Whistle-blowers launch constitutional challenge to solar panel firm's gag order in battle over ‘defamatory allegations'
The three 'whistle-blowers' who were recently gagged by solar panel company ARTsolar from making 'defamatory allegations' that it was importing rather than locally manufacturing its solar panels, have challenged the order on constitutional grounds.
The AmaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism has also applied to join the case.
An interim interdict by Durban High Court acting Judge Perlene Bramdhew issued on 26 March barred KwaZulu-Natal businessman and former ARTsolar client Brett Latimer, and former ARTsolar employees Kandace Singh and Shalendra Hansraj, from claiming the company conducts its business unethically and dishonestly.
Latimer, Singh and Hansraj contend the order violates their right to freedom of expression, as enshrined in the Constitution, which includes press and other media, 'as well as freedom to receive and impart information and ideas'.
In terms of the same order, Independent Media journalist Bongani Hans was also specifically gagged from publishing their allegations.
The Industrial Development Corporation (IDC), which provided R90-million funding for ARTsolar's new factory in New Germany, was also mentioned in the interdict as one of the organisations with whom Latimer, Singh and Hansraj were not allowed to communicate.
In early April, the IDC launched urgent proceedings against the order, arguing it was hampering its investigation into the allegations.
Acting Judge Paul Wallis agreed that the IDC should have been joined in the original proceedings. Wallis ruled that there was 'no absolute right to be protected from being the subject of defamatory allegations' and given the aims and objectives of the IDC, the prohibition was not justified.
He amended the order, removing the reference to the IDC.
Latimer, Singh and Hansraj have since issued a Rule 16A notice, challenging the constitutionality of the gagging order and opening the door for other interested parties to join the proceedings. (A Rule 16A notice informs the public that a constitutional issue is being raised in a particular court.)
The notice, which was issued out of the Durban High Court on 14 April, calls on interested parties to join the proceedings as amicus curiae.
AmaBhungane applies to be part of the court case
In a letter to lawyers representing all the parties, dated 17 April, attorney Dario Milo has given notice that amaBhungane wants to join the proceedings.
Milo, acting for amaBhungane, said that in addition to its journalism, the organisation actively advocates for media freedom and access to information.
'This includes engaging in litigation to challenge laws and practices that undermine the constitutional rights to freedom of expression and access to information. Their many successful legal challenges have helped to shape a legal environment that protects journalists and enables investigative reporting,' he said.
Amabhungane, he said, had recently been involved in litigation relating to an attempt to prevent it from reporting on certain business affairs of the Moti Group of companies.
In that matter, the interdict granted had been set aside as 'an abuse of process and an unjustifiable prior restraint on media freedom'.
Milo said amaBhungane, if admitted as an amicus curiae (friend of the court), would make submissions that orders for prior restraint (gagging orders) constituted one of the most serious infringements on press freedom and were only justified in exceptional cases. They should almost never be granted without affording the journalist concerned a full and fair opportunity to present a defence.
The interim order imposed a 'sweeping prohibition' on any defamatory statements or implications about ARTsolar's business practices, regardless of whether they may be justified.
'This is overbroad and deprives the public of information and ideas which may well be in the public interest,' Milo said.
Even where a journalist did not oppose an application for prior restraint, a court should not treat the matter as unopposed as the right to freedom of the press consists not only of the freedom of a journalist to speak, but also the freedom of the general public to know.
The parties have until 22 April to consent in writing to amaBhungane being admitted as an amicus curiae.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Metro's refusal to disclose power infrastructure data challenged
The metro is standing firm against AfriForum's application for critical information relating to the ongoing power crisis in Pretoria, igniting tensions between the civil rights organisation and municipal authorities. The organisation lodged an internal appeal on July 25, after the metro rejected its initial request, made under the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA), asserting that the metro's refusal was unlawful and lacked sufficient reasoning as prescribed by the law. AfriForum's application, originally submitted on May 21, requested detailed records about the metro's power infrastructure, including substation lists, maintenance schedules, contractor details, and maintenance reports. The group aims to shed light on the management and upkeep of these vital assets, which have been linked to frequent, prolonged power outages affecting large parts of Pretoria. 'This PAIA application was submitted to protect the public's interests and livelihoods. 'The right to access information is non-negotiable, especially when residents suffer because of the metro's poor maintenance and lack of transparency,' said Arno Roodt, AfriForum's district coordinator for Greater Pretoria South. Despite widespread power failures, often blamed on cable theft, poor planning, and inadequate maintenance, the metro responded vaguely to AfriForum's request, said Roodt. The municipality stated it 'reserves the right not to consent to the request at this time,' without providing any clear, legally grounded reasons for its refusal. 'This vague explanation flies in the face of both the relevant legislation and Section 32 of the Constitution. It reeks of a municipality trying to hide something. 'The public has a right to know why infrastructure is burning, why substations are failing, and who is responsible for these weekly power outages,' Roodt said. AfriForum's appeal aims to show that the metro's response falls short of the standards set by PAIA, which requires public bodies to provide substantive reasons when refusing access to information. According to Roodt, the metro did not meet these procedural or substantive requirements, effectively issuing a non-decision cloaked in ambiguous language. The appeal insists that even if some information could be exempt under PAIA's exceptions, the public interest in transparency about the electricity crisis outweighs those exceptions. 'The breakdowns and irregularities at substations will only end when light is shed on them,' Roodt stressed. Power outages in Pretoria have caused widespread disruption, affecting residents' safety, businesses, and daily life. The failures are not limited to occasional load shedding, but include severe infrastructure breakdowns, theft, and sabotage. AfriForum contends these problems stem largely from the metro's failure to maintain infrastructure properly, lack of transparency, and absence of security measures like surveillance cameras at substations. 'This refusal to disclose information under PAIA shields maladministration from exposure and accountability,' said Roodt. If the metro fails to release the requested information by August 22, the deadline for the internal appeal, the organisation plans to escalate the matter by lodging a formal complaint with the Information Regulator, an independent body tasked with enforcing PAIA compliance. Roodt confirmed that, should that move prove ineffective, legal action will be considered to compel the release of information. The metro has yet to respond publicly to the internal appeal or the deadline of August 22. This has left residents and civil society groups anxiously waiting to see if the municipality will uphold its legal obligations or continue to block access to information vital to resolving the power crisis. 'This is not just about accessing documents,' Roodt emphasised. 'It is about holding the metro accountable and ensuring transparency that protects residents' constitutional right to basic services, safety, and governance.' AfriForum's 'Fight and Build' approach combines legal challenges with grassroots efforts to strengthen community oversight of municipal infrastructure. The organisation advocates for the installation of security systems at vulnerable substations, organised neighbourhood watches, and ongoing public pressure to reform governance. 'Transparency is essential to restoring trust, preventing corruption, and improving the quality of life in our communities,' Roodt said. 'The metro's refusal has serious implications for service delivery, governance, and the safety of Pretoria's residents.' Selby Bokaba, metro spokesperson, said the information about the Maintenance Schedule and Records, Inspections and Compliance Reports and Breakdowns of Failure Incidents may not be released in line with the request tor for security reasons. 'Furthermore, some of the information requested may consist of personal information of information of a third party and written consent to disclose this information should be obtained from the data subject or owner prior to the release of such information,' said Bokaba. Major substation fires in Pretoria since 2021 – Wapadrand Substation: 2021 The Wapadrand substation was destroyed by fire, leaving parts of the city without power for weeks. The incident prompted the metro to allocate R20-million for battery surge protection at substations. – Koedoespoort Substation: June 2023 A transformer explosion at the Koedoespoort substation led to power outages in areas including Koedoespoort, Weavind Park, Lindopark, and others. The explosion followed recent repairs due to cable theft, and technicians worked to assess and restore power. – Pyramid Substation: September 2023 A lightning strike ignited a fire at the temporary Pyramid substation near Rooiwal Power Station. The blaze damaged the transformer and spread into the high-tension yard. The fire was contained, and investigations attributed the cause to the lightning strike. – Mooikloof Substation: April 2024 A fire at the Mooikloof substation triggered a trip at the Nyala in-feed station, affecting areas including Mooikloof, Wapadrand, and surrounding farms. The fire was caused by a fault originating from an external 11kV power line. – Njala Substation: August 2024 A 275kV transformer at the Njala substation in Moreleta Park exploded and caught fire. Emergency services from Erasmuskloof, Silverton, and Mamelodi fire stations responded promptly, extinguishing the fire within two hours. No injuries were reported, and the cause remains under investigation. – Brakfontein Substation: April 2025 A fire at the Brakfontein substation resulted in widespread power outages. Residents reported challenges such as reliance on candles and outdoor cooking. The fire was linked to previous cable theft incidents. – Zwartkop Substation: May 2025 A fire and explosion at the Zwartkop substation caused significant outages affecting Clubview, Valhalla, and Thaba Tshwane. Investigations revealed extensive vandalism and damage to high-tension cables. The substation remained offline while repairs were underway. ALSO READ: Fake ID syndicate busted in north of Pretoria raid, two arrested Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.
The South African
17 hours ago
- The South African
HOW did Gayton's son raise R50m to buy soccer club?
Gayton McKenzie's son Calvin Le John has revealed how he raised R50 million to purchase soccer club Siwelele FC, previous SuperSport United last month. The businessman is the firstborn of the Minister of Sport, Art and Culture who has taken over the family businesses. Le John – who uses his mother's maiden name – is hoping his new club fills the void left behind by Bloemfontein Celtics, which later became Royal AM. Speaking in his first interview, Calvin Le John answered burning questions about acquiring the 'new' PSL club, Siwelele FC. One of them was how he managed to raise R50 million to buy the club. Another was how and when the business transaction occurred. Gayton McKenzie's son revealed that the sale took place via an auction, and he bid R50 million for the club, which was ultimately accepted. 'I don't have 50 million lying around. I sold some properties to fund the project', Le He added that he sold shares to the family's diamond mine to a consortium to the sum of a whopping R90 million. Calvin Le John also shot down rumours the money was raised through corrupt tenders or via Gayton McKenzie's right-hand man, Kenny Kunene. He continued: 'I saw a rumour that I got a tender for R70 million, and that's a blatant lie.' 'I don't have any friends, associates, or family members who are doing any work in the city or the department of sports, for that matter. I don't do tenders. I tried, but seeing people being arrested is scary. 'I'm in different businesses, but I don't deal with the state'.. He added: 'If anybody has information about me receiving R70 million, let them bring it out. I have nothing to hide'. Le John added that SuperSport United required him to 'prove' how he acquired the funds to purchase the club. On Saturday, 9 August – which marks Women's Day in South Africa – Siwelele will make their debut in the league with a Betway Premiership match against Golden Arrows. The club will play in their home turf in Bloemfontein at the Dr Petrus Molemela Stadium in Mangaung. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
19 hours ago
- IOL News
uMkhanyakude Municipality disputes Cogta's court ruling interpretation
KwaZulu-Natal MEC for Cogta Thulasizwe Buthelezi Image: Supplied The uMkhanyakude District Municipality has accused KwaZulu-Natal Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Cogta) MEC Reverend Thulasizwe Buthelezi of misleading the public about a recent Pietermaritzburg High Court ruling. The municipality asserts that the judgement did not confirm the provincial intervention into the municipality. This follows a media statement issued by MEC Buthelezi on Saturday, stating that the court had upheld the decision to place the municipality under administration in terms of Section 139(1)(b) of the Constitution. In a statement issued the following day, the municipality said, 'The court has reserved its judgment on the matter regarding MEC Thulasizwe Buthelezi's decision to place uMkhanyakude District Municipality under administration, meaning that no final decision has been made.' MEC Buthelezi welcomed the ruling, describing it as a victory for the rule of law. 'This judgment reaffirms the authority of Mr Bamba Ndwandwe as the Administrator,' he said. He further urged the Mayor to ensure the gates of the municipality were opened so that the Administrator could assume his duties and restore normal operations. However, uMkhanyakude officials dismissed this interpretation, stating that the court's order dealt specifically with an application by the South African Municipal Workers Union (SAMWU) to compel the payment of salaries. 'That matter talks to employees' salaries only, not the intervention,' said Municipal Speaker Solomon Mkhombo. According to the municipality, the court instructed the Municipal Manager, together with Cogta to process the July salaries but made no final ruling on the legality of the provincial government's intervention. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Mkhombo stated that the municipality's legal team argued the intervention was politically motivated and constitutionally flawed. 'Cogta is using Section 139(1)(b)... for political reasons, known by MEC Buthelezi,' he said, adding that the department's legal representative admitted in court that not all due processes were followed before initiating the intervention. The municipality also criticised the freezing of its bank account by Cogta and its financial institution, calling it 'illegal' and praising the court for siding with employees in ensuring payment of salaries. 'The High Court reserved its judgment and Mr. Bamba Ndwandwe, the imposed administrator, is not the Administrator; hence the matter is still in court,' said Mkhombo. THE MERCURY
