Donald Trump has made it clear to Israel that he opposes temporary deals. Just as consultations are underway in Israel, they are also taking place at the White House. Trump is setting the pace and demanding a full agreement; he has grown averse to partial arrangements.' According to the report, Israel is currently considering two main options: a partial deal to release around 10 hostages, or a broader agreement to end the war. The debate has intensified as Hamas has expressed willingness to accept a temporary deal, while Israel has yet to commit. The paper also reported that U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff expressed doubts about Hamas' proposal and supports the White House push for a full agreement. It further noted that the Israeli War Cabinet was expected to meet Thursday to approve the army's operational plan to enter Gaza City. Defense Minister Israel Katz has already given the green light, but Prime Minister Netanyahu has yet to convene the broader Security Cabinet (the Cabinet), which must give final approval. An unnamed senior Israeli government official was quoted as saying that 'Israel will not provide its formal response to Hamas' reply until after that Cabinet meeting.' According to sources close to Netanyahu, the prime minister views a full-scale assault on Gaza City as a critical pressure point. One official told the paper that 'the occupation of Gaza City could serve as leverage to force Hamas into a comprehensive agreement on Israel's terms,' which include disarmament in Gaza, the forced exile of Hamas leaders, and excluding the movement from any future governance of the Strip.