French tycoon to cash in on Labour's data centre blitz
A French tycoon is plotting to cash in on the Labour-backed boom in data centres after snapping up planning rights for a landmark development in Cambridgeshire.
Max-Hervé George, who runs Swiss-based investment fund SWI Group, has bought a site earmarked for development near Sutton-in-the-Isle with the intention of constructing one of the UK's biggest data centres.
Mr George's fund said the new site, which won planning permission three years ago under a different developer, would target a capacity of 330 megawatts (MW) – making it one of the most significant projects in Britain.
Mr George's move highlights a new gold rush for data centres after they were classed as critical national infrastructure last September, with Sir Keir Starmer creating 'AI growth zones' so that they can be built more quickly.
The Cambridgeshire site aims to cater to a cluster of global technology businesses located in Britain's so-called 'golden triangle' between Cambridge, Oxford and London.
It is among a slew of projects lined up across Britain that underpin the Prime Minister's strategy for economic growth.
Under the plan, SWI Group has acquired the existing rights and planning permission from another business to develop the land. It plans to invest around £3bn to bring the site to life although the money is yet to be raised.
Mr George, 35, said that his business has been 'unstinting and steadfast' in its efforts to create 'Europe's most valuable data centre groups'.
He added: 'When we first got involved with data centres six years ago, we could see the demand for computing was going to grow dramatically, but the explosion in the growth of AI has taken even us by surprise.'
The Sutton project will be the group's fifth data centre to operate under its AiOnX brand, adding to its sites in Ireland, Denmark, Spain and Italy.
SWI is looking to invest more than €20bn (£14.6bn) into the centres, to provide a total capacity of 2 gigawatts.
Mr George set up SWI Group earlier this year by merging his Icona Capital business with Switzerland's Stoneweg, a fund manager.
He told The Telegraph in March that at least half of the fund's €10bn pot could be ultimately invested in British assets, in what could be a major boost for Sir Keir's push to attract overseas capital and bolster economic growth.
Mr George said at the time that he was 'intensively looking to invest in data centres', as well as warehousing and logistics properties.
Beyond SWI Group, Mr George made his millions through 'golden ticket' life insurance contracts sold by Aviva France.
Under those contracts, which he first received at the age of seven from his father, customers were able to trade funds based on the previous week's prices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Car collection of late McLaren co-owner Ojjeh up for sale
LONDON, June 29 (Reuters) - A unique collection of 20 barely used McLaren road cars that belonged to the Formula One team's late co-owner Mansour Ojjeh is being put up for sale, with hopes one very wealthy buyer might keep it together. Classic and historic car dealer Tom Hartley Jnr announced on Sunday he had been appointed by Ojjeh's family to handle the sale, which could fetch more than $70 million. Hartley also oversaw the sale earlier this year of former F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone's collection of 69 historic grand prix and Formula One racers to Red Bull heir Mark Mateschitz. Ojjeh's collection includes the very last model of the McLaren F1 to be built, finished in a unique 'Yquem' colour that was subsequently renamed 'Mansour Orange' by McLaren and which has just over 1,800km on the clock. Only 106 of the McLaren F1 sportscars were made between 1992 and 1998 and a 1995 one that had done less than 390km sold for $20.4 million in a 2021 auction at Pebble Beach, California. All the other cars are in the same orange colour and all are the final chassis made of each model. Apart from the F1 and a P1 GTR, the cars are all unused and have been maintained by the manufacturer. Accompanying photographs showed them displayed at the Bahrain F1 circuit. "Mansour was a founding father of McLaren as we know it today," said McLaren Racing chief executive Zak Brown in a statement. "A massively passionate racer and automotive enthusiast and no bigger fan of McLaren. His collection is very special, I'm not aware of anything else that compares with it," added the American, who has his own impressive collection of cars. Ojjeh, a Paris-born Saudi businessman, succeeded his father as CEO of Techniques d'Avant Garde (TAG) and sponsored the Williams F1 team in 1979. He then took an ownership stake in McLaren in 1984, financing the development of TAG-Porsche engines that won two constructors' titles and three drivers' championships. Ojjeh, who died in 2021 at the age of 68, was a key figure in launching McLaren Automotive with Ron Dennis. "Being entrusted with the sale of Mansour Ojjeh's McLaren collection is akin to handling Enzo Ferrari's Ferraris or Ferdinand Porsche's Porsches," said Hartley. "This is the most significant McLaren road car collection ever assembled, and I sincerely hope it is acquired by a single buyer." ($1 = 0.7292 pounds)
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Our neighbour built TWO homes without planning permission... we're going to sit there with popcorn when they got bulldozed
Fuming neighbours are ready to 'buy popcorn' and watch from their windows if bulldozers move in to tear down two huge homes – after it emerged they were built without planning permission. The controversial semi-detached homes sprung up on the site of a former pub car park in Bradford, West Yorks, despite original planning permission having long since lapsed. Now locals are demanding action over the 'cowboy' development, which they claim towers over surrounding heritage cottages and damages the area's character. Residents have also called on council officials to make an example of rogue developers who flout planning laws and later seek retrospective approval. It comes as MailOnline this weekend revealed further cases in Bradford where developments were constructed without proper permissions. Helen Naylor, 50, said: 'People in Bradford build exactly what they like, when they like, how they like. And to hell with all rules and regulations. 'The council needs to get its act together because in Bradford, nobody seems to care. 'Cowboys come along, whack something up and just expect that the council will eventually sign it off. 'I think everyone around here has just had enough of it.' The homes appeared in just under a year on the site of the long-disused pub car park in the Heaton area of the city, with one listed for sale online as a five-bedroom, three-storey property. Although permission was granted in 2015 for a modest development, residents say that lapsed long before building began. Now, both homes face potential demolition if Bradford Council refuses to approve the scheme in hindsight. Neighbour Jane Loe, 68, said: 'It's quite funny in a way, but also horrible for those who live here. 'My neighbour and I said we're buying popcorn if and when they make them pull it down. 'We're going to sit out here and laugh.' Ms Loe, who lives opposite the new houses with husband Nick Swift, 76, described the builder's behaviour as 'outrageous'. She explained: 'The original design was unattractive but what they've actually built is even worse. 'We've watched them deviate from the plans in every way for the last year and a half. 'The build quality is terrible – we've seen people working with no helmets, no high-vis, no gloves. 'They even plugged power tools into a neighbour's living room and just ran a cable across the road. 'It's been a bunch of cowboys, basically. It's a monstrosity.' The developer, named in council documents as Amjad Yaqoob, reportedly believed the 2015 approval still applied when he purchased the land. He has claimed to have been unaware that the consent had lapsed. Bradford Council has confirmed that no valid permission was in place when the two homes were built. A decision on the retrospective application is expected in the coming weeks. Neighbours close to the new-build homes say they hope the council will take firm action. Eighty-year-old Janet Megson, who lives nearby with her husband Les, 76, said: 'The whole thing is an absolute disaster. 'I believe they didn't have planning permission but that doesn't seem to mean a thing these days. 'I want to see the council enforce the rules and bring it back to how it was. They should be forced to take the whole thing down. 'I don't know what sort of mentality the council planning department had in the first place to allow anyone to build on this site. 'There are little cottages round the back, it's narrow. There's nowhere to park. It's just out of character. It's out of place, altogether. 'I think anywhere else in the country, with something without permission like this, they'd immediately have to take the whole thing down. 'But I'm afraid round here, it's this sort of 'we'll go back to the planning department, and we'll see if there are amendments or compromises'. 'It's ridiculous.' Mr Yaqoob, who runs a building company in Bradford, declined to comment when approached by MailOnline. However, architects working on his behalf told Bradford Council that there was 'never any malicious intent to build something without approval', and claimed the development was 'very similar' to the previously approved plans. The firm added: 'The materials used are sympathetic to the area, and there are no additional issues of overlooking or overbearing. 'We therefore feel the retrospective application should be approved.' That assessment, however, brought short shrift when MailOnline visited the village. Angry NHS worker Jane Megson, 52, said the idea of letting the build remain was 'disgusting'. She said: 'It doesn't fit in, and the thought of retrospective planning, it's disgusting. 'Why do we bother having rules and regulations if they're just going to do what they like and then get retrospective planning? 'The council needs to make a show of these people and force them to take it down, to be honest. 'It's shocking the way they behave in Bradford, quite frankly. 'The thing that annoys me is that they, on the planning application, said it fits in with the surroundings. 'It does not fit in with the surroundings at all.' 'I really do hope they make an example because it's happening far too often in Bradford. 'People just do what they want and then put in the retrospective planning. Because the council can't be bothered, they just roll over and let them have their way.' Helen Naylor, who lives yards from the unapproved homes, added: 'I think it's absolutely disgraceful, but it doesn't surprise me in the least. 'People in Bradford build exactly what they like, when they like, how they like. And to hell with all rules and regulations. 'The council needs to get its act together because in Bradford, nobody seems to care.' Fran Jones, 60, joked that the houses looked ready to collapse. She said: 'I think they might blow down when the wolf blows on them. I don't think they've got foundations – I think they're built on a concrete slab. 'They stand out a mile and the finish is cheap. I feel sorry for the people in the heritage cottages behind it. It's so awful. 'We saw them building it and we were all shaking our heads going: 'I'll huff, and I'll puff and I'll blow your house down'. 'The fact that it's now come up with no planning permission is no surprise to any of us.' The developer's agents, P.N. Bakes Architectural Consultancy, argue that the homes are 'very similar' to the 2015 plans and say their client believed a 'material start' had already been made. Bradford Council say enforcement action will be 'reviewed' once a decision is made. A spokesman said: 'Our Planning Enforcement Team have investigated reports of these works being carried out without planning permission. 'As a planning application has now been submitted, the matter of enforcement will be reviewed once a decision on planning permission has been made, as is standard practice nationally.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Lotus plant won't close, carmaker's Chinese owners insist
The business secretary says he has been reassured that Lotus's plant in Norfolk will not be shut down after crunch weekend talks with its Chinese owner. Jonathan Reynolds met the British sports carmaker and Geely, its Chinese majority-owner, on Sunday amid uncertainty over the 59-year-old factory in Hethel. In a statement after the meeting, a spokesman for the Department for Business and Trade said Reynolds had been 'reassured by management that they are committed to their UK operations and have no plans to close their Hethel plant'. During the meeting, Reynolds set out the government's commitment to working with Lotus and the UK's car sector to improve its competitiveness. This would include cutting manufacturers' energy costs and providing £2.5 billion of capital and research and development funding, measures announced last week as part of Labour's industrial strategy. Uncertainty over the future of the plant, which employs about 1,300 people, was triggered by a report in the Financial Times that Lotus planned to end production there. • Labour's industrial energy strategy lacks ambition, say carmakers In response, Lotus issued a statement on Saturday, saying that it had 'no plans' to close the factory, which was founded in 1966, and remained 'committed' to the UK, its largest commercial market in Europe and the 'heart' of the brand. The manufacturer said it was 'continuing normal operations' and was 'actively exploring strategic options to enhance efficiency and ensure global competitiveness in the evolving market. 'We have invested significantly in R&D [research and development] and operations in the UK, over the past six years,' it added. Geely acquired a 51 per cent stake in Lotus in 2017, as part of a deal to invest in Proton, its Malaysian owner, after years of losses at the company. The Chinese group has invested £3 billion but has struggled with the transition to upmarket electric vehicles and more recently US tariffs, and has shifted attention to a new site in Wuhan, eastern China. Shares in Lotus have fallen by 84 per cent since listing on Nasdaq in February last year. • What happens when a classic English sports car goes electric? Ben Goldsborough, the Labour MP for South Norfolk, whose constituency includes the Hethel plant, said: 'The one thing that we need to make sure is that with the Chinese ownership talking about the plant being safe, that it's not just the plant being safe, but there is a future as well in their proposals. 'That's why the British management team that I've been working very closely with alongside ministers have made it very clear that there is a desire to make sure that this isn't just an industry or a factory that stays there in name but it's also producing and keeping the Lotus brand alive as well.' This meant that 'concrete proposals on the future' of the plant were required, beyond 'warm words', Goldsborough said.
