Ex-movie mogul Harvey Weinstein convicted of sexual assault in New York retrial
Former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein was found guilty Wednesday of one count of sexual assault in his New York retrial, while being acquitted of another charge. The jury, however, has not yet reached a verdict on a third charge of rape and is set to resume deliberations.The retrial followed the overturning of Weinstein's 2020 conviction, a landmark case that had symbolized the rise of the MeToo movement. That conviction was thrown out last year due to procedural issues, prompting a new trial in the same Manhattan courthouse.advertisementA jury of seven women and five men deliberated for five days after hearing six weeks of testimony from three women: former TV production assistant Miriam Haley, actress Jessica Mann, and model Kaja Sokola. Weinstein was convicted of sexually assaulting Haley in 2006 but acquitted of assaulting Sokola. Jurors have yet to decide on Mann's allegation that Weinstein raped her in 2013.
Weinstein, 73, has dismissed all allegations of sexual misconduct. During deliberations, one juror raised concerns about pressure from fellow jurors and discussions straying beyond the charges, prompting private questioning by the judge.The latest conviction adds to Weinstein's legal burdens, including a separate 16-year sentence from a Los Angeles sex crimes case that he has not yet begun serving.Must Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Harvey Weinstein Net Worth: Where does the Hollywood Mogul's fortune stand after being convicted as a sex offender?
Harvey Weinstein's legal saga is all over the internet now. And so is his downfall. On June 11, after a jury convicted Weinstein of one count of criminal sexual act involving Miriam Haley, a former production assistant, dating back to 2006, and acquitted him of another charge involving Kaja Sokola, a 2002 allegation, the third charge, a third-degree rape accusation from Jessica Mann regarding a 2013 incident, remained unresolved due to the jury's inability to reach a consensus. On June 12, a Manhattan judge, Judge Curtis Farber, declared a mistrial on the final rape charge against the disgraced Hollywood producer due to a deadlock and intense discord among jurors. This decision followed a mixed verdict in his retrial, which had commenced in April 2025. This time, the jury foreperson reported feeling threatened and bullied by fellow jurors, which contributed to the decision to halt further deliberations. As a result, the charge involving Jessica Mann has not been adjudicated, and a new trial is being considered. A hearing is scheduled for July 2 to discuss the future of the retrial and potential sentencing. Despite the partial conviction, Weinstein has maintained his innocence, claiming that all encounters were consensual. He plans to appeal the recent conviction. To keep up with all these hefty legal procedures, how much of a financial toll is it taking on Weinstein? Let's take a look. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Device Made My Power Bill Drop Overnight elecTrick - Save upto 80% on Power Bill Pre-Order Undo Harvey Weinstein's net worth: As of June 2025, Harvey Weinstein's financial standing has experienced a significant decline from his peak net worth of $300 million. Once a powerful figure in Hollywood, his estimated net worth now stands at approximately $25 million, a dramatic reduction, thanks to the legal battles, settlements, and the collapse of his production company. From Hollywood mogul to financial downfall: Weinstein's fortune was primarily amassed through his co-founding of Miramax Films and The Weinstein Company, both instrumental in producing critically acclaimed films. However, the #MeToo movement, ignited by allegations against him in 2017, led to his ousting from the company and a series of legal challenges that have eroded his wealth. Legal battles and financial strain: Weinstein's legal expenses have been substantial. Reportedly, he paid some lawyers up to $100,000 per month each, potentially amounting to tens of millions in legal expenses since 2017. Additionally, his 2018 divorce from Georgina Chapman reportedly cost between $15 million to $20 million. Class action lawsuits by alleged sexual assault victims have resulted in settlements totaling at least $43 million. To fund these legal defenses and settlements, Weinstein sold approximately $62 million worth of property between 2017 and 2019. Collapse of The Weinstein Company: The Weinstein Company's bankruptcy in 2018 marked a pivotal point in Weinstein's financial decline. The company, once valued at over $500 million, declared bankruptcy following the scandal. A private equity firm purchased the studio's assets for a reported $289 million, but this sum did not go directly to Harvey Weinstein. The funds were largely used to settle debts and lawsuits, leaving Weinstein with only a fraction of his former wealth. Real estate liquidation: To cover mounting legal expenses and settlements, Weinstein sold several properties, including high-end real estate in New York and Los Angeles. Reportedly, Weinstein sold six homes for a total of $56 million between October 2017 and April 2018. For example, a townhouse in New York City was purchased in 2006 for $15 million and sold in March 2018 for $25.6 million, yielding a $10.65 million profit. Remaining assets and income streams: From a peak net worth of $300 million, Weinstein's estimated worth has plummeted to around $25 million. While his wealth has significantly diminished, he may still have residual income from royalties and residuals from films produced during his tenure in Hollywood. However, much of this income could be claimed by his accusers in future settlements. Additionally, any remaining liquid assets or undisclosed holdings could contribute to his current net worth.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Harvey Weinstein case: Judge declares mistrial on remaining rape charge as jury foreperson refuses to return to deliberate
Harvey Weinstein 's sex crimes retrial came to a disjointed end Thursday as the jury foreperson declined to deliberate and the judge declared a mistrial on a remaining rape charge, a day after a split verdict on other charges in the landmark #MeToo-era case. The outcome positions the ex-studio boss for a third New York trial - prosecutors said they're ready to retry the rape count - even as he faces a new sentencing on his sexual assault conviction. Weinstein, 73, denies all the charges. The Oscar-winning movie producer had a blank, drained expression as court officers escorted him out Thursday in his wheelchair. His lawyer said he plans to appeal. "What happened in that jury room was absolutely improper," attorney Arthur Aidala said outside court. Weinstein is due back in court July 2 for discussion of retrial and sentencing dates. His first-degree criminal sex act conviction carries the potential for up to 25 years in prison, while the unresolved third-degree rape charge is punishable by up to four years - less than he already has served. He's been behind bars since his initial conviction in 2020, and he later also was sentenced to prison in a separate California case, which he's appealing. In Wednesday's partial verdict, Weinstein was convicted of one criminal sex act charge but acquitted of another. Both concerned accusations of forcing oral sex on women in 2006. Those verdicts still stand. While the jury of seven women and five men was unanimous on those decisions, it got stuck on the rape charge involving another woman, Jessica Mann. The hairstylist and actor testified at length - as she did in 2020 - that Weinstein raped her amid a years-long consensual relationship. "I will never give up on myself and making sure my voice - and the truth - is heard," Mann said in a statement Thursday, confirming she's ready to testify yet again. Jury-room strains started leaking into public view Friday, when a juror asked to be excused because he felt another was being treated unfairly. Then Monday, the foreperson complained that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges. The man raised concerns again Wednesday, telling the judge he felt afraid in the jury room because another juror was yelling at him for sticking to his opinion and suggested the foreperson would "see me outside." When Judge Curtis Farber asked the foreperson Thursday whether he was willing to return to deliberations, the man said said no. And with that, Farber declared a mistrial on the rape count. Two jurors disputed the foreperson's account as they left court. One, Chantan Holmes, said that no one mistreated the man and that she believed he was just tired of deliberating. "We all felt bad. Because we really wanted to do this. We put our hearts and souls in here," she said. Another jury member, who identified himself only by his juror number, said the deliberations were contentious, but respectful. Weinstein's 2020 conviction seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the # MeToo movement. The anti-sexual-misconduct campaign was fueled by allegations against him. But that conviction was overturned last year, and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. Weinstein's accusers said he exploited his Tinseltown influence to dangle career help, get them alone and then trap and force them into sexual encounters. "These hopeful young women were trying to follow their dreams in a world that he controlled," Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, said at a news conference Thursday. Weinstein's defense portrayed his accusers as Hollywood wannabes and hangers-on who willingly hooked up with him to court opportunity, then later said they were victimized to collect settlement funds and #MeToo approbation. Miriam Haley, the producer and production assistant whom Weinstein was convicted - twice, now - of sexually assaulting, said outside court Wednesday that the new verdict "gives me hope." Accuser Kaja Sokola also called it "a big win for everyone," even though Weinstein was acquitted of forcibly performing oral sex on her when she was a 19-year-old fashion model. Her allegation was added to the case after the retrial was ordered. Holmes, the juror who spoke outside court, said the panel all felt Sokola "wasn't credible." The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted, unless they agree to be identified. Haley, Mann and Sokola did so.
Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Who is Harvey Weinstein? Disgraced producer found guilty of sexual assault again
Harvey Weinstein's name once opened doors in Hollywood. Now, it's tied to the biggest reckoning in entertainment history. The disgraced producer faces multiple convictions and prison sentences following years of allegations. In the latest courtroom drama, Weinstein's New York retrial ended abruptly after the jury foreman refused to deliberate. But prosecutors have confirmed they plan to pursue that charge again. The retrial concluded on a dramatic note. A New York jury found Weinstein guilty of one count of criminal sexual act. The charge stemmed from the assault of Miriam Haley, a former Project Runway production assistant, in 2006. Haley testified that Weinstein invited her to his SoHo apartment and later assaulted her in a bedroom, ignoring her protests and kicks. She told the court, 'No, no - it's not going to happen,' but he went ahead, reported Associated Press. The conviction echoes the verdict in Weinstein's original 2020 trial, which was overturned earlier in 2024 by New York's Court of Appeals. That retrial, now partly resolved, has reopened the legal battles that brought the #MeToo movement to global attention. While Weinstein was found guilty in Haley's case, he was acquitted of another charge involving Kaja Sokola. Sokola, a former model and now psychologist, testified that Weinstein lured her to a hotel room in 2006 and assaulted her shortly before her 20th birthday. As per Associated Press, Sokola said he undressed her while she pleaded, 'Please don't, please stop, I don't want this.' She added in court, 'My soul was removed from me.' Sokola also testified about another alleged assault when she was just 16, but that incident was beyond the legal statute of limitations. The retrial ended in a mistrial on the third charge - a third-degree rape accusation made by Jessica Mann. The jury foreman refused to deliberate further. Judge Curtis Farber declared a mistrial, with prosecutors confirming their intent to retry the charge. Mann later said, 'I would never lie about rape or use something so traumatic to hurt someone. I didn't speak up to ruin his life. He did that. I spoke because mine matters.' Weinstein continues to deny all allegations of rape or assault. But his legal troubles are far from over. He is already serving a 16-year prison sentence in California after being convicted in Los Angeles in 2022. That verdict is now under appeal. His lawyers claim he did not receive a fair trial and argue that his previous New York conviction, now overturned, prejudiced the jury. The former mogul's downfall began in 2017 when over 80 women accused him of sexual misconduct. Investigations by The New York Times and The New Yorker revealed patterns of abuse and threats spanning decades. The revelations sparked the global #MeToo movement, shifting the culture in workplaces and courtrooms worldwide. Q1: What was Harvey Weinstein convicted of in the retrial? He was found guilty of one count of criminal sexual act for assaulting Miriam Haley in 2006. Q2: Why did the judge declare a mistrial? The jury foreman refused to deliberate on the third-degree rape charge involving Jessica Mann, prompting the mistrial. Q3: Is Weinstein still in prison? Yes. He is serving a 16-year sentence from a separate conviction in Los Angeles while facing a possible new trial in New York.
