logo
Labour's got the jitters – which is why they're taking Farage seriously

Labour's got the jitters – which is why they're taking Farage seriously

Independent05-02-2025
Labour is making plans for Nigel – how to combat Nigel Farage, that is. Until recently, Keir Starmer 's allies believed Reform UK would mainly damage the Conservatives and help Labour by splitting the right-wing vote, as it did at last year's election.
But now Labour strategists take seriously the prospect of Reform winning scores of Labour seats next time. They can no longer assume Reform and the Tories won't forge an electoral pact or at least encourage anti-Labour tactical voting as Labour and the Liberal Democrats did successfully last year. After all, a Con-Farage deal helped Boris Johnson win a majority of 80 in 2019.
Some Labour figures insist their party won't be hit by a "time for change" factor after only one term. But that is not the view from the top. Or among the Labour MPs who fear they might lose their seats after five years. In almost every developed nation, a majority thinks the country is heading in the wrong direction and wants change. The status quo seems a bigger risk.
I'm told Labour intends to squeeze the Lib Dems and Greens (who currently have a healthy 22 per cent between them in the opinion polls) to make the next election a straight left-right fight. But that might not work; as my colleague John Rentoul noted recently, Labour may be under attack from its left as well as its right.
Labour's jitters have been heightened by this week's YouGov poll showing Reform ahead of both Labour and the Tories. Labour MPs in the 89 seats where Reform came second last year, many in the red wall, have formed a group which will urge a tougher government line on immigration and crime.
How will Starmer combat the Farage effect? Although Labour won't fight the last war, the next election will also be about change. As Farage proudly wears his anti-establishment badge, Labour will be the establishment in the eyes of many voters. It will be up against some version of the populist right – led by Farage or the Tories or both.
Pat McFadden, the Cabinet Office minister and one of Starmer's closest allies, revealed Labour's thinking at a brainstorming session held by the Progressive Britain think tank: "Labour must not defend a status quo that isn't ours, or instinctively defend systems and situations that are not delivering well enough for the public." He added: "We cannot allow the battle to be between the disruptors of opposition and the disrupted of incumbency. We too have to be disruptors."
Easier said than done in government – although Donald Trump is doing it. Indeed, in the grave new world, some Labour MPs admit privately there are lessons to learn from Trump – even if they pinch themselves when they say it. For example, some argue the government should approve the controversial giant Rosebank oilfield to protect the jobs of "working people" rather than lose them and import more oil and gas. But Labour is deeply divided, and its strong green wing, already seething the government is backing a third runway at Heathrow Airport, is now steamed up about what might prove a 'drill, baby drill' decision on Rosebank. The idea of aping Trump will abhor many inside Labour, but the party will have to become more populist - without abandoning its core values - to see off the populists.
There's another Trump parallel. Ministers frustrated with the Whitehall machine responding slowly to their edicts have concluded that "the state" is not working and needs an overhaul. For Starmer, being a competent technocrat will not be enough. Defending institutions that are not working well will harm Labour, as pro-Europeans found in the 2016 Brexit referendum, so ministers must challenge them.
As McFadden put it: "Expecting more from a system which has too many good people caught in bad processes won't work. We have to be changemakers in how the state works to make sure it is outcomes that matter not processes, to build what we do around the person using the service, and use the advantages of technology to the full."
Rather than ignore Farage and hope he damages the Tories, Labour will attack him head-on. It has begun to highlight his openness to funding the NHS through social insurance.
On the face of it, the best way to defeat the populists is through delivery. But a fear haunts some Labour figures: even if they can point to some improvements in the NHS, living standards and immigration by 2029, impatient voters are in no mood to thank mainstream parties they think are 'all the same,' as Farage puts it. People will still want change. With incumbents being booted out around the world, Labour might struggle to avoid a kicking.
Being an insurgent government won't be easy. But if Labour doesn't pull it off, the populists might claim another victory in four years – this time in the UK.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Closing hotels won't stop the migrant crisis
Closing hotels won't stop the migrant crisis

Spectator

time21 minutes ago

  • Spectator

Closing hotels won't stop the migrant crisis

After yesterday's landmark decision on the Bell Hotel in Epping, the next question must be: where do we go from here? What is essential to understand is that yesterday's High Court judgement was what might be called an 'Al Capone reckoning'. One ultimate actor, the state, and by extension the government, has been humbled on a mere technicality. The Essex hotel was deemed in breach of contract for using its rooms to accommodate refugees, rather than paying guests. The state was not brought to heel on its ethically unsound and socially corrosive laws on immigration and re-settlement. That the Home Office sought to block Epping Forest council's application for an injunction is important. Campaigners and the public will still face an elite establishment – especially, despite yesterday's judgement, a judiciary – that has an intransigent and indulgent attitude to migrants, and a slavish, literal-minded adherence to human rights laws. The fundamentals of the migrant crisis, then, have not been resolved by the closure of the Bell Hotel. They will not be resolved by the closure of other hotels, either. Illegal migrants will still come to Britain, and they will still be housed. This crisis will end in the same way it was always going to: with changes in policy and attitudes. We have already witnessed the effectiveness of one stern response. That was the Rwanda scheme. Although the plan for its establishment was fraught with difficulties, when it did briefly come into law last April many illegal immigrants responded by taking flight to the Republic of Ireland, as complaints by the Dublin government at the time attested. This principle of deterrence must be re-visited. Keir Starmer's plan to 'smash the gangs' has not worked. A government that really wanted to stop illegal migration would consider more stringent measures, such as automatic deportation of illegal immigrants or those with criminal convictions languishing in our prisons. These policies would prove popular, but Starmer isn't going to enact them. One might imagine that only a Reform government would. The ultimate 'uncompassionate' policy is the unsayable one: stop picking up migrants from their boats in the first place. Return them to France, with or without the French government's cooperation. This would most likely contravene maritime law and cause legal challenges and a diplomatic fallout with our neighbours. Lurking behind so many of these preventative measures are not legal or political obstacles, but rather intangible ones, those which can't be revoked or reversed by diktat, legislation, court ruling or vote. In order for matters to change for good, attitudes need to change and lazy assumptions need to be dismantled. The first is the one parroted by those with no imagination, no will or just no wish: this is that there is 'no solution' to this fundamentally global problem. There is, as outlined above. It just takes determination and the willingness to risk the opprobrium of bien-pensants. Passive and defeatist mantras should have no place anywhere in political discourse. The second is to confront the idle axiom that British people today increasingly hate foreigners. This is mostly untrue. Rather, many are angry at the increasing number of immigrants and their decreasing quality. If there is ire directed against one group of people, it is the liberal elite and those who have favoured cheap labour in their factories and homes. It is imperative that the thought-terminating accusation of 'xenophobia' is ignored or rebutted. A third shibboleth contains other weedy platitudes: that migrants who force their way onto our shores are 'fleeing persecution' and 'are only seeking a better life'. That first bromide is refutable. Those who come by boat are arriving from France, a democracy where no-one is persecuted by the state for their beliefs or ethnicity. The second statement represents a worrying detachment from reality. Of course illegal immigrants are seeking a better life. We all want a better life. The ultimate mindset which demands the most patience and perseverance in overturning is the embedded belief and unspoken truism that 'compassion' is inherently good. Sometimes it manifestly isn't. Sometimes, voicing compassionate sentiment only improves the feeling of well-being among those who voice it. Immigration policies based on compassion have so far only served to increase feelings of resentment and anger among the native population. Yesterday's judgement about the Bell Hotel matters, but real change will only come when we upend the conceit that compassionate beliefs or saying nice things necessarily correlate with or result in positive outcomes. Only an unfashionable attitude and 'uncaring' policies will solve the migrant crisis.

SNP speak out in row over Glasgow congestion charge
SNP speak out in row over Glasgow congestion charge

Glasgow Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

SNP speak out in row over Glasgow congestion charge

A row has developed between Labour and the SNP since it was revealed the council is looking at pursuing plans to introduce a congestion charge on drivers entering the city. It has come up against opposition with the Labour Group opposed, the Chamber of Commerce speaking against it, and Monica Lennon, a Central Scotland Labour MSP, stating it would discriminate against people who need to use services in Glasgow like hospitals and higher education. READ NEXT:Business leaders and MSP hit out at congestion charge plan The SNP group, which is in charge of the council, said it is right to look at raising a charge but that it would be years before it can be implemented. A Glasgow SNP Group spokesperson said: 'Glasgow City Council has no specific proposals to introduce a congestion charging scheme any time in the near future as Monica Lennon should be aware. 'It is of course right that the council should continue to explore all future opportunities to tackle congestion and raise revenues that can both improve our road network and our city's public transport offer. 'But any charging initiative, from which we would seek to exempt Glasgow residents, remains at an exploratory stage and is several years away.' After a discussion at a council committee, Johnny Carson, Labour group deputy leader, said 'These plans are wrong for our city. 'The council should be focused on fixing our expensive, unreliable and disjointed public transport system and securing the fair funding Glasgow deserves from the Scottish Government.' He said the Scottish Government has had an extra £5.1 billion from the Labour Government at Westminster. The SNP, however, said other parts of the UK have had better deals. READ NEXT:Opposition to plans for a Glasgow congestion charge on drivers revealed On the need to raise revenue, the SNP councillors suggested the UK Labour government could look at providing Glasgow with additional funding for public transport projects. The group spokesperson said: 'If Monica Lennon feels so strongly about improving public transport in the Glasgow city region, she should publicly demand her Labour bosses at Westminster award us the same transport funding packages that have been made available to our comparator city regions in England.'

Have your say: Is Nigel Farage stirring up tensions over asylum seekers?
Have your say: Is Nigel Farage stirring up tensions over asylum seekers?

Daily Mirror

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Have your say: Is Nigel Farage stirring up tensions over asylum seekers?

Some councils are aiming to block hotels from housing asylum seekers, leaving the Government scrambling to find alternatives for thousands of people. Nigel Farage is seizing the moment - but is he easing pressure on the system, or stoking tensions? The Government has promised to stop using asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament, but in the meantime it still needs places to house people. ‌ Epping Forest District Council has been granted a temporary High Court injunction to block migrants from being accommodated at the town's Bell Hotel. ‌ And of course Nigel Farage sees an opportunity here, saying Reform-led councils would do 'everything in their power to follow Epping's lead.' ‌ And a number of councils have already signalled they plan to do just that. In Hertfordshire, the Conservative-run Broxbourne Council said it was urgently seeking legal advice. So we want to know if you think Farage is using this opportunity to stir up tensions. Let us know by taking our poll below. The Bell Hotel in Epping has been the scene of violent clashes in recent weeks after a man staying there was charged with assaulting a 14-year-old girl - which he denies. It means every asylum seeker at The Bell has to be moved, and to make matters worse for the Home Office, other councils are expected to follow suit, with around 30,000 people being housed in hotels. Nigel Farage has said 12 local authorities where Reform are the largest party will be weighing up legal challenges. ‌ The Reform leader is being accused of inflaming tensions after he wrote: 'Now the good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain. Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex. 'Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels, and put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out; we now know that together we can win.' A Home Office source told the i newspaper that Farage is urging people to protest outside these hotels, saying: 'The police have a legal responsibility to keep people safe and maintain public order. This will be at the expense of them going out fighting crime.' On Thursday night, eight officers were injured during altercations between protesters and police, with those hurt sustaining injuries to their hands as well as cuts and grazes. A video circulating on social media on the same evening showed a police vehicle driving towards a number of protesters and appearing to collide with at least one person.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store