&w=3840&q=100)
Will Pakistan go to war with India over the Indus Waters? Or are the threats hollow?
Fishermen ride their boats in the Indus River. India's decision to pause the Indus Waters Treaty has led to several Pakistani officials to issue threats. File image/AFP
In the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam attack, India took stern steps announcing that it was pausing the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi stating, 'Now, India's water will flow for India's benefit, it will be conserved for India's benefit, and it will be used for India's progress.'
However, this move of putting the years-old treaty on hold has enraged Pakistan — with its prime minister now issuing threats to New Delhi, saying the 'enemy' would not be allowed to snatch 'even one drop' of water belonging to his country.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
His remarks come after Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir and its former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto issued similar threats. But should these threats worry India?
What did Sharif say on IWT?
Any attempt to block water flows into Pakistan would violate the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and provoke a 'decisive response', Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said on Tuesday, issuing a stern warning to India yet again.
Addressing an event in Islamabad, Sharif was quoted by Geo News as saying, 'The enemy cannot snatch even a single drop of water from Pakistan. If you attempt such a move, we will teach you a lesson you will never forget.' He described water as Pakistan's 'lifeline' and vowed no compromise on the nation's rights under international agreements.
What about Bhutto and Asim Munir?
Sharif's remarks come after former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari made similar comments, terming the Indus Waters Treaty's suspension an attack on the Indus Valley Civilisation and said Pakistan would not back down if India forced it into war.
While speaking at a function on Monday, the Pakistani leader say the country is 'strong enough for war to get back all six rivers,' vowing that Pakistan 'will never bow down'.
According to a report by Express Tribune, Bhutto said that the Indus is the singular major water source for the entire country and that the Indus valley civilisation has remained connected with the river for aeons. 'We have fought wars in the past, but the Indus was never attacked, and no one even thought of building dams or canals on the river.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Even Pakistan's Field Marshal Asim Munir issued threats against India over the Indus Waters Treaty. From US soil, the war-mongering general said that Islamabad would destroy any dam if it cut off water flow to Pakistan. 'We will wait for India to build a dam, and when it does so, phir 10 missile sey faarigh kar dengey [we will destroy it with 10 missiles],' he was quoted as saying by The Print.
India's decision to pause the Indus Waters Treaty in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, enraged many in Pakistan. File image/Reuters
Do these threats hold any water?
However, it seems that these remarks are part of just empty rhetoric. The treaty has a redressal system in which disputes are first taken up at the level of the Indus Commissioners of India and Pakistan, then escalated to the World Bank-appointed Neutral Expert, and finally to the International Court of Arbitration (CoA) in The Hague.
The World Bank itself has no jurisdiction in the matter with President Ajay Banga stating that the said that the agency has no role to play beyond a facilitator in the Indus Waters Treaty signed between India and Pakistan in 1960 for sharing of waters of Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab.
'We have no role to play beyond a facilitator. There's a lot of speculation in the media about how the World Bank will step in and fix the problem, but it's all bunk. The World Bank's role is merely as a facilitator,' World Bank President, Ajay Banga, was quoted as saying earlier.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Moreover, India has also rejected the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) at The Hague in this matter. New Delhi has maintained that it does not recognise this body and had earlier insisted that a neutral expert should handle the matter. However, the PCA proceeded, resulting in India boycotting the proceedings, terming them as 'illegal'.
In fact, on August 11, the PCA ruled that India must adhere to the Indus Waters Treaty in the design of new hydro-electric power stations on rivers that flow west to Pakistan endorsing Islamabad's position. In its ruling, it noted that it 'does not permit India to generate hydro-electric power on the Western Rivers based on what might be the ideal or best practices approach for engineering' of these projects.
However, India has rejected this, maintaining that the arbitration process was unilaterally initiated by Pakistan, violating the treaty's dispute resolution mechanism and undermining bilateral dialogue.
The Indus Waters Treaty is very crucial to Pakistan, as it lays down terms for the waters of the Indus River, a crucial lifeline for both countries. File image/Reuters
Why is the Indus Waters so important to Pakistan?
But why all of this hoopla over pact signed way back in 1960? Pakistan gets around 80 per cent of the Indus basin water, making it one of the largest irrigation systems in the world. About 80 per cent of Pakistan's farmland or nearly 16 million hectares, depends on this water, and 90 per cent of it goes into irrigation.
Now, if the water was to dry up here as a result of India holding back water in its reservoirs, Pakistan's farmers might struggle to sow key crops like cotton and paddy on time. This would eventually hurt the country's economy. There's also the matter of power; the lack of water could squeeze power generation, hit factory production and drive electricity prices even higher. And that's bad news because Pakistan's power sector is already drowning in $9 billion of circular debt.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Only time will tell if Pakistan resorts to military solutions on the Indus Waters Treaty. For now, it's a wait and watch game?
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
8 minutes ago
- The Print
India, US troops to undertake joint military exercise next month, first after Op Sindoor
The joint exercise comes at a time when Pakistan and US have come closer than ever before under the Trump administration. The US President hosting Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House to undertaking joint anti-terror talks with Islamabad, both sides have a long way from 2018 when Trump had described Pakistan as a 'safe haven for terrorists'. Termed 'Yudh Abhyas', the annual exercise from 1 to 16 September in US' Alaska will see an all-arms contingent going from the Indian Army led by the Madras Regiment, ThePrint has learnt. New Delhi: Amid heightened tensions between New Delhi and Washington, and a growing synergy between the Pakistan government and US President Donald Trump, Indian and American troops will undertake a joint military exercise next month. 'The upcoming edition will see participation from both sides in high-altitude conditions in Alaska, a factor that adds operational complexity to the drills. Such settings will also allow troops to train in environments that mirror potential conflict zones,' said a source. Launched in 2004 under the framework of the Indo-US defence Cooperation Agreement, 'Yudh Abhyas' alternates annually between locations in India and the US, with the previous edition held in Rajasthan in 2024. In the exercise, the Indian Army and US Army typically take part in tactical field training which covers counter-insurgency, counter-terrorism and peacekeeping scenarios with command post drills that focus on mission planning, joint operations and coordination under United Nations mandates. Beyond such tactics, the exercise also serves as a platform for sharing military technology, operational best practices and disaster relief coordination methods. Separately, India and the US are also preparing to finalise the proposed 10-year framework for the US-India Major Defence Partnership, expected to be signed during the next meeting between Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth. The plan aims to expand cooperation beyond arms purchases to include co-production of systems such as the Javelin ATGMs (anti-tank guided missiles) and the Stryker combat vehicle. Furthermore, amidst tensions with the US, the Ministry of Defence had last week dismissed media reports claiming India had paused talks for major US defence purchases. Calling such reports 'false and fabricated', MoD officials had said procurement cases 'are being progressed as per the extant procedures'. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: India sees the value of US defence ties, but MAGA-style tariffs threaten long-term stability
NDTV
8 minutes ago
- NDTV
National Sports Governance Bill To Be Implemented Within Next Six Months: Mansukh Mandaviya
Its passage through Parliament achieved smoothly, the landmark National Sports Governance Bill will be implemented within the next six months and preparatory work like "drafting of rules and identification of infrastructure" has already started, Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya told PTI on Wednesday. In his first interview after the passing of the bill in both houses, Mandaviya also justified as "standard safeguard" the bill's provision that gives government discretionary power to "impose reasonable restrictions" on international participation of Indian teams and individual athletes under "extraordinary circumstances". "This bill will be implemented as soon as possible. Within the next six months, all procedures will be completed to ensure 100 per cent implementation," Mandaviya said in the exclusive interaction at his residence. The passing of the bill makes India the 21st country to have a sports law. Implementation of its most significant provisions would require the setting up of a National Sports Board (NSB), which would provide affiliation to National Sports Federations (NSFs), a National Sports Tribunal (NST) for dispute resolution and a National Sports Election Panel (NSEP) to oversee NSF elections. "Creation of posts and other administrative approvals will follow established procedures of the Department of Personnel and Training and the Department of Expenditure," Mandaviya said "The aim is to ensure that both institutions (NSB and NST) are fully functional at the earliest possible date consistent with statutory and procedural requirements," he added, while reiterating that the bill is "the single biggest reform in sports since independence". The bill has been largely supported by the NSFs as well as athletes. The Indian Olympic Association, which was at first skeptical, has also backed it after extensive discussions with the minister. Standard safeguards With the passing of the bill, the unsaid understanding of the government having the final say on India's participation in international events has been formalised. This is an issue that crops up mostly when arch-foes Pakistan are involved in times of high border tensions as has been the case since this year's Pahalgam terror attack. Mandaviya said the government discretion in the bill has not been codified with any particular country in consideration. "The provision empowering the government to stop international participation is a standard safeguard seen in sports laws globally, intended for use in extraordinary circumstances," Mandaviya said. "It covers situations such as national security threats, diplomatic boycotts, or global emergencies, and is not directed against any particular country. "In practice, decisions regarding sporting engagements with Pakistan have been shaped by broader government policy and security assessments, particularly after major incidents affecting bilateral relations," he added. He cited the absence of bilateral cricket between the two countries since the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks as a case in point. "...full senior men's cricket tours to Pakistan have not taken place since the 2008 Mumbai attacks, and high-profile matches have often been moved to neutral venues. Such decisions are taken on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the Ministry of External Affairs and security agencies. "The Act formalises the government's ability to act decisively and lawfully in such situations, while ensuring that any decision remains consistent with India's commitments under the Olympic Charter and the statutes of relevant international sporting bodies," he said. "This reflects the Modi government's clarity in protecting national interest while upholding global sporting obligations." Speaking about the challenges that he faced during the consultative stage of the bill, Mandaviya said he took it upon himself to clear doubts with extensive presentations for all stakeholders on the nitty-gritties of the document. "The first major challenge was the fragmented legal landscape, with over 350 ongoing sports-related court cases that had stalled governance in many National Sports Federations. "The second challenge was balancing the demand for autonomy, as required under the Olympic Charter and International Federation statutes, with the need for public accountability and transparency," he explained. "The third challenge was addressing the wide variation in operational capacity, professionalism, and resources across different federations and state associations," he said. Mandaviya said consensus was achieved through more than 60 rounds of structured discussions, including plenary meetings, one-on-one engagements, and a Chintan-Shivir with stakeholders such as state sports ministers from all over the country. "I gave an entire day to NSF representatives, an entire day to athletes, coaches. I gave presentations to explain each and every clause of the bill. I explained to them why I think the clauses were needed. I did not impose, I asked for their feedback. "I told them that they should tell me what kind of bill they wanted, what kind of governance they wanted," he said. "Not just that, I also consulted sports lawyers in the High Court and the Supreme Court. All the suggestions were duly taken into consideration. I also went through each and every one of the 600 public suggestions," he added. A prominent name with whom Mandaviya consulted was former sports minister and Congress leader Ajai Maken, who prepared the draft sports bill in 2011 but could not push it beyond cabinet consultation. "In 2013, honourable Ajay Maken ji brought this bill to the cabinet but it could not be passed. It was because the moment the bill mentioned good governance in federations, vested interests within NSFs, especially those with political background, were against coming under any kind of governance scrutiny," he said. Athletes wanted representation Asked about the specific demands put forth by athletes during his interaction with them, Mandaviya said, "They wanted representation. Women athletes wanted representation, they asked where are we? And it was a legitimate question given that women athletes have been doing well consistently." The bill ensures that at least four women and two athletes of outstanding merit will have to be a part of any NSF's Executive Committee, the overall strength of which has been capped at 15. Confident that India's sporting landscape will go through a positive transformation due to the new law, Mandaviya said next on the agenda is a medal strategy to bring India into the list of top five global performers in the next two decades. "In the coming days, we will bring in a sports medal strategy. It would create the roadmap to figure where we should be in five years, next 25 years. What should be the planning for this. "Athlete is a part of society and sports is a people's movement," he said.
Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ukraine orders evacuations in Donetsk as Russian troops advance into region
Ukrainian authorities have ordered the evacuation of civilians who have children from more than a dozen towns and settlements in the Donetsk region amid rapid but limited advances made by Russia in the area. People in Bilozerske, in Ukraine's Donetsk region, are evacuating as Russian troops make gains in the area. The advances come just days before US President Donald Trump is due to meet his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska for talks on the war.(AFP) The order was issued on Wednesday by the head of the Donetsk region, governor Vadym Filashkin. It asks civilians with children to evacuate from towns and villages under threat. "We are beginning the mandatory evacuation of families with children from the town of Bilozerske," governor Vadym Filashkin said, adding that around a dozen of other settlements fell under the orders as well. According to the governor, some 1,150 children remaining in the area will be impacted by the order. The order comes just ahead of the meeting scheduled between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on Friday in Alaska, where they are expected to talk about ending the three-year-old war in Ukraine. Kyiv fears that it will be asked to give up territory and be dictated the terms of the ceasefire without being a part of the dialogue. Ukraine, Russia trade attacks ahead of Trump-Putin Alaska Summit Ukraine's General Staff said it made a successful drone strike early on Sunday on a major refinery in the Saratov region, the latest in a series of attacks this month on Russian oil facilities. Earlier, the regional governor announced that UAVS from Ukraine hit an unspecified 'industrial enterprise' in the region, about 530 miles (850 km) southeast of Moscow. The drone activity also caused temporary flight delays at a local airport, and at least one person was killed when drone debris fell in a residential area, the governor said. Videos posted on Russian social media showed flames and clouds of black smoke in the area of what was said to be the Rosneft PJSC-operated refinery. Russia also regularly targets energy infrastructure in Ukraine. On Sunday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Ilham Aliyev, the president of Azerbaijan, condemned Russia's targeted air strikes on the oil depot belonging to the Azerbaijani company SOCAR. They also blasted the Kremlin for an attack on a gas compressor station transporting Azerbaijani gas to Ukraine, according to a statement from Aliyev's office published on his website. Russia hit the city of Zaporizhzhia with bombs being dropped on residential buildings, its main bus terminal and one of the clinics, Zelenskiy said in a post on X Sunday. He said that there were casualties, but didn't provide an exact number.
